Faculty Bibliography

OBJECTIVE:Cognitive impairment is a common symptom of multiple sclerosis (MS) that can lead to declines in daily functioning. Timed instrumental activities of daily living (TIADLs) have been useful to bridge between cognitive testing and real-world functioning in disorders such as Alzheimer's disease and other dementias. However, these have not been standardized for general use, and the tasks that are typically employed have not been sensitive to the detection of milder forms of cognitive deficits. We developed a test of ten TIADLs tasks to measure a broader range of functioning, entitled the "Test of Everyday Cognitive Ability" or TECA, and tested its utility in a diverse sample of participants with MS. METHOD/METHODS:TECA performance was characterized in n = 177 participants with MS and compared to healthy controls (n = 49). A subset from each group received repeated administration. In addition, all participants completed a standard battery of neuropsychological measures. RESULTS:TECA performances were significantly different between MS and control participants. Further, MS participants with cognitive impairment performed significantly slower relative to those MS participants without impairment. CONCLUSIONS:The TECA is a TIADLs assessment appropriate for use in those with MS as it includes a broad range of task difficulties, requires minimum motor involvement, and is sensitive to MS-related cognitive impairment. The TECA is a brief and repeatable test of TIADLs and its ease of administration makes it suitable for both clinical practice and research settings.

[This corrects the article DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0177177.].

BACKGROUND:Neuropsychiatric disorders are a leading source of disability and require novel treatments that target mechanisms of disease. As such disorders are thought to result from aberrant neuronal circuit activity, neuromodulation approaches are of increasing interest given their potential for manipulating circuits directly. Low intensity transcranial electrical stimulation (tES) with direct currents (transcranial direct current stimulation, tDCS) or alternating currents (transcranial alternating current stimulation, tACS) represent novel, safe, well-tolerated, and relatively inexpensive putative treatment modalities. OBJECTIVE:This report seeks to promote the science, technology and effective clinical applications of these modalities, identify research challenges, and suggest approaches for addressing these needs in order to achieve rigorous, reproducible findings that can advance clinical treatment. METHODS:The National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH) convened a workshop in September 2016 that brought together experts in basic and human neuroscience, electrical stimulation biophysics and devices, and clinical trial methods to examine the physiological mechanisms underlying tDCS/tACS, technologies and technical strategies for optimizing stimulation protocols, and the state of the science with respect to therapeutic applications and trial designs. RESULTS:Advances in understanding mechanisms, methodological and technological improvements (e.g., electronics, computational models to facilitate proper dosing), and improved clinical trial designs are poised to advance rigorous, reproducible therapeutic applications of these techniques. A number of challenges were identified and meeting participants made recommendations made to address them. CONCLUSIONS:These recommendations align with requirements in NIMH funding opportunity announcements to, among other needs, define dosimetry, demonstrate dose/response relationships, implement rigorous blinded trial designs, employ computational modeling, and demonstrate target engagement when testing stimulation-based interventions for the treatment of mental disorders.

BACKGROUND: Fatigue is a common and debilitating feature of multiple sclerosis (MS) that remains without reliably effective treatment. Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) is a promising option for fatigue reduction. We developed a telerehabilitation protocol that delivers tDCS to participants at home using specially designed equipment and real-time supervision (remotely supervised transcranial direct current stimulation (RS-tDCS)). OBJECTIVE: To evaluate whether tDCS can reduce fatigue in individuals with MS. METHODS: Dorsolateral prefrontal cortex left anodal tDCS was administered using a RS-tDCS protocol, paired with 20 minutes of cognitive training. Here, two studies are considered. Study 1 delivered 10 open-label tDCS treatments (1.5 mA; n = 15) compared to a cognitive training only condition ( n = 20). Study 2 was a randomized trial of active (2.0 mA, n = 15) or sham ( n = 12) delivered for 20 sessions. Fatigue was assessed using the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS)-Fatigue Short Form. RESULTS AND CONCLUSION: In Study 1, there was modest fatigue reduction in the active group (-2.5 +/- 7.4 vs -0.2 +/- 5.3, p = 0.30, Cohen's d = -0.35). However, in Study 2 there was statistically significant reduction for the active group (-5.6 +/- 8.9 vs 0.9 +/- 1.9, p = 0.02, Cohen's d = -0.71). tDCS is a potential treatment for MS-related fatigue.

BACKGROUND: Cognitive impairment is a common and troubling feature of pediatric-onset multiple sclerosis (POMS). Brief cognitive assessment in the outpatient setting can identify and longitudinally monitor cognitive involvement so that early intervention is possible. OBJECTIVES: The goal of this study was to measure the sensitivity of two cognitive assessment approaches that are brief, repeatable, and suitable for clinical practice and for multicenter investigation. METHODS: Participants with POMS ( n = 69) were consecutively evaluated as part of outpatient neurologic visits and compared to healthy control participants (HC, n = 66) using the Brief International Cognitive Assessment for MS (BICAMS) approach and timed information processing measures from Cogstate, a computer-based assessment. RESULTS: There was strong agreement in the detection rate of impairment between both assessments, with 26% for the BICAMS and 27% for Cogstate. Two of the Cogstate tasks were the most sensitive individual measures. CONCLUSION: Both the BICAMS and Cogstate timed processing measures offer practical, sensitive, and standardized approaches for cognitive screening assessment in POMS.

OBJECTIVE: To explore the efficacy of remotely-supervised transcranial direct current stimulation (RS-tDCS) paired with cognitive training (CT) exercise in participants with multiple sclerosis (MS). METHODS: In a feasibility study of RS-tDCS in MS, participants completed ten sessions of tDCS paired with CT (1.5 mA x 20 min, dorsolateral prefrontal cortex montage). RS-tDCS participants were compared to a control group of adults with MS who underwent ten 20-min CT sessions through the same remotely supervised procedures. Cognitive outcomes were tested by composite scores measuring change in performance on standard tests (Brief International Cognitive Assessment in MS or BICAMS), basic attention (ANT-I Orienting and Attention Networks, Cogstate Detection), complex attention (ANT-I Executive Network, Cogstate Identification and One-Back), and intra-individual response variability (ANT-I and Cogstate identification; sensitive markers of disease status). RESULTS: After ten sessions, the tDCS group (n = 25) compared to the CT only group (n = 20) had significantly greater improvement in complex attention (p = 0.01) and response variability (p = 0.01) composites. The groups did not differ in measures of basic attention (p = 0.95) or standard cognitive measures (p = 0.99). CONCLUSIONS: These initial findings indicate benefit for RS-tDCS paired with CT in MS. Exploratory analyses indicate that the earliest tDCS cognitive benefit is seen in complex attention and response variability. Telerehabilitation using RS-tDCS combined with CT may lead to improved outcomes in MS.

Background: Fatigue is known for being one of the most debilitating and common symptoms of multiple sclerosis (MS). Despite its prevalence, though, reliable treatment options are lacking. Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) is a non-invasive neuromodulation treatment that uses low amperage (2.0 mA) electric current to stimulate cortical regions. tDCS has been shown to improve fatigue in MS following consecutive daily treatment sessions. We have recently developed and shown the feasibility of a remotely supervised tDCS (RS-tDCS) protocol to ease the burden of daily sessions and allow patients to complete the treatment at home. We aim to evaluate the efficacy of RS-tDCS in fatigue management for patients with MS. Methods: We enrolled n = 31 patients with MS (all subtypes) into a randomly controlled, double-blind trial; n = 27 patients provided data for analysis with n = 15 randomized to the active group and n = 12 in the placebo or "sham" group. Participants came to the clinic for baseline and follow-up measures including self-report forms on fatigue. At baseline they were also trained in operating the tDCS headset. Participants then took the device home where they complete 20 sessions of tDCS (20 minutes, 2.0 mA, dorsolateral prefrontal cortex montage, left anodal) paired with cognitive training. Results: Our primary outcome measure was the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Fatigue scale. When comparing change in PROMIS Fatigue between the active and sham tDCS groups we found that active tDCS participants had significantly greater reductions in fatigue (mean change in Active =-5.6 +/- 8.9 vs. Sham = 0.9 +/- 1.9, p = 0.02 conditions). We analyzed the within-subject effect tDCS had and found a significant, beneficial effect in the active group (pre-treatment mean = 26.6 +/- 9.2, post-treatment mean = 21.0 +/- 6.4, p = 0.04) and no such effect in the sham group (pre-treatment mean = 22.9 +/- 7.9, post-treatment mean = 23.8 +/- 8.4, p = 0.15). Finally, we calculated Cohen's d effect size (Active d =-0.71, Sham d = 0.11). Conclusions: These data suggest that RS-tDCS provides significant reduction in MS-related fatigue

The remotely supervised tDCS (RS-tDCS) protocol enables participation from home through guided and monitored self-administration of tDCS treatment while maintaining clinical standards. The current consensus regarding the efficacy of tDCS is that multiple treatment sessions are needed to observe targeted behavioral reductions in symptom burden. However, the requirement for patients to travel to clinic daily for stimulation sessions presents a major obstacle for potential participants, due to work or family obligations or limited ability to travel. This study presents a protocol that directly overcomes these obstacles by eliminating the need to travel to clinic for daily sessions. This is an updated protocol for remotely supervised self-administration of tDCS for daily treatment sessions paired with a program of computer-based cognitive training for use in clinical trials. Participants only need to attend clinic twice, for a baseline and study-end visit. At baseline, participants are trained and provided with a study stimulation device, and a small laptop computer. Participants then complete the remainder of their stimulation sessions at home while they are monitored via videoconferencing software. Participants complete computerized cognitive remediation during stimulation sessions, which may serve a therapeutic role or as a "placeholder" for other computer-based activity. Computers are enabled for real-time monitoring and remote control by study staff. Outcome measures that assess feasibility and tolerance are administered remotely with the aid of visual analogue scales that are presented onscreen. Following completion of all RS-tDCS sessions, participants return to clinic for a study end visit in which all study equipment is returned. Results support the safety, feasibility, and scalability of the RS-tDCS protocol for use in clinical trials. Across 46 patients, 748 RS-tDCS sessions have been completed. This protocol serves as a model for use in future clinical trials involving tDCS.

and Introduction Fatigue is a common and debilitating symptom of multiple sclerosis (MS) with estimates of up to 75% of patients reporting fatigue as their most disabling symptom [1]. Despite its prevalence, fatigue remains a frustrating symptom lacking reliable treatment options. tDCS has been previously shown to improve fatigue in MS patients, but requires daily sessions to be effective [2]. The necessity of daily sessions limits many studies to small sample sizes and few sessions studied, especially for patient populations with disability who may have additional physical barriers to attending daily sessions on top of personal and professional obligations. In response to this issue, we have developed a remotely-supervised tDCS (RS-tDCS) protocol that allows participants to complete tDCS sessions from home. The accessibility of our remote protocol increases both enrollment and compliance; moreover, it allows for an extended number of sessions to be studied [3]. Participants were enrolled in a RS-tDCS feasibility study in which they completed baseline, daily, and study-end measures of fatigue. 2. Methods This study was an open label, exploratory pilot study. Eligibility criteria were relatively broad, enrolling patients with a confirmed diagnosis of MS (all subtypes) between the ages of 18-70 years and a range of neurologic disability as measured by the Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS). Those with greater disability (EDSS >= 6.5) participated with the assistance of a caregiver proxy. Participants visited the clinic for baseline and follow-up measures. Here they completed self-report measures of fatigue, the Modified Fatigue Impact Scale (MFIS), and the PROMIS Fatigue measure (with lower scores associated with benefit). The baseline visit also consisted of tDCS training and the first of 10 sessions. Participants completed 9 daily tDCS sessions from home (20 minutes; DLPFC montage; left anodal) paired with brain training games. Before and after each session, participants rated their fatigue on a visual analogue scale. After all sessions were complete participants returned for a follow-up visit where baseline measures were repeated. Paired t-tests were used to analyze change in scores from baseline to follow-up. 3. Results A total of 25 participants were enrolled with all MS subtypes (n = 6 relapseremitting; n = 19 progressive) and a range of disability (EDSS scores ranged from 1.0 to 8.0). Most participants saw positive change in fatigue measures indicating an overall beneficial effect. Individuals' data points are shown in Fig. 1. Paired t-tests were performed to test for significance of the effect, summarized in Table 1. MFIS and daily fatigue measures showed significant improvement while PROMIS Fatigue did not. It is worth noting that n = 16 for the PROMIS Fatigue is due to its late introduction into the study, possibly reducing the power of that specific measure. 4. Discussion and Conclusion These data indicate RS-tDCS as a possible method for improving fatigue in patients with both relapsing-remitting and progressive MS. While benefit is shown to be significant in two of three fatigue measures, the benefit seems to be small. It is possible that higher amperage, more sessions, or longer sessions could bolster the effect we see. Further studies will look at dose-response and involve a sham arm to help validate findings. (Figure Presented)