Faculty Bibliography

BACKGROUND: The outcome of operatively treated capitellar fractures has not been reported frequently. The purpose of the present study was to evaluate the clinical, radiographic, and functional outcomes following open reduction and internal fixation of capitellar fractures that were treated with a uniform surgical approach in order to further define the impact on the outcome of fracture type and concomitant lateral column osseous and/or ligamentous injuries. METHODS: A retrospective evaluation of the upper extremity database at our institution identified sixteen skeletally mature patients (mean age, 40 +/- 17 years) with a closed capitellar fracture. In all cases, an extensile lateral exposure and articular fixation with buried cannulated variable-pitch headless compression screws was performed at a mean of ten days after the injury. Clinical, radiographic, and elbow-specific outcomes, including the Mayo Elbow Performance Index, were evaluated at a mean of 27 +/- 19 months postoperatively. RESULTS: Six Type-I, two Type-III, and eight Type-IV fractures were identified with use of the Bryan and Morrey classification system. Four of five ipsilateral radial head fractures occurred in association with a Type-IV fracture. The lateral collateral ligament was intact in fifteen of the sixteen elbows. Metaphyseal comminution was observed in association with five fractures (including four Type-IV fractures and one Type-III fracture). Supplemental mini-fragment screws were used for four of eight Type-IV fractures and one of two Type-III fractures. All fractures healed, and no elbow had instability or weakness. Overall, the mean ulnohumeral motion was 123 degrees (range, 70 degrees to 150 degrees). Fourteen of the sixteen patients achieved a functional arc of elbow motion, and all patients had full forearm rotation. The mean Mayo Elbow Performance Index score was 92 +/- 10 points, with nine excellent results, six good results, and one fair result. Patients with a Type-IV fracture had a greater magnitude of flexion contracture (p = 0.04), reduced terminal flexion (p = 0.02), and a reduced net ulnohumeral arc (p = 0.01). An ipsilateral radial head fracture did not appear to affect ulnohumeral motion or the functional outcome. CONCLUSIONS: Despite the presence of greater flexion contractures at the time of follow-up in elbows with Type-IV fractures or fractures with an ipsilateral radial head fracture, good to excellent outcomes with functional ulnohumeral motion can be achieved following internal fixation of these complex fractures. Type-IV injuries may be more common than previously thought; such fractures often are associated with metaphyseal comminution or a radial head fracture and may require supplemental fixation

PURPOSE: To compare the stability of a novel, nonspanning external fixator with a standard volar locked plate for treatment of unstable distal radius fractures. METHODS: A simulated, unstable, extra- articular distal radius fracture was created in six matched pairs of fresh frozen human distal radii. One of each pair was treated with a nonspanning external fixator [Mirza Cross Pin Fixator (CPX), A.M. Surgical Inc. Smithtown, NY] and the other was treated with a volar locked plate [Distal Volar Radial Plate (DVR), Hand Innovations, Miami, FL]. Each specimen was axially loaded in central, dorsal, and volar locations, loaded in cantilever bending in volar to dorsal, dorsal to volar, and radial to ulnar directions and loaded in torsion. Load-displacement curves were generated to determine the construct stiffness for each loading schema, with comparisons made between the two treatment groups. Specimens were then cyclically loaded with 50 N axial loads applied for 1,000 and 10,000 cycles. Measurement of construct stiffness was repeated and comparisons made both between the two treatments and within treatments to their precycling stiffness. RESULTS: There was no significant difference in the mechanical stiffness of the nonspanning external fixator and the volar locking plate after axial loading in any of the loading modalities.Cyclic loads of 1,000 and 10,000 cycles resulted in no significant difference in construct stiffness between the nonspanning external fixator and volar locked plate. However, the nonspanning external fixator demonstrated decreasing stiffness after cyclic loading with 10,000 cycles (p < 0.02). CONCLUSION: This study demonstrated no significant difference in the mechanical stiffness of the CPX nonspanning external fixator and volar locked plate in a cadaveric fracture model. Both constructs appear to be biomechanically equivalent in this experimental model; however, this is only one factor in the choice of fixation device for the management of unstable distal radius fractures

BACKGROUND: Ankle fracture-dislocations require urgent reduction to protect the soft tissues, to minimize articular injury, and to allow swelling to decrease. Conscious sedation is commonly used to provide analgesia for closed reduction of this injury. We hypothesized that an intra-articular block of the ankle would provide similar analgesia and the ability to reduce the ankle with a lower risk than conscious sedation. METHODS: Between September 2005 and January 2007, forty-two patients with an ankle fracture-dislocation presented to our emergency department and were enrolled in a prospective randomized study. The patients were given either conscious sedation or an intra-articular lidocaine block for the reduction and for the application of a plaster splint. After the reduction maneuver, the patients used a visual analog pain scale to rate the level of pain before, during, and after the procedure, from 1 (no pain) to 10 (severe pain). The senior authors reviewed the injury and reduction radiographs to confirm the reduction of the ankle joint. RESULTS: Twenty-one patients were randomized to each group. There was no difference in demographic data or fracture patterns between the groups. Both the sedation and the block reduced the pain to a similar degree. The pain reduction (the initial pain level minus the level of pain after medication was given or injected) was an average (and standard deviation) of 4.6 +/- 3.3 for the block group and 4.2 +/- 3.5 for the sedation group (p = 0.64). The average change in the level of pain between the initial presentation and during the reduction was 3.6 +/- 3.8 for the block group and 4.1 +/- 3.3 for the sedation group. Overall, there was no difference in analgesia provided by these two methods (p = 0.71). An acceptable reduction was achieved for forty-one of the forty-two patients with one failure in the sedation group. The average time for ankle reduction and stabilization in a splint was 81.5 minutes for the sedation group and 63.8 minutes for the block group. CONCLUSIONS: Compared with conscious sedation, an intra-articular lidocaine block provides a similar degree of analgesia and sufficient analgesia to achieve closed reduction of ankle fracture-dislocations

A prospective study was undertaken to determine if patients recover pre-injury level of shoulder function 1 year after 1 part proximal humeral fractures. Of the 67 patients enrolled, 43 were female and 24 male with an average age of 64.8 years (range, 25-90 years). All patients underwent a similar treatment protocol consisting of early therapy for range of shoulder motion and strengthening. Baseline demographics and functional assessment, including the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) evaluation form and the SF-36, were obtained at the time of injury. Functional and demographic data were evaluated with a Student's t test. Fifty-four patients (80%) completed a 1-year follow-up. By 3 months, all patients attained radiographic and clinical evidence of union and no loss of reduction. At 1 year, the ASES score was similar to pre-injury status (93.7 vs 99.1; P = .12). The range of shoulder motion of the affected side was diminished compared to the unaffected extremity in internal rotation (P < .001) and external rotation (P < .001) but not forward flexion. Patients, who sustain minimally displaced proximal humeral fractures treated nonoperatively, largely returned to preoperative functional status at 1-year follow-up. Patients should be counseled and made aware of the decreased range of shoulder motion following this fracture

PURPOSE: To examine our incidence of early complications that occur using the Proximal Humeral Internal Locking System (PHILOS) and to determine the contributing factors. SETTING: Academic medical center. PATIENTS: Fifty-one consecutive patients treated with a proximal humerus locking plate. OUTCOME: Development of an intraoperative, acute postoperative, or delayed postoperative complication. METHODS: A retrospective analysis was undertaken of a consecutive series of proximal humerus fractures treated with a locking plate between February 2003 and January 2006 at our institution. Fifty-one fractures or fracture nonunions were identified in 18 male and 33 female patients with an average age of 61. All acute injuries were treated with a similar protocol of open reduction internal fixation with the PHILOS plate followed by early range of shoulder motion. Nonunions were treated in a similar manner with the addition of iliac crest bone graft placement. Patients were objectively assessed on their outcome by physical as well as radiological examination. All complications were recorded. Statistical analyses were performed to determine if patient age, fracture type, or number of screws placed in the humeral head contributed to complications. RESULTS: Fifty-one patients were available for minimum 6-month follow-up (mean, 16 months; range, 6 to 45 months). Radiographically, 92% of the cases united at 3 months after surgery, and 2 fractures had signs of osteonecrosis at latest follow-up. Sixteen complications were seen in 12 patients (24%). Eight shoulders in eight patients (16%) had screws that penetrated the humeral head. Two patients developed osteonecrosis at latest follow-up. One acute fracture and one nonunion failed to unite after index surgery. Significant heterotopic bone developed in 1 patient. Early implant failure occurred in 2 patients; one was revised to a longer plate, and one underwent resection arthroplasty. There was one acute postoperative infection. CONCLUSION: The major complication reported in this study was screw penetration, suggesting that exceptional vigilance must be taken in estimating the appropriate number and length of screws used to prevent articular penetration; although the device provides exceptional fixation stability, its indication must be scrutinized for each individual patient, taking the extent of trauma/fracture and age into consideration and carefully weighing it against other forms of treatment

Despite the relatively common occurrence of fractures of the proximal humeral amongst the elderly, the subgroup of isolated greater and lesser tuberosity fractures have remained less well understood. While the majority of two-part fractures result from a standing-height fall onto an outstretched hand, isolated tuberosity fractures are also commonly associated with glenohumeral dislocations or direct impact to the shoulder region. Inasmuch as isolated greater tuberosity fractures are considered uncommon, isolated lesser tuberosity fractures are generally considered exceedingly rare. Non-operative treatment including a specific rehabilitation protocol has been advocated for the majority of non-displaced and minimally displaced fractures, with generally good outcomes expected. The treatment for displaced fractures, however, has included both arthroscopically assisted fixation and open or percutaneous reduction and internal fixation (ORIF). The choice of fixation and approach depends not only on fracture type and characteristics, but also on a multitude of patient-related factors. With an expected increase in the level of physical activity across all age groups and overall longer lifespans, the incidence of isolated tuberosity fractures of the proximal humeral is expected to rise. Orthopaedic surgeons treating shoulder trauma should be aware of treatment options, as well as expected outcomes

Rapid advances in the field of orthopaedic trauma have improved treatment options while keeping pace with the changing characteristics of the trauma population. The availability of locking implants has changed the approach to treating fractures in older patients with osteoporotic bones as well as in those with comminuted and complex injuries. Minimally invasive approaches have allowed the preservation and protection of soft tissues while allowing adequate reduction and fixation of fractures. This biologically friendly approach coupled with newer implants and instruments will improve early and long-term outcomes in trauma care

Bilateral asymmetric dislocations of the hip are rare compared to unilateral dislocations. This case study describes a female restrained passenger involved in a motor vehicle accident who sustained asymmetric bilateral hip dislocations. The patient underwent successful closed reduction of both hips. The clinical course and follow-up assessment of the patient was otherwise uneventful. Computed tomography scans, essential for diagnosing intra-articular loose bodies and subtle fractures, were performed after reduction and revealed in the right hip a nondisplaced acetabular rim fracture of the posterior wall on the side of the posterior dislocation. Hip dislocations are an injury requiring careful trauma evaluation to rule out concomitant injuries. Time to presentation and, more importantly, reduction of a hip dislocation, is essential in treating this injury and preventing long-term complications, such as avascular necrosis and posttraumatic arthritis. The incidence, anatomy, mechanism of injury, treatment options, and long-term sequelae of hip dislocation, with literature review, are discussed

Objectives: High-energy tibial plateau fractures are complex injuries that have varying outcomes. Our purpose was to evaluate outcomes of operatively treated Schatzker type V and VI tibial plateau fractures and compare them to the radiographic results. Patients and methods: Eighty consecutive patients underwent operative treatment for Schatzker type V (21 fractures) or type VI (62 fractures) tibial plateau fractures. There were 64 closed (77.1%) and 19 open fractures (22.9%), with 11 extremities (13.3%) having compartment syndrome. Fifteen patients (18.8%) with 18 fractures were lost to follow-up. Finally, 65 patients with 65 extremities were available for clinical and radiographic examinations after a mean follow-up of 17 months (range 10 to 40 months). Functional assessments were made using the WOMAC (Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Arthritis Index) questionnaire. Results: The mean range of knee motion at the latest follow-up was 1 degrees (0 degrees to 20 degrees) - 115 degrees (60 degrees to 140 degrees) and the mean WOMAC score was 76.6+/-55. Radiographically, 15 knees (23.1%) had evidence for collapse and I I patients (16.9%) had evidence for post-traumatic arthritis. Both loss of fracture reduction (p=0.001) and arthritic changes (p=0.04) were associated with a poorer functional score on the WOMAC. Complications included five deep wound infections (7.7%), two nonunions (3.1%), and 10 patients required additional unplanned surgery (15.4%). Conclusion: Early loss of surgical reduction and development of radiographic evidence for arthritic changes are predictors of functional scores in Schatzker type V and VI tibial plateau fractures