Faculty Bibliography

BACKGROUND CONTEXT: As adult spinal deformity (ASD) prevalence increases in our ever-aging population there is a concomitant increase in poor bone quality. ASD surgery is expensive and carries a high complication profile. It is important to optimize modifiable preoperative risk factors, such as osteopenia or osteoporosis. Additional diagnostic modalities such as a DEXA can add cost, delay diagnosis, and can be an additional insurance hurdle. Some studies suggest HU's can be utilized as a proxy for frailty, but it is unclear if this is useful in risk stratification. PURPOSE: Our goal was to evaluate the relationship between bone health as measured by HU's and PJK and identify a HU threshold in which PJK risk is increased. We hypothesize that HU will correlate with occurrence of PJK after ASD surgery. STUDY DESIGN/SETTING: Retrospective review of a prospective, multicenter ASD database. PATIENT SAMPLE: Of 1,330 pts eligible, 997 (74.9%) had complete 2Y follow-up. Of these, 605 meet inclusion criteria with 110 (18.18%) patients having a PJK. OUTCOME MEASURES: Development of PJK within 2 years of surgery.
METHOD(S): Operative ASD patients (scoliosis >20, SVA>5cm, PT>25, or TK>60) with available baseline (BL) and 2-year (2Y) radiographic and HRQL data were included if they had a preop CT. HU were measured from axial views within the cancellous body (x3) at both L1 and UIV with the mean value calculated for each. Threshold linear regression with Bayesian information criteria was utilized to identify optimal cut-offs of risk factors for PJK. Multivariable analysis (MVA) controlled for PJK prophylaxis and surgeon. Additionally, risk factors identified were controlled against each other.
RESULT(S): Threshold regression identified that cut-offs of <125 HU for UIV, >63 years for age, >0.31 for ASD-FI, and >47degree for preoperative T4-12 thoracic kyphosis, and <10 levels fused were predictive of PJK on bivariate analysis (P<0.05 for all). On MVA, age > 63 years old (OR 4.7; P = 0.003), female gender (OR 3.33; P=0.035), HU at UIV vertebrae <125 (2.83; P=0.008), ASD-FI >0.31 (OR 4.02; P=0.011), TK > 46degree (OR 3.75; P=0.003), and < 10 levels fused (OR 3.31; P=0.0310) were associated with increased odds of PJK.
CONCLUSION(S): Bone health as measured by HU appears to be an independent predictor of PJK after ASD surgery, specifically values <125 at the UIV. It also parallels frailty in prediction of PJK and can potentially be used as a proxy for frailty assessment. This can be easily measured and could help with risk stratification in the future. FDA DEVICE/DRUG STATUS: This abstract does not discuss or include any applicable devices or drugs.
Copyright

BACKGROUND CONTEXT: While past research has shown racial disparities exist in the outcomes and utilization of spine surgery, those studies were often performed on nondisease-specific national databases, which may capture different patient populations and complication rates compared to prospective multicenter databases. PURPOSE: Purpose: 1) Assess racial disparities for enrollment in two prospective multicenter databases (ASD-

BACKGROUND CONTEXT: Prior reports have focused on grading fusion status after adult spinal deformity (ASD) surgery; however, few focused on fusion status after 4-years postop. PURPOSE: To identify risk factors for nonunion in a prospective cohort of ASD patients with long-term follow-up (=4 years). STUDY DESIGN/SETTING: Prospective multicenter observational series. PATIENT SAMPLE: Database enrollment required age =18 years, scoliosis =20degree, sagittal vertical axis (SVA) =5cm, pelvic tilt =25degree, or thoracic kyphosis =60degree. OUTCOME MEASURES: Fusions were rated as bilaterally fused (A), unilaterally fused (B), partially fused (C), or not fused (D). Primary outcome was fusion (grade A or B) vs nonunion (grade C or D) at minimum 4-year follow-up. Secondary outcome measures included health-related quality of life (HRQL) (Oswestry Disability Index [ODI], Short Form-36 [SF-36] scores, Scoliosis Research Society-22 [SRS-22r] scores).
METHOD(S): Surgically treated ASD patients prospectively enrolled into a multicenter study (2008-2020) were assessed for fusion (grade A or B) vs nonunion (grade C or D). Inclusion required postop fusion grading at minimum 4-year follow-up. Demographics, frailty, comorbidities, alignment (baseline and initial correction), index surgery (total levels fused, iliac fixation, interbody fusion [IBF], use of bone morphogenetic protein [BMP] and/or demineralized bone matrix [

BACKGROUND CONTEXT: Sagittal alignment is integral to a patient's quality of life. Posterior spinal fusion (PSF) is currently the standard for correcting adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS). Vertebral body tethering (VBT) is a fusionless growth modulating surgical technique used to treat AIS. It relies on the Hueter-Volkmann Law. Indications for this procedure include patients who have coronal curves up to 50degree, growth remaining, and no excessive thoracic kyphosis. VBT has been shown to have good coronal plane deformity correction. There have been fewer examinations of the sagittal effects of VBT. PURPOSE: To determine if VBT is a non-inferior treatment for correction of AIS with regard to sagittal alignment compared to PSF. STUDY DESIGN/SETTING: Multicenter retrospective cohort study. PATIENT SAMPLE: Patients with AIS who underwent correction surgeries with LIV in the lumbar spine from 2013 to 2021 with pre- and minimum two-year postoperative standing full spine plain films. OUTCOME MEASURES: Sagittal vertical axis (SVA), cervical SVA (cSVA), pelvic tilt (PT), thoracic kyphosis (TK), cervical lordosis (CL), L4-S1 lordosis (L4L), T1 pelvic angle (TPA) and pelvic incidence lumbar lordosis mismatch (PI-LL).
METHOD(S): Radiographic analyses was completed with independent samples t-test with significance set to p <0.05.
RESULT(S): A total of 99 patients were included, 49 VBT and 50 PSF. There were no differences in age or levels instrumented between groups. The VBT cohort Lenke class breakdown is 23% 1A, 13% 1C, 31% 3C. 18% 5C, and 15% 6C, while the PSF cohort consisted of 42% 1A, 6% 1B, 2% 2C, 2% 3B, 12% 3C, 2% 5B, 24% 5C, and 10% 6C. At Baseline, the VBT cohort had lower SVA (-0.7mm+/-3.7 vs 2.2mm+/-5.0, p=0.001), CL (-0.9degree+/-18.2 vs 11.6degree+/-12.8, p=0.001), L4-S1 Lordosis (20.7degree+/-16.0 vs 41.6degree+/-10.2, p=0.001), and higher cSVA (3.3mm+/-1.6 vs -0.95mm+/-3.1, p=0.001) than those who were fused. Postoperatively, VBT patients have an overall higher L4-S1 Lordosis (36.0degree+/-10.1vs 18.3degree+/-12.5, p=0.001), cSVA (3.4mm+/-1.4 vs -3.7mm+/-2.1, p=0.001), and lower CL (-4.3degree+/-18.4 vs 7.0degree+/-12.2, p=0.001). The PSF cohort had a larger change in cSVA (2.8mm+/-4.0 vs 0mm+/-1.6, p=0.001) from baseline to 2-year follow-up compared to VBT. No differences in the change of L4-S1 Lordosis (VBT 1.5degree+/-12.3 vs 4.1degree+/-10.9, p=0.3), TPA (VBT -1.6degree+/-6.8 vs -1.4degree+/-8.5, p=0.89), PT (VBT -0.5degree+/-7.8 vs -1.9degree+/-8.5, p=0.42), or PI-LL (0.2degree+/-12.0 vs -0.5degree+/-14.0, p=0.81) were observed.
CONCLUSION(S): VBT and PSF for AIS result in statistically similar changes in sagittal alignment parameters. The fact that we showed similar results comparing sagittal alignment in fusion and VBT groups indicates that VBT is non-inferior from a sagittal perspective. It is important to maintain sagittal alignment when correcting AIS. Future work can examine the long-term effect of VBT on sagittal alignment. FDA DEVICE/DRUG STATUS: This abstract does not discuss or include any applicable devices or drugs.
Copyright

BACKGROUND CONTEXT: Adult spinal deformity (ASD) patients maintain upright posture by compensating through their spine, pelvis and lower extremities. Little data exist quantifying the contribution of lower extremity compensation through the hips, knees, and ankles to maintain upright posture. PURPOSE: Evaluate the effect of the lower limb compensation by numerically unfolding patients. STUDY DESIGN/SETTING: Multicenter, prospective cohort. PATIENT SAMPLE: A total of 288 patients surgically treated for complex ASD with preoperative full body images. OUTCOME MEASURES: Horizontal distance between vertebra centroid and ankle.
METHOD(S): Surgical ASD patients were enrolled into a prospective study based on three criteria deformity severity (PI-LL>25degree, TPA>30degree, SVA>15cm, TCobb>70degree or TLCobb>50degree), procedure complexity (>12 levels fused, 3CO or ACR) and/or age (>65 and >7 levels fused). Preop full-body images were evaluated and age and PI-adjusted normative values were used to model spine alignment based upon three configurations: COMP (all lower extremity compensatory mechanisms maintained), PARTIAL (removal of ankle dorsiflexion and knee flexion, maintained hip extension), UNCOMP (ankle, knee, and hip compensation eliminated by reset PT to the age and PI norms). The three configurations were compared, and COMP alignment was stratified by TPA percentiles to investigate the offsets from each vertebra to the ankle joint acting as a surrogate of the gravity line in free-standing position.
RESULT(S): A total of 288 patients met inclusion criteria (60+/-15yo, 70.5% female, 27.4+/-5.9 BMI). COMP spine deformity magnitude included PI-LL 15+/-24, TPA 24+/-14, and SVA 65+/-69mm. As the model transitioned from COMP to UNCOMP alignment, the initial posterior translation of the pelvis decreased significantly to an anterior translation vs the ankle (P.Shift 30 to -7.6 mm). This was associated with a decrease in pelvic retroversion (PT 24.1 to 16.1), hip extension (SFA 203 to 200), knee flexion (KA 5.5 to -0.4), and ankle dorsiflexion (AA 5.3 to 3.7). As a result, the anterior malalignment of the trunk significantly increased SVA (65 to 120mm) and G-SVA (C7-Ankle from 36 to 127 mm), leading to a three-fold increase in bending moments sustained by the ankle joint. The stratification of the COMP position by TPA percentiles revealed that as the deformity increases, the vertebrae above T8 translate anteriorly, those below T10 move posteriorly, with the T8-T10 segment remaining ~3cm posterior to the ankle joint independently of the deformity severity.
CONCLUSION(S): Removal of lower limbs' compensation revealed an unsustainable truncal malalignment with a three-fold increase of bending moments at the ankle joints. Combined, lower limb compensations permit "reducing" the SVA by two-fold and the C7-ankle SVA by three-fold. From a mechanical point of view, this compensation permits maintaining the trunk center of mass (T9) at a fixed offset of ~3 cm from the ankle joint. FDA DEVICE/DRUG STATUS: This abstract does not discuss or include any applicable devices or drugs.
Copyright

BACKGROUND CONTEXT: The ACS-NSQIP and SpineSage are both easy to use and readily available online perioperative risk calculators The ACS-NSQIP calculator predicts perioperative complications after surgery, but lacks more spine-specific predictors. The SpineSage platform was developed as a tool built for predicting complications in spine surgery. While a limited number of studies have shown it be predictive of both overall and major medical complications in spine surgery, large external validation studies are limited and none have directly compared NSQIP against SpineSage in the same cohort of spine surgery patients. PURPOSE: Assess the ACS-NSQIP Risk Calculator and SpineSage informatics platform for prediction of perioperative complications in spine surgery STUDY DESIGN/SETTING: Retrospective. PATIENT SAMPLE: A total of 440 patients undergoing thoracolumbar spine with or without fusion. OUTCOME MEASURES: Any complication, serious complication, pneumonia, cardiac, dural tear, SSI, UTI, VTE, reoperation, death and LOS METHODS: Each patient was entered into the ACS-NSQIP and SpineSage calculators and predicted risk for specific complications were directly compared to actual risks. Paired t-tests compared the differences between calculators and their predictability of complications. Patients were ranked based on risk predicted for each complication and the highest tertile for each was isolated. Multivariate regression controlling for age and gender was used to determine if the highest tertile for each risk calculator had predictability in complications following spine surgery.
RESULT(S): Mean LOS 4.2+3 days, EBL 444+300 mL, operative time 256+240 min, and levels instrumented 2.1+2.3. When assessing the four complications predicted by SpineSage there were significant differences in three of the four variables, as SpineSage underpredicted the risk of all and serious-complications (p.5). Both calculator tertiles were trending towards significance for major medical complications (SpineSage: OR: 2.0, [0.94-4.23], p=.073; ACS-NSQIP: OR: 1.8,[0.96-3.48],p=.067). When examining any medical risk, only ACS NSQIP had significant predictability for any medical complication (OR: 2.1, [1.3-3.3]; p=.003).
CONCLUSION(S): Similar to previous studies, the ACS-NSQIP score underpredicted most complications, with the exception of LOS and death. In contrast to previous studies, our data suggest SpineSage was not predictive of actual rates of complications. As both calculators are highly accessible and provide at least some objective perioperative risk data points, we recommend them as a guiding tool but not as an absolute endpoint for clinical decision making as they may be inaccurate and insensitive. Further, higher powered studies elucidating the findings in this study should be conducted. Additionally, the assessment of these calculators for a specific subset of patients, such as deformity, degenerative or pediatrics, can further help guide clinicians regarding the utility of these calculators for their particular patient populations. FDA DEVICE/DRUG STATUS: This abstract does not discuss or include any applicable devices or drugs.
Copyright

BACKGROUND CONTEXT: Numerous studies have reported the interplay between spinal deformity and pelvis compensatory mechanisms, but little data exist evaluating the contribution of lower extremity compensation (LE) to maintain upright posture. We hypothesis that hip, knee and ankle compensation is proportional to the severity of the spinal deformity and varies by demographics. PURPOSE: Evaluate the association between spinal alignment and lower limbs compensation. STUDY DESIGN/SETTING: Multicenter, prospective cohort. PATIENT SAMPLE: This study included 288 patients treated for complex adult spinal deformity (ASD) with full body images available. OUTCOME MEASURES: Pelvic retroversion (PT), hip extension (SFA), knee flexion (KA), ankle dorsiflexion (AA), pelvic translation (P.Shift) and patient reported outcomes (ODI, PROMIS and SRS-22).
METHOD(S): Surgical ASD patients were enrolled into a prospective study based on three criteria: deformity severity (PI-LL>25degree, TPA>30degree, SVA>15cm, TCobb>70degree or TLCobb>50degree), procedure complexity (>12 levels fused, 3CO or ACR) and/or age (>65 and >7 levels fused). Associations between lower extremity compensation (hip extension, knee flexion, and ankle dorsiflexion) and the magnitude of spinal deformity, patient demographics, patient frailty, and patient-reported outcomes (ODI, SRS, PROMIS-CAT) were assessed via regressions and partial correlations.
RESULT(S): A total of 288/329 patients met inclusion criteria (60+/-15yo, 70.5% female), had moderate to severe spinal deformity (PI-LL:15+/-24, TPA:24+/-14, SVA:65+/-69mm, lumbar Cobb:34+/-24), and reported high pain (PROMIS pain interference; PI=62.7+/-7.8) and reduced physical function (PROMIS physical function; PF=35.6+/-7.6). Lower extremity compensation included pelvic retroversion (PT:24.1+/- 11.8), hip extension (SFA: 203+/-10.5), knee flexion (KA:5.5+/- 9.6), ankle dorsiflexion (AA: 5.3+/-4.5), and posterior pelvic translation (P.Shift: 30+/-51mm). Overall, lower extremity compensation increased with age (all p <0.001), BMI and frailty (all p <0.001, except SFA). For a similar PT, women had greater hip extension than men (SFA: 206 vs 200, p <0.001), with less KA (3.6 vs. 10.1, p <0.001), AA, and P.Shift. Lower extremity compensation increased with PI (r=0.2-0.45, p <0.001), TPA (r=0.5-0.9, p <0.001) and correlated with PROMS (ODI:0.26 - 0.37, PROMIS PF: -0.28 - -0.39, SRS Acti.: -0.20 - -0.33). When controlling for deformity severity and PI, most associations between lower limbs compensation and PROMS were lost. However, P.Shift and SFA remained weakly correlated with physical scores (ODI and PROMIS PF).
CONCLUSION(S): The recruitment of LE compensation is overall proportional to the severity of adult spinal deformity, with different patterns observed between men and women. Patients achieved similar PT by recruiting different patterns of LE compensation. Hip extension and posterior pelvic translation are independently associated with impairment in patient-reported outcomes. FDA DEVICE/DRUG STATUS: This abstract does not discuss or include any applicable devices or drugs.
Copyright

BACKGROUND CONTEXT: In recent years spine surgeons have utilized different techniques and approaches to perform lumbar interbody fusion surgery. We sought to analyze the difference in outcomes between traditional open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (O-TLIF), minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (MIS-TLIF), dual position anterior/lateral lumbar interbody fusion with posterior instrumentation (Dual ALIF/LLIF), and single position anterior/lateral lumbar interbody fusion with posterior instrumentation (Single ALIF/LLIF). PURPOSE: To analyze the perioperative and postoperative outcomes of patient undergoing TLIF, MIS TLIF, Dual ALIF/LLIF, and Single ALIF/LLIF. STUDY DESIGN/SETTING: Retrospective cohort study at a single institution. PATIENT SAMPLE: Patients undergoing O-TLIF, MIS TLIF, Dual ALIF/LLIF, or Single ALIF/LLIF from 2014 to 2020. OUTCOME MEASURES: Operative time, estimated blood loss (EBL), length of stay (LOS), radiation dose, intraoperative and postoperative complications, and return to OR within 90 days.
METHOD(S): Patients who underwent single level lumbar interbody fusion surgery were analyzed. Patient charts were reviewed for operative time, EBL, LOS, radiation dose, intraoperative and postoperative complications, and return to OR within 90 days. Differences were assessed by ANOVA.
RESULT(S): A total of 1,226 patients underwent a single level lumbar interbody fusion (440 O-TLIF, 423 MIS TLIF, 316 Dual ALIF/LLIF, 47 Single ALIF/LLIF). There were no significant differences in BMI or gender between the groups, but in the O-TLIF cohort average age (60) was higher than MIS-TLIF (54), Dual ALIF/LLIF(52), and Single ALIF/LLIF (50) p < 0.001. There were also significant differences in average operative time (221 mins O-TLIF, 212 mins MIS TLIF, 277 mins dual ALIF/LLIF, 277 mins single ALIF/LLIF, p < 0.001), EBL (360 ml O-TLIF, 167ml MIS TLIF, 235 ml Dual ALIF/LLIF, 253 ml Single ALIF/LLIF, p<0.001), radiation dose (20 mGy O-TLIF, 51 mGy MIS TLIF, 43 mGy Dual ALIF/LLIF, 62 mGy Single ALIF/LLIF, p < 0.001). There was no difference in LOS, intraoperative complications, or 90-day complications between the groups, except a higher rate of neurological deficit in dual ALIF/LLIF (1.6%, p < 0.03). Post hoc analysis demonstrated statistical significance in operative time in the Dual ALIF/LLIF as compared to all the other groups. O-TLIF demonstrated a larger EBL and less radiation as compared to all the other groups as well as a longer operative time than Single ALIF/LLIF. Dual ALIF/LLIF demonstrated a longer operative time and increased rate of neurological deficit as compared to MIS TLIF.
CONCLUSION(S): In comparing different techniques for single level lumbar interbody fusion there were similar outcomes in LOS, perioperative complications and 90-day complications between all the groups. Open TLIF was associated with increased estimate blood loss and less radiation than all the other groups Dual position ALIF/LLIF surgery was associated with a longer operative time than all the other groups. FDA DEVICE/DRUG STATUS: This abstract does not discuss or include any applicable devices or drugs.
Copyright

BACKGROUND:Studies have utilized psychological questionnaires to identify the psychological distress among certain surgical populations. RESEARCH QUESTION/OBJECTIVE:Is there an additional psychological burden among patients undergoing surgical treatment for their symptomatic degenerative cervical disease? MATERIALS AND METHODS/METHODS:Patients>18 years of age with symptomatic, degenerative cervical spine disease were included and prospectively enrolled. Correlations and multivariable logistic regression analysis assessed the relationship between these mental health components (PCS, FABQ) and the severity of disability described by the NDI, EQ-5D, and mJOA score. Patient distress scores were compared to previously published benchmarks for other diagnoses. RESULTS:). Increasing neck disability and decreasing EQ-5D were correlated with greater PCS and FABQ(all p<0.001). Patients with severe psychological distress at baseline were more likely to report severe neck disability, while physician-reported mJOA had weaker associations. Compared to historical controls of lumbar patients, patients in our study had greater levels of psychological distress, as measured by FABQ (40.0 vs 17.6;p<0.001) and PCS (27.4 vs 19.3;p<0.001). DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION/CONCLUSIONS:Degenerative cervical spine patients seeking surgery were found to have a significant level of psychological distress, with a large portion reporting severe fear avoidance beliefs and catastrophizing pain at baseline. Strong correlation was seen between patient-reported functional metrics, but less so with physician-reported signs and symptoms. Additionally, this population demonstrated higher psychological burden in certain respects than previously identified benchmarks of patients with other disorders. Preoperative treatment to help mitigate this distress, impact postoperative outcomes, and should be further investigated. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE/METHODS:Level III.

BACKGROUND:As corrective surgery for cervical deformity (CD) increases, so does the rate of complications and reoperations. To minimize suboptimal postoperative outcomes, it is important to develop a tool that allows for proper preoperative risk stratification. OBJECTIVE:To develop a prognostic utility for identification of risk factors that lead to the development of major complications and unplanned reoperations. METHODS:CD patients age 18 years or older were stratified into 2 groups based on the postoperative occurrence of a revision and/or major complication. Multivariable logistic regressions identified characteristics that were associated with revision or major complication. Decision tree analysis established cutoffs for predictive variables. Models predicting both outcomes were quantified using area under the curve (AUC) and receiver operating curve characteristics. RESULTS:A total of 109 patients with CD were included in this study. By 1 year postoperatively, 26 patients experienced a major complication and 17 patients underwent a revision. Predictive modeling incorporating preoperative and surgical factors identified development of a revision to include upper instrumented vertebrae > C5, lowermost instrumented vertebrae > T7, number of unfused lordotic cervical vertebrae > 1, baseline T1 slope > 25.3°, and number of vertebral levels in maximal kyphosis > 12 (AUC: 0.82). For developing a major complication, a model included a current smoking history, osteoporosis, upper instrumented vertebrae inclination angle < 0° or > 40°, anterior diskectomies > 3, and a posterior Smith Peterson osteotomy (AUC: 0.81). CONCLUSION/CONCLUSIONS:Revisions were predicted using a predominance of radiographic parameters while the occurrence of major complications relied on baseline bone health, radiographic, and surgical characteristics.