Faculty Bibliography

Background: Unfavorable outcomes observed with stepwise linear ablation of non-paroxysmal AF (NPAF) in large clinical trials utilizing ablation catheters without contact-force sensing (CFS) may be attributable to pro-arrhythmic effects of incomplete ablation lines. The optimal ablation strategy for catheter ablation of NPAF using a contact force sensing radiofrequency (RF) ablation catheter remains unclear. Objective: To compare catheter ablation outcomes of stepwise linear ablation to left atrial (LA) posterior wall isolation in patients undergoing NPAF ablation using a CFS RF ablation catheter. Methods: We performed pulmonary vein antral isolation (PVAI) followed by isolation of the LA posterior wall in 80 consecutive patients undergoing first-time NPAF ablation between November 2015 and March 2016 (Group 1) and compared clinical outcomes to those of 112 consecutive patients who underwent PVAI followed by step-wise linear ablation for NPAF between May 2014 and November 2015 (Group 2). All ablation procedures were performed using the Carto 3 mapping system and SmartTouch RF ablation catheter (Biosense Webster, Inc.). Arrhythmia recurrence was assessed using 2-week event monitors at 3-month intervals. Arrhythmia-free survival at 12 months was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Results: Baseline characteristics of Group 1 and Group 2 were similar. At 12 months follow-up, arrhythmia-free survival was significantly greater in Group 1 patients compared with Group 2 (81.9% vs. 67.5%, respectively; p=0.0318). There was no significant difference in survival free from AF between group 1 and group 2 (89% vs. 84.1%, respectively; p=0.3431), however group 1 patients developed significantly fewer post-ablation atrial tachycardias (AT) than group 2 patients (8.1% vs 30.1%, respectively; p<0.001). Conclusion: Among patients undergoing NPAF ablation using a contact force sensing RF ablation catheter, LA posterior wall isolation resulted in fewer recurrent atrial arrhythmias than a stepwise linear approach. The reduction in recurrent atrial arrhythmias is driven primarily by a reduction in recurrent AT

Background: Pre-procedure time outs are integral to medicine to improve quality and safety. We hypothesized that a radiation safety time out for EP procedures would reduce radiation exposure levels for patients and staff. Objective: To design, implement and assess the effect of a radiation safety time out on radiation exposure in the EP lab. Methods: Baseline data on all adult EP procedures were collected for 6 months prior to implementation of the radiation safety time out. Upon implementation of the time out, data were collected prospectively with analyses to be performed every 3 months for up to 12 months. The primary endpoint was mean dose area product (DAP). Secondary endpoints were reference dose, fluoroscopy time, use of additional shielding, and use of alternative imaging. Results: The study was halted after three months. In total, 592 cases prior to the time out and 448 cases during implementation of the time out were included. Use of the time out resulted in a 22% reduction in the DAP (p = 0.013). The mean reference dose was also reduced by 26%. The use of additional radiation shields and ultrasound imaging for venous access increased significantly during the time out period. These differences remained significant when adjusted for BMI, proceduralist, and procedure type. There was no increase in procedure time or complications with the time out (Table). Conclusion: Implementation of a radiation safety time out significantly reduces radiation exposure during EP procedures. EP laboratories, as well as other areas of medicine that use fluoroscopy, should strongly consider the use of radiation safety time outs to reduce radiation exposures and improve safety. (Table presented)

Background: Analysis of the local unipolar electrogram aids premature ventricular contraction (PVC) localization in catheter ablation of idiopathic, outflow tract PVCs. A unipolar electrogram QS complex may be seen in the region of PVC origin, but the specificity of this finding is low. The unipolar anodal electrode utilized for PVC mapping is typically Wilson central terminal (WCT) or an indifferent electrode placed within the inferior vena cava (IVC). The optimal unipolar electrode selection for unipolar PVC mapping is unknown. Objective: To compare unipolar mapping of idiopathic outflow tract PVCs using WCT to unipolar mapping using an IVC electrode. Methods: PVC mapping and ablation was performed in 20 consecutive patients presenting for first-time ablation of idiopathic, outflow tract PVCs. The unipolar electrode utilized for initial mapping was randomly assigned and blinded to the operator. Mapping was performed using the CARTO 3 mapping system and SmartTouch RF ablation catheter (Biosense Webster, Inc.). Activation mapping and pace-mapping was performed at the discretion of the operator. Locations with a QS complex were annotated on the electroanatomic map. After a complete map was created blinded mapping was repeated with the alternate unipolar electrode prior to RF application. Results: PVCs were localized to the right ventricular outflow tract in 18 patients (90%) and to the left ventricular outflow tract in 2 patients (10%). Complete unipolar mapping could not be completed in 4 of 20 (20%) of cases due to infrequency of PVCs. In the 16 remaining patients, QS complex surface area was significantly larger with WCT than with the IVC electrode (3.11 +/- 1.8 cm² vs. 1.3 +/- 0.8 cm², p < 0.001). The IVC electrode QS area was completely within the WCT QS area in all cases, and the ratio of WCT QS area to IVC electrode QS area was 2.6 +/- 0.8 (range 1.8 to 4.4). The area of RF application at which PVCs were durably suppressed was within the IVC electrode QS area in all patients. Conclusion: Utilization of an indifferent IVC electrode may improve precision and specificity of unipolar mapping in catheter ablation of idiopathic, outflow tract PVCs

Introduction: Large clinical trials have recently demonstrated stepwise linear ablation for non-paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (NPAF) to be inferior to pulmonary vein isolation alone. It is unknown whether the unfavorable outcomes observed in these trials can be attributed to the pro-arrhythmic effects of incomplete ablation lines. We hypothesized that improved lesion quality related to use of contact-force sensing (CFS) ablation catheters would improve procedural outcomes. Methods: We prospectively analyzed procedural outcomes of 74 consecutive patients with NPAF undergoing first-time radiofrequency catheter ablation with a CFS catheter (Smart Touch, Biosense Webster) using a step-wise approach (Group 1). The clinical outcomes of these patients were compared with 74 consecutive patients with NPAF who underwent catheter ablation between September 2013 and June 2014 with a non-contact force sense radiofrequency ablation catheter (Group 2) at a single tertiary care medical center. Arrhythmia recurrence was assessed using 2-week event monitors at 3-month intervals following index ablation. Results: Baseline characteristics of Group 1 and Group 2 were similar, although in Group 1 there was a greater prevalence of patients with persistent NPAF lasting for 6-months or longer prior to initial ablation (43% vs 21%, p=0.071). The recurrence rate at 1 year as estimated by the Kaplan-Meier method was not significantly different between Group 1 and Group 2 (25.7% vs 29.7%, p=0.582). The presenting recurrent arrhythmia was most frequently atrial tachycardia (AT) in both groups (Group 1: n=19, AT 68.4% and AF 31.6% vs Group 2: n=22, AT 59.1% and AF 40.9%). A similar proportion of patients in both groups underwent repeat ablation (Group 1: 17.6% vs Group 2: 13.5%, p=0.496). Conclusions: Utilization of a CFS ablation catheter was not associated with improved clinical outcomes for stepwise catheter ablation for NPAF. The optimal strategy for NPAF ablation using a contact-force sensing catheter remains undefined