Faculty Bibliography

The Society for Vascular Surgery Lower Extremity Threatened Limb Classification System has been developed to stratify amputation risk on the basis of extent of the wound, level of ischemia, and severity of foot infection (WIfI). However, there are no currently validated metrics to assess, grade, and consider functional status, especially ambulatory status, as a major consideration during limb salvage efforts. Therefore, we propose an adjunct to the current WIfI system to include the patient's ambulatory functional status after initial assessment of limb threat. We propose a functional ambulatory score divided into grade 0, ambulation outside the home with or without an assistive device; grade 1, ambulation within the home with or without an assistive device; grade 2, minimal ambulation, limbs used for transfers; and grade 3, a person who is bed-bound. Adding ambulatory function as a supplementary assessment tool can guide clinical decision making to achieve optimal future functional ambulatory outcome, a patient-centered goal as critical as limb preservation. This adjunct may aid limb preservation teams in rapid, effective communication and clinical decision making after initial WIfI assessment. It may also improve efforts toward patient-centered care and functional ambulatory outcome as a primary objective. We suggest a score of functional ambulatory status should be included in future trials of patients with chronic limb-threatening ischemia.

OBJECTIVE:Upper extremity and neck access is commonly used for complex endovascular aortic repairs. We sought to compare perioperative stroke and other complications of (1) arm/neck (AN) and femoral or iliac access versus femoral/iliac (FI) access alone, (2) right- versus left-sided AN, and (3) specific arm versus neck access sites. METHODS:Patients entered in the thoracic endovascular aortic repair/complex endovascular aortic repair registry in the Vascular Quality Initiative from 2009 to 2018 were analyzed. Patients with a missing access variable and aortic arch proximal landing zone were excluded. The primary outcome was perioperative in-hospital stroke. Secondary outcomes were other postoperative complications and 1-year survival. Kaplan-Meier curves and log-rank test were used for survival analysis. RESULTS:Of 11,621 patients with 11,774 recorded operations, 6691 operations in 6602 patients met criteria for analysis (1418 AN, 5273 FI). AN patients had a higher rate of smoking history (83.6% vs 76.1%; P < .0001), and prior stroke (12.6% vs 10.1%; P = .01). Operative time (280 ± 124 minutes vs 157 ± 102 minutes; P < .0001), contrast load (141 ± 82 mL vs 103 ± 67 mL; P < .0001), and estimated blood loss (300 mL vs 100 mL; P < .0001) were larger in the AN group, indicative of greater complexity cases. Overall, AN had a higher rate of stroke (3.1% vs 1.8%; P = .003) compared with FI and on multivariable analysis AN access was found to be an independent risk factor for stroke (odds ratio, 1.97; P = .0003). There was no difference in stroke when comparing right- and left-sided AN access (2.8% vs 3.2%; P = .71). Stroke rates were similar between arm, axillary, and multiple access sites, but were significantly higher in patients with carotid access (2.6% vs 3.5% vs 13% vs 3.7%; P = .04). AN also had higher rates of puncture site hematoma, access site occlusion, arm ischemia, and in-hospital mortality (7.1% vs 4.2%; P < .0001). At 1 year, AN had a lower survival rate (85.1% vs 88.1%; P = .03). CONCLUSIONS:Upper extremity and neck access for complex aortic repairs has a higher risk of stroke compared with femoral and iliac access alone. Right-sided access does not have a higher stroke rate than left-sided access. Carotid access has a higher stroke rate than axillary, arm, and multiple arm/neck access sites.

BACKGROUND:Surgical training is constantly adapting to better prepare trainees for an evolving landscape of surgical practice. Training in vascular surgery additionally underwent a paradigm shift with the introduction of the integrated training pathway now more than a decade ago. With this study, we sought to characterize the needs and goals of our current vascular surgery trainee population. METHODS:The Association of Program Directors in Vascular Surgery Issues Committee compiled a survey to assess demographics, current needs, and goals of trainees and to evaluate trainee distress using a validated seven-item Physician Well-Being Index. The survey was distributed electronically to all current vascular surgery trainees and recent graduates in the academic years 2016-2017 and 2017-2018, and responses were recorded anonymously. RESULTS:During the 2 years of the survey, the response rate was 30% (n = 367/1196). The respondents were 55% (n = 202) integrated vascular residents and 45% (n = 165) vascular surgery fellows. In each year of the survey, 60% (n = 102/170) and 58% (n = 86/148) of trainees expressed a desire to pursue academics in their careers, whereas 37% (n = 63/174) and 35% (n = 53/152) indicated their program had structured academic development time (2016-2017 and 2017-2018, respectively). Fifty-five percent (n = 96/174) and 52% (n = 79/152) stated that the overall impact of collaborative learners was positive. More than 60% of respondents in both years of the survey indicated experiencing one or more symptoms of distress on a weekly basis. The frequency of distress was associated with older age and with the presence of an advanced degree in both years of the survey. Sex, level of training, presence of collaborative learners, and having protected research time were not associated with frequency of distress in either year of the survey. CONCLUSIONS:These results highlight an opportunity for programs to further evaluate the needs of their trainees for academic development during vascular surgery training to better accommodate trainees' career goals. Further investigation to identify modifiable risk factors for distress among vascular surgery trainees is warranted.

OBJECTIVE:Treatment of type B aortic dissections with thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) has been adopted in many centers with the goal of covering the proximal entry tear. Coverage of the left subclavian artery (LSCA) is commonly required to achieve a dissection-free proximal seal zone. A novel thoracic single side-branched (TSSB) endograft device offers a potential off-the-shelf option to achieve total endovascular incorporation of LSCA during zone 2 TEVAR. The aim of this study was to determine what percentage of patients with type B aortic dissection who require zone 2 TEVAR meet the anatomical requirements for this device. METHODS:All consecutive patients undergoing TEVAR for type B aortic dissections at a single institution from 2006 to 2016 were evaluated. Three-dimensional centerline reconstruction of preoperative computed tomography angiography was performed to identify the diameter of the aorta, distances between branch vessels, diameter of the target branch vessel, and location of the primary entry tear. Only patients who met criteria for zone 2 TEVAR were included in the analysis. The primary outcome was percentage of patients that meet all anatomical requirements for TSSB. Individual criteria were evaluated independently, and results were stratified by dissection chronicity. RESULTS:Eighty-seven patients who underwent TEVAR for Stanford type B aortic dissections were reviewed. Fifty-seven (66%) would have required zone 2 TEVAR. Indications for TEVAR were malperfusion (12), aneurysm (15), persistent pain (22), rupture (3), uncontrolled hypertension (5), and other (3). Mean follow-up was 19 months (range, 1-72 months). Only 16 of the 57 patients (28%) met all the requirements for anatomic suitability. The primary contributor was that only 49% of patients had sufficient length between arch branches to prevent coverage of a proximal branch. CONCLUSIONS:Although the new TSSB device can allow for a more proximal seal zone and eliminate the need for open aortic arch debranching, only 28% of patients with type B dissection who required zone 2 TEVAR met all the anatomic requirements for this device. Future devices will need to account for the short distance between the left carotid and LSCA to be more broadly applicable.

Mortality after gunshot wounds to the thoracic aorta ranges from 92% to 100%. Survival is almost always in patients with injury from low-caliber, low-velocity bullets with hemorrhage contained by the wall of the aorta. Bullet embolization, even rarer with a reported incidence of 0.3% of vascular injuries, is most commonly found during autopsy. We report the successful treatment and survival of a patient who presented with a large-caliber gunshot wound to the aortic arch with contained rupture and bullet embolization from the aortic arch to the superficial femoral artery. The patient remained functionally independent and was discharged without complication.

Chronic type B aortic dissections with continued aneurysmal expansion of the thoracoabdominal aorta after the initial thoracic endovascular aortic repair represent a subset of aortic pathology in which staged distal extension to seal additional septal tears can be advantageous. This approach may require incorporation of visceral or renal branches into the distal seal zone, while maintaining the possibility of further distal extension in the future. We describe a novel technique for incorporation of the celiac axis, with a branch stent graft delivered from a transfemoral approach, then lifted cranially to create an antegrade sandwich graft configuration in a 59-year-old male who presented with a complicated type B aortic dissection requiring coverage of the celiac artery. Utilizing the previous thoracic endograft as a platform for sandwich grafting, a self-expanding stent graft was deployed into the celiac artery from a femoral approach. A steerable sheath with an anchoring balloon was used to lift the stent into an up-facing snorkel position, which was subsequently sandwiched with another thoracic stent graft terminating proximal to the superior mesenteric artery. When single visceral or renal branch incorporation is desired, sandwich grafting via a "lift" technique limits the extent of aortic coverage and reduces the number of branch components, without increasing the complexity of additional visceral and renal branch incorporation during future endovascular aortic repair.

The search for etiology of stroke in a young patient may present a diagnostic challenge. In rare cases, chronic trauma to the carotid artery may be the cause of cerebral thromboembolic events. The hyoid bone lies in close proximity to the carotid artery bifurcation, and anatomic variants have been implicated in carotid compression, stenosis, dissection, and pseudoaneurysm. We report a case of recurrent strokes in a 32-year-old woman due to an elongated hyoid bone causing thrombus formation in her right internal carotid artery (ICA), resulting in recurrent embolic strokes confirmed on diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging. Computed tomography angiography of the neck and head demonstrated the right hyoid bone was located between the ICA and external carotid artery (ECA), just above the carotid bifurcation, with residual nonocclusive thrombus in the right ICA. Carotid duplex ultrasonography confirmed that with the neck in neutral position, the hyoid was located between the ICA and ECA; however, with neck rotation, the hyoid slipped across the ICA and out of the bifurcation. There was no evidence of carotid stenosis. After an initial course of anticoagulation and antiplatelet therapy, resection of the greater cornu of the hyoid bone with release of the right ICA was performed. One year postoperatively, the patient had complete return of neurologic function and had no further neurologic events. Hyoid bone entrapment of the carotid artery is a rare etiology of thromboembolic stroke caused by repetitive local trauma. The diagnosis can be confirmed by carotid duplex with provocative maneuvers. Partial hyoid resection is a safe and effective treatment to relieve recurrent symptoms. Hyoid bone entrapment may be an important and under-recognized cause of stroke in young adults.

Perforation of inferior vena cava (IVC) filter struts is a common incidental finding on postoperative computed tomography (CT) scans that is not associated with bleeding or major complications. However, in rare circumstances, it can be associated with hemorrhage requiring immediate removal. We present a case of a 62-year-old man who developed abdominal pain and right lower extremity weakness 2 weeks after treatment of a pulmonary embolism with IVC filter placement and anticoagulation. A CT scan revealed a large right-sided retroperitoneal hematoma with active extravasation from the IVC filter struts that had perforated the IVC wall. He underwent a hybrid operation with endovascular retrieval of the IVC filter and concomitant IVC primary repair combined with evacuation of the hematoma, causing nerve compression. Postoperatively, he regained normal sensory and motor function. Perforation of IVC filter struts is usually asymptomatic, but in rare circumstances, it can cause hemorrhage requiring immediate removal and IVC repair. Surgical intervention is indicated in the setting of a large hematoma with nerve or vessel compression and may require a combined endovascular and open approach.

BACKGROUND:Iliofemoral vein thrombosis can lead to debilitating edema and venous claudication that significantly worsens quality of life, especially in young active individuals. Venous reconstruction becomes increasingly complex and has worsening patency with subsequent revisions so preoperative planning is critical to success. METHODS:We report a case of a 54-year-old man in active military service with profoundly symptomatic leg swelling after failure of 3 previous common femoral vein (CFV) reconstructions. The CFV and distal external iliac vein were thrombosed up to a few centimeters above the inguinal ligament. Direct proximal control would have required a retroperitoneal or transabdominal incision. However, a hybrid approach utilizing through-wire access, remote balloon control of the external iliac vein, cryopreserved vein graft, stent graft, and arteriovenous fistula was able to address the factors (graft size, external compression, adequate flow) contributing to his previous graft failures with a novel, less invasive approach. RESULTS:At 1-year follow-up, he was asymptomatic and the graft remained patent with normal vascular duplex studies. His leg swelling subsided and he was able to return to his previous physical activity level. CONCLUSIONS:A hybrid approach to complex venous reconstruction can provide a minimally invasive and durable alternative to more invasive procedures and alleviate mechanical causes of early graft failure.

OBJECTIVE:Inferior vena cava (IVC) injuries are potentially lethal and require prompt intervention. Repair of complex IVC injuries may require the use of a prosthetic graft or a complicated panel or spiral vein graft reconstruction to avoid the need for ligation. Collateral venous drainage may be sufficient to allow acceptable results from IVC ligation; however, previous studies have suffered from low numbers and have differing results. The aims of this study were to assess the outcomes of isolated IVC injuries overall and to compare IVC ligation with repair. METHODS:Patients in the National Trauma Data Bank from 2007 to 2014 with an IVC injury were evaluated. Isolated IVC injury was defined as patients with nonvascular Abbreviated Injury Scale scores <4 and no other named vascular injury. The primary outcome was mortality; secondary outcomes were in-hospital amputation-free survival, major lower extremity amputation, lower extremity compartment syndrome, acute kidney injury (AKI), deep venous thrombosis (DVT), and pulmonary embolism (PE). RESULTS:Overall, 1075 (0.018%) patients had IVC injuries and 443 met inclusion criteria. On univariate analysis, in comparing IVC ligation and primary repair, ligation was not associated with mortality (23% vs 16%; P = .102) but was associated with blunt mechanism (22% vs 11%; P = .009), higher fasciotomy rate (11% vs 0%; P < .001), trend toward lower in-hospital amputation-free survival (76% vs 84.4%, P = .056), and higher rates of AKI (9% vs 4%; P = .060) and PE (3% vs 1%, P = .087). Similarly, major lower extremity amputation, compartment syndrome, and DVT were not different between groups. IVC ligation was not independently associated with mortality (adjusted odds ratio [AOR], 1.54; P = .197), in-hospital amputation-free survival (AOR, 0.61; P = .141), major amputation (AOR, Inf; P = .99), lower extremity compartment syndrome (AOR, 0.82; P = .827), or PE (AOR, 6.72; P = .052), but it was independently associated with fasciotomy (AOR, 31.4; P = .002), AKI (AOR, 2.7; P = .048), and DVT (AOR, 2.3; P = .021). CONCLUSIONS:IVC ligation was not independently associated with mortality or lower extremity amputation, but it was associated with AKI and need for fasciotomy.