Faculty Bibliography

BACKGROUND:Epinephrine autoinjectors (EA) are the standard of care for severe food allergic reactions, although they are frequently underused or misused. OBJECTIVE:The goal of this work is to understand the factors associated with underuse of EA by caregivers of pediatric patients with food allergy. METHODS:A survey was administered to 200 caregivers of pediatric patients with food allergies to assess most severe lifetime allergic reaction, EA education, use and factors associated with incorrect use or underutilization. RESULTS:One hundred sixty-four surveys were completed; 118 (72%) of lifetime most severe reactions warranted EA use, but the EA was used in only 45 (38.1%). Reasons caregivers indicated for not administering the EA included: reactions did not seem severe enough, it was the patient's first allergic reaction, use of other medication, and fear of using EA. CONCLUSION/CONCLUSIONS:Multiple factors contribute to underuse of EA for the treatment of severe allergic reactions. Results from this study highlight the need for continuous EA education in caregivers of and pediatric patients with food allergies, using a mutlipronged approach targeting clear symptom recognition and alleviation of fear of EA use.

As communities struggle to adapt to life under the threat of the global pandemic, COVID-19, those living with Food Protein-Induced Enterocolitis Syndrome (FPIES) must adapt with additional difficulties. Social distancing and shelter-in-place strategies have been implemented, resulting in fewer supermarkets trips, stockpile-purchasing behaviors in up to 74.5% of those surveyed(1), and shortages of staple food items all with potential impact on the availability of foods for those on limited diets. Concern about allergic reactions make exploring alternative or new ingredients undesirable or untenable. Remaining safe at home is important to avoid trips to the emergency department where families may be exposed to the COVID-19 virus and medical attention can be limited due to the burden on global health systems. Parents of children with FPIES are also understandably concerned about meeting their child's nutritional needs during these times of sheltering-in-place. Now more than ever, advice on what foods to serve and when to serve them is critically important.

Food allergy is increasingly prevalent and poses a life-threatening risk to those afflicted. The health care costs associated with food allergies are also increasing. Current and emerging treatments for food allergies aim at protecting against reactions caused by accidental ingestion and increasing the food allergen reaction threshold, although this protection is often temporary. In the future, ideal biologic therapies would target key mediators of the type II immune pathway, essential in development of the atopic march to prevent development of food allergies. Biologics offering long-term protection against allergic reactions to food are needed, and several agents are already in development.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW/OBJECTIVE:Food oral immunotherapy (OIT) has emerged as way to mitigate serious allergic reactions including life-threatening anaphylaxis related to accidental ingestion. However, gastrointestinal-related adverse effects of OIT have been reported and are often cited as reasons for discontinuation of therapy. We summarize recent research on the prevalence of eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) in patients undergoing OIT. RECENT FINDINGS/RESULTS:We examined 12 recent studies on OIT for peanut, milk, walnut, egg, and wheat, which enrolled a total of 620 patients. Gastrointestinal symptoms were common during OIT, and while generally mild, 24 (3.9%) patients from the reviewed studies reported gastrointestinal symptoms that were significant enough to prompt discontinuation of OIT. Of these, two (0.3% of the total 620 patients or 8.3% of those with gastrointestinal symptoms) patients had biopsy-confirmed EoE. One of these patients was subsequently found to also have ulcerative colitis that had been previously undiagnosed. SUMMARY/CONCLUSIONS:EoE is a rare but concerning side effect of OIT. More research is needed to better elucidate both the OIT-related and patient-related factors that may predispose individuals to develop EoE. The presence of comorbid conditions and/or preexisting subclinical esophageal eosinophilia may account for some of cases of EoE identified during OIT.

BACKGROUND:We previously reported the safety and efficacy of epicutaneous immunotherapy (EPIT™) for peanut allergy (250 μg, daily epicutaneous peanut protein; DBV712 250μg) in a 12-month randomized controlled study (PEPITES) of peanut-allergic children aged 4-11 years. OBJECTIVE:To assess interim safety and efficacy of an additional 2 years of EPIT from the ongoing (5-year treatment) open-label extension PEOPLE study. METHODS:Subjects who completed PEPITES were offered enrollment in PEOPLE. Following an additional 2 years of daily DBV712 250μg, subjects who had received DBV712 250μg in PEPITES underwent Month-36 double-blind, placebo-controlled, food challenge (DBPCFC) with an optional Month-38 sustained unresponsiveness (SU) assessment. RESULTS:198 (93%) of 213 eligible subjects who had received DBV712 250μg in PEPITES entered PEOPLE, of whom 141 (71%) had assessable DBPCFC at Month 36. At Month 36, 51.8% (73/141) of subjects reached an eliciting dose (ED) of ≥1000 mg, compared with 40.4% (57/141) at Month 12. 75.9% (107/141) demonstrated increased ED compared to baseline. 13.5% (19/141) tolerated the full DBPCFC of 5444 mg. Median cumulative reactive dose increased from 144 to 944 mg. 18 subjects underwent an optional SU assessment; 14/18 (77.8%) maintained an ED of ≥1000 mg at Month 38. Local patch-site skin reactions were common but decreased over time. There was no treatment-related epinephrine use in years 2 or 3. Compliance was high (96.9%), and withdrawals due to treatment-related adverse events low (1%). CONCLUSION/CONCLUSIONS:These results demonstrate that daily EPIT treatment for peanut allergy beyond 1 year leads to continued response from a well-tolerated, simple-to-use regimen.

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES/OBJECTIVE:Although food allergy is recognized as a growing worldwide public health problem, there continues to be limited data on prevalence rates in developing and emerging countries. Most prevalence estimates are based on self-reports, with only few studies using objective assessments. The aim was to analyze the frequency of sensitization to food allergens by serum specific IgE in a large group of unselected allergic patients in Mexico. MATERIALS AND METHODS/METHODS:We analyzed data registries from patients of all ages with suspected food allergy referred to a specialized laboratory in Mexico City from January 2016 to April 2018. A descriptive analysis, and an age/food-group comparison were made. RESULTS:A total of 2633 subjects tested for food allergy were identified during the study period; 1795 subjects fulfilled the inclusion criteria. The overall positivity (sIgE≥0.35kUA/L) to at least one food was 24%. The most frequently positive foods were hazelnut, apple, shrimp, peanut, egg white, egg yolk, peach, almond, tomato, bean, milk, strawberry, kiwi, maize and wheat. Positivity for some foods was more frequent across different age groups, in young children (≤5 years) milk; in older children (6-17 years): peanut, almond, wheat, soy and maize; in adults: apple. We also found other foods with high positivity but less than 50 samples: rye 60%, mango 42.9%, carrot 37.5%, cashew 27.3%, banana 21.1% and oat 20.6%. CONCLUSION/CONCLUSIONS:Our study reported the presence of a differential regional IgE sensitization pattern as compared with the internationally reported one, highlighting the importance of local staple foods.