Faculty Bibliography

OBJECTIVES/OBJECTIVE:To assess the outcomes of patients who underwent closed reduction and percutaneous pinning (CRPP) with cannulated screws for treatment of a displaced femoral neck fracture (DFNF) as they were deemed too high risk to undergo hemiarthroplasty (HA). DESIGN/METHODS:Prospective cohort study. SETTING/METHODS:One urban academic medical center. PATIENTS/PARTICIPANTS/METHODS:Sixteen patients treated with CRPP and 32 risk-level-matched patients treated with HA. INTERVENTION/METHODS:CRPP for patients with DFNFs who were deemed too ill to undergo HA. The concept being that CRPP would aid in pain control and facilitate mobilization and if failed, the patient could return electively after medical optimization for conversion to arthroplasty. MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS/METHODS:Complications, readmissions, mortality, inpatient cost, and functional status. RESULTS:The CRPP cohort had a greater incidence of exacerbations of chronic medical conditions or new onset of acute illness and an elevated mean American Society of Anesthesiologist score. There were no differences in discharge location, length of stay, major complication rate, ambulation before discharge, or 90-day readmission rate. Patients undergoing CRPP were less likely to experience minor complications including a significantly decreased incidence of acute blood loss anemia. Three patients (18.7%) in the CRPP cohort underwent conversion to HA or THA. There was no difference in inpatient, 30-day, or 1-year mortality. CONCLUSION/CONCLUSIONS:In the acutely ill patients with DFNFs, "damage control" fixation with CRPP can be safely performed in lieu of HA to stabilize the fracture in those unable to tolerate anesthesia or the sequelae of major surgery. Patients should be followed closely to evaluate the need for secondary surgery. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE/METHODS:Therapeutic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of Levels of Evidence.

Hip fractures are increasingly common and often occur in patients with complex medical comorbidities. There remains a need for a safer anesthetic option for these patients for the operative repair of their injury other than general or neuraxial anesthesia. At our institution, for medically complex and physiologically tenuous patients, we perform Monitored Anesthesia Care and Soft-Tissue Infiltration of Local Anesthetic (MAC-STILA) when performing percutaneous fixation techniques for hip fractures. We describe our technique here.

INTRODUCTION:The purpose of this study is to determine whether the Score for Trauma Triage in the Geriatric and Middle-Aged (STTGMA) patients is able to predict fall, fracture, periprosthetic fracture, or dislocation risk after femoral neck fracture arthroplasty surgery. METHODS:Four hundred one patients who underwent hip arthroplasty surgery after a femoral neck fracture at one urban academic medical center were stratified into groups based on their risk scores assigned at femoral neck fracture presentation. The cohort was reviewed for the occurrence of postdischarge falls, secondary fractures, and prosthetic dislocations that resulted in a presentation to the emergency department (ED) after discharge from their hip fracture surgery. The incidence and timing of these complications after discharge were compared between the low-risk and high-risk groups. RESULTS:The low-risk group included 201 patients, and the high-risk group included 200 patients. The high-risk group had significantly more postdischarge falls resulting in ED presentation (49 vs. 32, p = .035) that occurred significantly sooner (12.6 vs. 18.3 months, p = .034) after discharge. CONCLUSIONS:The STTGMA model was able to successfully stratify patients who are at a higher risk of sustaining a fall after an arthroplasty procedure for a femoral neck fracture.

OBJECTIVES/OBJECTIVE:To examine the feasibility of a novel anesthetic option for hip fracture fixation with short cephalomedullary nails. DESIGN/METHODS:Retrospective cohort study. SETTING/METHODS:An urban, academic level 1 trauma center, a tertiary care academic medical center, and an orthopedic specialty hospitalPatients/Participants: 20 recent and 40 risk-matched (1:1:1 by anesthesia type) historical hip fracture patients. INTERVENTION/METHODS:All patients with an OTA 31.A1-3 IT hip fracture presenting from October 1st 2019 - March 31st, 2020 treated with a short cephalomedullary nail (CMN) underwent a new intraoperative anesthesia protocol using monitored anesthesia care (MAC) and soft-tissue infiltration with local anesthesia (STILA). MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS/METHODS:Intraoperative measures, postoperative pain scores, narcotic and acetaminophen use, hospital quality measures, and inpatient cost. RESULTS:A total of 60 patients (20 each: MAC, general, spinal) were identified. There were differences among the groups regarding mean minimum and maximum intraoperative heart rate with MAC-STILA protocol demonstrating the best maintenance of normal heart rate parameters (60-100 bpm). For the first 3 hours post-operatively, MAC-STILA patients reported consistently lower pain scores (VAS <1) than spinal or general patients (VAS>1). Through 48 hours postoperatively, MAC-STILA narcotic usage was similar to that of the spinal cohort and approximately five times less than the general cohort. There were no differences in procedural time, length of stay, minor or major complications, inpatient and 30-day mortality, or 30-day readmissions, or post-operative ambulatory distance. There was no difference in inpatient cost among cohorts. CONCLUSIONS:This feasibility study demonstrates safety for the MAC-STILA protocol with comparison to spinal and general anesthesia. The MAC-STILA protocol is a viable option for treatment of OTA 13.A1-3 IT fractures with a short CMN, and may be the preferred method for patients with severe medical co-morbidities or relative contraindications to general and/or spinal anesthesia. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE/METHODS:Therapeutic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of Levels of Evidence.

PURPOSE/OBJECTIVE:This study sought to compare postoperative outcomes and complications between patients with distal humerus fractures treated with open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) of their non-dominant versus dominant arm. METHODS:A retrospective review of all patients who sustained a distal humerus fracture treated operatively with ORIF at one academic institution between 2011 and 2015 was performed. Measured outcomes included complications, time to fracture union, painful hardware, removal of hardware, Mayo Elbow Performance Index (MEPI), and elbow range of motion. Differences in outcomes between patients who underwent surgery of their dominant upper extremity and those who underwent surgery of their non-dominant extremity were assessed. RESULTS:Sixty-nine patients met inclusion criteria. Forty (58.0%) underwent ORIF of a distal humerus fracture on their non-dominant arm and 29 (42.0%) on their dominant arm. Groups did not differ with respect to demographics, injury information, or surgical management. Mean overall follow-up was 14.1 ± 10.5 months, with all patients achieving at least 6 months follow-up. The non-dominant cohort experienced a higher proportion of postoperative complications (P = 0.048), painful hardware (P = 0.018), and removal of hardware (P = 0.002). At latest follow-up, the non-dominant cohort had lower MEPI scores (P = 0.037) but no difference in elbow arc of motion (P = 0.314). CONCLUSION/CONCLUSIONS:Patients who sustained a distal humerus fracture of their non-dominant arm treated with ORIF experienced more postoperative complications, reported a greater incidence of painful hardware, underwent removal of hardware more often, and had worse functional recovery in this study. Physicians should emphasize the importance of physical therapy and maintaining arm movement especially when the non-dominant arm is involved following distal humerus fracture repair. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE/METHODS:Level III.

OBJECTIVES/OBJECTIVE:To evaluate the outcomes of patients who underwent soft tissue flap coverage during treatment of a tibia fracture nonunion. DESIGN/METHODS:Retrospective analysis on prospectively collected data. SETTING/METHODS:Academic medical center. PATIENTS/PARTICIPANTS/METHODS:157 patients were treated for a fracture nonunion following a tibia fracture over a 15-year period. Sixty-six had sustained an open tibial fracture initially and 25 of these patients underwent soft tissue flaps for their open tibia fracture nonunion. INTERVENTION/METHODS:Manipulation of soft tissue flaps, either placement or elevation for graft placement in ununited previously open tibial fractures. MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS/METHODS:Bony healing, time to union, ultimate soft tissue status, postoperative complications, and functional outcome scores using the Short Musculoskeletal Functional Assessment (SMFA). This group was compared to a group of open tibial fracture nonunions that did not undergo soft tissue transfer. RESULTS:Bony healing was achieved in 24/25 patients (96.0%) who received flaps at a mean time to union of 8.7 ± 3.3 months compared to 39/41 patients (95.1%) at a mean 7.5 ± 3.2 months (p > 0.05) in the non-coverage group. Healing rate and time to union did not differ between groups. At latest follow-up, the flap coverage group reported a mean SMFA index of 17.1 compared to an SMFA index of 27.7 for the non-coverage group (p = 0.037). CONCLUSIONS:Utilization of soft tissue flaps in the setting of open tibia shaft nonunion repair surgery are associated with a high union rate (>90%). Coverage with or manipulation of soft tissue flaps did not result in improved bony healing rate or time to union compared to those who did not require flaps. However, soft tissue flap coverage was associated with higher functional scores at long-term follow-up. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE/METHODS:Therapeutic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

BACKGROUND:Nonunion of fractures about the proximal humerus represents a rare and complex problem. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the clinical and functional outcomes following proximal humerus fracture (PHF) nonunion repair using a plate and screw construct with a direct comparison to those experienced following operative fixation of acute PHF using a plate and screw construct. METHODS:Two separate patient cohorts were included in this study. The first consisted of 16 patients diagnosed with a non-united PHF who underwent operative nonunion repair treated with a standard algorithmic approach. The comparison group consisted of 173 patients who achieved union following initial open reduction and internal fixation of an acute PHF treated with a proximal humerus locking plate construct. All patients had at least 12 months of postoperative follow-up. Outcomes were assessed for both groups using American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) scores, visual analog scale (VAS) pain scores, and postoperative shoulder range of motion (ROM). Statistical analyses were used to compare these outcome measures between the two cohorts. RESULTS:The nonunion repair cohort consisted of eleven surgical neck nonunions and five nonunions of both the surgical neck and greater tuberosity. Ten patients had undergone surgical treatment for their original fracture, while six were initially treated non-operatively. All patients had Boileau type 3 sequelae of their proximal humerus fracture. Union was achieved in all patients at a mean of 5.4 months following nonunion repair. Complications included hardware failure requiring revision in two patients (12.5%) and avascular necrosis requiring conversion to anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty following union in one patient (6.3%). The nonunion repair and acute fracture cohorts did not differ with respect to mean ASES scores, VAS pain scores, or active shoulder ROM at any postoperative time point. CONCLUSION/CONCLUSIONS:Surgical repair of PHF nonunion is a viable treatment strategy that can lead to consistent bony healing with outcomes comparable to those of patients who achieve fracture union following initial surgical repair of an acute proximal humerus fracture. Surgeons should be cognizant of mechanical considerations that may lead to early failure.

CASE:A 41-year-old man presented with a transverse patella fracture and proximal patellar tendon avulsion after a fall from standing. Disruption of the extensor mechanism of the knee at multiple points is rare. He was treated operatively for his patella fracture and patellar tendon avulsion but experienced early failure of the patellar tendon fixation requiring reoperation. Both components of injury ultimately healed, and he returned to function. CONCLUSION:This case describes a rare presentation of an uncommon injury pattern affecting the extensor mechanism. This is the first report to describe multifocal failure of the extensor chain from a low-energy mechanism.

Purpose/UNASSIGNED:To assess risk factors and associated outcomes of acute kidney injury (AKI) in hip fracture patients. Methods/UNASSIGNED:Risk factors for AKI were identified by multivariate logistic regression. AKI patients were matched to patients who did not experience AKI using a validated trauma triage score. Comparative analyses between matched groups were performed. Results/UNASSIGNED:Risk factors of AKI included increasing Charlson Comorbidity Index and use of anticoagulation medications. AKI was associated with increased likelihood of medical complications and longer, more costly hospital stays. Discussion/UNASSIGNED: