Faculty Bibliography

Echocardiography is the best technique to diagnose, evaluate, follow-up and guide the treatment of hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM). Diagnosis of HCM depends on left ventricular wall thickness >/=15 mm. Also noted are mitral valve systolic anterior motion, anteriorly positioned mitral valve leaflet coaptation, anomalous anterior insertion of papillary muscles, and diastolic dysfunction. Resting left ventricular outflow tract (LVOT) gradient occurs in 25% of patients and provocable gradients may be demonstrated in more than half of patients. Echocardiography is important for sudden death risk assessment; patients with a wall thickness more than 30 mm have a higher risk of sudden cardiac death, as often as 2%/year. Two thirds of the symptomatic obstructed patients can be successfully managed long term with medical treatment alone (beta-blockers, disopyramide, verapamil) guided by transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) response and follow-up. Obstructed patients, who fail medical therapy, are usually offered invasive treatment: surgical septal myectomy, alcohol septal ablation, or DDD pacemaker. Preoperative TTE is a necessary guide for the surgeon in planning the operation. It gives the surgeon precise measurements of septal thickness, mitral valve leaflets length and floppiness and papillary muscle anomalies. Intraoperative transesophageal echocardiography is a very important tool for evaluating surgical results. Persistent SAM, resting outflow gradient more than 30 mm Hg or more than 50 mmHg with provocation, moderate to severe mitral regurgitation are indications for immediate revision. For patients >40 years old, and also not suitable for surgery because of comorbidities, alcohol septal ablation is viable alternative therapy for relief of obstruction and improvement of symptoms. Echocardiography is a valuable tool to choose the site of ablation (using myocardial contrast echocardiography), as well as for evaluation of results.

Physicians treating hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) are faced with unique management challenges. Understanding pathophysiology and overall good prognosis forms the basis for medical treatment. Treatment is tailored by the presence or absence of outflow tract gradient and individual symptoms. In all patients, formal stratification for sudden death risk is necessary, with consideration of defibrillator implantation in patients deemed to be at high risk. In patients with no or only mild symptoms the approach of watchful waiting is often appropriate. For symptomatic patients with non-obstructed disease medical treatment with calcium channel blockers and beta-blockers is aimed to improve heart failure symptoms, and ischemia. Verapamil is the most often used, with likely benefit of relieving ischemia. Obstruction, most commonly due to systolic anterior motion of the mitral valve (SAM) and mitral-septal contact, occurs in >/=50% of all HCM patients, worsening symptoms and increasing mortality. Successful medical treatment of obstruction with negative inotropes slows acceleration of left ventricular ejection with delay in SAM, ultimately yielding a lower pressure gradient. Beta -blockers are the first line treatment in obstructive HCM predominantly by mitigating provocable gradients. The magnitude of symptom relief with verapamil is similar to the effect of beta -blockade. Disopyramide combined with beta -blockade is thought by some to be the most effective medical treatment of obstruction, and has been shown to be safe and not pro-arrhythmic. Most symptomatic HCM patients with significant obstruction at rest or provocation can be successfully managed with long-term medication alone.

All patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) should have five aspects of care addressed. An attempt should be made to detect the presence or absence of risk factors for sudden arrhythmic death. If the patient appears to be at high risk, discussion of the benefits and risks of ICD are indicated, and many such patients will be implanted. Symptoms are appraised and treated. Bacterial endocarditis prophylaxis is recommended. Patients are advised to avoid athletic competition and extremes of physical exertion. First degree family members should be screened with echocardiography and ECG.

This report describes a patient with an unusual large anomalous papillary muscle within the left ventricular cavity causing symptomatic midventricular outflow obstruction. The obstructing papillary muscle comprised a large central core that extended multiple circumferential muscular arms to all the walls of the left ventricle, including the septum. The papillary muscle and the arms divided the left ventricle into apical and subaortic chambers. Flow communicated between the two chambers through multiple openings between the arms with a systolic peak Doppler gradient of 50 mm Hg.

BACKGROUND: Extended myectomy for left ventricular outflow tract obstruction (LVOTO) due to hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) has good long-term results. In addition to the midseptal resection (R) for HCM, our group has introduced a novel variation in anterior leaflet plication (P) and release (R) of papillary muscle attachments. We sought to investigate the medium-term success of this three-step repair that addresses all aspects of complex HCM pathology. METHODS: Nineteen patients underwent resection-plication-release repair for complex HCM pathology. Transesophageal echocardiography was performed on all patients preoperatively and postoperatively to assess adequacy of resection, left ventricular outflow tract gradients, and mitral valve function. All patients underwent transthoracic outpatient echocardiography at a mean follow-up of 2.4 +/- 2.1 years (range, 0.5 to 6). RESULTS: The average age of the patients was 57 +/- 14 years. The preoperative peak LVOTO was 137 +/- 45 mm Hg. The average degree of mitral regurgitation was 3.1. The average length of stay was 7.5 +/- 3.3 days. There were no readmissions or deaths in the group. Initial postoperative transesophageal echocardiography demonstrated marked reduction in LVOTO to 10 +/- 17 mm Hg (p < 0.0001) and significant improvement in mitral regurgitation to 0.2 (p < 0.0001). In follow-up, the LVOT gradient remained low at 6 +/- 14 (p > 0.0001) and mitral regurgitation remained insignificant at 0.4 (p < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: Anterior leaflet plication and papillary muscle release are logical adjuncts to septal resection in the treatment of the complicated pathophysiology of obstructive HCM. Durable long-term results can be achieved with an aggressive approach to mitral valve pathology in conjunction with extended myectomy.

OBJECTIVES: In this study we assessed the long-term efficacy and safety of disopyramide for patients with obstructive hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM). BACKGROUND: It has been reported that disopyramide may reduce left ventricular outflow gradient and improve symptoms in patients with HCM. However, long-term efficacy and safety of disopyramide has not been shown in a large cohort. METHODS: Clinical and echocardiographic data were evaluated in 118 obstructive HCM patients treated with disopyramide at 4 HCM treatment centers. Mortality in the disopyramide-treated patients was compared with 373 obstructive HCM patients not treated with disopyramide. RESULTS: Patients were followed with disopyramide for 3.1 +/- 2.6 years; dose 432 +/- 181 mg/day (97% also received beta-blockers). Seventy-eight patients (66%) were maintained with disopyramide without the necessity for major non-pharmacologic intervention with surgical myectomy, alcohol ablation, or pacing; outflow gradient at rest decreased from 75 +/- 33 to 40 +/- 32 mm Hg (p < 0.0001) and mean New York Heart Association functional class from 2.3 +/- 0.7 to 1.7 +/- 0.6 (p < 0.0001). Forty other patients (34%) could not be satisfactorily managed with disopyramide and required major invasive interventions because of inadequate symptom and gradient control or vagolytic side effects. All-cause annual cardiac death rate between disopyramide and non-disopyramide-treated patients did not differ significantly, 1.4% versus 2.6%/year (p = 0.07). There was also no difference in sudden death rate, 1.0%/year versus 1.8%/year (p = 0.08). CONCLUSIONS: Two-thirds of obstructed HCM patients treated with disopyramide could be managed medically with amelioration of symptoms and about 50% reduction in subaortic gradient over >/=3 years. Disopyramide therapy does not appear to be proarrhythmic in HCM and should be considered before proceeding to surgical myectomy or alternate strategies.