Faculty Bibliography

BACKGROUND: Darinaparsin is a novel organic arsenic that reaches higher intracellular concentration with decreased toxicity compared to inorganic arsenic. We conducted a multi-center phase II study with darinaparsin in patients with advanced HCC. METHODS: Eligibility criteria included unresectable or metastatic measurable HCC, up to two prior systemic treatments, ECOG performance status < or = 2, Child Pugh Class A or B and adequate organ functions. Darinaparsin was administered at 420 mg/m(2) intravenously, twice weekly at least 72 h apart for 3 weeks in a 4-week cycle. The primary end point was response rate. A Simon two-stage design was used. RESULTS: Among 15 patients in the first stage, no objective responses were observed. Two patients had stable disease. The median number of cycles on study per patient was 2 (1-6). The median progression free survival and overall survival were 55 days (95% confidence interval: 50-59) and 190 days (95% confidence interval: 93-227), respectively. No treatment related hospitalizations or deaths occurred. Treatment related grade 1-2 toxicities included nausea, vomiting (26.7% each), fatigue (20%), anorexia and diarrhea (13.3% each). Grade 3 anorexia, wheezing, agitation, abdominal pain and SGPT were observed in 1 patient each (6.7%). One patient experienced grade 4 hypoglycemia (6.7%). CONCLUSIONS: Darinaparsin could be safely administered with tolerable toxicity profiles, and no QTc prolongation in patients with advanced HCC. However, at this dose and schedule, it has shown no objective responses in HCC and this trial was terminated as planned after the first stage of efficacy analysis

PURPOSE: Dose-dense regimens have been shown to improve outcome when given as adjuvant therapy to patients with breast cancer compared with their three weekly counterparts. We investigated the feasibility of a dose-dense regimen with carboplatin/paclitaxel followed by pegfilgrastim in patients with advanced ovarian cancer. We also investigated the toxicities including the percentage of patients with grade 2 or greater peripheral neurotoxicity and the clinical response of this regimen. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Women with untreated Stage III or IV epithelial ovarian, (fallopian) tubal, or primary peritoneal cancer were treated with carboplatin area under the curve (AUC) 5 and paclitaxel 175 mg/m(2) day one, and pegfilgrastim 6 mg day two every 2 weeks for six cycles. RESULTS: Between 9/06 and 9/08, 43 patients enrolled. Thirty-one patients completed six or more cycles of therapy. The dose limiting toxicities resulting in treatment discontinuation included: grade 3 and 4 neuropathy, grade 4 thrombocytopenia, grade 4 thrombocytopenia/grade 3 febrile neutropenia, and grade 4 supraventricular tachycardia. Twelve patients (30%) had >or=grade 2 neuropathy from this regimen. The overall response rate in patients with measurable disease was 58% (11 out of 19). CONCLUSION: Dose-dense carboplatin/paclitaxel appears to be effective. However, based on dose limiting toxicities occurring when administering 6 cycles of treatment, it is not feasible. Given the neuropathy and thrombocytopenia, we do not recommend 6 cycles of this regimen without modification

BACKGROUND: Cisplatin is a highly effective chemotherapeutic agent against epithelial ovarian cancer but is associated with significant toxicities. SPI-77 is a liposomal pegylated formulation of cisplatin that was developed to reduce systemic toxicity and to better deliver cisplatin to tumors. We assessed the response rates and safety of SPI-77, in patients with recurrent epithelial ovarian cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients were selected for having previously achieved a platinum treatment free interval of greater than 6 months (e.g. platinum-sensitive) and high potential of achieving responses when rechallenged with a platinum drug. SPI-77 was administered at a dose of 260 mg/m(2) every 21 days until disease progression. RESULTS: Enrollment was terminated after 5 patients were treated because of concern with the adequacy of the formulation. Four out of the five patients had stable disease as best response. While no serious, unexpected adverse events occurred in spite of large cumulative doses of SPI-77, there were concerns related to the large lipid load and prolonged persistence of residual platinum in body stores. CONCLUSION: The results of this study, although inconclusive regarding its primary endpoints, provide some important lessons for the development of similar liposomal platinum agents

BACKGROUND: Ixabepilone (BMS-247550), an epothilone B analog, is a microtubule stabilizing agent which has shown activity in several different tumor types and preclinical models in melanoma. In an open label, one-arm, multi-center phase II trial the efficacy and toxicity of this epothilone was investigated in two different cohorts: chemotherapy-naive (previously untreated) and previously treated patients with metastatic melanoma. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: Eligible patients had histologically-confirmed stage IV melanoma, with an ECOG performance status of 0 to 2. Ixabepilone was administered at a dose of 20 mg/m(2) on days 1, 8, and 15 during each 28-day cycle. The primary endpoint was response rate (RR); secondary endpoints were time to progression (TTP) and toxicity. Twenty-four patients were enrolled and 23 were evaluable for response. Initial serum lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) levels were elevated in 6/11 (55%) of the previously treated and in 5/13 (38%) of the previously untreated patients. No complete or partial responses were seen in either cohort. One patient in the previously treated group developed neutropenia and fatal septic shock. Seventeen patients (8 in the previously untreated group and 9 in the previously treated group) progressed after 2 cycles, whereas six patients (3 in each group) had stable disease after 2-6 cycles. Median TTP was 1.74 months in the previously untreated group (95% CI = 1.51 months, upper limit not estimated) and 1.54 months in the previously treated group (95% CI = 1.15 months, 2.72 months). Grade 3 and/or 4 toxicities occurred in 5/11 (45%) of previously untreated and in 5/13 (38%) of previously treated patients and included neutropenia, peripheral neuropathy, fatigue, diarrhea, and dyspnea. CONCLUSIONS/SIGNIFICANCE: Ixabepilone has no meaningful activity in either chemotherapy-naive (previously untreated) or previously treated patients with metastatic melanoma. Further investigation with ixabepilone as single agent in the treatment of melanoma is not warranted. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinical Trials.gov NCT00036764

OBJECTIVE: Survival in women with recurrent or metastatic cervical cancer remains poor. More effective and less toxic regimens are needed. Cisplatin is an effective radiosensitizer, but its single agent activity in recurrent cervical cancer, especially after prior cisplatin exposure, is disappointing, with a response rate of only 13%. Oxaliplatin has preclinical activity in cisplatin-resistant tumors and may have synergic activity when combined with paclitaxel. Our objective is to determine the efficacy and toxicity of paclitaxel and oxaliplatin in patients with recurrent or metastatic cervical cancer. METHODS: Patients with histologic confirmation of primary metastatic or recurrent cervical cancer not amenable to surgical management were eligible. Treatment consisted of paclitaxel 175 mg/m(2) IV and oxaliplatin 130 mg/m(2) IV every 21 days. The primary endpoints were toxicity, recorded every cycle, and response, determined by RECIST criteria and were assessed every 9 weeks, with subsequent confirmation as required. Sample size determinations were made using a Simon's two-stage design with a projected overall response proportion of 13% with cisplatin alone. Survival rates were calculated with Kaplan-Meier methods. RESULTS: Of the 35 patients enrolled, 32 were evaluable. The median age was 56 (27-78); 30 had had prior radiation (23 concomitant with cisplatin). Patients completed a mean of 4.2 cycles (1-11). There were 2 complete and 5 partial responses for a total response rate of 7/32 (22%; 95% CI: 9.3%-40.0%). Eight patients had stable disease for an overall clinical benefit rate of 15/32 (47%; 95% CI: 29.1%-65.3%). The mean time to best response was 13.5 weeks (95% CI: 10.6, 16.4). The mean progression-free survival was 21 weeks (95% CI: 14.7, 27.2) and mean overall survival was 52 weeks (95% CI: 39.4, 64.8). A total of 135 cycles were administered. There were 28 (20.1%) grade 3/4 hematologic toxicities and 46 (34.1%) grade 3/4 non-hematologic toxicities, which were predominantly sensory neuropathy. There were 13 treatment delays, 4 dose reductions, and no treatment-related deaths. CONCLUSIONS: The combination of paclitaxel and oxaliplatin is an effective regimen in patients with recurrent or persistent cervical cancer including a majority previously exposed to cisplatin. Further study and comparison with other platinum-based regimens is warranted

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to determine whether adding the anti-epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibitor erlotinib to carboplatin/paclitaxel improved pathologic complete response (pCR) at reassessment surgery in epithelial ovarian, fallopian tube, or primary peritoneal cancers (OFPC). METHODS: Patients with stage III-IV OFPC initiated treatment within 12weeks of initial cytoreductive surgery or, after histologic confirmation of diagnosis, neoadjuvantly. Treatment included paclitaxel (175mg/m(2)) and carboplatin (AUC 6) every 3weeks for up to 6 cycles, plus oral erlotinib 150mg daily. The primary objective was to determine whether the pCR rate at reassessment surgery was at least 60% after optimal cytoreduction at initial surgery (< 1cm residual disease), or at least 40% after suboptimal cytoreduction (at least 1cm residual disease) using a two-stage design (alpha=0.10, beta=0.10). RESULTS: The study population included 56 patients with stage III-IV OFPC. EGFR gene amplification was present in 15% of the 20 tumors evaluated. Twenty-eight patients had protocol therapy after optimal cytoreduction (stratum I), 23 had protocol therapy either after suboptimal cytoreduction (stratum II), and 5 received neoadjuvant therapy prior to cytoreduction (stratum III). Pathologic CR was confirmed in 8 patients (29%; 95% confidence intervals 13%, 49%) in stratum I and 3 patients (11%, 95% C.I. 2%, 28%) in stratum II, which did not meet the prespecified efficacy endpoint in either stratum. CONCLUSIONS: Among unselected patients, erlotinib plus carboplatin-paclitaxel did not improve pCR rates compared with historical experience with carboplatin-paclitaxel alone in patients with stage III-IV OFPC

OBJECTIVE: Imatinib mesylate (IM, Gleevec), a potent PDGF/PDGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitor, affects stroma and vascular endothelial cells. Our study sought to determine the safety and activity of paclitaxel with an intermittent schedule of IM. MATERIALS AND METHODS: rEOC patients previously treated with platinum/paclitaxel and </=2 regimens for recurrence were enrolled. Paclitaxel 80 mg/m(2) was given on days 3, 10, 17 every 28 days and oral IM 300 mg bid on days 1-4, 8-11, and 13-18. RESULTS: Between 2007-2009, 14 patients enrolled, 12 were evaluable. Nine patients were on study at 12 weeks. Objective responses (by RECIST and/or CA125) occurred in 4 patients. There were no grade 4, and only four grade 3 toxic events: diarrhea, edema and 2 cases of neutropenia. Early study closure was due to sufficient safety information with preliminary encouraging efficacy results. CONCLUSION: This weekly paclitaxel regimen with intermittent IM is tolerable with anti-tumor activity, making it suitable as part of future studies