Faculty Bibliography

IN BRIEF Dietary guidelines for patients with diabetes extend beyond glycemic management to include recommendations for mitigating chronic disease risk. This review summarizes the literature suggesting that excess dietary phosphorus intake may increase the risk of skeletal and cardiovascular disease in patients who are in the early stages of chronic kidney disease (CKD) despite having normal serum phosphorus concentrations. It explores strategies for limiting dietary phosphorus, emphasizing that food additives, as a major source of highly bioavailable dietary phosphorus, may be a suitable target. Although the evidence for restricting phosphorus-based food additives in early CKD is limited, diabetes clinicians should monitor ongoing research aimed at assessing its efficacy.

Each year approximately 13,000 Veterans transition to maintenance dialysis, mostly in the traditional form of thrice-weekly hemodialysis from the start. Among >6000 dialysis units nationwide, there are currently approximately 70 Veterans Affairs (VA) dialysis centers. Given this number of VA dialysis centers and their limited capacity, only 10% of all incident dialysis Veterans initiate treatment in a VA center. Evidence suggests that, among Veterans, the receipt of care within the VA system is associated with favorable outcomes, potentially because of the enhanced access to healthcare resources. Data from the United States Renal Data System Special Study Center "Transition-of-Care-in-CKD" suggest that Veterans who receive dialysis in a VA unit exhibit greater survival compared with the non-VA centers. Substantial financial expenditures arise from the high volume of outsourced care and higher dialysis reimbursement paid by the VA than by Medicare to outsourced providers. Given the exceedingly high mortality and abrupt decline in residual kidney function (RKF) in the first dialysis year, it is possible that incremental transition to dialysis through an initial twice-weekly hemodialysis regimen might preserve RKF, prolong vascular access longevity, improve patients' quality of life, and be a more patient-centered approach, more consistent with "personalized" dialysis. Broad implementation of incremental dialysis might also result in more Veterans receiving care within a VA dialysis unit. Controlled trials are needed to examine the safety and efficacy of incremental hemodialysis in Veterans and other populations; the administrative and health care as well as provider structure within the VA system would facilitate the performance of such trials.

PURPOSE: Kidney stone prevention relies on the 24-hour urine collection to diagnose metabolic abnormalities and direct dietary and pharmacologic therapy. While its use is guideline-supported for high risk and interested patients, evidence that the test can accurately predict recurrence or treatment response is limited. We sought to critically reassess the role of the 24-hour urine collection in stone prevention. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In addition to a MEDLINE(R) search to identify controlled studies of dietary and pharmacologic interventions, evidence supporting the AUA and EAU guidelines for metabolic stone prevention were evaluated. Additionally, placebo-arms of these studies were examined to assess the stone clinic effect: the impact of regular office visits without specific treatment on stone recurrence. RESULTS: The 24-hour urine test has several limitations including the complexity of interpretation, need for repeat collections, inability to predict stone recurrence with individual parameters and supersaturation values, unclear rationale of laboratory cutoff values, and difficulty with determining collection adequacy. Only one prospective trial has compared selective dietary recommendations based on 24-hour urine collection results versus general dietary instructions. While the trial supported the intervention arm, significant limitations to the study were found. Placebo arms of intervention trials have noted a 0-61% decrease in stone recurrence rate and a remission rate during the study of 20-86%. CONCLUSIONS: Whether all recurrent stone formers benefit from 24-hour urine collection has not been established. Additional comparative effectiveness trials are needed to determine which stone former benefits from selective therapy, as guided by the 24-hour urine collection.

Background/Purpose: Lesinurad is a selective uric acid reabsorption inhibitor approved in the United States and European Union at 200 mg daily dose in combination with a xanthine oxidase inhibitor (XOI) for treatment of hyperuricemia associated with gout in patients unable to achieve target serum uric acid on XOI (allopurinol or febuxostat) alone. Approval of lesinurad was based on three pivotal, placebo-controlled, 12-month phase III (core) studies evaluating lesinurad 200 mg (LESU200) and 400 mg (LESU400) in combination with XOI. Patients completing core studies were eligible to enter extension studies, continuing LESU+XOI at the same dose or randomized from placebo to LESU200 or LESU400 plus XOI. Methods: Renal-related and kidney stone safety data were pooled from core studies to compare LESU200+XOI and LESU400+XOI with XOI alone and from core studies + extension studies to evaluate the impact on renal safety of extended LESU+XOI treatment. Renal-related treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were a customized list of 36 preferred terms selected from the Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities (MedRA) Renal and Urinary Disorders System Organ Class (SOC), the Investigations SOC and the Acute Renal Failure MedRA Standardized MedRA Query (SMQ). Descriptive statistics are provided for patients receiving >1 dose of study medication. To adjust for varying treatment duration, TEAEs are expressed as exposure-adjusted incidence rates (EAIRs; subjects with events per 100 person-years). Results: In the core studies, EAIRs for any renal-related TEAE, serious renal-related TEAEs, and renal-related TEAEs leading to discontinuation were similar with XOI alone and LESU200+XOI and lower than with LESU400 +XOI (Table 1). Similar results were found for kidney stone and serious kidney stone TEAEs. The most common renal-related TEAE was increased serum creatinine (sCr). EAIRs for sCr elevations >1.5x baseline were higher with LESU+XOI than XOI alone (Table 1). Overall, 75% and 84% of sCr elevations in the XOI alone and LESU+XOI groups, respectively, were resolved at last study assessment; 75% and 66% resolved without interruption of medication. Exposure to extended LESU+XOI treatment in core+extension studies did not show an increase from core studies in EAIRs for any renal-related or kidney stone adverse event category (Table 2). Conclusion: Lesinurad at the approved dose of 200 mg once-daily combined with XOI demonstrated comparable rate of adverse events to XOI alone. There was no clinically relevant increase in these adverse events with the extension of treatment beyond 1 year. (Table presented)