Faculty Bibliography

BACKGROUND CONTEXT: Adult spinal deformity (ASD) patients undergoing surgery risk neurological decline following surgery. However, surgery may be the key in improving outcomes in patients starting with lower extremity motor deficits at baseline (BL). We aim to analyze the improvement in neurological outcomes of ASD patients undergoing spinal reconstruction with BL and 6-week postoperative lower extremity motor scores (LEMS). PURPOSE: The aim of this study is to analyze the improvement in neurological outcomes of adult patients undergoing deformity surgery with baseline abnormal LEMS. STUDY DESIGN/SETTING: Multicenter, prospective cohort. PATIENT SAMPLE: A total of 205 patients were included in the study. OUTCOME MEASURES: Patient and procedural factors that lead to the improvement in neurological outcomes of adult patients undergoing deformity surgery with baseline abnormalLEMS.
METHOD(S): ASD patients ages = 18 were prospectively studied from 2018-2021. All patients underwent an instrumented PSF with a few also having an ASF of the lumbar spine. Patients were dichotomized based on BL LEMS (NML = 50, ABML < 50). The ABNML group was then dichotomized based on whether LEMS improved overall from BL or experienced no change or declined by first postoperative follow-up (PO) and various factors were analyzed and compared using standard statistical tests.
RESULT(S): Of the 205 patients evaluated, 134 (65.4%) were NML and 71 were ABNML (34.3%) at BL. Among the 71 patients with ABML LEMS at BL, 49% (N=35) improved to NML levels, 21% (N=15) improved from BL levels but not to NML, 20% (N=14) remained the same, and 10% (N=7) declined further at 6week PO. Compared to ABNML patients with no change or a decline in LEMS at first PO, patients who improved overall (70%; N=50) had significantly more decompressions performed (86% vs 57%; p=0.0092), and had more PCOs performed intraoperatively (90% vs 62%, p=0.0074). There were no statistical differences between the groups in age, BL LEMS, BMI, total instrumented vertebrae (TIV), EBL, and OR time. Overall, the number of patients with NML LEMS at 6 weeks PO increased by 7.5% (65.4% to 70.2%; p<.0001).
CONCLUSION(S): Seventy percent of patients with ABML LEMS at BL improved their motor strength by the first PO visit, while 30% stayed the same or declined. ABNML patients who improved from BL had significantly more decompressions performed and, surprisingly, more PCOs performed. Interestingly, patient factors between the two groups demonstrated no statistical differences further highlighting that improvement may be influenced by the differences in surgical techniques. FDA DEVICE/DRUG STATUS: This abstract does not discuss or include any applicable devices or drugs.
Copyright

BACKGROUND CONTEXT: Evidence on long-term maintenance of health status in adult spinal deformity (ASD) patients who improve above MCID threshold (MCID+) at 2 years following surgery is limited. PURPOSE: This study aims to: (1) evaluate whether patients who reached MCID+ status at two years postoperatively will maintain MCID+ status at 5 years, (2) identify risk factors associated with maintaining MCID+ status, and (3) Assess whether maintaining MCID+ status at 5 years is associated with satisfaction with surgery. STUDY DESIGN/SETTING: Retrospective review. PATIENT SAMPLE: Patients who underwent adult spinal deformity (ASD) surgery with minimum 5-year follow-up who achieved 2-year MCID in ODI were identified. OUTCOME MEASURES: Maintenance of MCID+ status at 5 years for Oswestry Diability Index (ODI).
METHOD(S): Patients who maintained MCID+ status at 5 years and those who did not formed the comparison groups. Multivariable logistic regression, controlling for age, complications after two years and two-year alignment, was used to identify risk factors associated with the inability to maintain MCID+ status. In a separate multivariable logistic regression, whether maintaining MCID+ status was associated with 5-year surgical satisfaction was assessed.
RESULT(S): Of 633 eligible patients, 339 had 5-year data. Of 133 with both 2- and 5-year data, 70 who achieved 2-year MCID in ODI were included. 30% (21) failed to maintain MCID+ status at 5 years. Preoperatively, 33% (23) were narcotic users, 47% (33) were frail and mean surgical invasiveness was 96.6+/-36.02. On multivariable logistic regression, preoperative variables were assessed: CCI > 3 (OR 5.75; p=0.026), ASA grade > 2 (OR 5.25; p=0.015), anemia (OR 19.74; p=0.009), and cancer (OR 6.46; p=0.015) were associated with increased odds of failure to maintain MCID+ status at 5-year follow-up. Patients who failed to maintain MCID+ status at 5 years had a higher odds of being unsatisfied with the surgery (OR 15.66; p=0.001). Frailty and surgical invasiveness had no significant impact on MCID+ status at 5 years.
CONCLUSION(S): Preoperative comorbid conditions significantly impact patient's long-term ability to maintain the positive gains in health-related quality of life measures from the surgery. Surgeons should continue to monitor and treat the chronic conditions to ensure maintenance of long-term recovery. FDA DEVICE/DRUG STATUS: This abstract does not discuss or include any applicable devices or drugs.
Copyright

BACKGROUND CONTEXT: Prior studies assessed the association between underlying neurological condition and worse outcomes following spinal surgery with recent emphasis of self-reported loss of balance (Imbalance) by Uribe et al. PURPOSE: To investigate if patients with self-reported loss of balance have poorer outcomes following adult spinal deformity (ASD) surgery. STUDY DESIGN/SETTING: Retrospective review of prospectively collected database. PATIENT SAMPLE: ASD patients with baseline and 2-year radiographic and patient-reported outcome measure (PROM) data were included. OUTCOME MEASURES: Demographics, radiographic outcomes, complications, and PROM were compared from baseline to 2-year follow up.
METHOD(S): Patients undergoing a long spinal fusion with no prior history of spine surgery were retained. Patients were grouped according to imbalance and unsteady gait. The groups were propensity matched by age, PI-LL, and surgical invasiveness score. Demographics, radiographic, complications and PROM were compared from baseline to 2-year post-op.
RESULT(S): A total of 212 patients were reported (106 patients in each group). The mean age (64 vs 63 years), BMI (27.2 vs 27.0 kg/m2), and gender (76% vs 87% female) were not significantly different for patients with imbalance and without imbalance respectively (all p >0.05). Patients in the imbalance group had a higher Frailty Index Score compared to patients without imbalance (3.74 vs 2.33, p <0.001). At baseline, the sagittal profile for both groups were comparable with regard to PT, PI-LL, and SVA. Patients with loss of balance had a significantly lower thoracic Cobb angle (25.27degree vs 37.45degree, p <0.001) and lumbar Cobb angle (37.03degree vs 45.53degree, p=0.004), although the global coronal alignment was similar (imbalance:41.51 mm vs 34.25 mm, p=0.155). Patients with imbalance had worse PROM measures, including ODI (45.15 vs 36.62), SF-36 Mental Component Score (44.04 vs 51.76), SF-36 Physical Component Score (30.17 vs 35.10), and SRS-22 Mental domain score (3.28 vs 3.80) (p <0.001 for all). Postoperatively, patients with imbalance had less PT correction (-1.45degree vs -3.60degree, p=0.039) for a comparable correction in their PI-LL (-11.93degree vs-15.08degree, p=0.144) by 2-year follow-up. Both groups demonstrated similar improvements in their coronal plane deformity. Imbalance patients had higher rates of radiographic PJK at 2-year follow-up (26.4% vs 14.2%, p=0.026). Furthermore, patients with reported imbalance have significantly higher rate of implant related complications (47.2% vs 34.0%, p=0.05). After controlling for age, baseline sagittal parameters, PI-LL correction and Charlson Comorbidity Index, patients with imbalance had 2.2 times increased odds of sustaining PJK by 2 years.
CONCLUSION(S): Patients with a self-reported loss of balance and unsteady gait have significantly worse baseline frailty and PROMs, represented by poorer mental health and physical function. Although those patients had higher rates of PJK and implant-related complications, surgical intervention significantly improved their quality of life. Despite the improvement, they remained with lower PROMs by 2-year follow-up. Therefore, in the clinic setting and with limited institutional access to Frailty scores, asking patients if they have loss of balance or unsteady gait is a simple yet powerful question which may trigger their preoperative risk stratification and optimization. FDA DEVICE/DRUG STATUS: This abstract does not discuss or include any applicable devices or drugs.
Copyright

BACKGROUND CONTEXT: Prone LLIF (P-LLIF) is a novel technique allowing for placement of a lateral interbody in the prone position and allowing posterior decompression and revision of posterior instrumentation without repositioning. To date, studies evaluating the P-LLIF have been small single surgeon series. This multicentre retrospective cohort examines perioperative outcomes and complications of single position P-LLIF againsttraditional Lateral LLIF (L-LLIF) technique with patient repositioning in patients undergoing revision lumbar fusion surgery. PURPOSE: To evaluate the feasibility and safety of the single-position P-LLIF technique for revision lumbar fusion surgery. STUDY DESIGN/SETTING: Multicenter retrospective cohort study. PATIENT SAMPLE: A total of 101 patients undergoing revision circumferential fusion with lateral lumbar interbody fusion (LLIF) were included, of which 43 had P-LLIF and 58 had L-LLIF. OUTCOME MEASURES: Outcome measures included levels fused, operative time, estimated blood loss and perioperative complications. Radiographic analysis included lumbar lordosis (LL), pelvic incidence (PI), pelvic tilt (PT), PI-LL mismatch and segmental lumbar lordosis.
METHOD(S): A multicenter retrospective cohort study was performed from 4 institutions from the USA and Australia of patients undergoing revision anterior-posterior lumbar fusion via either: 1) single-position prone LLIF (P-LLIF); or 2) lateral decubitus LLIF with repositioning to prone (L-LLIF) between January 2015 and November 2021. Patients with greater than 4 levels fused were excluded. Demographics, perioperative outcomes, complications and radiological outcomes were compared using independent samples t-tests and chi-squared analyses as appropriate with significance set at p<0.05.
RESULT(S): A total of 101 patients undergoing revision lateral lumbar interbody fusion surgery were included, of which 43 had P-LLIF and 58 had L-LLIF. Age, BMI and CCI were similar between groups. The number of posterior levels fused (2.21 P-LLIF vs 2.66 L-LLIF, p=0.469) and interbody levels fused (1.23 P-LLIF vs 1.25 L-LLIF, p=0.838) were similar between groups. Levels decompressed, posterior column osteotomy and anterior column release were similar between groups. Operative time was significantly less in the P-LLIF group compared to the L-LLIF group (151 vs 206 min, p=0.004). EBL was similar between groups (150 mL P-LLIF vs 182 mL L-LLIF, p=0.31) and there was a trend toward reduced length of stay (2.7 vs 3.3 days, p=0.09). No significant difference was demonstrated in perioperative or postoperative complications between P-LLIF and L-LLIF groups. Radiographic analysis demonstrated no significant differences in preoperative or postoperative sagittal alignment as measured by lumbar lordosis, PI-LL mismatch, or segmental lumbar lordosis between groups.
CONCLUSION(S): P-LLIF significantly improves operative efficiency and may reduce length of stay when compared to L-LLIF and repositioning for revision lumbar fusion. No increase in complications was demonstrated by P-LLIF or trade-offs in sagittal alignment restoration. FDA DEVICE/DRUG STATUS: This abstract does not discuss or include any applicable devices or drugs.
Copyright

BACKGROUND CONTEXT: Preoperative risk stratification is critical to determining which adult spinal deformity (ASD) patients may develop postop complications and to maximize surgical success. Currently it is unknown if a preoperative inflammatory state results in a higher risk for postop complications. This information can be used in risk stratification models to aid in complication avoidance. PURPOSE: To determine if patients with preoperative elevated serum markers for inflammation have higher rates of postoperative complications STUDY DESIGN/SETTING: Retrospective review of multicenter prospective ASD database. PATIENT SAMPLE: ASD patients. OUTCOME MEASURES: C-reactive protein (CRP), Erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR), complications by type and by severity of intervention: none, mild, moderate and severe. Demographic and surgical variables: age, estimated blood loss (EBL), operating room (OR) time, body mass index (BMI), America Society of Anesthesia physical classification scale (ASA), Charlson comorbidity index (CCI), Edmonton frailty scale (EF), 3-column osteotomy (3CO), number of post fusion levels.
METHOD(S): Preoperative labs were drawn on ASD patients and the inflammatory markers were CRP and ESR. CRP thresholds for cardiac risk: normal = 3. The CRP moderate and elevated values were combined into one group named elevated. Normal ESR thresholds: Male age 50, =20, Female >50, =30. Patients were stratified by having normal or elevated markers and rates of complications were compared between the groups. A multivariate model with CRP/ESR and demographic/surgical variables for postoperative complications. Health-related quality of life (HRQOL) metrics were compared RESULTS: The total number of patients with preoperative CRP was 159 and ESR was 158. CRP: normal=114 patients (71.7%), moderate elevation=28 (17.6%), severe elevation=17 (10.7%). Combined elevated=45/159(28.3%). Elevated ESR=25(15.8%), normal=133(84.2%). The elevated CRP group had significantly higher rate of moderate complication 13/45(28.9%) vs 16/114(14.0%), p=0.03 and severe complication 15/45 (33.3%) vs 17/114(14.9%, p=0.009. Elevated ESR patients had significantly higher rate of moderate complication 9/25 (36.0%) vs 20/133 (15.0%), p=0.01. In multivariable logistic regression elevated CRP had odds ratio for moderate complication of 3.3 (95% CI 1.4-7.6, p=0.006), and for severe complication of 2.3 (95% CI 1.05-5.1, p=0.037). Multivariable logistic regression for elevated ESR and moderate complication had odds ratio of 2.9 (95%CI 1.04-7.8, p=0.041). Elevated CRP also had significantly higher rate of wound complications (15.6% vs 3.5%, p=0.007) and MSK complications (11.1% vs 1.8%, p=0.01). Elevated ESR had significantly higher rate of cardiac complications (32.0% vs 13.5%, p=0.02) and neurological complications (24.0% vs 9.0%, p=0.03). Elevated CRP had worse preoperative leg pain, SRS Activity and VR12 PCS(p<0.05). Elevated ESR had worse baseline ODI (p=0.03).
CONCLUSION(S): A preoperative inflammatory state as defined by elevated CRP and ESR is an independent risk factor for the development of moderate and severe postop complications. Having elevated preop CRP is 3.3 and 2.3 times more likely to have a moderate and severe complication, respectively. Elevated ESR is 2.9 times more likely to have a moderate complication. This data can be used in risk stratification models to aid in minimizing postoperative complications. FDA DEVICE/DRUG STATUS: This abstract does not discuss or include any applicable devices or drugs.
Copyright

BACKGROUND CONTEXT: Prophylaxis usage has been established in literature as an important component of minimizing the risk of proximal junctional kyphosis (PJK) and proximal junctional failure (PJF) development. However, literature is scarce on the effects of prophylaxis in patients who have achieved adequate postoperative alignment and those who maintained poor alignment postoperatively. PURPOSE: To investigate how PJK prophylaxis impacts rates of PJK and PJF with and without ideal alignment and the associated cost/cost-effectiveness. STUDY DESIGN/SETTING: Retrospective cohort study of a prospective adult thoracolumbar deformity database. PATIENT SAMPLE: This study included 1,541 patients. OUTCOME MEASURES: Radiographic alignment, patient-reported outcome measures (ODI), cost per QALY.
METHOD(S): Operative adult spinal deformity patients (scoliosis >20degree, SVA>5cm, PT>25degree, or TK>60degree) with an UIV at L1 or below and available baseline (BL) and 2-year (2Y) radiographic and HRQL data were included. "Matched" and "unmatched" alignment refers to the age-adjusted alignment criteria. PJK prophylaxis was defined by usage of cement, hooks or tethers. PJF was defined as PJK with reoperation. Costs were calculated using the PearlDiver database, accounting for additional costs of prophylaxis when applicable, through estimates from Medicare pay scales for services within a 30-day window, including estimates regarding costs of postoperative complications, outpatient healthcare encounters, revisions and medical related readmissions. QALY was calculated using SF6D.
RESULT(S): A total of 738 ASD patients or below met inclusion criteria (59.9yrs+/-14.0, 79%F, BMI: 27.7 kg/m2 +/-6.0, CCI: 1.8 +/-1.7). Surgically, patients had a mean level fused of 11.1+/-4.4, LOS of 7.9 days+/-4.4, EBL of 1577 mL, operative time of 377 min, with 63% undergoing an osteotomy. Forty percent of patients had PJK prophylaxis. Controlling for age, CCI, BL osteoporosis, levels fused, usage of 3CO, UIV, BL SVA and BL PI-LL, patients who were matched postoperatively in PT, SVA, or PI-LL had lowered PJF rates (OR:.5, 95% CI:.28-.86, p=.01) with prophylaxis. Among those unmatched in either SVA, PILL, or PT by 6W, prophylaxis significantly reduced the rates of PJK and PJF as well (p <0.05). ANCOVA controlling for age, CCI, BL osteoporosis, levels fused, usage of 3CO, UIV, BL SVA and BL PI-LL shows patients with ideal age-adjusted alignment and prophylaxis resulted in a lower cost per QALY by 2Y ($399,948 vs $514,228, p <.001). Similarly, in unmatched patients, prophylaxis resulted in a substantially lower cost per QALY by 2Y ($466,409 vs 672, 024, p <.001), primarily due to decreased costs of reoperation and greater improvements in QALY among prophylaxis cohorts.
CONCLUSION(S): Despite additional surgical cost, optimization of radiographic realignment in conjunction with utilization of proximal junctional failure prophylactic techniques achieves ideal cost utility, predominately due to the minimization of mechanical failure related reoperations. Even among those not achieving optimal alignment, junctional prophylactic measures improved cost utility, emphasizing its critical role of minimization of junctional failures to achieve cost efficiency in adult spinal deformity surgery. FDA DEVICE/DRUG STATUS: This abstract does not discuss or include any applicable devices or drugs.
Copyright

BACKGROUND CONTEXT: Indirect decompression technique may be limited in that it does not include direct removal of the offending intervertebral disc or osteophyte protruding into the canal. PURPOSE: This study evaluates resolution of radiculopathy and perioperative complications in lumbar fusion with indirect or direct decompression techniques. STUDY DESIGN/SETTING: Retrospective analysis of large single center academic institution. PATIENT SAMPLE: This study included 116 single-level lumbar fusion patients with preoperative radiculopathy from 2012 to 2021. OUTCOME MEASURES: Resolution of radiculopathy, visual analog scores (VAS), perioperative complications, motor scores.
METHOD(S): Patients 18 years of age diagnosed with preoperative radiculopathy undergoing single-level lumbar fusion with up to two-year follow-up were grouped by indirect and direct decompression. Direct decompression group included TLIF with or without direct decompression procedure as well as ALIF and LLIF with direct decompression procedure. Indirect decompression group included ALIF and LLIF without direct decompression procedure. Propensity score matching (PSM) was used to control for differences in age between groups. Outcome measures were compared between groups using means comparison tests. Logistic regression analysis was used to correlate decompression type with symptom resolution over time.
RESULT(S): A total of 116 patients were included in this analysis: 58 direct decompression (mean 53.9y, 67.2% female) and 58 indirect decompression (mean 54.6y, 61.4% female). Direct decompression patients experienced greater blood loss relative to indirect decompression patients (242.4 +/- 128.5 vs 171.79 +/- 143.9 mL, p=0.007). Additionally, direct decompressionpatients experienced full resolution of radiculopathy at 3 months postop at a greater rate than those in the indirect decompression group (OR: 4.742, [1.97-11.41]; 53.1% vs 13.73%, p=0.002). At 6 months, direct decompression patients demonstrated a significantly larger reduction in VAS score 6 months postop (-2.889 +/- 2.3 vs -0.897 +/- 4.3, p=0.044). With regard to motor function, direct decompression patients had improved motor score with respect to the L5 dermatome at 6 months compared to indirect decompression patients (DELTAmotor score from baseline: 0.1714 +/- 0.453 vs -0.024 +/- 0.154, p=0.019).
CONCLUSION(S): Patients who underwent direct decompression experienced significantly greater resolution of preoperative lower extremity radiculopathy at 3 months compared with those who underwent ID alone. At 6 and 12 months, no differences were noted between the two groups. There were no differences in complication rates. At 6 months postop, direct decompression patients had greater improvement in preoperative motor deficit than ID patients. In particularly debilitated patients, these findings may influence surgeons to perform a direct decompression to achieve more rapid resolution of radiculopathy symptoms. FDA DEVICE/DRUG STATUS: This abstract does not discuss or include any applicable devices or drugs.
Copyright

BACKGROUND CONTEXT: Thoracic decompensation (TD) represents a distinct radiographic complexity from proximal junctional kyphosis (PJK). Few studies exist on the occurrence of TD following adult spinal deformity (ASD) corrective surgery. PURPOSE: To assess the incidence of TD following ASD-corrective surgery in comparison with the occurrence of PJK. STUDY DESIGN/SETTING: Retrospective cohort. PATIENT SAMPLE: A total of 689 ASD patients. OUTCOME MEASURES: ASD, TD, PJK, thoracic compensation.
METHOD(S): ASD patients with complete baseline (BL) and two-year (2Y) followup were included. Patients were divided into groups: those who developed TD: T4-T12 >54.2degree and those who developed PJK. Further analysis assessed outcomes among patients with both TD and PJK (TDPJK). Thoracic compensation was defined as expected thoracic kyphosis minus BL thoracic kyphosis. Means comparison tests and multivariable logistic regression analysis assessed differences between patient groups.
RESULT(S): A total of 373 patients met inclusion criteria. Patient breakdown by radiographic outcome was: TD (N=31), PJK (N=223) and TDPJK (N=119). Age, gender, and ASD-mFI were similar between TD and PJK patients. TD patients were more likely to be osteoporotic than PJK patients, p < 0.05. Procedures on TD patients were less invasive and utilized a shorter construct (9.3 vs 11.5 levels; both p < 0.05). TD patients had significantly greater cervical lordosis, thoracic kyphosis, and lumbar lordosis than PJK patients at BL and 2Y follow-up, all p < 0.05. Thoracic compensation was significantly associated with TD (OR 1.07 [CI 1.04-1.09], p < 0.001) controlling for age, ASD-mFI, and invasiveness. TDPJK had the highest complication rate (84.9%), significantly greater than PJK patients (70.9%), and TD patients (61.3%), both p < 0.05. PJK patients were 78.7% less likely to develop PJF than TDPJK patients (OR 0.213 [CI 0.101-0.453], p < 0.001).
CONCLUSION(S): Patients who developed thoracic decompensation were more likely to present with osteoporosis, but had less invasive procedures and levels fused than patients with proximal junctional kyphosis. The tradeoff between fusing too much resulting in proximal junctional kyphosis and fusing too little predisposing to thoracic decompensation can serve as the basis of future studies to determine optimal construct length to balance these two risks. Thoracic compensation was predictive of postoperative thoracic decompensation in adult spinal deformity-correction. Patients who developed TDPJK had the highest rate of complications and greater odds of junctional failure. FDA DEVICE/DRUG STATUS: This abstract does not discuss or include any applicable devices or drugs.
Copyright

BACKGROUND CONTEXT: Previous literature has demonstrated the advantages of lateral single position surgery (L-SPS) in the perioperative period; however, 2-year postoperative outcomes of this novel technique have not yet been compared to circumferential anterior-posterior fusion (FLIP) at 2-years postoperatively. PURPOSE: Evaluate the feasibility and safety of L-SPS technique against the conventional FLIP. STUDY DESIGN/SETTING: Multi-center retrospective cohort study. PATIENT SAMPLE: Patients undergoing primary AP (ALIF or LLIF) fusions with bilateral percutaneous pedicle screw fixation between L2-S1 with minimum 2-year followup at three institutions. OUTCOME MEASURES: Outcome measures included levels fused, operative time, estimated blood loss and perioperative complications. Radiographic analysis included lumbar lordosis (LL), pelvic incidence (PI), pelvic tilt (PT), PI-LL mismatch and segmental lumbar lordosis.
METHOD(S): Patients were grouped as L-SPS if anterior and posterior portions of the procedure were performed in the lateral decubitus position, and FLIP if patients were repositioned from supine or lateral to prone position for the posterior portion of the procedure. Groups were compared in terms of demographics, intraoperative, perioperative and radiological outcomes, complications and reoperations up to 2 years follow-up. Measures were compared using independent samples or paired t-tests and chi-squared analyses with significance set at p<0.05.
RESULT(S): A total of 442 pts met inclusion, including 352 L-SPS and 90 FLIP pts. Significant differences were noted in age (62.4 vs. 56.9; p= < 0.001) and smoking status (7% vs. 16%; p=0.023) between the L-SPS and FLIP groups. No differences between L-SPS and FLIP were noted in gender (57.4% female vs 57.8% female, p=1.000), BMI (30.0kg/m2 vs 29.3kg/m2; p=0.318). No differences were noted in number of levels fused between L-SPS and FLIP (1.45vs 1.50; p=0.533), proportion including ALIF (38% vs 39%; p=0.809), or the proportion of surgeries including L5-S1 (38%vs 31%; p=0.222). Perioperative outcomes: L-SPS demonstrated significantly lower Op time (97.7min vs 297.0 min; p < 0.001), fluoro dose (36.5mGy vs 78.8mGy; p < 0.001), EBL (88.8mL vs 270.0mL; p < 0.001), and LOS (1.91 days vs. 3.61 days; p < 0.001) compared to FLIP. L-SPS also demonstrated significantly fewer post-op complications than FLIP (21.9% vs 34.4%; p=0.013), specifically regarding rates of ileus (0.0% vs 5.6%; p < 0.001). There was no difference in remaining surgical site, neurological, or medical complications between groups. Reoperation: N=no differences in reoperation were noted at 30-day (1.7%L-SPS vs 4.4%FLIP, p=0.125), 90-day (5.1%L-SPS vs 5.6%FLIP, p=0.795) or 2-year follow-up (9.7%L-SPS vs 12.2%FLIP; p=0.441). The most common reason for return to OR was Adjacent Segment Disease, (L-SPS 3.1% vs. FLIP 7.8%; p=0.067). Pseudarthrosis rates were similar between groups (0.0%L-SPS vs. 1.1%FLIP; p=0.204). Radiological Outcomes: no significant differences were noted in rates of radiological fusion (94.3% L-SPS vs 97.8%FLIP; p=0.266) or subsidence (6.9%L-SPS vs 12.2%FLIP; p=0.260). There were no differences noted between L-SPS and FLIP in change in LL from Baseline to 1-year (3.5 vs 2.8; p=0.466) and post-op to 1yr (-0.18 vs -0.51; p=0.777), or in PI-LL from Baseline to 1-year (-3.5 vs -3.2; p=0.835) and from post-op to 1-year (0.71 vs 0.71; 0.998).
CONCLUSION(S): L-SPS improves safety, improves operative efficiency and reduces complications in the perioperative period while maintaining similar efficacy of AP fusion at 2-year followup in treating degenerative lumbar spinal conditions. FDA DEVICE/DRUG STATUS: This abstract does not discuss or include any applicable devices or drugs.
Copyright

BACKGROUND CONTEXT: Complexity and potential risk to the patient in the perioperative period have led to circumferential spine fusion surgery often being performed in a staged fashion, whether in the same admission or split admission. There is no established protocol or clear evidence that this is beneficial to the patient. Previous studies of this topic have tended to favor same-day surgery to staged surgery with decreased blood loss, length of stay and cost. Multiple factors can potentially contribute to morbidity for these patients, including multiple insults activating inflammatory response and repeated exposures to anesthetics. PURPOSE: To determine if there is a difference in complication profile between staged vs same-day circumferential, multi-approach thoracolumbar spine surgery. STUDY DESIGN/SETTING: A retrospective single-center cohort assessment for adult patients undergoing multiple approach thoracolumbar fusion surgery from January 2012 to December 2021 in an academic center. PATIENT SAMPLE: All patients who underwent anterior or lateral approaches for the purpose of disc preparation and fusion and subsequently had a posterior approach for screws were included. The same-day group had both parts performed under the same anesthetic vs the staged group who had separate anesthetics on separate days in a planned fashion OUTCOME MEASURES: Primary outcome: complication rate at 90 days.
Secondary Outcomes: complication profile - readmission, reoperation, DVT/PE, Ileus, delayed extubation, infection. Surgical characteristics - length of stay, operative time, estimated blood loss, transfusion rates. Demographic characteristics -ages, sex, BMI, diabetes, smoking habits.
METHOD(S): A retrospective single-center cohort assessment for adult patients undergoing multiple approach thoracolumbar fusion surgery from January 2012 to December 2021. Patients who underwent anterior or lateral approaches for the purpose of disc preparation and fusion and subsequently had a posterior approach for screws were included. The same-day group had both parts performed under the same anesthetic vs the staged group who had separate anesthetics on separate days in a planned fashion. Statistical comparison of demographic data (ages, sex, BMI, diabetes, smoking habits), complication rates (readmission, reoperation, DVT/PE, Ileus, delayed extubation, infection) and surgical characteristics (operative time, length of stay, estimated blood loss, transfusion rates) was made between the two groups.
RESULT(S): A total of 1039 patients (918 same-day vs 121 staged) underwent circumferential thoracolumbar spine surgery from 2012 to 2021. The groups differed slightly in demographics with the staged group being slightly older (56.7 yrs same-day vs 59.6 yrs staged, p < 0.05) and had a higher incidence of smoking (6.6% same-day vs 22.3% staged, p < 0.001). The average time between stages was 2.5 days (SD 2.15). The total operative time was significantly longer in the staged group (354 min same-day vs 523 min staged, p < 0.001). The overall complication rate was not significantly different between the two groups (22.0% same-day vs 29.8% staged, p=0.748). Analysis of specific complications demonstrated an increase in DVT/PE (1.4% same-day vs 11.6% staged, p < 0.001) and postoperative ileus (4.2% same-day vs 15.7% staged, p < 0.001) in the staged group. The length of hospital admission was longer in the staged group (4.6 days same-day vs 7.7 days staged, p < 0.0001).
CONCLUSION(S): Staging circumferential surgery did not demonstrate statistical increase in complications at 90 days. However, review of specific postoperative complications including DVT/PE and postoperative ileus demonstrated significant increase in the staged group compared to the same-day group. The staged patients had a significantly longer hospital stay and their total surgery time was significantly longer. These would ultimately contribute heavily to hospital costs. There were potential limitations in the comparison of the groups with the staged patients being older and more likely to smoke. The study group recommends considering if staging the surgery is required as it can lead to increase in DVT/PE and postoperative ileus with prolonged stay in hospital. FDA DEVICE/DRUG STATUS: This abstract does not discuss or include any applicable devices or drugs.
Copyright