Faculty Bibliography

The midurethral sling (MUS) is now the most commonly performed surgical treatment for stress urinary incontinence (SUI), and is considered the gold standard for patients with genuine SUI. This article examines the use of the MUS to treat all forms of SUI, with an emphasis on the nonindex patient (ie, intrinsic sphincter deficiency, lack of urethral hypermobility, mixed incontinence, failed MUS, concomitant prolapse, obesity, and elderly). The efficacy and safety of the MUS to treat SUI is assessed in these specific populations. Based on the available evidence, the discussion attempts to identify populations in whom MUS may not be appropriate.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the clinical and urodynamic differences in the presentation and the value of simultaneous fluoroscopy in dysfunctional voiding (DV) and primary bladder neck obstruction (PBNO); the 2 most common causes of non-neurogenic "functional" bladder outlet obstruction in women. METHODS: A review of our urodynamic study database (March 2003 to August 2009) was conducted. DV was diagnosed when increased external sphincter activity was found during voluntary voiding on electromyography (EMG) or fluoroscopy. PBNO was diagnosed when a failure of bladder neck opening was noted on fluoroscopy during voiding. The demographics, symptoms, and urodynamic study parameters were collected. Comparisons were done using chi-square and 2-tailed t-tests. RESULTS: DV was diagnosed in 34 women and PBNO in 16. The patients with DV were younger than those with PBNO (40.9 vs 59.2 years, P < .001). Women with DV showed a clinical trend toward having more storage symptoms than those with PBNO and fewer voiding symptoms. Patients with DV had a greater mean maximal flow rate (12 vs 7 mL/s, P = .027) and lower mean postvoid residual urine volume (125 vs 400 mL, P = .012). No significant differences were found in maximal detrusor pressure, detrusor pressure at maximal flow rate, or detrusor overactivity. EMG showed increased activity during voiding in 79.4% of those with DV and 14.3% of those with PBNO (P < .001). CONCLUSION: Clinically, women with DV and PBNO had similar presentations, although those with PBNO had poorer emptying. The flow rates and patterns seemed to differ between those with DV and PBNO, although the voiding pressures were similar. EMG alone would have given the wrong diagnosis in 20.6% of those with DV (false negative) and 14.3% of those with PBNO (false positive). When fluoroscopy is used to define these entities, the accuracy of EMG to differentiate them is questionable.

Introduction and Objectives: To determine the utility of urodynamics (UDS) in patients with obstruction secondary to anti-incontinence surgery (AIS). Methods: A retrospective review of all procedures performed to relieve obstruction due to AIS from 01/01-06/11. Patient demographics, UDS findings, type of AIS, indication for intervention, procedure to relieve obstruction, preoperative and postoperative symptoms were recorded. Patients were excluded if this was not the primary procedure to relieve obstruction, if follow up data was missing, or if a neurologic disorderwas present. Patients were grouped into the following categories prior to intervention: UDS diagnosis of obstruction vs. non-diagnostic UDS or no UDS testing and patients with predominantly storage symptoms vs. patients with elevated PVR/retention and voiding symptoms. Outcomes were compared between these groups using SPSS statistical software and chi-square test. Curewas defined as resolution of symptoms for which intervention was indicated at last follow-up. Results: A total of 71 women were included in the analysis. There were 53 women with elevated PVR/retention, 32 (60.3%) were diagnosed with obstruction on UDS, 4 (7.5%) had nondiagnostic UDS and 17 (32%) did not undergo preoperativeUDS. All 18 patients with predominantly storage symptoms underwent UDS. In patients with elevated PVR/retention there was no difference in age, type of AIS procedure, time to intervention, follow up, preoperative voiding symptoms or type of intervention between groups. Patientswho had diagnostic UDS had significantly more storage symptoms than those who had non diagnostic UDS or who did not undergo UDS (81.2%% vs. 18.7% p=0.01). In patients who had storage symptoms and underwent UDS, those without evidence of detrusor overactivity (DO) had significantly greater improvement of their storage symptoms when compared to those with DO (85.7% vs. 53.8%, p=0.02). Overall 90.1% of patients improved and 74.6% were cured. In patients with elevated PVR/Retention there was no difference between groups with respect to improvement in symptoms, overall cure, and overall success according to whether they had diagnostic UDS or not. Conclusion: If voiding symptoms or urinary retention/ elevated PVR are the primary indication for intervention following AIS, it appears UDS are not required to proceed with intervention. If storage symptomsare themain indication for intervention, UDS may be a valuable tool for patient counseling

PURPOSE: Male slings have emerged as a popular and efficacious treatment for men with post-prostatectomy stress urinary incontinence. Traditionally slings have been used with caution or avoided in men with impaired detrusor contractility or Valsalva voiding because of concern that patients will not be able to overcome the fixed resistance of a sling during micturition. We propose that men with post-prostatectomy urinary incontinence who have impaired contractility and/or void with abdominal straining for urodynamics can be safely treated with slings. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective review of patients with post-prostatectomy urinary incontinence who underwent an initial sling procedure between January 2004 and January 2010 was conducted at a single institution. Preoperative urodynamic characteristics, and postoperative Patient Global Impression of Improvement, post-void residual and noninvasive uroflow data were examined. Patients were grouped by poor bladder contractility or Valsalva voiding status. Exclusion criteria were lack of preoperative urodynamics and/or postoperative post-void residual. A total of 92 patients were analyzed. The variables were compared using the Student t test and the chi-square test. RESULTS: No statistically significant difference was shown in postoperative post-void residual (mean 4 months postoperatively) or urinary retention when comparing by bladder contractility or Valsalva voiding. In the subset of patients with available postoperative uroflow data, there were no differences in postoperative maximum flow rate or voided volume. CONCLUSIONS: Men with post-prostatectomy urinary incontinence with urodynamic findings suggesting impaired contractility or Valsalva voiding can be safely treated with sling surgery if they have normal preoperative emptying

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the utility of estimated tumour volume, number of positive surgical margins (PSMs), and margin location for predicting biochemical failure in patients with PSM, in an attempt to better risk-stratify the heterogeneous group of patients at high risk of biochemical failure after radical prostatectomy (RP) for prostate cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We reviewed our database of 2410 patients who had RP, and isolated 423 with PSMs who had a prostate-specific antigen (PSA) nadir at undetectable levels. Kaplan-Meier curves were used for univariate survival analysis, with the log-rank test used to examine differences between survival curves. Multivariate Cox regression analysis was used to assess the independent main effect of estimated tumour volume, number of PSMs and margin location on biochemical-free survival. RESULTS: Increasing estimated tumour volume was directly associated with increasing risk of biochemical failure in patients with PSMs (P = 0.041). Patients with more than one PSM were at greater risk of biochemical failure than those with one PSM (P = 0.001). Margin location had no effect on biochemical-free survival in patients with PSMs. When incorporated into a multivariate Cox regression model including age, preoperative PSA level and pathological Gleason score, estimated tumour volume and number of PSMs remained independent predictors of biochemical recurrence. CONCLUSIONS: Coupled with other variables before and after RP, both estimated tumour volume and number of PSMs might serve to further discriminate those patients most likely to benefit from immediate adjuvant radiotherapy after RP.

OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to assess the prognostic significance of hydronephrosis on pathologic and clinical outcomes in muscle-invasive bladder cancer. METHODS: We performed a retrospective evaluation of a prospectively maintained cystectomy database and identified patients with hydronephrosis on preoperative imaging. Of a total of 306 patients, 57 (19%) had unilateral hydronephrosis and 17 (6%) had bilateral hydronephrosis. We constructed multivariate Cox regression analysis and Kaplan Meier tables to evaluate the association between preoperative hydronephrosis and clinical outcomes. RESULTS: In patients without hydronephrosis, 41.4% had extravesical disease compared with 56.1% and 64.7% in patients with unilateral or bilateral hydronephrosis, respectively. Mean overall survival (OS) among patients without hydronephrosis, with unilateral hydronephrosis, and with bilateral hydronephrosis was 55.5, 42.1, and 22.2 months, respectively. Five-year OS and disease-specific survival (DSS) was 46%, 35%, and 22% (P = .001) and 68%, 54%, and 35% (P = .002), respectively. Multivariate analysis demonstrated that both unilateral and bilateral hydronephrosis are significant independent risk factors for DSS and OS. Bilateral hydronephrosis was found to have a hazard ratio of 3.87 (95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.71-8.78, P = .001) and 2.75 (95% CI = 1.45-5.18, P = .002) for DSS and OS, respectively. The hazard ratios for unilateral hydronephrosis were 1.7 (95% CI = 1.05-2.87, P = .03) and 1.5 (95% CI = 1.03-2.23, P = .04) for DSS and OS, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Preoperative hydronephrosis is associated with a significantly poorer prognosis in patients with muscle-invasive bladder cancer. These patients should be appropriately counseled with regard to overall prognosis and the potential benefit of neoadjuvant chemotherapy.

BACKGROUND: A previously healthy 51-year-old man with two children sustained a minor testicular trauma and subsequently sought medical care for persistent discomfort. INVESTIGATIONS: Physical examination, scrotal ultrasonography, Doppler ultrasound evaluation of testicular blood flow, scrotal MRI, measurement of serum tumor markers and testosterone levels, CT of the chest, abdomen and pelvis, intraoperative frozen section analysis and final pathologic analysis. DIAGNOSIS: Bilateral testicular seminoma (clinical stage I). MANAGEMENT: The patient initially underwent radical left orchiectomy with intraoperative frozen section analysis, which returned equivocal results. Final pathologic analysis revealed a 2.5 cm left testicular seminoma without vascular invasion. After careful discussion, he ultimately underwent radical right orchiectomy; pathologic analysis revealed a 2.7 cm right seminoma with vascular invasion. Testosterone replacement therapy was initiated. After further discussion, the patient elected to undergo adjuvant abdominal radiotherapy to a total of 25 Gy. The patient showed no evidence of disease over a post-treatment follow-up period of 24 months.

This case describes a twin with bilateral retinoblastoma who developed leiomyosarcoma of the bladder at age 17 and again at 39. At 17-years of age she was diagnosed with a leiomyosarcoma of the bladder after presenting with recurrent urinary tract infections, hematuria, and dysuria. She was treated with partial cystectomy. After a 12-year disease-free interval, she was diagnosed with a second leiomyosarcoma of the bladder. This case supports the relationship between the genetic form of retinoblastoma and leiomyosarcoma and illustrates the necessity for extensive follow-up and well-defined treatment of secondary neoplasms.