Faculty Bibliography

PURPOSE/OBJECTIVE:mutation in their tumors. However, the development of resistance to BRAFi and MEKi remains a difficult clinical challenge with limited therapeutic options available to these patients. In this study, we investigated the mechanism and potential therapeutic utility of combination BRAFi and adoptive T-cell therapy (ACT) in melanoma resistant to BRAFi. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN/METHODS:with various human melanoma cell lines sensitive and resistant to BRAFi as well as patient-derived xenografts (PDX) derived from patients. In addition, samples were evaluated from patients on a clinical trial of BRAFi in combination with ACT. RESULTS:Herein we report that in human melanoma cell lines, senstitive and resistant to BRAFi and in PDX from patients who progressed on BRAFi and MEKi therapy, BRAFi caused transient upregulation of mannose-6-phosphate receptor (M6PR). This sensitized tumor cells to CTLs via uptake of granzyme B, a main component of the cytotoxic activity of CTLs. Treatment of mice bearing resistant tumors with BRAFi enhanced the antitumor effect of patients' TILs. A pilot clinical trial of 16 patients with metastatic melanoma who were treated with the BRAFi vemurafenib followed by therapy with TILs demonstrated a significant increase of M6PR expression on tumors during vemurafenib treatment. CONCLUSIONS:.

BACKGROUND:Epacadostat is a potent inhibitor of the immunosuppressive indoleamine 2,3-dioxygenase 1 (IDO1) enzyme. We present phase 1 results from a phase 1/2 clinical study of epacadostat in combination with ipilimumab, an anti-cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated protein 4 antibody, in advanced melanoma (NCT01604889). METHODS:Only the phase 1, open-label portion of the study was conducted, per the sponsor's decision to terminate the study early based on the changing melanoma treatment landscape favoring exploration of programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1)/PD-ligand 1 inhibitor-based combination strategies. Such decision was not related to the safety of epacadostat plus ipilimumab. Patients received oral epacadostat (25, 50, 100, or 300 mg twice daily [BID]; 75 mg daily [50 mg AM, 25 mg PM]; or 50 mg BID intermittent [2 weeks on/1 week off]) plus intravenous ipilimumab 3 mg/kg every 3 weeks. RESULTS:Fifty patients received ≥1 dose of epacadostat. As of January 20, 2017, 2 patients completed treatment and 48 discontinued, primarily because of adverse events (AEs) and disease progression (n = 20 each). Dose-limiting toxicities occurred in 11 patients (n = 1 each with epacadostat 25 mg BID, 50 mg BID intermittent, 75 mg daily; n = 4 each with epacadostat 50 mg BID, 300 mg BID). The most common immune-related treatment-emergent AEs included rash (50%), alanine aminotransferase elevation (28%), pruritus (28%), aspartate aminotransferase elevation (24%), and hypothyroidism (10%). Among immunotherapy-naive patients (n = 39), the objective response rate was 26% by immune-related response criteria and 23% by Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors version 1.1. No objective response was seen in the 11 patients who received prior immunotherapy. Epacadostat exposure was dose proportional, with clinically significant IDO1 inhibition at doses ≥25 mg BID. CONCLUSIONS:When combined with ipilimumab, epacadostat ≤50 mg BID demonstrated clinical and pharmacologic activity and was generally well tolerated in patients with advanced melanoma. TRIAL REGISTRATION/BACKGROUND:ClinicalTrials.gov identifier, NCT01604889 . Registration date, May 9, 2012, retrospectively registered.

Immune-checkpoint inhibition (ICI) treatments improve outcomes for metastatic melanoma; however, > 60% of treated patients do not respond to ICI. Current biomarkers do not reliably explain ICI resistance. Given the link between ICI and autoimmunity, we investigated if genetic susceptibility to autoimmunity modulates ICI efficacy. In 436 patients with metastatic melanoma receiving single line ICI or combination treatment, we tested 25 SNPs, associated with > 2 autoimmune diseases in recent genome-wide association studies, for modulation of ICI efficacy. We found that rs17388568-a risk variant for allergy, colitis and type 1 diabetes-was associated with increased anti-PD-1 response, with significance surpassing multiple testing adjustments (OR 0.26; 95% CI 0.12-0.53; p = 0.0002). This variant maps to a locus of established immune-related genes: IL2 and IL21. Our study provides first evidence that autoimmune genetic susceptibility may modulate ICI efficacy, suggesting that systematic testing of autoimmune risk loci could reveal personalized biomarkers of ICI response.

Although much clinical progress has been made in harnessing the immune system to recognize and target cancer, there is still a significant lack of an understanding of how tumors evade immune recognition and the mechanisms that drive tumor resistance to both T-cell and checkpoint blockade immunotherapy. Our objective is to understand how tumor-mediated signaling through inhibitory receptors, including PD-1, combines to affect the process of T-cell recognition of tumor antigen and activation signaling. This has the goal of understanding the basis of resistance to PD-1 blockade and potentially identifying new molecular targets to enable T-cells to overcome dysfunction mediated by multiple inhibitory receptors. Biomembrane Force Probe (BFP) measurements show that that the activities of TCR-proximal signaling components affect T-cell mechanosensing and sensitivity at the earliest stages of antigen recognition and are influenced by PD-1 and other inhibitory receptors via Shp-1/2 by targeting CD28 and Lck to directly suppress TCR-pMHC-CD8 binding. Phospho-proteomics and flow cytometry-based analysis of patient-derived T-cells from PD-1 responders and nonresponders identified additional mediators, signaling components and pathways associated with PD-1 checkpoint blockade resistance. Targeting these interactions and understanding the basis of resistance to PD-1 blockade would potentially allow identification of novel biomarkers of resistance or new molecular targets to enable T-cells to overcome dysfunction during PD-1 checkpoint blockade

BACKGROUND:Therapies targeting anti-tumor T-cell responses have proven successful in the treatment of a variety of malignancies. However, as most patients still fail to respond, approaches to augment immunotherapeutic efficacy are needed. Here, we investigated the ability of histone deacetylase 6 (HDAC6)-selective inhibitors to decrease immunosuppression and enhance immune function of melanoma patient T-cells in ex vivo cultures. METHODS:T-cells were harvested from peripheral blood or tumor biopsies of metastatic melanoma patients and cultured in the presence of pan-, class-specific or class-selective histone deacetylase (HDAC) inhibitors. Changes in cytokine production were evaluated by Luminex and intracellular flow cytometry staining. Expression of surface markers, transcription factors, protein phosphorylation, and cell viability were assessed by flow cytometry. Changes in chromatin structure were determined by ATAC-seq. RESULTS:T-cell viability was impaired with low doses of pan-HDAC inhibitors but not with specific or selective HDAC inhibitors. The HDAC6-selective inhibitors ACY-1215 (ricolinostat) and ACY-241 (citarinostat) decreased Th2 cytokine production (i.e. IL-4, IL-5, IL-6, IL-10 and IL-13). Expansion of peripheral blood T-cells from melanoma patients in the presence of these inhibitors resulted in downregulation of the Th2 transcription factor GATA3, upregulation of the Th1 transcription factor T-BET, accumulation of central memory phenotype T-cells (CD45RA-CD45RO + CD62L + CCR7+), reduced exhaustion-associated phenotypes (i.e. TIM3 + LAG3 + PD1+ and EOMES+PD1+), and enhanced killing in mixed lymphocyte reactions. The frequency, FOXP3 expression, and suppressive function of T regulatory cells (Tregs) were decreased after exposure to ACY-1215 or ACY-241. Higher frequencies of T-cells expressing CD107a + IFNγ+ and central memory markers were observed in melanoma tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TIL), which persisted after drug removal and further expansion. After ACY-1215 treatment, increased chromatin accessibility was observed in regions associated with T-cell effector function and memory phenotypes, while condensed chromatin was found in regions encoding the mTOR downstream molecules AKT, SGK1 and S6K. Decreased phosphorylation of these proteins was observed in ACY-1215 and ACY-241-treated T-cells. AKT- and SGK1-specific inhibition recapitulated the increase in central memory frequency and decrease in IL-4 production, respectively, similar to the observed effects of HDAC6-selective inhibition. CONCLUSIONS:HDAC6-selective inhibitors augmented melanoma patient T-cell immune properties, providing a rationale for translational investigation assessing their potential clinical efficacy.

Significant advancements, including development of immune checkpoint inhibitors and targeted therapies, have transformed outcomes in patients (pts) with unresectable or metastatic melanoma. However, pts who do not respond or who progress while receiving these regimens have limited options. Spartalizumab is a high-affinity, humanized monoclonal antibody blocking the programmed cell death-1 (PD-1) receptor. This randomized, open-label, 2-part, multicenter, open-platform, phase 2 study (NCT03484923) will evaluate safety and efficacy of spartalizumab combination treatment in pts with unresectable or metastatic melanoma progressing after prior anti-PD-1/ L1 therapy and, if the tumor harbors a BRAF V600 mutation, a BRAF inhibitor. The primary endpoint is objective response rate in each arm per RECIST v1.1; secondary endpoints include duration of response and assessment of paired tumor biopsies for biomarkers of antitumor T-cell activity. The first "selection" part will begin with 3 combination arms: (1) spartalizumab + LAG525 (LAG-3 antibody), (2) spartalizumab + capmatinib (c-MET inhibitor), and (3) spartalizumab + canakinumab (IL-1beta antagonist). An adaptive design will allow dropping arms for futility, adding new arms, and selecting >= 1 arm for expansion. Bayesian methodology will be used with specific probability criteria for futility and efficacy assessments at each interim analysis. Pts (= 60-85) will be stratified by baseline lactate dehydrogenase and randomized equally to all open arms during the selection part. In the second "expansion" part, efficacy and safety of treatment combination(s) selected during part 1 will be further investigated. Sample size for part 2 will be adaptive and based on predictive power calculations considering the results from part 1

To understand prognostic factors for outcome between differentially sequenced nivolumab and ipilimumab in a randomized phase II trial, we measured T-cell infiltration and PD-L1 by immunohistochemistry, T-cell repertoire metrics, and mutational load within the tumor. We used next-generation sequencing (NGS) and assessed the association of those parameters with response and overall survival. Immunosequencing of the T-cell receptor β-chain locus (TCRβ) from DNA of 91 pretreatment tumor samples and an additional 22 pairs of matched pre- and post treatment samples from patients who received nivolumab followed by ipilimumab (nivo/ipi), or the reverse (ipi/nivo), was performed to measure T cell clonality and fraction. Mutational and neoantigen load were also assessed by NGS in 82 of the 91 patients. Tumors were stained using immunohistochemistry for PD-L1+ and CD8+ T cells. Pretreatment tumor TCR clonality and neoantigen load were marginally associated with best response with nivo/ipi (P = 0.04 and 0.05, respectively), but not with ipi/nivo. Amalgamated pretreatment mutational load and tumor T cell fraction were significantly associated with best response with nivo/ipi (P = .002). Pretreatment PD-L1 staining intensity and CD8+ T-cell counts were correlated with T-cell fraction and clonality, but not mutational or neoantigen load. Patients with increased T-cell fraction post-treatment at week 13 had a 30-fold increased likelihood of survival (P = .002). Mutational and neoantigen load, and T-cell infiltrate within the tumor, were associated with outcome of sequential checkpoint inhibition using nivolumab then ipilimumab, but not when ipilimumab was administered before nivolumab.

Background/UNASSIGNED:Two primary histologic subtypes, superficial spreading melanoma (SSM) and nodular melanoma (NM), comprise the majority of all cutaneous melanomas. NM is associated with worse outcomes, which have been attributed to increased thickness at presentation, and it is widely expected that NM and SSM would exhibit similar behavior once metastasized. Herein, we tested the hypothesis that primary histologic subtype is an independent predictor of survival and may impact response to treatment in the metastatic setting. Methods/UNASSIGNED:We examined the most recent Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) cohort (n = 118 508) and the New York University (NYU) cohort (n = 1621) with available protocol-driven follow-up. Outcomes specified by primary histology were studied in both the primary and metastatic settings with respect to BRAF-targeted therapy and immunotherapy. We characterized known driver mutations and examined a 140-gene panel in a subset of NM and SSM cases using next-generation sequencing. All statistical tests were two-sided. Results/UNASSIGNED:NM was an independent risk factor for death in both the SEER (hazard ratio [HR] = 1.55, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.41 to 1.70, P < .001) and NYU (HR = 1.47, 95% CI = 1.05, 2.07, P = .03) cohorts, controlling for thickness, ulceration, stage, and other variables. In the metastatic setting, NM remained an independent risk factor for death upon treatment with BRAF-targeted therapy (HR = 3.33, 95% CI = 1.06 to 10.47, P = .04) but showed no statistically significant difference with immune checkpoint inhibition. NM was associated with a higher rate of NRAS mutation (P < .001), and high-throughput sequencing revealed NM-specific genomic alterations in NOTCH4, ANK3, and ZNF560, which were independently validated. Conclusions/UNASSIGNED:Our data reveal distinct clinical and biological differences between NM and SSM that support revisiting the prognostic and predictive impact of primary histology subtype in the management of cutaneous melanoma.