Faculty Bibliography

Background/Purpose: Alveolar cleft surgery is the most common bone reconstruction performed in patients with a cleft. Osteogenic agents such as BMP-2 have been used to restore the bony cleft without the morbidity of bone graft, but concerns remain regarding premature fusion of sutures, exuberant bone formation, and malignant degeneration. We have recently demonstrated that dipyridamole-coated, 3D printed bio-ceramic (3DPBC) scaffolds generate comparable bone amounts to BMP2 and significantly greater bone compared to negative controls in short-term growing animal model studies. No detrimental effects to growth sutures were noted in any animals. This study investigates the long-term osteogenic properties, degradation kinetics, and effects on facial growth of these tissue engineering constructs in growing animal models. Methods/Description: Twenty-two 1-month-old (immature) New Zealand white rabbits underwent creation of unilateral 3.5 x 3.5 mm alveolar defects. Each alveolar defect was repaired with either 3DPBC scaffolds coated with 1000 muM dipyridamole (n = 14) or with autogenous bone graft from the radius (n = 8). Six rabbits from the 3DPBC scaffold group were sacrificed at 8 weeks. The remaining rabbits (n = 8 each group) were euthanized following completion of craniofacial growth (6 months). Bone regeneration, scaffold degradation, and maxillary suture patency were calculated using CT images reconstructed and analyzed in Amira software. Facial symmetry was evaluated using dense-surface 3D modeling and validated with bilateral cephalometric measurements of maxillary projection. Bone growth and suture patency were qualitatively evaluated through histologic analysis.
Result(s): After 6 months, animals with defects repaired with 3DPBC scaffolds regenerated an average of 52.9% +/- 3.3% bone (mean +/- SEM), compared to 40.7%+/-4.0% in defects repaired with bone graft (P = .02). This is compared to unoperated alveolus occupied by 39.3% +/- 1.6% bone. Scaffolds showed significant degradation at 6 months (6.7% +/- 1.6%) compared to at 8 weeks (27.1% +/- 1.9%; P >= .001). Morphometric analysis using dense surface modeling showed similar symmetry indices of 55.0 +/- 3.3 for scaffold animals and 61.7% +/- 1.6% for bone graft animals (P = .10). Comparative measurements of operated and unoperated sides showed no significant differences in asymmetry between scaffold and bone graft animals (P = .86). Histologic analysis of scaffold samples revealed vascularized, organized bone within scaffold interstices without evidence of ectopic bone, excess inflammatory cells, or suture fusion.
Conclusion(s): In a growing animal model, dipyridamole-coated 3DPBC scaffolds can regenerate bone comparable to autogenous bone graft by radiographic and histologic analysis. Over 6 months, scaffolds show significant, favorable degradation and do not result in premature suture fusion or disruption of facial growth compared to bone graft. These results support long-term safety and efficacy of this tissue engineering strategy in the repair of alveolar cleft defects

The surgical treatment of nonsyndromic craniosynostosis is one of the most common procedures performed by craniofacial surgeons. However, for residents and fellows, the high degree of difficulty and complex anatomy may result in slow progress along a steep learning curve. This is particularly important in the context of contemporary academic practice, where work-hour limits and other factors restrict operative exposure and opportunities for trainees to learn. These issues have prompted the development of surgical simulation modalities that, while prevalent in other surgical specialties, have not been fully adopted in reconstructive surgery.Among these resources is the Craniofacial Interactive Virtual Assistant - Professional Edition (CIVA-Pro), a procedural cognition simulator that is free of charge. By integrating 3-dimensional virtual animation, voice over, and high-definition intraoperative video, CIVA-Pro describes cardinal craniofacial surgery procedures in an engaging platform. In this study, a detailed, step-by-step description of the fronto-orbital advancement surgical technique to complement the corresponding CIVA-Pro module was presented. This synergistic combination of multimedia educational resources provides a unique didactic option for current trainees to prepare for surgery.

BACKGROUND:Single-stage primary cleft lip and palate (PCLP) repair is controversial in the United States, and most patients are treated with a staged approach. In this study, early postoperative complications of the single-stage approach as compared to primary cleft lip (PCL) or primary cleft palate (PCP) alone were evaluated. This study represents the largest cohort of patients undergoing combined cleft lip and palate repair. METHODS:The American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program-Pediatric database was used to identify patients undergoing single-stage PCLP, PCL, or PCP repairs. Preoperative factors and postoperative outcomes were compared between the 3 groups, as well as within the PCLP group between patients with and without complications. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed. RESULTS:A TOTAL OF:: 181 patients were included in the single-stage PCLP group, 1007 in the PCP group and 783 in the PCL group. There was no difference in the rates of early complications between the 3 groups. Within the PCLP group, cardiac risk factors (β = 35.19; 95% confidence interval [CI] 7.88-75.21; P = 0.04) and complications (β = 77.31; 95% CI 35.82-118.79; P < 0.001) were significant risk factors for longer operative time. CONCLUSION/CONCLUSIONS:Analysis of a national database showed that single-stage PCLP repair is not associated with increased risk of early postoperative complications as compared to primary lip or palate repair alone. In-depth long-term analyses of craniofacial morphology, fistulae rate, speech, and dental outcomes are essential for a comprehensive assessment of the effects of combined cleft lip and palate repair.

Background/UNASSIGNED:Rhinoplasty relies on clear patient communication and precise execution of a three-dimensional (3D) plan to achieve optimal results. As 3D imaging and printing continue to grow in popularity within the medical field, rhinoplasty surgeons have begun to leverage these resources as an aid to preoperative planning, patient communication, and the technical performance of this challenging operation. Objective/UNASSIGNED:Utilizing departmentally-available resources and open access 3D imaging platforms, we have developed an affordable, reproducible protocol for rapid in-house virtual surgical planning (VSP) and subsequent manufacture of 3D-printed rhinoplasty models. Methods/UNASSIGNED:Preoperative 3D photographic images underwent virtual rhinoplasty using a freely-available 3D imaging and sculpting program (BlenderTM [Version 2.78, Amsterdam, The Netherlands]). Once the ideal postoperative result was digitally achieved, scaled, sterilizable and patient-specific 3D models of the preoperative and ideal postoperative result were manufactured in-house using a departmentally-owned 3D printer. Results/UNASSIGNED:3D-printed models have successfully been manufactured and employed for 12 patients undergoing rhinoplasty. The average time to prepare a set of pre- and postoperative models was 3 hours, while the printing process required 18-24 hours per model. Each set of surgical models can be manufactured at a total materials cost of approximately $5.00. Conclusions/UNASSIGNED:We describe an affordable means to construct sterilizable, scaled, patient-specific 3D-printed models for rhinoplasty. This technique may become of increasing interest to academic and cosmetic centers as hardware costs of 3D printers continues to fall.

BACKGROUND:Simulation is progressively being integrated into surgical training, yet its utility in plastic surgery has not been well described. We present a prospective, randomized, blinded trial comparing digital simulation to a surgical textbook for conceptualization of cleft-lip repair. METHODS:Thirty-five medical students were randomized to learning cleft repair using a simulator or textbook. Participants outlined markings for a standard cleft-lip repair before (pre-intervention) and after (post-intervention) 20 minutes of studying their respective resource. Two expert reviewers blindly graded markings according to a 10-point scale, on two separate occasions. Intra-rater and inter-rater reliability were calculated using intra-class correlation coefficients. Paired and independent t-tests were performed to compare scoring between study groups. A validated student satisfaction survey was administered to assess the two resources separately. RESULTS:Intra-rater grading reliability was excellent among both raters for pre-intervention and post-intervention grading (rater 1 ICC=0.94 and 0.95, respectively; rater 2 ICC=0.60 and 0.92, respectively; p<0.001). Mean pre-intervention performances for both groups were comparable (0.82±1.17 vs. 0.64±0.95; p=0.31). Significant improvement from pre-intervention to post-intervention performance was observed in the textbook (0.82±1.17 v. 3.50±1.62; p<0.001) and simulator (0.64±0.95 vs. 6.44±2.03; p<0.001) groups. However, the simulator group demonstrated a significantly greater improvement (5.81±2.01 vs. 2.68±1.49; p<0.001). Participants reported the simulator to be more effective (p<0.001) and a clearer tool (p<0.001), that allowed better learning (p<0.001) than textbooks. All participants would recommend the simulator to others. CONCLUSIONS:We present level I evidence supporting online digital simulation as a superior educational resource for novice learners, compared to traditional textbooks.