Faculty Bibliography

Understanding global body balance can optimize the postoperative course for patients undergoing spinal or lower limb surgical realignment. This observational cohort study aimed to characterize patients with reported imbalance and identify predictors. The CDC establishes a representative sample annually via the NHANES. All participants who said "yes" (Imbalanced) or "no" (Balanced) to the following question were identified from 1999"“2004: "During the past 12 months, have you had dizziness, difficulty with balance or difficulty with falling?" Univariate analyses compared Imbalanced versus Balanced subjects and binary logistic regression modeling predicted for Imbalance. Of 9964 patients, imbalanced (26.5%) were older (65.4 vs. 60.6 years), with more females (60% vs. 48%). Imbalanced subjects reported higher rates of comorbidities, including osteoporosis (14.4% vs. 6.6%), arthritis (51.6% vs. 31.9%), and low back pain (54.4% vs 32.7%). Imbalanced patients had more difficulty with activities, including climbing 10 steps (43.8% vs. 21%) and stooping/crouching/kneeling (74.3% vs. 44.7%), and they needed greater time to walk 20 feet (9.5 vs. 7.1 s). Imbalanced subjects had significantly lower caloric and dietary intake. Regression revealed that difficulties using fingers to grasp small objects (OR: 1.73), female gender (OR: 1.43), difficulties with prolonged standing (OR: 1.29), difficulties stooping/crouching/kneeling (OR: 1.28), and increased time to walk 20 feet (OR: 1.06) were independent predictors of Imbalance (all p < 0.05). Imbalanced patients were found to have identifiable comorbidities and were detectable using simple functional assessments. Structured tests that assess dynamic functional status may be useful for preoperative optimization and risk-stratification for patients undergoing spinal or lower limb surgical realignment.

The consequences of malnutrition in spine surgery have been studied to a lesser degree compared to other orthopedic subspecialties. However, there is growing interest in understanding the effects of preoperative malnutrition on spine surgery outcomes. Literature on the relationship between malnutrition and spine surgery outcomes appeared sporadically in the late 1990s and early 2000s. Over the last decade, however, there has been a push to understand the sequelae of malnutrition on patients undergoing spine surgery. The aims of this review are to highlight: 1. the different parameters by which malnutrition has been defined and measured in spine surgery; 2. the prevalence of malnutrition in spine surgery; 3. the outcomes of spine surgery in malnourished patients; and 4. the effects of nutritional supplementation or interventions on spine surgery outcomes. Malnutrition has often been defined utilizing specific serological laboratory values or nutritional indices. Serologic values of malnutrition include an albumin < 3.5 g/dL, transferrin < 150 mg/ dL, or a total lymphocyte count of < 1,500 cells/mm3 . The available literature reports that the prevalence of malnutrition in patients undergoing lumbar spine surgery ranges from 5% to 50%, with most literature supporting a value toward the higher end of this spectrum. Malnourished patients undergoing spine surgery have higher rates of surgical site infections, medical complications, lengths of stay, ICU admissions, 30-day and 1-year mortalities, reoperations, 30-day readmissions, and costs of care. Given the plethora of spine surgeries performed in the country annually and the prevalence of malnutrition in up to 50% of our patients, we recommend performing preoperative nutritional assessments on all patients to ensure their optimization prior to surgery.

OBJECTIVE:The objective of this study was to use an unsupervised cluster approach to identify patterns of operative adult spinal deformity (ASD) and compare the perioperative outcomes of these groups. METHODS:A multicenter data set included patients with complex surgical ASD, including those with severe deformities, significant surgical complexity, or advanced age who underwent a multilevel fusion. An unsupervised cluster analysis allowing for 10% outliers was used to identify different deformity patterns. The perioperative outcomes of these clusters were then compared using ANOVA, Kruskal-Wallis, and chi-square tests, with p values < 0.05 considered significant. RESULTS:Two hundred eighty-six patients were classified into four clusters of deformity patterns: hyper-thoracic kyphosis (hyper-TK), severe coronal, severe sagittal, and moderate sagittal. Hyper-TK patients had the lowest disability (mean Oswestry Disability Index [ODI] 32.9 ± 17.1) and pain scores (median numeric rating scale [NRS] back score 6, leg score 1). The severe coronal cluster had moderate functional impairment (mean physical component score 34.4 ± 12.3) and pain (median NRS back score 7, leg score 4) scores. The severe sagittal cluster had the highest levels of disability (mean ODI 49.3 ± 15.6) and low appearance scores (mean 2.3 ± 0.7). The moderate cluster (mean 68.8 ± 7.8 years) had the highest pain interference subscores on the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (mean 65.2 ± 5.8). Overall 30-day adverse events were equivalent among the four groups. Fusion to the pelvis was most common in the moderate sagittal (89.4%) and severe sagittal (97.5%) clusters. The severe coronal cluster had more osteotomies per case (median 11, IQR 6.5-14) and a higher rate of 30-day implant-related complications (5.5%). The severe sagittal and hyper-TK clusters had more three-column osteotomies (43% and 32.3%, respectively). Hyper-TK patients had shorter hospital stays. CONCLUSIONS:This cohort of patients with complex ASD surgeries contained four natural clusters of deformity, each with distinct perioperative outcomes.

STUDY DESIGN/SETTING/METHODS:Retrospective review of a prospectively collected database. OBJECTIVE:The objective of this study was to determine the relationship between paracervical muscle area, density, and fat infiltration and cervical alignment among patients presenting with cervical spine pathology. BACKGROUND CONTEXT/BACKGROUND:The impact of cervical spine alignment on clinical outcomes has been extensively studied, but little is known about the association between spinal alignment and cervical paraspinal musculature. METHODS:We examined computed tomography scans and radiographs for patients presenting with cervical spine pathology. The posterior paracervical muscle area, density, and fat infiltration was calculated on axial slices at C2, C4, C6, and T1. We measured radiographic parameters including cervical sagittal vertical axis, cervical lordosis, T1 slope (T1S), range of motion of the cervical spine. We performed Pearson correlation tests to determine if there were significant relationships between muscle measurements and alignment parameters. RESULTS:The study included 51 patients. The paracervical muscle area was higher for males at C2 (P=0.005), C4 (P=0.001), and T1 (P=0.002). There was a positive correlation between age and fat infiltration at C2, C4, C6, and T1 (all P<0.05). The cervical sagittal vertical axis positively correlated with muscle cross-sectional area at C2 (P=0.013) and C4 (P=0.013). Overall cervical range of motion directly correlated with muscle density at C2 (r=0.48, P=0.003), C4 (r=0.41, P=0.01), and C6 (r=0.53. P<0.001) and indirectly correlated with fat infiltration at C2 (r=-0.40, P=0.02), C4 (r=-0.32, P=0.04), and C6 (r=-0.35, P=0.02). Muscle density correlated directly with reserve of extension at C2 (r=0.57, P=0.009), C4 (r=0.48, P=0.037), and C6 (r=0.47, P=0.033). Reserve of extension indirectly correlated with fat infiltration at C2 (r=0.65, P=0.006), C4 (r=0.47, P=0.037), and C6 (r=0.48, P=0.029). CONCLUSIONS:We have identified specific changes in paracervical muscle that are associated with a patient's ability to extend their cervical spine.

Background: The impact of an initially less invasive cardiac intervention on outcomes of future surgical spine procedures has been understudied; therefore, we sought to investigate the effect of coronary stents on postoperative outcomes in an elective spine fusion cohort. Methods: Elective spine fusion patients were isolated with International Classification of Diseases-Ninth Edition and current procedural terminology procedure codes in the PearlDiver database. Patients were stratified by number of coronary stents: (1) 1 to 2 stents (ST12); (2) 3 to 4 stents (ST34); (3) no stents. Mean comparison tests compared differences in demographics, diagnoses, comorbidities, and 30-day and 90-day complication outcomes. Logistic regression assessed the odds of complications associated with coronary stents, controlling for levels fused, age, sex, and comorbidities (odds ratio [95% confidence interval]). Statistical significance was P < 0.05. Results: A total of 726,061 elective spine fusion patients were isolated. Of those patients, 707,396 patients had no stent, 17,087 ST12, and 1578 ST34. At baseline (BL), ST12 patients had higher rates of morbid obesity, chronic kidney disease, congestive heart failure, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and diabetes mellitus compared with no stent and ST34 patients (all P < 0.001). Relative to no stent patients, ST12 patients had a longer length of stay and, at 30 days, significantly higher complication rates, including pneumonia, myocardial infarction (MI), sepsis, acute kidney injury, urinary tract infection (UTI), wound complications, transfusions, and 30-day readmissions (P < 0.05). Controlling for age, sex, comorbidities, and levels fused, ST12 was a significant predictor of MI within 30 days (OR 2.15 [95% CI 1.7"“2.7], P < 0.001) and 90 days postoperatively (OR 1.87 [95% CI 1.6"“2.2], P < 0.001). ST34 patients compared with no stent patients at 30 days presented with increased rates of complication, including pneumonia, MI, sepsis, UTI, wound complications, and 30-day readmissions. Regression analysis showed no significant differences in complications between ST12 vs ST34 at 30 days, but at 90 days, ST34 was associated with significantly increased rate and odds of death (1.1% vs 0.3%, P = 0.021; OR 1.94 [95% CI 1.13"“3.13], P = 0.01). Conclusion: Cardiac stents failed to normalize risk profile of patients with coronary artery disease. Postoperatively at 90 days, elective spine fusion patients with 3 or more stents were significantly at risk of mortality compared with patients with fewer or no stents.

STUDY DESIGN/METHODS:Retrospective cohort. OBJECTIVE:To assess whether patient outcomes and cost effectiveness of adult spinal deformity (ASD) surgery have improved over the past decade. BACKGROUND:Surgery for ASD is an effective intervention, but one that is also associated with large initial healthcare expenditures. Changes in the cost profile for ASD surgery over the last decade has not been evaluated previously. METHODS:ASD patients who received surgery between 2008-19 were included. ANCOVA was used to marginal means for outcome measures (complication rates, reoperations, HRQLs, total cost, utility gained, QALYs, cost efficiency [cost per QALY]) by year of initial surgery. Cost was calculated using the PearlDiver database and represented national averages of Medicare reimbursement for services within a 30-day window including length of stay and death differentiated by complication/comorbidity, revision, and surgical approach. Internal cost data was based on individual patient DRG codes, limiting revisions to those within 2Y of the initial surgery. Cost per QALY over the course of 2008-2019 were then calculated. RESULTS:There were 1236 patients included. There was an overall decrease in rates of any complication (0.78 vs. 0.61), any reoperation (0.25 vs. 0.10), and minor complication (0.54 vs. 0.37) between 2009 and 2018 (all P<0.05). National average 2Y cost decreased at an annual rate of $3,194 (R2=0.6602), 2Y Utility Gained increased at an annual rate of 0.0041 (R2=0.57), 2Y QALYs Gained increased annually by 0.008 (R2=0.57), and 2Y Cost per QALY decreased per year by $39,953 (R2=0.6778). CONCLUSION/CONCLUSIONS:Between 2008 and 2019, rates of complications have decreased concurrently with improvements in patient reported outcomes, resulting in improved cost effectiveness according to national Medicare average and individual patient cost data. The value of ASD surgery has improved substantially over the course of the last decade.

Prematurity is associated with surgical complications. This study sought to determine the risk of prematurity on 30-day complications, reoperations, and readmissions following ≥7-level PSF for AIS which has not been established. Utilizing the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (ACS NSQIP)-Pediatric dataset, all AIS patients undergoing ≥7-level PSF from 2012"“2016 were identified. Cases were 1:1 propensity score-matched to controls by age, sex, and number of spinal levels fused. Prematurity sub-classifications were also evaluated: extremely (<28 weeks), very (28"“31 weeks), and moderate-to-late (32"“36 weeks) premature. Univariate analysis with post hoc Bonferroni compared demographics, hospital parameters, and 30-day outcomes. Multivariate logistic regression identified independent predictors of adverse 30-day outcomes. 5531 patients (term = 5099; moderate-to-late premature = 250; very premature = 101; extremely premature = 81) were included. Premature patients had higher baseline rates of multiple individual comorbidities, longer mean length of stay, and higher 30-day readmissions and infections than the term cohort. Thirty-day readmissions increased with increasing prematurity. Very premature birth predicted UTIs, superficial SSI/wound dehiscence, and any infection, and moderate-to-late premature birth predicted renal insufficiency, deep space infections, and any infection. Prematurity of AIS patients differentially impacted rates of 30-day adverse outcomes following ≥7-level PSF. These results can guide preoperative optimization and postoperative expectations.

Background: Given the physical and economic burden of complications in spine surgery, reducing the prevalence of perioperative adverse events is a primary concern of both patients and health care professionals. This study aims to identify specific perioperative factors predictive of developing varying grades of postoperative complications in adult spinal deformity (ASD) patients, as assessed by the Clavien-Dindo complication classification (Cc) system. Methods: Surgical ASD patients ≥18 years were identified in the American College of Surgeons"™ National Surgical Quality Improvement Program from 2005 to 2015. Postoperative complications were stratified by Cc grade severity: minor (I, II, and III) and severe (IV and V). Stepwise regression models generated dataset-specific predictive models for Cc groups. Model internal validation was achieved by bootstrapping and calculating the area under the curve (AUC) of the model. Significance was set at P < 0.05. Results: Included were 3936 patients (59 ± 16 years, 63% women, 29 ± 7 kg/m²) undergoing surgery for ASD (4.4 ± 4.7 levels, 71% posterior approach, 11% anterior, and 18% combined). Overall, 1% of cases were revisions, 39% of procedures involved decompression, 27% osteotomy, and 15% iliac fixation. Additionally, 66% of patients experienced at least 1 complication, 0% of which were Cc grade I, 51% II, 5% III, 43% IV, and 1% V. The final model predicting severe Cc (IV"“V) complications yielded an AUC of 75.6% and included male sex, diabetes, increased operative time, central nervous system tumor, osteotomy, cigarette pack-years, anterior decompression, and anterior lumbar interbody fusion. Final models predicting specific Cc grades were created. Conclusions: Specific predictors of adverse events following ASD-corrective surgery varied for complications of different severities. Multivariate modeling showed smoking rate, osteotomy, diabetes, anterior lumbar interbody fusion, and higher operative time, among other factors, as predictive of severe complications, as classified by the Clavien-Dindo Cc system. These factors can help in the identification of high-risk patients and, consequently, improve preoperative patient counseling. Clinical Relevance: The findings of this study provide a foundation for identifying ASD patients at high risk of postoperative complications .

BACKGROUND:Patients with less severe adult spinal deformity undergo surgical correction and often achieve good clinical outcomes. However, it is not well understood how much clinical improvement is due to sagittal correction rather than treatment of the spondylotic process. PURPOSE/OBJECTIVE:Determine baseline thresholds in radiographic parameters that, when exceeded, may result in substantive clinical improvement from surgical correction. STUDY DESIGN/METHODS:Retrospective. METHODS:ASD patients with BL and 2-year(2Y) data were included. Parameters assessed: SVA, PI-LL, PT, T1PA, L1PA, L4-S1 Lordosis, C2-C7 SVA(cSVA), C2-T3, C2 Slope(C2S). Outcomes: Good Outcome(GO) at 2Y: [Meeting either: 1) SCB for ODI(change greater than 18.8), or 2) ODI<15 and SRS-Total>4.5. Binary logistic regression assessed each parameter to determine if correction was more likely needed to achieve GO. Conditional inference tree(CIT) run machine learning analysis generated baseline thresholds for each parameter, above which, correction was necessary to achieve GO. RESULTS:We included 431 ASD patients. There were 223(50%) that achieved a GO by two years. Binary logistic regression analysis demonstrated, with increasing baseline severity in deformity, sagittal correction was more often seen in those achieving GO for each parameter(all P<0.001). Of patients with baseline T1PA above the threshold, 95% required correction to meet Good Outcome(95% vs. 54%,P<0.001). A baseline PI-LL above 10° (74% of patients meeting GO) needed correction to achieve GO (OR: 2.6,[95% CI 1.4-4.8]). A baseline C2 slope above 15° also necessitated correction to obtain clinical success (OR: 7.7,[95% CI 3.7-15.7]). CONCLUSION/CONCLUSIONS:Our study highlighted point may be present at which sagittal correction has an outsized influence on clinical improvement, reflecting the line where deformity becomes a significant contributor to disability. These new thresholds give us insight into which patients may be more suitable for sagittal correction, as opposed to intervention for the spondylotic process only, leading to a more efficient utility of surgical intervention for adult spinal deformity. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE/METHODS:III.