Faculty Bibliography

Infantile hemangiomas are the most common tumor of infancy, occurring with an incidence of up to 10% of all births. They are benign but highly proliferative lesions involving aberrant localized growth of capillary endothelium. Although most hemangiomas occur sporadically and as single lesions, or in conjunction with pleiotropic genetic syndromes, we have previously identified six kindreds where hemangiomas appear to segregate as an autosomal dominant trait with high penetrance. Four such families contain affected individuals in three or more generations. In the current study, blood samples from five of these families were collected and used in a whole genome linkage search at 10-cM resolution. We established evidence for linkage to 5q in three families, and evidence for locus heterogeneity. The three 5q-linked families were further genotyped to generate haplotype information and narrow the candidate interval. Based on recombination breakpoint analysis, the interval exists between markers D5S2490 and D5S408, spanning 55 cM, and corresponding to 5q31-33. Using information from affected and unaffected individuals, the interval spans 38 cM between markers D5S1469 and D5S211. Three candidate genes involved with blood vessel growth map to this region: fibroblast growth factor receptor-4 (FGFR4), platelet-derived growth factor receptor-beta (PDG-FRB), and fms-related tyrosine kinase-4 (FLT4). The genes and gene products associated with familial hemangiomas may be involved somatically in the more common sporadic cases

BACKGROUND: The pathogenesis of infantile hemangiomas is not yet understood. Growth factors and hormonal and mechanical influences have been thought to affect the focal abnormal growth of endothelial cells in these lesions. However, these influences may represent secondary responses to an underlying primary molecular event leading to the development of hemangiomas. OBSERVATIONS: We report the rare familial occurrence of hemangiomas and/or vascular malformations in 6 kindreds, suggesting autosomal dominant inheritance. In these families, multiple generations (2-4) were affected by hemangiomas or vascular malformations. In contrast to the generally accepted female-male ratio of 3:1 to 4:1 associated with sporadic hemangiomas, the families with hemangiomas in our study demonstrated a 2:1 ratio. Additionally, vascular malformations and hemangiomas were present in different members of the same family. The vascular lesions appeared to be transmitted in an autosomal dominant fashion with moderate to high penetrance. CONCLUSIONS: We have identified 6 families demonstrating autosomal dominant segregation of childhood hemangiomas. Additionally, family members with vascular malformations were identified in these kindreds. Physicians caring for children with hemangiomas and vascular malformations should include in their medical histories inquiries about vascular lesions in other family members, even when obvious lesions are not present in the parents. The identification of the mutation(s) underlying vascular lesions will provide insight into the pathogenesis of these familial hemangiomas and, potentially, common sporadic hemangiomas. In addition, such research would shed light on the regulation of angiogenic processes during development

We present the management challenge provided by a patient with kaposiform hemangioendothelioma associated with Kasabach-Merritt phenomenon. A female child presented at 14 months of age with an ecchymotic swelling of her right upper arm and axilla. Subsequently, she developed profound thrombocytopenia and hypofibrinogenemia (Kasabach-Merritt phenomenon). Biopsy of the lesion revealed kaposiform hemangioendothelioma, which has been reported as the predominant pathologic diagnosis associated with Kasabach-Merritt phenomenon. To achieve involution of the lesion and preserve function of the arm, the following interventions were involved: embolization, systemic interferon, cyclophosphamide, epsilon aminocaproic acid, and compression therapy. The clinical management of this patient was formidable until we arrived at the proper combination of therapies. Multimodal intervention may be required to manage fastidious hemangioendotheliomas of childhood, achieve clinical improvement, and prevent further morbidity

We evaluated the frequency of an association of cutaneous cervicofacial hemangiomas in a 'beard' distribution (including the preauricular areas, chin, anterior neck, and lower lip) with symptomatic hemangiomas of the upper airway or subglottic areas. Of 529 patients seen, 187 were pediatric patients with hemangiomas of the head and neck. Sixteen of the 187 patients (8.5%) had cutaneous lesions with a beard distribution, with a score of 4 or greater. Ten of these 16 (63%) patients had some degree of symptomatic airway involvement, and four of the 10 (40%) required tracheotomy. The presence of cutaneous hemangiomas in a beard distribution should alert the evaluating physician to the potential association of upper airway or subglottic involvement

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate medical treatment for hemangiomas involving the parotid area with or without other areas of involvement. DESIGN: Retrospective analysis of pediatric patients treated medically for proliferative hemangiomas of the parotid region with or without hemangiomas in other regions. Indications for treatment included respiratory symptoms relating to hemangiomas of the upper airway, difficulty feeding, rapid rate of growth of the hemangioma, and deformity or obstruction of the ear canal. SETTING: New York University Multidisciplinary Vascular Anomaly Conference, New York, NY, and the Pediatric Oncology Department of Ospedale Pediatrico Bambino Gesu, Rome, Italy. PATIENTS: Thirteen patients with proliferative hemangiomas in the parotid area were treated medically to inhibit growth and enhance involution of the hemangioma. INTERVENTION: Six patients were treated with corticosteroids alone (2-4 mg/kg daily). Two patients were treated with corticosteroids (2-4 mg/kg daily) followed by interferon alfa-2a (3 million U/m2 daily) because of a failure to respond to corticosteroid therapy. One patient was treated with interferon alfa-2a alone (3 million U/m2 daily). Four patients were initially treated with interferon alfa-2a, then treated with corticosteroids. One of these patients required intralesional corticosteroid therapy for a massively enlarged lip and is therefore included in this group. The other patient was given oral corticosteroids for unknown reasons at another institution. In the remaining 2 patients, there was no response to the use of interferon alfa-2a. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The size, bulk, and symptoms relating to the hemangiomas of the patients were assessed. RESULTS: None of the patients had a significant improvement of the lesions of the parotid hemangiomas. In contrast, for those patients with clinical symptoms due to hemangiomas elsewhere or with cutaneous involvement typical of hemangiomas, the symptoms improved with either of the above therapies, and the cutaneous areas demonstrated signs of involution. CONCLUSIONS: The results in the 13 patients in this article demonstrate that hemangiomas in certain anatomic sites, such as the parotid area, may be more resistant to therapy with corticosteroids or interferon alfa-2a. Differences in drug metabolism, caliber of blood vessels, and/or blood flow in the parotid gland may account for this observation