Faculty Bibliography

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Currently, there are no diagnostic criteria for vasculitides. To this end, there is a current European League Against Rheumatism and American College of Rheumatology initiative for formulating separate classification and diagnostic criteria for different forms of vasculitis. The authors of this review previously disagreed to separate classification and diagnostic criteria. They now expand this disagreement in light of both of more recent information and a reassessment of older communications. RECENT FINDINGS: We still can find no clear methodologies proposed to prepare separate diagnostic and classification criteria. Furthermore, the inadequate importance given to probabilities in discussing disease criteria was strikingly apparent. Among 77 articles on diagnostic/classification criteria making, not more than 4% discussed Bayes' theorem or predictive values or confidence intervals. The misconceptions related to the worry about circularity and the proper role of nomenclature in classification and diagnostic criteria continue. SUMMARY: Separate diagnostic and classification criteria are unrealistic. Classification criteria and nomenclature are only tools to a proper diagnosis, essentially not different for patient care or research. A frank discussion of probabilities in diagnosis is essential not only with the patients but also with all the stakeholders.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate clinical response by baseline disease duration using 2-year data from the AMPLE trial. METHODS: Patients were randomised to subcutaneous abatacept 125 mg weekly or adalimumab 40 mg bi-weekly, with background methotrexate. As part of a post hoc analysis, the achievement of validated definitions of remission (Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI) 6 months). Disease Activity Score 28 (C-reactive protein) <2.6 or 6 months) across multiple clinical measures. CONCLUSIONS: Abatacept or adalimumab with background methotrexate were associated with similar onset and sustainability of response over 2 years. Patients treated early or later in the disease course achieved comparable clinical responses. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT00929864, Post-results.

Behcet's syndrome (BS) is a vasculitis involving several organ systems including the eyes. Ocular involvement is one of the most disabling complications of BS, causing loss of vision that may progress to blindness if left untreated. The typical form of ocular involvement is a relapsing and remitting panuveitis and retinal vasculitis. Initial attacks may spontaneously improve and subsequently disappear in a few weeks but tend to recur if left untreated. Destructive and recurrent attacks, especially with posterior segment and retina involvement, may cause irreversible ocular structural changes and permanent damage in sensory retina, resulting in loss of vision. The risk of irreversible damage to ocular tissue which may result in loss of vision warrants early and intensive treatment especially in patients at high risk such as young men who tend to follow an aggressive disease course. The management strategy involves rapid suppression of inflammation during the attacks and prevention of recurrent attacks. Local and systemic measures including immunosuppressives, corticosteroids, and biologic agents are used for this purpose. Surgery may be required in selected cases. The prognosis of eye involvement has greatly improved over the last decades with the effective use of immunosuppressives.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of the Patient/Physician Reported Efficacy Determination In Clinical Practice Trial (PREDICT; ClinicalTrials identifier NCT01255761) was to compare the patient-reported Routine Assessment of Patient Index Data 3 (RAPID-3) instrument with the investigator-based Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI) for assessing certolizumab pegol (CZP) treatment response in rheumatoid arthritis patients at 12 weeks and to predict the treatment response at week 52 using the data from week 12 (coprimary end points). METHODS: Patients received 400 mg of CZP at weeks 0, 2, and 4 (loading dose), followed by 200 mg every 2 weeks thereafter. Patients were randomized 1:1 to assessment with the RAPID-3 or the CDAI. Responder classification was performed at week 12; treatment response was defined as a score of 22 or RAPID-3 score >12) at 2 consecutive visits were withdrawn from the study. RESULTS: Patients had longstanding disease (mean 8.9 years) and high levels of disease activity (mean scores of 6.3 on the DAS28-ESR, 16.1 on the RAPID-3, and 40.2 on the CDAI). Previous anti-tumor necrosis factor therapy had failed in 55.5% of them. At week 12, a total of 64.7% (by RAPID-3) and 76.4% (by CDAI) of the patients were classified as responders (difference of -11.9% [95% confidence interval -18.4%, -5.3%]). At week 52, a total of 31.5% (by RAPID-3) and 32.3% (by CDAI) of the responders achieved a low level of disease activity on the DAS28-ESR (difference of -1.3% [95% confidence interval -9.3%, 6.6%]). CONCLUSION: The CDAI classified more patients as CZP responders at week 12 than did the RAPID-3. Although these outcome measures were not statistically comparable, the positive predictive value for low disease activity at week 52 was similar. As these tools cover differing domains of therapy response, further evaluation for clinical disease activity assessments and treatment decisions is needed.