Faculty Bibliography

BACKGROUND:The purpose of this study was to examine outcomes of a patient cohort undergoing intervention for carotid blowout syndrome associated with head and neck cancer. METHODS:Patients with head and neck cancer who presented with carotid distribution bleeding from 2000 to 2014 were identified in the medical record. Primary outcomes were short- and midterm mortality and recurrent bleeding. Standard statistical methods and survival analysis were used to analyze study population characteristics and outcomes. RESULTS:Thirty-seven patients were included in the study. The mean age was 60.1 ± 11.4 years (74% male). All malignancies were squamous cell type, stage IV, in a variety of primary locations: 32% oral cavity, 24% larynx, 16% superficial neck, with the remainder in the oropharynx, nasopharynx, and hypopharynx. Fifty-one percent of bleeds were of common carotid, 29% external carotid, and 19% internal carotid origin. Among the patients, 68% presented with acute hemorrhage, 24% with impending bleed, and 8% with threatened bleed. All patients underwent intervention: 38% received endovascular coil embolization, 30% stent grafts, 22% surgical ligation, and 10% primary vessel repair or bypass grafting. Although major complications were rare, 10.8% of patients had perioperative stroke. Sixteen recurrent bleeding episodes involving 12 arteries occurred in 11 patients (29.73%). Median rebleeding time was 7 days (interquartile range, 6-49). Estimated recurrent bleeding risk at 30 days and 6 months was 24% and 34%, respectively. Of the patients, 91.9% survived to hospital discharge. The 90-day and 1-year estimated survivals were 60.9% and 36.6%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS:Carotid blowout syndrome associated with head and neck cancer carries poor mid- and long-term prognoses; however, mortality may be related more to the advanced stage of disease rather than carotid involvement or associated intervention. Both surgical and endovascular approaches may be efficacious in cases of acute hemorrhage but carry a significant risk of periprocedural stroke and recurrent bleeding.

IMPORTANCE:Salivary duct carcinoma is a rare, aggressive malignancy of the salivary glands. Owing to its rare nature, clinical data are limited, and only a few clinical studies comprise more than 50 patients. OBJECTIVE:To review the University of Pittsburgh Medical Center's experience with salivary duct carcinoma over a 20-year period, focusing on demographics, presentation, treatment, and outcome. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS:This investigation was a retrospective cohort study in a multihospital institution with tertiary referral. A pathology database was reviewed for all cases of histopathologically diagnosed salivary duct carcinoma from January 1, 1995, to October 20, 2014. Patients who were referrals for pathology review only and were never seen at the institution were excluded. In total, 75 study patients were identified. The electronic medical record was reviewed for details regarding demographics, presentation, treatment, and outcome, including overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS). This study was supplemented with a review of the institution's Head and Neck Oncology Database for further clinical details. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES:Primary outcome measures consisted of OS and DFS. RESULTS:The study sample comprised 75 participants with a mean age at diagnosis of 66.0 years (age range, 33-93 years), and 29% (n = 22) were female. Most primary tumors were from the parotid gland (83%), with the next most frequent site being the submandibular gland (12%). Overall, 41% of the cases were carcinoma ex pleomorphic adenoma. Rates of other histologic features included the following: perineural invasion (69%), extracapsular spread (58%), ERBB2 (formerly HER2) positivity (31%) (62% of those who were tested), and vascular invasion (61%). The median OS was 3.1 years, and the median DFS was 2.7 years. Univariate Kaplan-Meier survival analyses demonstrated that facial nerve sacrifice and extracapsular spread were associated with lower OS (2.38 vs 5.11 years and 2.29 vs 6.56 years, respectively) and DFS (2.4 vs 3.88 years and 1.44 vs 4.5 years, respectively). Although underpowered, multivariable analysis demonstrated significantly worse OS in patients with N2 and N3 disease (hazard ratio [HR] 8.42, 95% CI, 1.84-38.5) but did not show significantly worse DFS or OS for facial nerve sacrifice or extracapsular spread. There was no association between ERBB2 positivity and survival and no difference in survival between patients receiving radiation therapy vs radiation therapy plus chemotherapy. No patients had recurrence or distant metastasis after 5 disease-free years. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE:Salivary duct carcinoma is an aggressive disease. A large number of cases in this review were carcinoma ex pleomorphic adenoma and had classic negative prognostic indicators, such as perineural invasion, vascular invasion, and extracapsular spread. ERBB2 positivity was not associated with any difference in survival. Facial nerve involvement appears to indicate worse prognosis, as does nodal stage higher than N1. Recurrence and metastasis after 5 years are rare.

BACKGROUND:Transoral robotic-assisted surgery (TORS) carries a small, but not insignificant, risk of life-threatening postsurgical hemorrhage. The purpose of this study was to analyze all post-TORS hemorrhagic events at our institution to establish preventative recommendations. METHODS:We conducted a retrospective review of 224 consecutive patients who underwent TORS for any indication at a single tertiary care institution. RESULTS:Twenty-two patients (n = 22; 9.82%) had varying degrees of postoperative bleeding. An impaired ability to protect the airway at the time of hemorrhage increased the rate of severe complications. Prophylactic transcervical arterial ligation did not significantly decrease overall postoperative bleeding rates (9.1% vs 9.9%; p = 1.00); however, there was a trend toward decreased hemorrhage severity in prophylactically ligated patients (3.0% vs 7.3%; p = .7040). CONCLUSION:Prophylactic transcervical arterial ligation may reduce the incidence of severe bleeding following TORS. Post-TORS patients displaying an inability to protect the airway should be strongly considered for prophylactic tracheostomy to assist airway protection. © 2015 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Head Neck 38: E776-E782, 2016.

BACKGROUND:Increasing evidence exists that tumor volume may be a superior prognostic model than traditional TNM staging. It has been observed that oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (oropharyngeal SCC) in the setting of human papillomavirus (HPV) positivity have a greater propensity for cystic nodal metastases, and, thus, presumably larger volume with relatively smaller primary tumors. The influence of HPV status on the predictive value of tumor volume is unknown. METHODS:Fifty-three patients with HPV-positive oropharyngeal SCC were treated with definitive chemotherapy and intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT). RESULTS:The estimated 2-year overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) was 92.2% and 83.6%, respectively. Nodal classification did not predict OS (p = .096) or DFS (p = .170). Similarly, T classification did not predict OS (p = .057) or DFS (p = .309). Lower nodal volume was associated with greater DFS (p = .001). CONCLUSION:Nodal tumor volume was found to be predictive of DFS. DFS was best predicted by nodal gross tumor volume (GTV) at 24 months. © 2015 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Head Neck 38: E1613-E1617, 2016.

The use of external-beam radiotherapy (EBRT) in differentiated thyroid cancer (DTC) is debated because of a lack of prospective clinical data, but recent retrospective studies have reported benefits in selected patients. The Endocrine Surgery Committee of the American Head and Neck Society provides 4 recommendations regarding EBRT for locoregional control in DTC, based on review of literature and expert opinion of the authors. (1) EBRT is recommended for patients with gross residual or unresectable locoregional disease, except for patients <45 years old with limited gross disease that is radioactive iodine (RAI)-avid. (2) EBRT should not be routinely used as adjuvant therapy after complete resection of gross disease. (3) After complete resection, EBRT may be considered in select patients >45 years old with high likelihood of microscopic residual disease and low likelihood of responding to RAI. (4) Cervical lymph node involvement alone should not be an indication for adjuvant EBRT.

Training and credentialing for robotic surgery in otolaryngology - head and neck surgery is currently not standardized, but rather relies heavily on industry guidance. This manuscript represents a comprehensive review of this increasingly important topic and outlines clear recommendations to better standardize the practice. The recommendations provided can be used as a reference by individuals and institutions alike, and are expected to evolve over time. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Head Neck 38: E151-E158.

OBJECTIVE:Assess the use and potential benefits of a new robotic system for transoral radical tonsillectomy, transoral supraglottic laryngectomy, and retroauricular thyroidectomy in a cadaver dissection. METHODS:Three previously described robotic procedures (transoral radical tonsillectomy, transoral supraglottic laryngectomy, and retroauricular thyroidectomy) were performed in a cadaver using the da Vinci Xi Surgical System. Surgical exposure and access, operative time, and number of collisions were examined objectively. RESULTS:The new robotic system was used to perform transoral radical tonsillectomy with dissection and preservation of glossopharyngeal nerve branches, transoral supraglottic laryngectomy, and retroauricular thyroidectomy. There was excellent exposure without any difficulties in access. Robotic operative times (excluding set-up and docking times) for the 3 procedures in the cadaver were 12.7, 14.3, and 21.2 minutes (excluding retroauricular incision and subplatysmal elevation), respectively. No robotic arm collisions were noted during these 3 procedures. The retroauricular thyroidectomy was performed using 4 robotic ports, each with 8 mm instruments. CONCLUSIONS:The use of updated and evolving robotic technology improves the ease of previously described robotic head and neck procedures and may allow surgeons to perform increasingly complex surgeries.

UNLABELLED:Despite advances in treatment approaches for head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC), survival rates have remained stagnant due to the paucity of preclinical models that accurately reflect the human tumor. Patient-derived xenografts (PDX) are an emerging model system where patient tumors are implanted directly into mice. Increased understanding of the application and limitations of PDXs will facilitate their rational use. Studies to date have not reported protein profiles of PDXs. Therefore, we developed a large cohort of HNSCC PDXs and found that tumor take rate was not influenced by the clinical, pathologic, or processing features. Protein expression profiles, from a subset of the PDXs, were characterized by reverse-phase protein array and the data was compared with The Cancer Genome Atlas HNSCC data. Cluster analysis revealed that HNSCC PDXs were more similar to primary HNSCC than to any other tumor type. Interestingly, while a significant fraction of proteins were expressed similarly in both primary HNSCC and PDXs, a subset of proteins/phosphoproteins were expressed at higher (or lower) levels in PDXs compared with primary HNSCC. These findings indicate that the proteome is generally conserved in PDXs, but mechanisms for both positive and negative model selection and/or differences in the stromal components exist. IMPLICATIONS/CONCLUSIONS:Proteomic characterization of HNSCC PDXs demonstrates potential drivers for model selection and provides a framework for improved utilization of this expanding model system.

OBJECTIVES/OBJECTIVE:The aim of this study is to describe the feasibility as well as oncologic outcomes of robot-assisted neck dissection (RAND) through a modified facelift incision in an American population. STUDY DESIGN/METHODS:Retrospective case series. SETTING/METHODS:University tertiary care hospital. METHODS:All patients who underwent RAND between November 2012 and December 2014 were included. Medical records were reviewed for demographics, medical histories, staging, operative information, postoperative hospital course and complications, and oncologic outcomes. RESULTS:There were 11 RANDs identified among 10 patients. Five patients had known nodal metastasis at the time of surgery. Two patients had been previously irradiated. The average time of surgery was 284.4 ± 72.3 minutes, including other associated procedures. The average lymph node yield was 28.5 ± 9.3 nodes. There were no major complications. Average follow-up was 19.4 months. There was 1 supraclavicular recurrence in a previously irradiated patient. All patients are currently alive and without evidence of disease. CONCLUSIONS:Robot-assisted neck dissection is a safe and feasible procedure that can be performed by surgeons with familiarity with neck dissection and robot-assisted surgery and who have been trained in RAND. Appropriate oncologic outcomes can be obtained in a patient wishing to avoid a noticeable scar.

STUDY OBJECTIVE/OBJECTIVE:Postoperative pulmonary complications (PPCs) are significant problems in patients undergoing radical head and neck cancer surgery with free flap reconstruction. The objective of the study was to identify the incidence, outcome, and risk factors for PPCs We hypothesized that preoperative pulmonary disease and amount of fluid administered during the surgery would be associated with PPCs. DESIGN/METHODS:A retrospective clinical observational study. SETTING/METHODS:A large academic institution. SUBJECTS/METHODS:A total of 110 patients who underwent head and neck cancer surgery with microvascular free flap reconstruction between January 1, 2005 and December 31, 2011. INTERVENTIONS/METHODS:No study interventions were performed. MEASUREMENTS/METHODS:PPCs including pulmonary edema, pneumonia, and acute respiratory distress syndrome were clinically diagnosed. Perioperative parameters and outcomes among patients with and without PPCs were compared. Factors predictive of PPCs were identified with univariate and multiple logistic regression analyses. MAIN RESULTS/RESULTS:The incidence of PPCs was 32.7% (36 patients): pulmonary edema in 23.6% (26) and pneumonia in 9.1% (10). No acute respiratory distress syndrome was found. Inhospital mortality was 1.8% (2). No difference was found in survival between the patients with PPCs and those without (1 year survival was 69.4% vs 78.4%; P=.85). The patients with PPCs required longer ventilation support (median, 4 vs 2days; P=.002) and more frequent intensive care unit readmissions (30.3% vs 5.7%; P=.001) and stayed longer in the hospital (median, 17 vs 12days; P=.014). None of the preoperative parameters or intraoperative parameters including pulmonary comorbidity or the amounts of intraoperative fluid/blood administration was found as the factor to predict postoperative pulmonary compilations. CONCLUSION/CONCLUSIONS:The incidence of PPCs in patients undergoing radical head and neck surgery was 32.7% in 110 patients. Preoperative pulmonary disease or the amount of fluid administered during the surgery was not associated with PPCs.