Faculty Bibliography

PURPOSE/OBJECTIVE:The purpose of the current study is to meta-analyze the current evidence in the literature to compare arthroscopic Bankart repair versus conservative management for first-time anterior shoulder dislocation. METHODS:A literature search of MEDLINE, EMBASE and The Cochrane Library, was performed based on the PRISMA guidelines. Prospective studies comparing arthroscopic Bankart repair versus conservative management as treatment for first-time anterior shoulder dislocation were included. Recurrence, further treatment, and return to play were compared, with all statistical analysis performed using Review Manager Version 5.3. A p-value of < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. RESULTS:= 0, p = 0.002). CONCLUSION/CONCLUSIONS:Arthroscopic Bankart repair resulted in a 7-fold lower recurrence rate and a higher rate of return to play compared to conservative management. Thus, arthroscopic Bankart repair may be advisable to perform routinely for first-time dislocators who participate in sports.

Introduction/UNASSIGNED:The traditional nociceptive approach to pain identifies the mind and body as functionally separate. However, the biopsychosocial model accounts for the impact of social, psychological and physical factors on the patient experience. The purpose of this study was to determine the relationship between diagnosis, physical disability, and psychological distress among patients with anterior knee pain-one of the most common complaints in an orthopedic clinic. Methods/UNASSIGNED:This was a single-center, cross-sectional study. Patients presenting for initial evaluation of knee pain completed the Pain Catastrophizing Scale, Kujala Anterior Knee Pain Scale, and SF-12 questionnaires. Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS Version 24. Results/UNASSIGNED:207 patients, 108 (52.2%) females and 99 (47.8%) males, with a mean age 44.5 ± 15.4 years were enrolled. The osteoarthritis cohort had the highest pain catastrophizing score (17 ± 14.5), lowest Kujala score (48.3 ± 18.1), lowest SF-12 PCS (37.5 ± 8.3), and lowest SF-12 MCS (50.8 ± 11.0). Across all diagnoses, there was a statistically significant negative correlation between the total Pain Catastrophizing Score (PCS) and the Kujala, SF-12 Physical, and SF-12 Mental Component Scores. Bivariate and multivariate analysis demonstrated a correlation between PCS and duration of symptoms and African-Americans. The Kujala and SF-12 PCS demonstrated a statistically significant correlation with age, smoking, and the Asian Indian ethnicity. The SF-12 MCS showed a significant relationship with the Asian Indian ethnicity. Bivariate analysis also showed a statistically significant relationship between the SF-12 PCS and the SF-12 MCS. Conclusion/UNASSIGNED:Knee pain patients presenting to an orthopedic sports medicine clinic demonstrate diminished physical quality of life and psychological reserves. This study determined an association between catastrophizing behavior and other patient reported outcomes measuring pain, physical distress, quality of life and mental/emotional well-being. To optimize patient outcomes, psychological domain should be managed contemporaneously to orthopedic pathology.

OBJECTIVE:To report radiographic features and complications of coracoclavicular ligament reconstruction and the association of radiographic features with symptomatology. MATERIALS AND METHODS/METHODS:Retrospective picture archiving and communication system query (1/2012-8/2018) identified subjects with prior coracoclavicular ligament reconstruction. Post-operative radiographs were reviewed with attention to the following: (1) acromioclavicular alignment, (2) coracoclavicular width, (3) distal clavicular osteolysis, (4) osseous tunnel widening, and (5) hardware complication or fracture. Medical records were reviewed to determine purpose of imaging follow-up (symptomatic versus routine). Statistical analysis determined associations between binary features and outcomes, and inter-reader agreement. RESULT/RESULTS:Review of 55 charts identified 32 subjects (23 male, 9 females; age range 24-64; imaged 1-34 months following surgery) meeting inclusion criteria. Loss of acromioclavicular reduction was the most common imaging finding (n = 25, 78%), with 76% progressing to coracoclavicular interval widening. Distal clavicular osteolysis was seen in 21 cases (66%) and was significantly associated with loss of acromioclavicular joint reduction (p = 0.032). Tunnel widening occurred in 23 patients (82%) with more than one follow-up radiograph. Six (19%) had hardware complication or fracture. No radiographic feature or complication had significant correlation with symptomatology (p values 0.071-0.721). Inter-reader agreement was moderate to substantial for coracoclavicular interval widening and hardware complication, fair to substantial for tunnel widening, and fair to moderate for loss of acromioclavicular reduction and distal clavicular osteolysis. CONCLUSION/CONCLUSIONS:Loss of acromioclavicular joint reduction, coracoclavicular interval widening, distal clavicular osteolysis, and tunnel widening are common radiographic features after coracoclavicular ligament reconstruction; however, they do not necessarily correlate with symptomatology.

BACKGROUND:Given the relatively low incidence of infection, the role of prophylactic antibiotics for infection prevention in arthroscopic surgery is unclear. Without established evidence-based guidelines, it becomes important to understand the trends and common practices in the field. HYPOTHESIS/OBJECTIVE:We hypothesized that a majority of surgeons would use preoperative intravenous antibiotics and that postoperative antibiotics would be rarely used. METHODS:A web-based link containing a questionnaire on perioperative antibiotic use for arthroscopic surgery of the knee and shoulder was sent to sports medicine surgeons at several institutions in the New York tri-state region. The questionnaire addressed antibiotic use both preoperatively and postoperatively and the type of medication used. RESULTS:During the study period, 86 surgeons responded to the knee portion of the survey and 139 surgeons responded to the shoulder portion of the survey. A significant majority (94.24% for knee and 93.02% for shoulder) of the respondents routinely preferred to use preoperative intravenous antibiotics for both shoulder and knee surgery. The antibiotic of choice for a majority of the respondents was cefazolin (98.1% respondents). In patients with penicillin allergies, most preferred to use clindamycin. Most respondents (84.5%) did not routinely use postoperative oral antibiotics. CONCLUSION/CONCLUSIONS:There is significant consensus among orthopedic surgeons performing knee and shoulder arthroscopic surgery regarding use of preoperative antibiotics, with the majority routinely prescribing preoperative intravenous antibiotics for prophylaxis and cefazolin being the most commonly used antibiotic. The majority of surgeons prefer not to use postoperative oral antibiotics. CLINICAL RELEVANCE/CONCLUSIONS:This study describes the current trends in the use of perioperative antibiotics among orthopedic surgeons for routine arthroscopic procedures in the shoulder and knee.

Injuries to the posterolateral corner of the knee are rare but significant injuries that occur most commonly in the context of a multiligamentous knee injury. The structures of the posterolateral corner serve as a primary restraint to varus and external rotation and as a secondary restraint to posterior translation. Contemporary reconstructive techniques focus on anatomic restoration of function of the posterolateral corner and excellent long-term results have been demonstrated.

Meniscus surgery has dramatically changed over the last 20 years. This article reviews the advances and current evidence in meniscus repair.

Bone tunnel-related issues are frequently encountered during revision anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Tunnel malposition, widening, and interference pose unique challenges that may complicate surgery and compromise outcomes. Preoperative planning is critical to identify and characterize bone tunnel pathology. Choice of technique, graft, and implant are influenced by numerous patientrelated and technical factors. Despite this complexity, a variety of strategies are available to help manage and navigate common bone tunnel problems. Among these include alternative techniques for reaming, bone grafting, and fixation. This review provides a modern evidence-based and practical guide to equip the orthopedic surgeon with a systematic approach to the evaluation and management of bone tunnel-related issues encountered during revision anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

OBJECTIVE:The purpose of this study is to systematically review the literature and to evaluate the reported rehabilitation protocols, return-to-play guidelines, and subsequent rates of return to play following cartilage restoration procedures in the knee. DESIGN/METHODS:MEDLINE, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library were searched according to the PRISMA guidelines to find studies on cartilage restoration procedures in the knee, including (1) microfracture (Mfx), (2) osteochondral autograft transfer (AOT), (3) osteochondral allograft implantation (OCA), and (4) autologous chondrocyte implantation (ACI). Studies were included if they reported return-to-play data or rehabilitation protocols. RESULTS:Overall, 179 studies fit our inclusion criteria, with 48 on Mfx, 34 on AOT, 54 on OCA, and 51 on ACI. The rate of return to play was reported as high as 88.2% with AOT, and as low as 77.2% following OCA, with rates of return to play at the same/higher level as high as 79.3% with AOT, and as low as 57.3% following ACI. The average reported time of return to play was as low as 4.9 months with AOT, and as high as 11.6 months following ACI. CONCLUSIONS:The majority of patients are able to return to play following cartilage restoration procedures in the knee, regardless of surgical procedure utilized. However, while the rate of return to play at the same level was similar to the overall rate of return following AOT, there was a large number of patients unable to return to the same level following Mfx, OCA, and ACI. Additionally, there is wide variety in the rehabilitation protocols, and scant literature on return-to-play protocols.

BACKGROUND:Open subpectoral biceps tenodesis (OSBT) with cortical button fixation can deliver acceptable results for long head of the biceps (LHB) pathology with the benefit of smaller bone tunnel diameter and a potential reduced risk of postoperative humeral shaft fracture. However, functional outcomes and complications of a button-only technique with a small diameter tunnel in the subpectoral region have not been studied sufficiently. PURPOSE/OBJECTIVE:We sought to determine whether OSBT with cortical button fixation results in significant functional improvements from preoperative to final follow-up. The secondary purpose was to determine whether there is a lower risk of major postoperative complications. METHODS:A retrospective review of patients who underwent OSBT with cortical button fixation at one institution was conducted with objective measurements and clinical outcomes collected with a minimum of 2 years of follow-up. Surgical data was collected for analysis. Objective measures obtained at follow-up included physical exam, strength testing using a handheld dynamometer, and Long-Head of the Biceps score. Clinical outcomes were measured using the following validated questionnaires preoperatively and postoperatively: American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score (ASES), Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand score (DASH), and Oxford Shoulder Score (OSS). RESULTS:Sixty-one patients with mean age of 53.1 ± 10.1 years at the time of surgery were enrolled in the study. Mean follow-up time was 42.4 ± 16.9 months (range: 24 to 64 months). The postoperative LHB score was 95.5 ± 6.1 (range: 77 to 100). All functional outcome measures (ASES, DASH, and OSS) demonstrated statistically significant improvements at final follow-up (p < 0.05 for each). At total of 92.5% of patients stated they would have the procedure again if necessary. Mean elbow flexion strength on the operative side measured 98.7% ± 15.9% (range: 74.1% to 142.3%) of the contralateral arm. The mean LHB tendon diameter was 5.7 ± 0.8 mm and mean tunnel diameter was 5.9 ± 0.7 mm. There were no cases of intraoperative or postoperative fracture, infection, or Popeye deformity noted during the follow-up period. CONCLUSION/CONCLUSIONS:Subpectoral biceps tenodesis with cortical button fixation is a safe and effective surgical treatment option to relieve pain and restore function.