Faculty Bibliography

HYPOTHESIS/OBJECTIVE:Revascularization is a more effective intervention to reduce future postop complications. METHODS:Patients undergoing elective spine fusion surgery were isolated in the PearlDiver database. Patients were stratified by having previous history of vascular stenting (Stent), coronary artery bypass graft (CABG), and no previous heart procedure (No-HP). Means comparison tests (chi-squared and independent samples t-tests, as appropriate) compared differences in demographics, diagnoses, and comorbidities. Binary logistic regression assessed the odds of 30-day and 90-day postoperative (postop) complications associated with each heart procedure (Odds Ratio [95 % confidence interval]). Statistical significance was set p < 0.05. RESULTS:731,173 elective spine fusion patients included. Overall, 8,401 pts underwent a CABG, 24,037 pts Stent, and 698,735 had No-HP prior to spine fusion surgery. Compared to Stent and No-HP patients, CABG patients had higher rates of morbid obesity, chronic kidney disease, and diabetes (p < 0.001 for all). Meanwhile, stent patients had higher rates of PVD, hypertension, and hyperlipidemia (all p < 0.001). 30-days post-op, CABG patients had significantly higher complication rates including pneumonia, CVA, MI, sepsis, and death compared to No-HP (all p < 0.001). Stent patients vs. No-HF had higher 30-day post-op complication rates including pneumonia, CVA, MI, sepsis, and death. Furthermore, adjusting for age, comorbidities, and sex Stent was significantly predictive of a MI 30-days post-op (OR: 1.90 [1.53-2.34], P < 0.001). Additionally, controlling for levels fused, stent patients compared to CABG patients had 1.99x greater odds of a MI within 30-days (OR: 1.99 [1.26-3.31], p = 0.005) and 2.02x odds within 90-days postop (OR: 2.2 [1.53-2.71, p < 0.001). CONCLUSION/CONCLUSIONS:With regards to spine surgery, coronary artery bypass graft remains the gold standard for risk reduction. Stenting does not appear to minimize risk of experiencing a post-procedure cardiac event as dramatically as CABG.

STUDY DESIGN/SETTING/METHODS:Retrospective cohort study. OBJECTIVE:Assess the extent to which defined risk factors of adverse events are drivers of cost-utility in spinal deformity (ASD) surgery. METHODS:ASD patients with 2-year (2Y) data were included. Tertiles were used to define high degrees of frailty, sagittal deformity, blood loss, and surgical time. Cost was calculated using the Pearl Diver registry and cost-utility at 2Y was compared between cohorts based on the number of risk factors present. Statistically significant differences in cost-utility by number of baseline risk factors were determined using ANOVA, followed by a generalized linear model, adjusting for clinical site and surgeon, to assess the effects of increasing risk score on overall cost-utility. RESULTS:< .001). CONCLUSIONS:III.

OBJECTIVE:The objective of this study was to adjust the sagittal age-adjusted score (SAAS) to accommodate frailty in alignment considerations and thereby increase the predictability of clinical outcomes and junctional failure. METHODS:Surgical adult spinal deformity (ASD) patients with 2-year data were included. Frailty was assessed with the continuous ASD modified frailty index (ASD-mFI). Two-year outcomes were proximal junctional kyphosis (PJK), proximal junctional failure (PJF), major mechanical complications, and best clinical outcome (BCO), defined as Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) score < 15 and Scoliosis Research Society outcomes questionnaire total score > 4.5 by 2 years. Linear regression analysis established a 6-week score based on the component scores of SAAS, frailty, and US normal values for ODI score. Logistic regression analysis followed by conditional inference tree run forest analysis generated categorical thresholds. Multivariate analysis, controlling for age, baseline deformity, and history of revision, was used to compare outcome rates, and logistic regression generated odds ratios for the continuous score. Thirty percent of the cohort was used as a random sample for internal validation. RESULTS:In total, 412 patients were included (mean ± SD age 60.1 ± 14.2 years, 80% female, BMI 26.9 ± 5.4 kg/m2). Baseline frailty categories were as follows: 57% not frail, 30% frail, and 14% severely frail. Overall, by 2 years, 39% of patients had developed PJK, 8% PJF, and 21% mechanical complications; 22% had undergone a reoperation; and 15% met BCO. When the cohort as a whole was assessed, the 6-week SAAS had a correlation with the development of PJK and PJF, but not mechanical complications, reoperation, or BCO. Development of mechanical complications, PJF, reoperation, and BCO demonstrated correlations with ASD-mFI (all p < 0.05). Regression analysis modifying SAAS on the basis of ODI norms and frailty generated the following equation: frailty-adjusted SAAS (FAS) = 0.108 × T1 pelvic angle + 0.162 × pelvic tilt - 0.39 × pelvic incidence - lumbar lordosis - 0.03 × ASD-mFI - 1.6771. With conditional inference tree analysis, thresholds were derived for FAS: aligned < 1.7, offset 1.7-2.2, and severely offset > 2.2. Significance between FAS categories was found for PJK, PJF, mechanical complications, reoperation, and BCO by 2 years. Binary logistic regression, controlling for baseline deformity and revision status, demonstrated significance between FAS and all 5 outcome variables (all p < 0.01). Internal validation saw each outcome variable maintain significance between categories, with even greater odds for PJF (OR 13.4, 95% CI 4.7-38.3, p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS:Consideration of physiological age, in addition to chronological age, may be beneficial in the management of operative goals to maximize clinical outcomes while minimizing junctional failure. This combination enables the spine surgeon to fortify a surgical plan for even the most challenging patients undergoing ASD corrective surgery.

STUDY DESIGN/METHODS:Retrospective. OBJECTIVE:The objective of this study is to describe the rate of postoperative morbidity before and after two-year (2Y) follow-up for patients undergoing surgical correction of adult spinal deformity (ASD). SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA/BACKGROUND:Advances in modern surgical techniques for deformity surgery have shown promising short-term clinical results. However, the permanence of radiographic correction, mechanical complications, and revision surgery in ASD surgery remains a clinical challenge. Little information exists on the incidence of long-term morbidity beyond the acute postoperative window. METHODS:ASD patients with complete baseline and five-year (5Y) health-related quality of life and radiographic data were included. The rates of adverse events, including proximal junctional kyphosis (PJK), proximal junctional failure (PJF), and reoperations up to 5Y were documented. Primary and revision surgeries were compared. We used logistic regression analysis to adjust for demographic and surgical confounders. RESULTS:Of 118 patients eligible for 5Y follow-up, 99(83.9%) had complete follow-up data. The majority were female (83%), mean age 54.1 years and 10.4 levels fused and 14 undergoing three-column osteotomy. Thirty-three patients had a prior fusion and 66 were primary cases. By 5Y postop, the cohort had an adverse event rate of 70.7% with 25 (25.3%) sustaining a major complication and 26 (26.3%) receiving reoperation. Thirty-eight (38.4%) developed PJK by 5Y and 3 (4.0%) developed PJF. The cohort had a significantly higher rate of complications (63.6% vs. 19.2%), PJK (34.3% vs. 4.0%), and reoperations (21.2% vs. 5.1%) before 2Y, all P <0.01. The most common complications beyond 2Y were mechanical complications. CONCLUSIONS:Although the incidence of adverse events was high before 2Y, there was a substantial reduction in longer follow-up indicating complications after 2Y are less common. Complications beyond 2Y consisted mostly of mechanical issues.

BACKGROUND:Height gain following a surgical procedure for patients with adult spinal deformity (ASD) is incompletely understood, and it is unknown if height gain correlates with patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs). METHODS:This was a retrospective cohort study of patients undergoing ASD surgery. Patients with baseline, 6-week, and subanalysis of 1-year postoperative full-body radiographic and PROM data were examined. Correlation analysis examined relationships between vertical height differences and PROMs. Regression analysis was utilized to preoperatively estimate T1-S1 and S1-ankle height changes. RESULTS:This study included 198 patients (mean age, 57 years; 69% female); 147 patients (74%) gained height. Patients with height loss, compared with those who gained height, experienced greater increases in thoracolumbar kyphosis (2.81° compared with -7.37°; p < 0.001) and thoracic kyphosis (12.96° compared with 4.42°; p = 0.003). For patients with height gain, sagittal and coronal alignment improved from baseline to postoperatively: 25° to 21° for pelvic tilt (PT), 14° to 3° for pelvic incidence - lumbar lordosis (PI-LL), and 60 mm to 17 mm for sagittal vertical axis (SVA) (all p < 0.001). The full-body mean height gain was 7.6 cm, distributed as follows: sella turcica-C2, 2.9 mm; C2-T1, 2.8 mm; T1-S1 (trunk gain), 3.8 cm; and S1-ankle (lower-extremity gain), 3.3 cm (p < 0.001). T1-S1 height gain correlated with the thoracic Cobb angle correction and the maximum Cobb angle correction (p = 0.002). S1-ankle height gain correlated with the corrections in PT, PI-LL, and SVA (p < 0.001). T1-ankle height gain correlated with the corrections in PT (p < 0.001) and SVA (p = 0.03). Trunk height gain correlated with improved Scoliosis Research Society (SRS-22r) Appearance scores (r = 0.20; p = 0.02). Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Depression scores correlated with S1-ankle height gain (r = -0.19; p = 0.03) and C2-T1 height gain (r = -0.18; p = 0.04). A 1° correction in a thoracic scoliosis Cobb angle corresponded to a 0.2-mm height gain, and a 1° correction in a thoracolumbar scoliosis Cobb angle resulted in a 0.25-mm height gain. A 1° improvement in PI-LL resulted in a 0.2-mm height gain. CONCLUSIONS:Most patients undergoing ASD surgery experienced height gain following deformity correction, with a mean full-body height gain of 7.6 cm. Height gain can be estimated preoperatively with predictive ratios, and height gain was correlated with improvements in reported SRS-22r appearance and PROMIS scores. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE/METHODS:Therapeutic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

OBJECTIVE:Management of adult spinal deformity (ASD) has increasingly favored operative intervention; however, the incidence of complications and reoperations is high, and patients may fail to achieve idealized postsurgical results. This study compared health-related quality of life (HRQOL) metrics between patients with suboptimal surgical outcomes and those who underwent nonoperative management as a proxy for the natural history (NH) of ASD. METHODS:ASD patients with 2-year data were included. Patients who were offered surgery but declined were considered nonoperative (i.e., NH) patients. Operative patients with suboptimal outcome (SOp)-defined as any reoperation, major complication, or ≥ 2 severe Scoliosis Research Society (SRS)-Schwab modifiers at follow-up-were selected for comparison. Propensity score matching (PSM) on the basis of baseline age, deformity, SRS-22 Total, and Charlson Comorbidity Index score was used to match the groups. ANCOVA and stepwise logistic regression analysis were used to assess outcomes between groups at 2 years. RESULTS:In total, 441 patients were included (267 SOp and 174 NH patients). After PSM, 142 patients remained (71 SOp 71 and 71 NH patients). At baseline, the SOp and NH groups had similar demographic characteristics, HRQOL, and deformity (all p > 0.05). At 2 years, ANCOVA determined that NH patients had worse deformity as measured with sagittal vertical axis (36.7 mm vs 21.3 mm, p = 0.025), mismatch between pelvic incidence and lumbar lordosis (11.9° vs 2.9°, p < 0.001), and pelvic tilt (PT) (23.1° vs 20.7°, p = 0.019). The adjusted regression analysis found that SOp patients had higher odds of reaching the minimal clinically important differences in Oswestry Disability Index score (OR [95% CI] 4.5 [1.7-11.5], p = 0.002), SRS-22 Activity (OR [95% CI] 3.2 [1.5-6.8], p = 0.002), SRS-22 Pain (OR [95% CI] 2.8 [1.4-5.9], p = 0.005), and SRS-22 Total (OR [95% CI] 11.0 [3.5-34.4], p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS:Operative patients with SOp still experience greater improvements in deformity and HRQOL relative to the progressive radiographic and functional deterioration associated with the NH of ASD. The NH of nonoperative management should be accounted for when weighing the risks and benefits of operative intervention for ASD.

STUDY DESIGN/METHODS:This is a multicenter, prospective cohort study. OBJECTIVE:This study tests the hypothesis that the elimination of lower limb compensation in patients with adult spinal deformity (ASD) will significantly increase the magnitude of sagittal malalignment. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA/BACKGROUND:ASD affects a significant proportion of the elderly population, impairing functional sagittal alignment and inhibiting the overall quality of life. To counteract these effects, patients with ASD use their spine, pelvis, and lower limbs to create a compensatory posture that allows for standing and mobility. However, the degree to which each of the hips, knees, and ankles contributes to these compensatory mechanisms has yet to be determined. METHODS:Patients undergoing corrective surgery for ASD were included if they met at least one of the following criteria: complex surgical procedure, geriatric deformity surgery, or severe radiographic deformity. Preoperative full-body x-rays were evaluated, and age and pelvic incidence -adjusted normative values were used to model spine alignment based upon three positions: compensated (all lower extremity compensatory mechanisms maintained), partially compensated (removal of ankle dorsiflexion and knee flexion, with maintained hip extension), and uncompensated (ankle, knee, and hip compensation set to the age and pelvic incidence norms). RESULTS:A total of 288 patients were included (mean age 60 yr, 70.5% females). As the model transitioned from the compensated to uncompensated position, the initial posterior translation of the pelvis decreased significantly to an anterior translation versus the ankle (P.Shift: 30 to -7.6 mm). This was associated with a decrease in pelvic retroversion (pelvic tilt: 24.1-16.1), hip extension (SFA: 203-200), knee flexion (knee angle: 5.5-0.4), and ankle dorsiflexion (ankle angle: 5.3-3.7). As a result, the anterior malalignment of the trunk significantly increased: sagittal vertical axis (65-120 mm) and G-SVA (C7-ankle from 36 to 127 mm). CONCLUSIONS:Removal of lower limbs compensation revealed an unsustainable truncal malalignment with two-fold greater SVA.

BACKGROUND:As our focus on delivering cost effective healthcare increases, interventions like cervical deformity surgery, which are associated with high resource utilization, have received greater scrutiny. The purpose of this study was to assess relationship between surgical costs, deformity correction, and patient reported outcomes in ACD surgery. METHODS:ACD Patients ≥ 18 years with baseline (BL) and 2-year (2Y) data were included. Cost of surgery was calculated by applying average Medicare reimbursement rates by CPT code to surgical details of each patient in the cohort. CPT codes for corpectomy, ACDF, osteotomy, decompression, levels fused, and instrumentation were considered in the analysis. Costs of complications and reoperations were intentionally excluded from the cost analysis. Patients were ranked into two groups by surgical cost: lowest cost (LC) and highest cost (HC). ANCOVA assessed differences in outcomes while accounting for covariates as appropriate. RESULTS:113 met inclusion criteria. While mean age, frailty, BMI and gender composition were similar between cost groups, mean CCI was significantly higher in the HC group compared to that of the LC group (p=.014). At baseline, LC and HC groups had similar HRQLs and radiographic deformity (all p >.05). Logistic regression accounting for baseline age, deformity and CCI found that HC patients had significantly lower odds of undergoing reoperation within 2-years (OR: 0.309, 95 % CI: 0.193 - 0.493, p <.001). Furthermore, logistic regression accounting for baseline age, deformity and CCI found odds of DJF were significantly lower for those in the HC group (OR: 0.163, 95 % CI: 0.083 - 0.323, p <.001). At 2-years, logistic regression accounting for age and baseline TS-CL found HC patients still had significantly higher odds of reaching a "0″ TS-CL modifier at 2-years (OR: 3.353, 95 % CI: 1.081 - 10.402, p=.036). Logistic regression accounting for age and baseline NDI score found HC patients had significantly higher odds of reaching MCID in NDI at 2-years (OR: 4.477, 95 % CI: 1.507 - 13.297, p=.007). A similar logistic regression accounting for age and baseline mJOA score found odds of reaching MCID in mJOA significantly higher for high-cost patients (OR: 2.942, 95 % CI: 1.101 - 7.864, p=.031). CONCLUSIONS:While patient presentation influences surgical planning and costs, this study attempted to control for such variations to assess impact of surgical costs on outcomes. Despite continued scrutiny over healthcare costs, we found that more costly surgical interventions can produce superior radiographic alignment as well as patient reported outcomes for patients with cervical deformity.

STUDY DESIGN/METHODS:Retrospective review of a prospectively enrolled adult spinal deformity (ASD) database. OBJECTIVE:To investigate what patient factors elevate the risk of sub-optimal outcomes after deformity correction. BACKGROUND:Currently, it is unknown what factors predict a poor outcome after adult spinal deformity surgery, which may require increased pre-operative consideration and counseling. METHODS:Patients >18yrs undergoing surgery for ASD(scoliosis≥20°, SVA≥5 cm, PT≥25°, or TK≥60°). An unsatisfactory outcome was defined by the following categories met at 2Y: (1) clinical: deteriorating in ODI at 2Y f/u (2) complications/reop: having a reoperation and major complication were deemed high risk for poor outcomes postoperatively (HR). Multivariate analyses assessed predictive factors of HR patients in adult spinal deformity patients. RESULTS:633 ASD (59.9 years, 79%F, 27.7 kg/m2, CCI: 1.74) were included. Baseline severe Schwab modifier incidence (++): 39.2% PI-LL, 28.8% SVA, 28.9% PT. 15.5% of patients deteriorated in ODI by 2 years, while 7.6% underwent a reoperation and had a major complication. This categorized 11 (1.7%) as HR. HR were more comorbid in terms of arthritis (73%) heart disease (36%) and kidney disease (18%), P<0.001. Surgically, HR had greater EBL (4431ccs), underwent more osteotomies (91%), specifically Ponte(36%) and Three Column Osteotomies(55%), which occurred more at L2(91%). HR underwent more PLIFs (45%) and had more blood transfusion units (2641ccs), all P<0.050. The multivariate regression determined a combination of a baseline DRAM score in the 75th percentile, having arthritis and kidney disease, a baseline right lower extremity motor score ≤3, cSVA >65 mm, C2 slope >30.2°, CTPA >5.5° for an R2 value of 0.535 (P<0.001). CONCLUSIONS:When addressing adult spine deformities, poor outcomes tends to occur in severely comorbid patients with major baseline psychological distress scores, poor neurologic function, and concomitant cervical malalignment.

OBJECTIVE:The objective of this study was to evaluate spinopelvic sagittal alignment and spinal compensatory changes in adult cervical kyphotic deformity. METHODS:A database composed of 13 US spine centers was retrospectively reviewed for adult patients who underwent cervical reconstruction with radiographic evidence of cervical kyphotic deformity: C2-7 sagittal vertical axis > 4 cm, chin-brow vertical angle > 25°, or cervical kyphosis (T1 slope [T1S] cervical lordosis [CL] > 15°) (n = 129). Sagittal parameters were evaluated preoperatively and in the early postoperative window (6 weeks to 6 months postoperatively) and compared with asymptomatic control patients. Adult cervical deformity patients were further stratified by degree of cervical kyphosis (severe kyphosis, C2-T3 Cobb angle ≤ -30°; moderate kyphosis, ≤ 0°; and minimal kyphosis, > 0°) and severity of sagittal malalignment (severe malalignment, sagittal vertical axis T3-S1 ≤ -60 mm; moderate malalignment, ≤ 20 mm; and minimal malalignment > 20 mm). RESULTS:Compared with asymptomatic control patients, cervical deformity was associated with increased C0-2 lordosis (32.9° vs 23.6°), T1S (33.5° vs 28.0°), thoracolumbar junction kyphosis (T10-L2 Cobb angle -7.0° vs -1.7°), and pelvic tilt (PT) (19.7° vs 15.9°) (p < 0.01). Cervicothoracic kyphosis was correlated with C0-2 lordosis (R = -0.57, p < 0.01) and lumbar lordosis (LL) (R = -0.20, p = 0.03). Cervical reconstruction resulted in decreased C0-2 lordosis, increased T1S, and increased thoracic and thoracolumbar junction kyphosis (p < 0.01). Patients with severe cervical kyphosis (n = 34) had greater C0-2 lordosis (p < 0.01) and postoperative reduction of C0-2 lordosis (p = 0.02) but no difference in PT. Severe cervical kyphosis was also associated with a greater increase in thoracic and thoracolumbar junction kyphosis postoperatively (p = 0.01). Patients with severe sagittal malalignment (n = 52) had decreased PT (p = 0.01) and increased LL (p < 0.01), as well as a greater postoperative reduction in LL (p < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS:Adult cervical deformity is associated with upper cervical hyperlordotic compensation and thoracic hypokyphosis. In the setting of increased kyphotic deformity and sagittal malalignment, thoracolumbar junction kyphosis and lumbar hyperlordosis develop to restore normal center of gravity. There was no consistent compensatory pelvic retroversion or anteversion among the adult cervical deformity patients in this cohort.