Faculty Bibliography

OBJECTIVE: This study was performed to evaluate the results of operative treatment of ankle fractures in patients who required syndesmotic stabilization in addition to malleolar fracture fixation compared with patients who required malleolar fixation alone. DESIGN: The authors conducted a retrospective review of prospectively collected data. SETTING: Academic medical center. PATIENTS: Between October 2000 and November 2006, 347 patients who underwent surgical repair of an unstable ankle fracture were enrolled in a prospective database. INTERVENTION: Patients who had an associated syndesmotic disruption requiring surgical stabilization in association with either an ankle fracture or a fracture-dislocation were identified and compared with a cohort treated during the same time period who had sustained an ankle fracture or fracture-dislocation without syndesmotic disruption. MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS: All patients were followed and evaluated at 3, 6, and 12 months with clinical and radiographic examination as well as functional status (Short Musculoskeletal Functional Assessment, American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society). Patient-reported pain and postoperative complications were recorded as well. RESULTS: Three hundred forty-seven patients met the inclusion criteria and had 1-year minimum follow up. Seventy-nine patients (23%) who had syndesmotic stabilization were identified and compared with 268 patients (77%) who did not. No differences were found between the two groups with respect to age or American Society of Anesthesiologists status; however, there was a greater percentage of men in the syndesmotic injury group (P = 0.04). There was a greater percentage of Type C fractures requiring syndesmosis stabilization, whereas Type B fractures were less likely to require syndesmosis stabilization (P = 0.001) At 6- and 12-month follow up, there was a clear difference in outcome based on American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society and Short Musculoskeletal Functional Assessment scores; patients who underwent syndesmotic stabilization had worse American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society scores with lower function ratings (P = 0.04) and worse pain ratings (P = 0.02). Short Musculoskeletal Functional Assessment scores were also worse at 12 months in patients who had syndesmotic stabilization because the dysfunction index was higher in the syndesmotic injury group (P = 0.009). Radiographically, 18 of 144 (13%) syndesmotic screws were noted to be broken on follow-up radiographs, eight of which were subsequently removed. There were no other differences in complication rates. CONCLUSION: Patients who required syndesmotic stabilization in addition to malleolar fracture fixation had poorer outcomes at 12 months compared with patients who required malleolar fracture fixation alone. This information is important for patient counseling to manage expectations regarding outcomes after injury

Hip dislocations are uncommon injuries that result from high-energy mechanisms. These patients require careful trauma evaluation to rule out concomitant injuries. Early closed or open reduction that is performed within 6 hours and close radiological follow-up is recommended to obtain the best possible results. It is also essential to educate the patient regarding the potential sequelae and follow them for evidence of osteonecrosis and posttraumatic arthritis

Fractures of the distal humerus can be difficult to treat due to the periarticular nature of these injuries and the complexity of the elbow joint. Although anatomic and timely repair of the distal humerus with meticulous handling of soft tissues and appropriate postoperative therapy all help to optimize results, an open fracture presents other challenges that may limit successful outcomes in spite of these measures. Open fractures have been found to affect younger males involved in high-energy injuries, as well as older, osteoporotic females involved in lower energy situations. Successful management of these injuries requires urgent and aggressive soft tissue management, skeletal stabilization, and treatment of neurovascular insult (if applicable). This article presents a review of the current literature available concerning the epidemiology, assessment and examination, treatment options, complications, and outcomes of patients with open distal humerus fractures

The diagnostic and therapeutic modalities utilized in the management of pelvic ring fractures depend on patient characteristics, mechanism of injury, and hemodynamic status at the time of presentation. Knowledge of the complex anatomy and biomechanics of pelvic stability may guide appropriate initial management strategies. Even with the development of specific treatment algorithms and advances in both diagnostic and operative techniques, fractures of the pelvis continue to cause significant morbidity and mortality. The current paper reviews the diagnosis and management of pelvic ring fractures, focusing on current concepts with respect to initial assessment and treatment protocols, including the identification of associated injuries and emergency methods of provisional pelvic stabilization

Various treatment options exist for distal radius fractures, and the complications associated with operative and nonoperative management are well documented in the literature. While surgical management with the use of various buttress and locked plating constructs has gained popularity, the long-term outcomes of these plating techniques have not yet significantly demonstrated improved outcomes, as compared to adequately reduced nonoperative measures. Furthermore, this operative technique can be associated with failures and complications. We present a case report of one volar-plate construct requiring revision, secondary to loss of fracture reduction, with no evidence of implant loosening or failure. A literature review on the complications associated with these plate constructs is also presented

There has been increased emphasis on validated, patient-reported functional outcomes after orthopaedic interventions for various conditions. The few reports on these types of outcomes after treatment of fracture nonunions are limited to specific anatomic sites, limited by small numbers, and retrospective. To determine whether successful healing of established long-bone nonunions resulted in improved functional outcomes and reduction in patient-reported pain scores, we prospectively followed 80 patients. These patients had a mean of 1.4 surgical procedures before enrollment and a mean of 18 months had elapsed from previous surgery until enrollment. Baseline data and functional scores were obtained before intervention. Seventeen of the 80 patients (21%) had positive intraoperative cultures. At a mean of 18.7 months (range, 12-36 months), 72 (90%) nonunions had healed. Patients with healed nonunions scored better on the Short Musculoskeletal Functional Assessment. Pain scores among all patients improved compared with baseline, but to a greater degree in patients who achieved healing by final followup. Our data suggest improvement in pain scores is seen in all patients after surgery, whereas successful internal fixation leads to improved function. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, therapeutic study. See Guidelines for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence

BACKGROUND: While alendronate therapy has been shown to decrease the risk of vertebral and femoral neck fractures in postmenopausal osteoporotic patients, recent reports have associated long-term alendronate therapy with unilateral low-energy subtrochanteric and diaphyseal femoral fractures in a small number of patients. To our knowledge, there has been only one report of sequential bilateral femoral fractures in patients on long-term bisphosphonate therapy. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the case log of the senior author over the last four years to identify patients who presented with a subtrochanteric or diaphyseal femoral fracture after a low-energy mechanism of injury (a fall from standing height or less) and who had been taking alendronate for more than five years. Radiographs were reviewed, and the fracture patterns were recorded. Serum calcium levels were recorded when available. RESULTS: Seven patients who sustained low-energy bilateral subtrochanteric or diaphyseal femoral fractures while on long-term alendronate therapy were identified. One patient presented with simultaneous bilateral diaphyseal fractures, two patients had sequential subtrochanteric fractures, and four patients had impending contralateral subtrochanteric stress fractures noted at the time of the initial fracture. Of the latter four, one patient had a fracture through the stress site and the other three patients had prophylactic stabilization of the site with internal fixation. No patient had discontinued alendronate therapy prior to the second fracture. All patients were women with an average age of sixty-one years, and they had been on alendronate therapy for an average of 8.6 years. All fractures were treated with reamed intramedullary nailing and went on to union at an average of four months. CONCLUSIONS: In patients on long-term alendronate therapy who present with a subtrochanteric or diaphyseal femoral fracture, we recommend radiographs of the contralateral femur and consideration of discontinuing alendronate in consultation with an endocrinologist. If a contralateral stress fracture is found, prophylactic fixation should be considered

Stress radiographs are useful in determining the amount of ligamentous laxity present following trauma. The results may be helpful in determining diagnosis, surgical indications, and the type and timing of rehabilitation. Some techniques for obtaining stress radiographs involve specific patient positioning or manually applied force; others require use of a particular testing device. Stress radiographs may be obtained for a variety of anatomic areas and joints. The parameters that define abnormality on stress radiographs should be compared with those of clinical findings. The use of common and novel methods to obtain stress radiographs has led to improved identification and diagnosis of many orthopaedic pathologies. Some of these techniques have been developed with the aim of reducing patient discomfort or minimizing the clinician's exposure to radiation.

Fracture compression can be achieved in many ways intraoperatively using either screws in compression plates, compression devices, or using intramedullary nails. The use of locked intramedullary nails combines the advantages of indirect fracture fixation and compression with minimal soft tissue disruption. This article describes the technique, advantages, and limitations of the use of intramedullary nails for compression across fractures, nonunions, and joint arthrodeses

BACKGROUND: This study investigated which variables influence patients' return to sports after operative fixation of an unstable ankle fracture. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Over a 5-year period, 488 patients underwent surgical repair of an unstable ankle fracture. 243 patients preoperatively identified themselves as participating in vigorous activity. Clinical evaluation, functional outcome scores, and radiographic findings were reviewed retrospectively. RESULTS: At 3 months postoperatively, only 3% of all patients had returned to full sports. At 6 months, 14% of patients had returned, while at one year, only 24% of patients had returned. Younger age was predictive of return to sports by 3 months (p = 0.02), 6 months (p = 0.02) and 12 months (p = 0.0001). Males were more likely to return to sports at 6 (p = 0.001) and 12 months (p = 0.040). At 1 year, 88% of recreational athletes had returned to sports, while only 11.6% of competitive athletes had returned to sports (p = 0.043). At 12 months, bimalleolar injuries were more likely to return to sports than unimalleolar ankle fractures (p = 0.042). Furthermore, patients without an associated syndesmotic injury were more likely to return to athletic activities at 12 months (p = 0.011). A patient with an ASA of one or two was ten times more likely to return to sports versus a patient with an ASA of three or four (odds ratio > 10, p = 0.010). CONCLUSION: Predictors of return to sporting activities at one year include younger age, male gender, no or mild systemic disease, and a less severe ankle fracture. Negative predictors include older age, female gender, and the presence of severe medical comorbidities