Faculty Bibliography

OBJECTIVE:To develop an evidence-based guideline for the pharmacologic and nonpharmacologic treatment of psoriatic arthritis (PsA), as a collaboration between the American College of Rheumatology (ACR) and the National Psoriasis Foundation (NPF). METHODS:We identified critical outcomes in PsA and clinically relevant PICO (population/intervention/comparator/outcomes) questions. A Literature Review Team performed a systematic literature review to summarize evidence supporting the benefits and harms of available pharmacologic and nonpharmacologic therapies for PsA. GRADE (Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation) methodology was used to rate the quality of the evidence. A voting panel, including rheumatologists, dermatologists, other health professionals, and patients, achieved consensus on the direction and the strength of the recommendations. RESULTS:The guideline covers the management of active PsA in patients who are treatment-naive and those who continue to have active PsA despite treatment, and addresses the use of oral small molecules, tumor necrosis factor inhibitors, interleukin-12/23 inhibitors (IL-12/23i), IL-17 inhibitors, CTLA4-Ig (abatacept), and a JAK inhibitor (tofacitinib). We also developed recommendations for psoriatic spondylitis, predominant enthesitis, and treatment in the presence of concomitant inflammatory bowel disease, diabetes, or serious infections. We formulated recommendations for a treat-to-target strategy, vaccinations, and nonpharmacologic therapies. Six percent of the recommendations were strong and 94% conditional, indicating the importance of active discussion between the health care provider and the patient to choose the optimal treatment. CONCLUSION/CONCLUSIONS:The 2018 ACR/NPF PsA guideline serves as a tool for health care providers and patients in the selection of appropriate therapy in common clinical scenarios. Best treatment decisions consider each individual patient situation. The guideline is not meant to be proscriptive and should not be used to limit treatment options for patients with PsA.

OBJECTIVE:To develop an evidence-based guideline for the pharmacologic and nonpharmacologic treatment of psoriatic arthritis (PsA), as a collaboration between the American College of Rheumatology (ACR) and the National Psoriasis Foundation (NPF). METHODS:We identified critical outcomes in PsA and clinically relevant PICO (population/intervention/comparator/outcomes) questions. A Literature Review Team performed a systematic literature review to summarize evidence supporting the benefits and harms of available pharmacologic and nonpharmacologic therapies for PsA. GRADE (Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation) methodology was used to rate the quality of the evidence. A voting panel, including rheumatologists, dermatologists, other health professionals, and patients, achieved consensus on the direction and the strength of the recommendations. RESULTS:The guideline covers the management of active PsA in patients who are treatment-naive and those who continue to have active PsA despite treatment, and addresses the use of oral small molecules, tumor necrosis factor inhibitors, interleukin-12/23 inhibitors (IL-12/23i), IL-17 inhibitors, CTLA4-Ig (abatacept), and a JAK inhibitor (tofacitinib). We also developed recommendations for psoriatic spondylitis, predominant enthesitis, and treatment in the presence of concomitant inflammatory bowel disease, diabetes, or serious infections. We formulated recommendations for a treat-to-target strategy, vaccinations, and nonpharmacologic therapies. Six percent of the recommendations were strong and 94% conditional, indicating the importance of active discussion between the health care provider and the patient to choose the optimal treatment. CONCLUSION/CONCLUSIONS:The 2018 ACR/NPF PsA guideline serves as a tool for health care providers and patients in the selection of appropriate therapy in common clinical scenarios. Best treatment decisions consider each individual patient situation. The guideline is not meant to be proscriptive and should not be used to limit treatment options for patients with PsA.

OBJECTIVE:The intestinal microbiota has been associated with the development of inflammatory arthritis. The aim of this study was to dissect intestinal mucosal immune responses in the preclinical phase of arthritis and determine the requirement of Th17 cells, beyond the cytokine interleukin-17 (IL-17), for arthritis development. We further examined whether the involvement of Th17 cells in arthritis depends on the host microbiota. METHODS:) mice, and assessed the impact of microbiota on the Th17-dependence of CIA. RESULTS: mice showed a specific reduction of mucosal Th17 and partially reduced IL-17-producing CD8 T cells. However, total levels of IL-17A, mostly produced by γδ T cells and neutrophils, were unaffected. Arthritis was significantly reduced in Th17-deficient mice, suggesting additional IL-17A-independent roles for Th17 cells. Accordingly, antigen-stimulated T cells from Th17-deficient mice produced less IL-17A, IL-17F and GM-CSF. Importantly, Th17-dependence of arthritis was lost upon substitution of intestinal microbiota. CONCLUSION/CONCLUSIONS:These data suggest that activation of mucosal immunity precedes arthritis development, and support a microbiota-dependent role for Th17 cells in arthritis. Therefore, a microbiome-guided stratification of patients might improve the efficacy of Th17-targeted therapies.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW/OBJECTIVE:Despite a robust therapeutic landscape, significant gaps exist in the quality of care of psoriatic disease. Thus, an improved understanding of the challenges in providing quality care and the implementation of effective strategies to overcome them is needed. In this review, we summarize the burden of psoriatic disease, discuss the challenges in the care of psoriatic patients, and outline how combined dermatology-rheumatology clinics bridge many of these gaps. RECENT FINDINGS/RESULTS:Multiple challenges are faced in providing high-quality care to patients with psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis from the pre-diagnosis phase of disease to the follow-up period. Challenges are mainly driven by lack of education of patients and healthcare providers, inefficient communication between specialists, lack of a holistic approach to patients, and limitations of available therapies. The Psoriasis and Psoriatic Arthritis Clinics Multicenter Advancement Network (PPACMAN) is working on demonstrating the effectiveness of combined dermatology-rheumatology clinics in addressing some of these challenges. Recent findings show that combined clinic models may improve quality of care by raising awareness of psoriatic disease, fostering educational activities for both patients and physicians, and allowing for comprehensive evaluation and management of patients through improved communications between disciplines. Psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis are complex diseases that often require an interdisciplinary approach. Thus, combined dermatology-rheumatology clinics and local-regional partnerships are potentially effective in improving quality of care in psoriatic disease.

Background/Purpose: Psoriatic Arthritis (PsA) affects up to 30% patients with psoriasis and is characterized by wide spread synovio-entheseal inflammation. Physiologically, the human gut microbiota metabolizes dietary fiber into shortchain fatty acids (FA)- which exert anti-inflammatory effects by increasing activity of regulatory T cells (Tregs).Moreover, we have previously shown decreased abundance of Akkermansia and Ruminococcus and concomitant decrease in mediumchain FA (MCFA) levels in stool of PsA patients. We therefore hypothesized that FA supplementation may have favorable effects on gut microbiome and lead to increase in tolerance, potentially serving as therapeutic target in psoriatic disease.
Method(s): Wild type (WT)animals were fed SCFA-rich diet for 14 days followed by 16S rRNA sequencing and microbiota analysis of pellet specimens.We then evaluated effects ofMCFA-rich diet in healthy subjects. Peripheral blood and stool samples were collected at days 0, 7 and 14 for 16s rRNA sequencing and FACS. Finally, we conducted a small, prospective, proof-ofprinciple study in new-onset, drug-naive psoriatic disease patients (with or without PsA). Each participant received MCFA (1 gm 4 times a day for 6 weeks). Clinical history was obtained at baseline. Skin and joint exam were performed at baseline and follow up. Serum and stool samples were collected at baseline, weeks 3, and 6 for 16S rRNA sequencing and FACS, respectively. Wilcoxon signed-rank test was used to compare differences in Tregs before and after MCFA-rich administration.
Result(s): SCFA rich diet in WT mice led to statistically significant perturbations in gut bacterial composition 14 days into intervention, with a dramatic increase in commensals (Fig 1A; p<0.001), most notably in Akkermansia(Fig 1B). MCFA administration to healthy subjects (n=7) also led to significant changes in community structure (Fig 2A; p=0.03) and associated increases in circulating Treg cells (Fig 2B; p<0.001). These findings were also observed in psoriatic disease patients (n=4) showing a significant alteration in specific taxa, including Actinobacteria (Fig 2 C; p<0.05) and Mollicutes (p=0.09) and concomitant increase in circulatory Treg cells (Fig 2D)
Conclusion(s): In both health and psoriatic disease, MCFA supplementation is associated with distinct changes in human gut microbiota composition and peripheral Treg cells. These findings rationalize the need for a larger placebo controlled, prospective trial to study the effects of MCFA in patients with psoriasis and PsA as a potential therapy alone or in combination with DMARDs. (Figure Presented)

Background/Purpose: The microbiome serves a number of important functions, including modulation of the immune system and protection from pathogenic microorganisms1. Many autoimmune diseases have been associated with intestinal microbial dysbiosis1. Recent studies have also demonstrated that microbiota can affect the lifetime, bioavailability and efficacy of drugs2. Conversely, even drugs designed to specifically target human cells have been associated with changes in microbial composition3. To date, most research has focused on bacterial microorganisms and little is known about the role that fungal microorganisms (the mycobiome) play, including their interactions with bacteria. In this study, we characterized the ecological effects of biologic therapies on the intestinal mycobiome.
Method(s): Fecal samples were collected from SpA patients pre- and post-treatment with either tumor necrosis factor inhibitors (TNFi; n=15) or secukinumab (n=14), an anti-IL-17A monoclonal antibody (IL-17i). Subjects treated with TNFi were naive to biologic therapy, whereas those treated with secukinumab previously failed or had incomplete response to TNFi. Samples underwent DNA extraction, amplification, and gene sequencing of the ITS1 region conserved in fungi. In parallel, gene sequencing of the 16S rRNA gene region conserved in bacteria was also performed. Sequences were analyzed with R and Quantitative Insights into Microbial Ecology (QIIME).
Result(s): ITS fungal data reveled that, on average, subjects treated with TNFi and IL-17i did not have major differences in overall microbial alpha or beta diversity pre- and post-treatment. However, there were dramatic shifts in the relative abundance of specific taxa, such as Candida albicans, which were more prominent in the IL-17i cohort compared to the TNFi cohort (p=0.04). The IL-17i cohort also demonstrated similar changes in certain 16S bacterial taxa, including Clostridia (p=0.02) and Clostridiales (p=0.02).
Conclusion(s): We characterized, for the first time, the effects of two biologic therapies on human intestinal fungal and bacterial microbiota composition. Treatment with biologics, particularly IL-17i, leads to a gut microbial dysbiosis characterized by significant changes in abundance of C. albicans and Clostridia in a subgroup of SpA patients. This is in line with the known increased risk of candidiasis seen with IL-17i, and may at least partially explain the potential link between IL-17 blockade, intestinal dysbiosis, and the subclinical and clinical gut inflammation observed in some patients treated with these molecules. Further studies to understand the downstream effects of these perturbations may allow for the development of precision medicine approaches in PsA and SpA

Background/Purpose: The Psoriatic Arthritis Impact of Disease (PsAID) questionnaire is a patient reported measure of disease impact. The 12-item questionnaire has many advantages including demonstrated validity, reliability, responsiveness and discrimination. However, few studies have examined the use of individual items as surrogates for important patient reported outcomes. For example, we were interested in whether the single PsAID fatigue item could be used in place of the 13 item FACIT-F instrument. Likewise, the pain, function, depression, and anxiety items could be used in place of additional questionnaires if the items correlated well with validated instruments both in cross-sectional and longitudinal settings. The objective of this study was to examine the longitudinal construct validity of the individual PSAID items for pain, fatigue, function, depression and anxiety.
Method(s): Patients with PsA were enrolled in the Psoriatic Arthritis Research Consortium (PARC) between 2015- 2017. PARC is a longitudinal observational cohort at four institutions: University of Pennsylvania, Cleveland Clinic, New York University, and University of Utah. Two of these institutions (Utah and Penn) administered the PSAID. Patient characteristics at the first/baseline visit were descriptively reported. The correlations were calculated among individual PSAID items with similar constructs (e.g., 'tired' item with FACIT-F, BASDAI tired item, etc.) at baseline using Spearman's correlation coefficients. The change scores (e.g., score at visit 1 - score at visit 0) and the correlation among change scores between the individual items and related constructs were also calculated.
Result(s): PSAID data were available from 862 visits; 302 patients completed at least one PSAID and 208 patients completed PSAIDs at >=2 visits. Most patients were in low disease activity (mean 66/68 swollen and tender joint counts were 2.6 and 5.3, respectively). At baseline, the mean PsAID9 and PsAID12 scores were 3.39 (SD2.45) and 3.22 (2.40) respectively. The individual PsAID items were moderately correlated (rho= 0.5-0.8) with similar constructs at baseline. However, aside from the moderate to strong correlation between the PsAID pain question with the RAPID3 pain question (rho=0.71), change scores were only slightly correlated with like instruments (rho = 0.2-0.45, Table).
Conclusion(s): The individual PsAID items did not correlate well with change in similar constructs over time. This may be due to the attribution of each symptom to PsA in the PSAID questionnaire. The assessed PsAID items cannot be used as close substitutes for the validated questionnaires with which they were compared