Faculty Bibliography

PURPOSE/OBJECTIVE:To determine whether the presence of an ultrasound hypoechoic region at the site of a MRI region of interest (ROI) results in improved prostate cancer (PCa) detection and predicts clinically significant PCa on MRI - ultrasound fusion targeted prostate biopsy (MRF-TB). MATERIALS AND METHODS/METHODS:Between July 2011 and June 2017, 1058 men who underwent MRF-TB and systematic biopsy by a single surgeon were prospectively entered into an IRB-approved database. MRI ROI were identified and scored for suspicion by a single radiologist. Each MRI ROI was prospectively evaluated for presence of a hypoechoic region at the site (ROI-HyR) by the surgeon and graded as 0,1,2 representing none, poorly demarcated, or well demarcated, respectively. Interaction of MRI suspicion score (mSS) and US grade (USG), and prediction of cancer detection rate (CDR) by USG, was evaluated by univariate and multivariate analysis. RESULTS:For 672 men, overall and Gleason Score (GS)≥7 CDR were 61.2% and 39.6%, respectively. CDR for USG 0,1,2 were 46.2%, 58.6%, 76.0% (p<0.001) for any cancer and 18.7%, 35.2%, 61.1% (p<0.001) for GS≥7, respectively. For MRF-TB only, GS≥7 CDR for USG 0,1,2 was 12.8%, 25.7%, 52.0% (p<0.001), respectively. On univariate analysis, among mSS 2-4, USG was predictive of GS≥7 CDR. Multivariable regression analysis revealed USG, PSAD, and mSS were predictive of GS≥7 PCa on MRF-TB. CONCLUSIONS:Ultrasound findings at the site of MRI ROI independently predict the likelihood of GS≥7 PCa, as men with a well demarcated ROI-HyR at the time of MRF-TB have a higher risk than men without.

INTRODUCTION/BACKGROUND:Penectomy for PC is useful in staging, disease prognosis, and treatment. Limited studies have evaluated its surgical complications. We sought to assess these complications and determine predictive models to create a novel risk score for penectomy complications. PATIENTS AND METHODS/METHODS:A retrospective review of patients undergoing PC surgical management from the 2005-2016 American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program was performed. Data were queried for partial and total penectomy among those with PC. To develop predictive models of complications, we fit LASSO logistic, random forest, and stepwise logistic models to training data using cross-validation, demographic, comorbidity, laboratory, and wound characteristics as candidate predictors. Each model was evaluated on the test data using receiver operating characteristic curves. A novel risk score was created by rounding coefficients from the LASSO logistic model. RESULTS:A total of 304 cases met the inclusion criteria. Overall incidence of penectomy complications was 19.7%, where urinary tract infection (3.0%), superficial surgical site infection (3.0%), and bleeding requiring transfusion (3.9%) were most common. LASSO logistic, random forest, and stepwise logistic models for predicting complications had area under the curve (AUC) [95% confidence interval] values of 0.66 [0.52-0.81], 0.73 [0.63-0.83], and 0.59 [0.45-0.74], respectively. Eleven variables were included in the risk score. The LASSO model-derived risk score had moderately good performance (area under the curve [95% confidence interval] 0.74 [0.66-0.82]). Using a cutoff point of 6, the score attains sensitivity 0.58, specificity 0.74, and kappa 0.26. CONCLUSION/CONCLUSIONS:PC management through penectomy is associated with appreciable complications rates. Predictive models of penectomy complications performed moderately well. Our novel prognostic risk score may allow for improved preoperative counseling and risk stratification of men undergoing surgical management of PC.

CONTEXT/BACKGROUND:- In Gleason score GS (7) prostate cancers, the quantity of Gleason pattern 4 (GP 4) is an important prognostic factor and influences treatment decisions. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-targeted biopsy has been increasingly used in clinical practice. OBJECTIVE:- To investigate whether MRI-targeted biopsy may detect GS 7 prostate cancer with greater GP 4 quantity, and whether it improves biopsy/radical prostatectomy GS concordance. DESIGN/METHODS:- A total of 243 paired standard and MRI-targeted biopsies with cancer in either standard or targeted or both were studied, 65 of which had subsequent radical prostatectomy. The biopsy findings, including GS and tumor volume, were correlated with the radical prostatectomy findings. RESULTS:- More prostate cancers detected by MRI-targeted biopsy were GS 7 or higher. Mean GP 4 percentage in GS 7 cancers was 31.0% ± 29.3% by MRI-targeted biopsy versus 25.1% ± 29.5% by standard biopsy. A total of 122 of 218 (56.0%) and 96 of 217 (44.2%) prostate cancers diagnosed on targeted biopsy and standard biopsy, respectively, had a GP 4 of 10% or greater ( P = .01). Gleason upgrading was seen in 12 of 59 cases (20.3%) from MRI-targeted biopsy and in 24 of 57 cases (42.1%) from standard biopsy ( P = .01). Gleason upgrading correlated with the biopsy cancer volume inversely and GP 4 of 30% or less in standard biopsy. Such correlation was not found in MRI-targeted biopsy. CONCLUSIONS:- Magnetic resonance imaging-targeted biopsy may detect more aggressive prostate cancers and reduce the risk of Gleason upgrading in radical prostatectomy. This study supports a potential role for MRI-targeted biopsy in the workup of prostate cancer and inclusion of percentage of GP 4 in the prostate biopsy reports.

OBJECTIVES/OBJECTIVE:Recent advances have led to the use of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) alone or with fusion to transrectal ultrasound (TRUS) images for guiding biopsy of the prostate. Our group sought to develop consensus recommendations regarding MRI-guided prostate biopsy based on currently available literature and expert opinion. METHODS:The published literature on the subject of MRI-guided prostate biopsy was reviewed using standard search terms and synthesized and analyzed by four different subgroups from among the authors. The literature was grouped into four categories-MRI-guided biopsy platforms, robotic MRI-TRUS fusion biopsy, template mapping biopsy and transrectal MRI-TRUS fusion biopsy. Consensus recommendations were developed using the Oxford Center for Evidence Based Medicine criteria. RESULTS:There is limited high level evidence available on the subject of MRI-guided prostate biopsy. MRI guidance with or without TRUS fusion can lead to fewer unnecessary biopsies, help identify high-risk (Gleason ≥ 3 + 4) cancers that might have been missed on standard TRUS biopsy and identify cancers in the anterior prostate. There is no apparent significant difference between MRI biopsy platforms. Template mapping biopsy is perhaps the most accurate method of assessing volume and grade of tumor but is accompanied by higher incidence of side effects compared to TRUS biopsy. CONCLUSIONS:Magnetic resonance imaging-guided biopsies are feasible and better than traditional ultrasound-guided biopsies for detecting high-risk prostate cancer and anterior lesions. Judicious use of MRI-guided biopsy could enhance diagnosis of clinically significant prostate cancer while limiting diagnosis of insignificant cancer.