Faculty Bibliography

The MRI appearance of 'Little Leaguer's shoulder' has not been previously reported in the radiology literature. Purported etiologies include proximal humeral epiphyseolysis, osteochondrosis of the proximal humeral epiphysis, stress fracture of the proximal humeral epiphyseal plate, and rotational stress fracture of the proximal humeral epiphyseal plate. We describe magnetic resonance imaging findings in four patients and review the literature

Femoral stress fractures represent an uncommon but important lower-extremity injury in athletes and soldiers. Careful assessment of the involved and contralateral lower extremity and the spine is required to make the diagnosis. Based on a review of the literature, specific treatment is based on individual patient assessment. In most cases, nonoperative management results in an excellent outcome. Certain fractures will require operative intervention to prevent displacement or to reduce a displaced fracture and return stability to the lower extremity. Complications in athletes with femoral stress fractures are rare. Most athletes can expect to return to their preinjury level of competition, if they are compliant with the treatment plan

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this article is to review the current understanding of the MRI appearance of articular cartilage and its relationship to the microscopic and macroscopic structure of articular cartilage, the optimal pulse sequences to be used in imaging, the appearance of both degenerative and traumatic chondral lesions, the appearance of the most common cartilage repair procedures, and future directions and developments in cartilage imaging. CONCLUSION: Articular cartilage plays an essential role in the function of the diarthrodial joints of the body but is frequently the target of degeneration or traumatic injury. The recent development of several surgical procedures that hold the promise of forming repair tissue that is hyaline or hyalinelike cartilage has increased the need for accurate, noninvasive assessment of both native articular cartilage and postoperative repair tissue. MRI is the optimal noninvasive method for assessment of articular cartilage

The surgical management of knee injuries has increased in recent years. Postoperative magnetic resonance (MR) imaging of the knee following surgical intervention serves an important role in the diagnostic evaluation of patients with recurrent or residual symptoms following surgical intervention. MR imaging additionally assists in the noninvasive documentation of temporal changes at the surgical site potentially reflective of procedural success, or failure. Background understanding of the common surgical procedures performed, their normal postoperative MR imaging appearance, and imaging features of potential procedural complications are essential in the accurate evaluation of patients following prior knee surgery. The focus of the following article is to review the clinical and MR imaging features of the postoperative knee following prior surgical treatment of ligamentous, meniscal, and articular cartilage injuries of the joint

Articular cartilage abnormalities of the knee are a cause of significant patient morbidity. Several surgical techniques have been developed to treat these lesions to improve patient symptoms and to delay or prevent the development of osteoarthritis. MRI has been shown to be an accurate non-invasive test for the evaluation of articular cartilage injuries and for evaluating the postoperative knee following chondral repair. As these surgical repair techniques become more commonly performed, is important for radiologists to be familiar with the surgical techniques and the MRI appearance of the postoperative knee including both normal and abnormal findings. In this article, these chondral repair techniques will be reviewed as well those normal and abnormal MRI findings following these surgeries

It is becoming increasingly important for the radiologist to evaluate the appearance and outcome of cartilage repair procedures. MR imaging is currently the best method for such evaluation but it is necessary to use cartilage-specific sequences and to modify those sequences when necessary to minimize artifacts from retained metal within the joint. This article reviews the surgical technique of the more commonly performed cartilage repair procedures, currently recommended techniques for the MR imaging evaluation of articular cartilage and cartilage repair procedures, and the MR imaging appearance of cartilage repair procedures and of the most frequently encountered complications following such procedures

New developments and improvements in ligamentous and meniscal surgery and cartilage repair procedures have led to an increased incidence ot these procedures being performed. Subsequently, there has been a corresponding increase in postoperative imaging studies. and it is imperative for radiologists to be comfortable with the normal imaging appearance of these procedures and associated complications

MR arthrography by virtue of its ability accurately to demonstrate intra-articular structures and abnormalities of these structures has become an important tool for the evaluation of a variety of articular disorders. Although not necessary in all patients, MR arthrography may facilitate the evaluation of patients with suspected intra-articular pathology in whom conventional MRI is not sufficient for an adequate therapy planning. MR arthrography combines the advantages of arthrography, like joint distention and delineation of intra-articular structures, with the superior spatial resolution of MRI. This technique improves diagnostic confidence, particularly in the assessment of subtle lesions and of complex anatomic structures. MR arthrography is of high value in the evaluation of osteochondral defects, loose bodies, previously operated menisci, and acetabular labral lesions

Magnetic resonance (MR) imaging of the postoperative knee has become more common because more arthroscopic repair procedures are being performed. The most common procedures include partial meniscectomy and meniscal repair, anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction, and cartilage repair procedures. Specific findings of a retorn meniscus following meniscal repair or partial meniscectomy are increased signal intensity extending through the site of repair on T2-weighted images, displaced meniscal fragments, and abnormal signal intensity at a site distant from the repair. Findings of ACL graft disruption on T2-weighted MR images include absence of intact graft fibers and increased signal intensity similar to that of fluid within the expected region of the graft. Partial tears of the graft appear as areas of increased signal intensity affecting a portion of the graft with some intact fibers still present. An impinged ACL graft may appear to be draped over the anterior inferior edge of the intercondylar roof or be posteriorly bowed. Localized anterior arthrofibrosis appears on T1-weighted MR images as a focal nodular lesion of low signal intensity that is anterior to the ACL graft in the intercondylar notch and is indistinguishable from adjacent joint fluid. On T2-weighted images, the nodule is well differentiated from high-signal-intensity joint fluid. Finally, MR imaging has been shown to be accurate in the evaluation of cartilage repair tissue. Knowledge of the normal MR imaging appearance of the knee after the more common repair procedures will allow radiologists to recognize complications associated with such procedures