Faculty Bibliography

INTRODUCTION/BACKGROUND:Total hip arthroplasty (THA) has predominantly been utilized to treat older patients with primary osteoarthritis. However, recent improvements in surgical technique and implant materials have increased implant longevity, making THA a viable option for younger patients (< 30 years old). While trend analyses indicate an expanding utilization of THA in younger patients with non-OA diagnoses, current data on mid- and long-term THA outcomes in this population are limited. This study aims to describe the demographics, perioperative data, and implant survivorship of patients younger than 30 years undergoing THA. METHODS:A retrospective study across two large urban academic medical institutions identified 135 patients aged < 30 years who underwent 155 primary THAs between 2012 and 2017, with up to 10-year clinical follow-up. Baseline demographics, surgical indications, intraoperative details, and postoperative outcomes were analyzed. RESULTS:The mean age at surgery was 24.9 years (range 18-29). Osteonecrosis of the femoral head (55.5%), developmental hip dysplasia (28.3%), and arthritis (15.5%) were the primary indications. Most surgeries utilized the posterior approach (64.5%), manual technique (65.8%), and Ceramic-on-Polyethylene articulation (71.6%). Seven patients (4.5%) were readmitted within 90-days of surgery, including three non-orthopedic-related readmissions (1.9%) and four orthopedic-related readmissions (2.6%). Dislocations were reported in two patients (1.3%). There were six all-cause revisions (3.9%), four aseptic (2.6%) and two septic (1.3%). Kaplan-Meier analysis showed 10-year survival from implant retaining reoperation was 98.7%, 10-year survival from all-cause revision was 96.1%, and 10-year survival from aseptic revision was 97.4%. CONCLUSION/CONCLUSIONS:With a 10-year aseptic implant survivorship rate of 97.4%, THA is a reliable surgical intervention for patients younger than 30 years of age who have severe hip pathology. Further studies are warranted for a more comprehensive understanding of mid- and long-term survivorship risk factors in this demanding population, facilitating improved risk assessment and informed surgical decisions.

PURPOSE/OBJECTIVE:Bacterial biofilms create a challenge in the treatment of prosthetic joint infection (PJI), and failure to eradicate biofilms is often implicated in the high rates of recurrence. In this study, we aimed to compare the effectiveness of a novel nanoparticle ultrasonication technology on Staphylococcus aureus biofilm eradication compared to commonly used orthopedic irrigation solutions. METHODS:Twenty-four sterile, titanium alloy discs were inoculated with a standardized concentration of methicillin-resistant S. aureus and cultured for seven days to allow for biofilm formation. Discs were then treated with either ultrasonicated nanoparticle therapy or irrigation with chlorhexidine gluconate, povidone-iodine or normal saline. The remaining bacteria on each surface was subsequently plated for colony-forming units of S. aureus. Bacterial eradication was reported as a decrease in CFUs relative to the control group. Mann-Whitney U tests were used to compare between groups. RESULTS:Treatment with ultrasonicated nanoparticles resulted in a significant mean decrease in CFUs of 99.3% compared to controls (p < 0.0001). Irrigation with povidone-iodine also resulted in a significant 77.5% reduction in CFUs compared to controls (p < 0.0001). Comparisons between ultrasonicated nanoparticles and povidone-iodine demonstrated a significantly higher reduction in bacterial CFUs in the nanoparticle group (p < 0.0001). CONCLUSION/CONCLUSIONS:Ultrasonicated nanoparticle were superior to commonly used bactericidal irrigation solutions in the eradication of S. aureus from a titanium surface. Future clinical studies are warranted to evaluate this ultrsonication technology in the treatment of PJI.

INTRODUCTION/UNASSIGNED:Ehlers-Danlos syndromes (EDS) are genetic connective tissue disorders affecting multiple organ systems that frequently result in connective tissue hyperlaxity and early osteoarthritis. Short- and long-term outcomes after primary total hip arthroplasty (THA) in this patient population remain poorly characterised. The primary purpose of this study is to compare postoperative outcomes and survivorship after primary THA in patients with and without EDS. METHODS/UNASSIGNED:The New York Statewide Planning and Research Cooperative System (SPARCS) database was queried for all patients undergoing primary elective THA between September 2009 and December 2020. Patients with EDS were identified using ICD9 and ICD10 diagnosis codes. Given the relatively low incidence of EDS in this patient population, the cohort was propensity-matched 1:10 to patients without diagnosis of EDS based on demographics characteristics and medical comorbidities as measured by the Elixhauser Comorbidity Index. RESULTS/UNASSIGNED: 0.063). CONCLUSIONS/UNASSIGNED:EDS patients undergoing primary THA have increased rate of all cause revision and demonstrate decreased revision free survival compared to non-EDS THA patients.

INTRODUCTION/BACKGROUND:Discharge disposition after total joint arthroplasty may be predictable. Previous literature has attempted to improve upon models such as the Risk Assessment and Prediction Tool (RAPT) in an effort to optimize postoperative planning. The purpose of this study was to determine whether preoperative laboratory values and other previously unstudied demographic factors could improve the predictive accuracy of the RAPT. METHODS:All patients included had RAPT scores in addition to the following preoperative laboratory values: red blood cell count, albumin, and vitamin D. All values were recorded within 90 days of surgery. Demographic variables including marital status, American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) scores, body mass index, Charlson Comorbidity Index, and depression were also evaluated. Binary logistic regression was used to determine the significance of each factor in association with discharge disposition. RESULTS:Univariate logistic regression found significant associations between discharge disposition and all original RAPT factors as well as nonmarried patients (P < 0.001), ASA class 3 to 4 (P < 0.001), body mass index >30 kg/m2 (P = 0.065), red blood cell count <4 million/mm3 (P < 0.001), albumin <3.5 g/dL (P < 0.001), Charlson Comorbidity Index (P < 0.001), and a history of depression (P < 0.001). All notable univariate models were used to create a multivariate model with an overall predictive accuracy of 90.1%. CONCLUSIONS:The addition of preoperative laboratory values and additional demographic data to the RAPT may improve its PA. Orthopaedic surgeons could benefit from incorporating these values as part of their discharge planning in THA. Machine learning may be able to identify other factors to make the model even more predictive.

INTRODUCTION/BACKGROUND:Mechanical falls represent a potential adverse event after total knee arthroplasty (TKA) and may introduce further injury and delay postoperative recovery. This study aimed to identify patient characteristics associated with inpatient falls, to determine the impact of inpatient falls on surgical outcomes following TKA, and to describe the relationship between tourniquet and/or adductor canal block (ACB) use and fall rates. METHODS:Patients undergoing primary, elective TKA at a single institution between 2018 and 2022 were retrospectively analyzed. Patients were stratified into groups based on whether they sustained a postoperative inpatient fall or not. Perioperative characteristics, lengths of stay (LOS), rates of 90-day readmissions, and revisions were compared, and fall characteristics were described. Subanalysis was conducted comparing fall incidence based on tourniquet and/or ACB use. RESULTS:In total 6472 patients were included with 39 (0.6%) sustaining falls. Falls most commonly occurred on postoperative days one (43.6%) and two (30.8%), and were most commonly due to loss of balance (41.9%) or buckling (35.5%). Six (15.4%) fall patients sustained minor injuries, and one (2.6%) sustained major injury (malleolar fracture requiring non-operative orthopaedic management). The LOS (3.0 ± 1.5 vs 2.3 ± 1.5 days, p = 0.002) and all-cause revision rates at latest follow-up (10.3% vs. 2.0%, p = 0.008) were significantly higher in the fall group. Falls were comparable across subgroups based on tourniquet and/or ACB use (p = 0.429). CONCLUSION/CONCLUSIONS:Patients who fell had a longer LOS and higher revision rate postoperatively. Rates of inpatient falls were comparable regardless of tourniquet and/or ACB use. Concern for inpatient falls should not influence surgeons when considering the use of tourniquets and/or ACBs, though well-designed, large-volume, prospective randomized studies are warranted to better understand this relationship.

PURPOSE/OBJECTIVE:Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is a known complication of hip arthroplasty for femoral neck fractures (FNF) with various prophylactic anticoagulants utilized to decrease risk. The purpose of this study was to assess the efficacy and perioperative outcomes associated with aspirin for VTE prophylaxis following arthroplasty for FNF. METHODS:Medical records of 1,220 patients who underwent hip hemiarthroplasty (HHA) or total hip arthroplasty (THA) at an urban academic center from 2011 to 2022 were retrospectively reviewed. Patient characteristics and perioperative outcomes, including length of stay (LOS), VTE, 90-day hospital encounters, and discharge disposition, were collected. Outcomes for patients prescribed aspirin (n = 214) were compared to those prescribed non-aspirin VTE prophylaxis (n = 1006) using propensity score matching. RESULTS:Patients who received aspirin had higher rates of THA (36.0 vs 26.7%; p = 0.008). There were no significant risk-adjusted differences in the incidence of VTE (0.5 vs 0.5%, p = 1.000) and 90-day readmissions (10.4 vs 12.3%, p = 0.646) between patients prescribed aspirin and non-aspirin VTE prophylaxis, respectively. Patients prescribed non-aspirin agents had higher rates of non-home discharge (73.9 vs 58.5%; p < 0.001) and longer LOS (143.5 vs 124.9 h; p = 0.005). Sub-analysis of patients prescribed aspirin and non-aspirin prophylaxis based on comorbidity scores demonstrated no difference in VTE incidence for low (0.0 vs 1.6%, p = 1.000) and high scores (0.0 vs 0.0%, p = 1.000), respectively. CONCLUSION/CONCLUSIONS:Aspirin is not associated with increased incidence of VTE after HHA or THA for FNF. Aspirin prophylaxis should be considered in hip fracture patients to mitigate bleeding risk, particularly those with low to intermediate VTE risk. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE/METHODS:Level III, Retrospective study.

Culture-positive (CP) and culture-negative (CN) periprosthetic joint infections (PJI) remain a crucial area of research; however, current studies comparing these infections rely on unstandardized outcome reporting tools. Our study aimed to compare the outcomes of two-stage revision of CP and CN PJI using the standardized Musculoskeletal Infection Society (MSIS) outcome reporting tool. We retrospectively reviewed 138 patients who were diagnosed with PJI and indicated for two-stage revision total knee arthroplasty (rTKA). The majority of patients in both CP and CN cohorts achieved infection control without the need for reoperation (54.1% and 62.5%, respectively). There was a significant difference in the overall distribution of MSIS outcomes (p = 0.043), with a significantly greater rate of CN patients falling into Tier 1 (infection control without the use of suppressive antibiotics) (52.5% versus 29.6%, p = 0.011). There was also a significant difference in the distribution of septic versus aseptic reoperations after 2nd stage (p = 0.013), with more CP reoperations being septic and more CN reoperations being aseptic. The duration from first to second stage was significantly shorter in the CN cohort (p = 0.002). While overall infection control was similar between cohorts, these data suggest that the outcomes of two-stage rTKA are favorable in cases of CN PJI.

INTRODUCTION/BACKGROUND:Literature examining the risks, benefits, and potential complications of TKA in morbidly obese patients is conflicting. Surgeons with more experience performing TKA on morbidly obese patients may generate superior outcomes. This study sought to assess whether complication rates and implant survivorship in morbidly obese TKA patients varies between high (HV) and low (LV) volume surgeons. METHODS:A retrospective review was performed to include all morbidly obese (BMI ≥ 40) patients that underwent primary TKA between January 2016 and July 2021 at our high-volume center. Demographics and clinical outcomes were collected and compared between surgeons with a higher morbidly obese TKA volume (> 10 annual cases) and surgeons with a lower morbidly obese TKA volume. RESULTS:A total of 964 patients (HV 91 [9.4%], LV 873 [90.6%]) were identified. The HV surgeon and LV surgeons had an average annual volume of 15.3 and 5.2 cases, respectively. The average BMI for the HV and LV cohorts were 44.5 ± 3.7 and 44.0 ± 3.6, respectively (p = 0.160). The HV surgeon had significantly lower operative times (105.7 ± 17.4 vs. 110.7 ± 29.6 min, p = 0.018), and a lower 90-day minor complication rate (0.0% vs. 4.7%, p = 0.035). For patients with at least 2-year follow-up, all-cause revision (3.4% vs. 12.5%, p = 0.149) and revision due to PJI (0.0% vs. 5.8%, 0.193) rates were numerically lower in the HV cohort. Improvements in KOOS, JR and VR-12 scores were similar at 3-month and 1-year follow-up. Freedom from all-cause revision (HV: 96.6% vs. LV: 80.4%, p = 0.175) and revision due to PJI (HV: 100.0% vs. LV: 93.6%, p = 0.190, p = 0.190) at latest follow-up did not statistically differ between groups. CONCLUSION/CONCLUSIONS:The HV surgeon had significantly lower operative time and 90-day minor complication rates and numerically lower all-cause revision and revision due to PJI rates when performing TKA in morbidly obese patients. Surgeon's experience may affect surgical outcomes after TKA in morbidly obese patients. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE/METHODS:III.

INTRODUCTION/UNASSIGNED:There is conflicting evidence in the literature regarding the clinical utility of tourniquets in total knee arthroplasty (TKA), specifically in regards to perioperative blood loss. In this meta-analysis and systematic review, we aim to evaluate the clinical advantages and disadvantages associated with tourniquet use in the setting of TKA. METHODS/UNASSIGNED:A systematic review was conducted through April 2017 using keywords: "tourniquet" and "total knee arthroplasty" or "total knee replacement". Perioperative variables including TXA use, blood loss, incidence of venous thromboembolism (VTE), and wound complications were either extracted from the studies or corresponding authors were contacted. A sub-analysis was conducted to evaluate the effects of TXA on intraoperative and total blood loss (TBL), and VTE incidence. RESULTS/UNASSIGNED:After review of 558 articles, 19 studies reporting outcomes in 1094 patients were analyzed. Intraoperative blood loss was significantly lower in the tourniquet cohorts compared to non-tourniquet (p < 0.01). TBL was reduced in tourniquet groups but not significantly (p = 0.08). In contrast, calculated blood loss was greater in tourniquet groups, but this difference was not significant (p = 0.43). There was a greater likelihood for wound complications and VTE among tourniquet assisted TKA, albeit only significant for the former (p = 0.01). TXA sub-analysis demonstrated intraoperative blood loss was significantly reduced with tourniquet use regardless of TXA implementation (p < 0.01). In studies without TXA, tourniquet patients were at greater risk of developing VTE (p = 0.08). These risks decreased with TXA administration. CONCLUSION/UNASSIGNED:This meta-analysis demonstrates that tourniquets prevent intraoperative blood loss, yet within the postoperative period, there is no significant difference in TBL between tourniquet and non-tourniquet assisted TKA. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE/UNASSIGNED:Level II; Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

INTRODUCTION/UNASSIGNED:Total hip arthroplasty (THA) using computer-assisted navigation (N-THA) and robot-assisted surgery (RA-THA) has been increasingly adopted to improve implant positioning and offset/leg-length restoration. Whether clinically meaningful differences in patient-reported outcomes (PROMs) compared to conventional THA (C-THA) are achieved with intraoperative technology has not been established. This systematic review aimed to assess whether published relative PROM improvements with technology use in THA achieved minimal clinically important differences (MCIDs). METHODS/UNASSIGNED: 2786) studies, respectively, for analyses. RESULTS/UNASSIGNED:Statistically significant improvements in postoperative PROM scores were reported in 2/6 (33.3%) studies comparing N-THA with C-THA, though only 1 (16.7%) reported clinically significant relative improvements. Statistically significant improvements in postoperative PROMs were reported in 6/10 (60.0%) studies comparing RA-THA and C-THA, though none reported clinically significant relative improvements. Improved radiographic outcomes for N-THA and RA-THA were reported in 83.3% and 70.0% of studies, respectively. Only 1 study reported a significant improvement in revision rates with RA-THA as compared to C-THA. CONCLUSIONS/UNASSIGNED:Reported PROM scores in studies comparing N-THA or RA-THA to C-THA often do not achieve clinically significant relative improvements. Future studies reporting PROMs should be interpreted in the context of validated MCID values to accurately establish the clinical impact of intraoperative technology.