Try a new search

Format these results:

Searched for:

in-biosketch:true

person:schifp01

Total Results:

170


Growth inhibition induced by Ro 31-8220 and calphostin C in human glioblastoma cell lines is associated with apoptosis and inhibition of CDC2 kinase

Begemann, M; Kashimawo, S A; Lunn, R M; Delohery, T; Choi, Y J; Kim, S; Heitjan, D F; Santella, R M; Schiff, P B; Bruce, J N; Weinstein, I B
Protein kinase C (PKC) is a central component in signal transduction and growth control and might be an appropriate target for the chemotherapy of human brain tumors. This study demonstrates that the staurosporine derivative Ro 31-8220, a potent PKC inhibitor, inhibited the growth of 7 human brain tumor cell lines with an IC50 of about 2 microM. Calphostin C, a structurally unrelated PKC inhibitor, inhibited the growth of two of these cell lines with an IC50 of about 100 to 300 nM. Drug withdrawal and clonogenicity assays indicated that the growth inhibition by both of these compounds was irreversible. Morphologic studies, DNA fragmentation studies and flow cytometric assays showed that the treated glioblastoma cells underwent apoptosis. Treatment of glioblastoma cells with Ro 31-8220 lead to a rapid decline in the level of the anti-apoptosis protein bcl-2. At least three of the glioblastoma cell lines carried mutant p53 alleles with missense mutations in the DNA binding domain of p53. Therefore, the induction of apoptosis in these cell lines occurred through a p53-independent mechanism. Furthermore treatment of these glioblastoma cell lines with Ro 31-8220 or calphostin C led to an increase of cells in the G2-M phase of the cell cycle. This correlated with a decrease in CDC2-associated histone H1 kinase activity, as well as a decrease in the level of the CDC2 protein as shown by immunoblotting. When added to subcellular assays Ro 31-8220 markedly inhibited CDC2 histone H1 kinase activity with an IC50 of 100 nM, but calphostin C directly inhibited this kinase activity only at very high concentrations (above 100 microM). Thus these compounds inhibit the growth of glioblastoma cells through novel mechanisms. Ro 31-8220, in particular, might be a useful agent for the treatment of human brain tumors
PMID: 9858877
ISSN: 0250-7005
CID: 100728

Changes in biochemical disease-free survival rates as a result of adoption of the consensus conference definition in patients with clinically localized prostate cancer treated with external-beam radiotherapy

Ennis, R D; Malyszko, B K; Heitjan, D F; Rubin, M A; O'Toole, K M; Schiff, P B
PURPOSE: The optimal definition of biochemical recurrence of prostate cancer after definitive radiotherapy remains elusive. Different institutions have developed their own definitions, and a consensus conference (CC) sponsored by the American Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology has recently proposed another definition. This study compares the definition previously used at our institution with the definition proposed by the CC. METHODS: Two hundred and eight patients were treated for localized prostate cancer with conformal external-beam radiotherapy between 1989-1993 at our institution and followed for at least 24 months. Patients were categorized as failures according to our institutional definition and the CC definition. Our definition (CPMC) required two increases in serum prostate specific antigen (PSA) over at least a 3-month period with a final value of at least 1 ng/ml or a single value resulting in clinical intervention. The CC definition required three consecutive increases in PSA. This was modified to also consider those patients with one or two increases leading to clinical intervention as failures. Differences in the failure rates between the two definitions were evaluated and factors influencing these differences were explored. In an additional analysis, CC was modified such that patients with one or two PSA increases were censored at the time of the PSA prior to the increases (CC-II), rather than at the last PSA (CC). The median follow-up time was 31 months. RESULTS: There were 36 fewer failures according to CC (n = 96) compared with CPMC (n = 132) (p < 0.001). Twenty cases called failures by CPMC subsequently had a decrease in PSA ('false failures'). The other 16 patients have had two increases in PSA, but are awaiting their next follow-up visit to obtain a third PSA ('pending failures'). Analysis of factors predicting 'pending failures' showed Gleason score to be the sole predictor of this change in status in multivariate analysis (p = 0.03) with patients with lower-grade tumors being more likely to change status (Gleason 2-6: 15% vs. Gleason 7-10: 1%). On the other hand, 'false failures,' compared to true failures, had a lower mean PSA nadir (1.7 ng/ml vs. 7.0 ng/ml, p < 0.001) and significantly smaller mean increases in PSA (1st increase: 0.6 ng/ml vs. 3.4 ng/ml, p = 0.006; 2nd increase: 0.4 ng/ml vs. 4.8 ng/ml, p = 0.002). In 85% (17 of 20) of these patients, at least one of the increases was < or = 0.3 ng/ml compared with 44% (42 of 96) of the true failures (p = 0.0008). CC-II resulted in a small decrease in BDFS rates compared with CC, but did not affect the overall difference between CC and CPMC. A modified definition that defines failure as two consecutive increases in PSA over 3 months, with a final value greater than 1.0 ng/ml and each increase being at least 0.3 ng/ml, or three consecutive increases would result in a 'false' failure rate of only 3% (3 of 99) and identify 56% (54 of 96) of the true failures after only two PSA increases. CONCLUSION: The CPMC definition of two PSA increases can falsely identify patients as failures, particularly if the increases in PSA are small (i.e., < or = 0.3 ng/ml). The CC definition requiring three increases in PSA can falsely identify patients as disease-free when the time to failure is long relative to the follow-up time. We propose a that a definition that combines aspects of both definitions (two consecutive increases in PSA over 3 months, with a final value greater than 1.0 ng/ml and each increase being at least 0.3 ng/ml, or three consecutive increases) may be a better definition of biochemical failure
PMID: 9635696
ISSN: 0360-3016
CID: 100731

Treatment of human glioblastoma cells with the staurosporine derivative CGP 41251 inhibits CDC2 and CDK2 kinase activity and increases radiation sensitivity

Begemann, M; Kashimawo, S A; Heitjan, D F; Schiff, P B; Bruce, J N; Weinstein, I B
CGP, 41251, a staurosporine derivative, is a potent inhibitor of protein kinase C (PKC). In recent studies we found that this compound causes growth inhibition and induces apoptosis in human glioblastoma cell lines and also inhibits the growth of xenografts of a human astrocytoma. In this study we investigate its effects on cell cycle control. Treatment of glioblastoma or gliosarcoma cells with CGP 41251 lead to a time and dose dependent increase of the percentage of cells in the G2-M phase of the cell cycle. This correlated with a decrease of CDC2- and CDK2-associated histone H1 kinase activities as well as a decrease in the cellular level of the CDC2 protein. The decrease of CDC2- associated histone H1 kinase activity was detected within 5 hours, and there was complete inhibition after 24 hours. Assays of mixtures of cell extracts obtained from cultures treated with CGP 41251, the inactive analog CGP 42700, or untreated cultures indicated that this decrease was due to a decrease in the CDC2 kinase itself rather than the accumulation of an inhibitor of this kinase. In vitro assays in which CGP 41251 was added directly to the in vitro assay system revealed marked inhibition of both CDC2- and CDK2-associated kinase activity at about 1 microM. Thus CGP 41251 inhibits CDC2- and CDK2-associated kinase activities both in vivo and in vitro. Its biologic effects may, therefore, not be due simply to inhibition of PKC. Since cells in the G2-M phase of the cell cycle are relatively more sensitive to killing by gamma- radiation than cells in other phases of the cell cycle, we carried out radiosensitization studies. We found that CGP 41251 was a radiation sensitizer in two glioblastoma cell lines. Therefore, this compound may be useful in the treatment of glioblastomas, possibly in combination with radiation therapy
PMID: 9703866
ISSN: 0250-7005
CID: 100730

Biologic classification as an alternative to anatomic staging for clinically localized prostate cancer: a proposal based on patients treated with external beam radiotherapy

Ennis, R D; Malyszko, B K; Rescigno, J; Whitman, A E; Heitjan, D F; O'Toole, K M; Rubin, M; Schiff, P B
OBJECTIVES: The prognostic significance of clinical stage in patients with prostate cancer who are treated with external beam radiotherapy is unclear. This study evaluates multiple pretreatment factors, including clinical stage, to determine which are the best prognostic factors, and develops a classification system based on these factors. METHODS: All 249 evaluable patients with clinically localized adenocarcinoma of the prostate treated with definitive conformal external beam radiotherapy without androgen deprivation at our institution between 1989 and 1993 were analyzed. Clinical stage, serum PSA level, Gleason score, race, and history of transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP) were evaluated for their ability to predict biochemical disease-free survival (BDFS). Factors predictive of BDFS were then used to construct a classification system. The classification system was then analyzed for its ability to predict BDFS, distant metastases, local recurrence, and clinical disease free survival in univariate and multivariate analyses. Median follow-up was 27 months. RESULTS: Gleason score and PSA predicted BDFS in multivariate analysis (both P <0.0001), whereas clinical stage, race, and history of a TURP did not. These two biologic factors were combined into a four-level classification system. This classification system was analyzed together with Gleason score and PSA and was found to be the only predictor of BDFS on multivariate analysis (P <0.0001). In addition, this classification system was the only predictor of distant metastases in multivariate analysis (P <0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: The classification system derived herein based on the biologic factors of Gleason score and serum PSA levels is the sole predictor of distant metastases and biochemical recurrence for patients treated with definitive conformal external beam radiotherapy for clinically localized prostate cancer. This classification system may be useful when comparing competing therapies and stratifying patients in clinical trials, but requires validation from other institutions and other therapies prior to its widespread use
PMID: 9495709
ISSN: 0090-4295
CID: 100732

Pulsed-dose-rate brachytherapy: design of convenient (daytime-only) schedules

Brenner, D J; Schiff, P B; Huang, Y; Hall, E J
PURPOSE: To design pulsed-brachytherapy (PDR) protocols that are expected to be at least as clinically efficacious (in terms of both tumor control and late sequelae) as continuous low-dose-rate (CLDR) regimens, but that involve irradiation only during extended office hours. Both interstitial and intracavitary brachytherapy protocols are considered. METHODS AND MATERIALS: The linear quadratic formalism was used in which the late normal tissue damage and tumor control for one protocol relative to another are assumed to be determined primarily by the level of cellular survival. PDR schedules were designed in which pulses are delivered during 'extended office hours' (8 A.M. to 8 P.M.) with no irradiation overnight. Generally, the proposed PDR regimes last the same number of treatment days as the corresponding CLDR regimen, but the PDR treatment lasts longer on the final day (i.e., until 8 P.M.). PDR doses were calculated such as to produce a tumor control which is equivalent to standard CLDR protocols, and the corresponding predicted late complication rate was compared with that for CLDR. Ranges of plausible values for the half-times of sublethal damage repair for tumors and for late-responding normal tissues were considered. RESULTS: As has been previously shown, the efficacy of PDR relative to CLDR depends considerably on the repair rates for sublethal damage repair. Clinical and experimental evidence suggests that average repair half-times for early effects (e.g., tumor control) are less than about a half hour, and for late sequelae are more than about an hour. If these estimates are correct, daytime PDR regimes can usually be designed which take the same number of days as the corresponding CLDR regimen, but have comparable or better therapeutic ratios than CLDR. CONCLUSION: Protocols for PDR can be designed to involve irradiation only during extended office hours, that are likely to result in clinical results comparable or better than CLDR, for any expected combination of the repair half-times of early- and late-responding tissues. The suggested protocols allow all of the advantages of a computerized remote-controlled afterloader while preserving the benefits of low dose rate. In addition, the protocols could allow the patient to go home overnight, or to stay overnight in an adjacent medical inn or hospital-associated hotel, rather than in a hospital bed-which could have major economic benefits. In such an economic situation, an extra treatment day for the daytime PDR could well be considered, which would virtually guarantee an improved clinical advantage relative to CLDR
PMID: 9369127
ISSN: 0360-3016
CID: 100733

Re-examining the role of prostate-specific antigen density in predicting outcome for clinically localized prostate cancer

Ingenito, A C; Ennis, R D; Hsu, I C; Begg, M D; Benson, M C; Schiff, P B
OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the prognostic significance of prostate-specific antigen density (PSAD) in clinically localized prostate cancer and determine whether this index is independent of or superior to prostate-specific antigen (PSA) in predicting outcome of patients treated with external beam radiotherapy. METHODS: Between January 1989 and December 1993, 175 evaluable patients with clinically localized prostate cancer received definitive radiotherapy using computed tomography (CT)-guided conformal techniques. PSAD was defined as the ratio of the pretreatment serum PSA to the prostate volume measured from CT treatment planning scans by one investigator. All PSA values were determined using the Hybritech assay. Biochemical failure was defined as two consecutive elevations in PSA separated by at least 3 months and a final PSA value greater than 1 ng/mL. RESULTS: Multivariate analysis including PSA and Gleason score revealed both to be statistically significant predictors of biochemical disease-free survival (P = 0.048 and P < 0.001, respectively). PSAD did not achieve significance on regression analysis. A direct multivariate analysis including PSA and PSAD required dichotomization in order to reduce high correlation. This analysis demonstrated a relative risk (RR) for failure of 1.27 (NS) for high PSA versus low PSA compared with a RR of 1.20 (NS) for high PSAD versus low PSAD. A regression model containing all three variables indicated only the Gleason score as significant in predicting biochemical failure. CONCLUSIONS: These data do not suggest that PSAD is either an independent prognostic factor or a stronger discriminant of outcome than PSA in patients with clinically localized prostate cancer treated with definitive external beam radiotherapy. Larger patient numbers with longer follow-up data, use of a clinical end point, or an analysis restricted to the appropriate subgroup may demonstrate the utility of PSAD in the future
PMID: 9218022
ISSN: 0090-4295
CID: 100734

Detection of circulating prostate carcinoma cells via an enhanced reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction assay in patients with early stage prostate carcinoma. Independence from other pretreatment characteristics

Ennis, R D; Katz, A E; de Vries, G M; Heitjan, D F; O'Toole, K M; Rubin, M; Buttyan, R; Benson, M C; Schiff, P B
BACKGROUND: Circulating prostate cells can be detected in the venous blood of patients with clinically localized prostate carcinoma by applying reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) techniques using primers specific for the prostate specific antigen (PSA) gene. This study evaluates whether the detection of circulating cells correlates with established prognostic factors, treatment, and pathologic stage. METHODS: Two hundred and twenty-seven patients with clinically localized adenocarcinoma of the prostate had an RT-PCR assay performed as part of their staging evaluation. No treatment decisions were made on the basis of the RT-PCR results. Of these, 156 patients were treated with radical prostatectomy (RP) and 71 with radical external beam radiotherapy (EBRT). Forty-eight patients were treated with hormonal therapy prior to RP (n = 39) or EBRT (n = 9). The prognostic factors analyzed for their relationship to RT-PCR were clinical stage, pretreatment serum PSA levels, Gleason score of the biopsy specimen, and Gleason score of the surgical specimen. An analysis of the relationship between treatment and RT-PCR results was also performed. Multivariate logistic regression analysis of predictors of RT-PCR positivity was performed as well. In addition, univariate and multivariate analyses of predictors of pathologic stage, including RT-PCR, were performed. RESULTS: Sixty-one patients (26.9%) had a positive RT-PCR assay. There was no relationship between clinical stage, pretreatment PSA, biopsy Gleason score, or surgical Gleason score and RT-PCR positivity. In univariate analysis, patients treated with RP had a higher rate of RT-PCR positivity than patients treated with EBRT (P = 0.054). However, in multivariate logistic regression analysis no factor, including treatment with RP, was a significant predictor of RT-PCR positivity. RT-PCR and pretreatment PSA predicted pathologic stage in univariate and multivariate analyses (P < 0.0001 and P = 0.002, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: The detection of circulating prostate cells using RT-PCR occurs in approximately 25% of early stage prostate carcinoma patients and is independent of other established prognostic factors. In addition, a positive RT-PCR assay is a strong predictor of pathologic upstaging in patients with clinically organ-confined disease
PMID: 9191530
ISSN: 0008-543x
CID: 100735

Physician/patient-driven risk assignment in radiation oncology: reality or fancy?

Amols, H I; Zaider, M; Hayes, M K; Schiff, P B
PURPOSE: Treatment plan optimization in radiation oncology entails designing multiple x-ray beams to irradiate a tumor to a dose that will achieve locoregional control while minimizing normal tissue complications. For some anatomical sites, it is possible to estimate tumor control probabilities (TCP) and normal tissue complication probabilities (NTCP) as a function of radiation dose. Thus, treatment plan optimization can be based on biologic end points rather than on dose calculations alone. Given multiple plans with different NTCPs and TCPs, a tradeoff must be made between maximizing TCP and maintaining an acceptable NTCP. How do physicians reach these decisions? Can the process be quantified? Should patients participate in the process? METHODS AND MATERIALS: Physicians and patients were asked to rank a series of treatment plans having different combinations of TCP and NTCP. Responses were parametrized into a figure of merit (FM) equation which quantifies predilections of TCP and NTCP. RESULTS: Physician-based FM equations are site- and patient-specific. Variations exist among physicians, but treatment plan selection is often conservative in accordance with the primum non nocere dictum. FM equations generated from the responses of patients suggest that some patients may be willing to accept higher treatment toxicity in exchange for increased TCP. CONCLUSION: The term 'optimized treatment plan' contains inherently subjective criteria which reflect one's willingness to accept treatment morbidity in exchange for probability of cure. These criteria may differ among patients and/or physicians. A quantifiable FM may permit the design of custom-made treatment plans that include physician and patient input
PMID: 9231666
ISSN: 0360-3016
CID: 100736

Potential decreased morbidity of interstitial brachytherapy for gynecologic malignancies using laparoscopy: A pilot study [Meeting Abstract]

Choi, JC; Ingenito, AC; Nanda, RK; Smith, DH; Wuu, CS; Chin, LJ; Schiff, PB
ISI:A1997XW28000412
ISSN: 0360-3016
CID: 100768

Is there a role for adjuvant treatment in patients with T3N0M0 breast cancer treated by modified radical mastectomy? [Meeting Abstract]

Hayes, MK; Ravi, A; Antonacci, R; Schiff, PB
ISI:A1997YD97100335
ISSN: 0033-8419
CID: 100769