Faculty Bibliography

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES/OBJECTIVE:Biopsies taken at deceased donor kidney procurement continue to be cited as a leading reason for discard; however, the reproducibility and prognostic capability of these biopsies are controversial. DESIGN, SETTING, PARTICIPANTS, & MEASUREMENTS/METHODS:=116 kidneys). RESULTS:=0.15), respectively. Ninety-eight (36%) recipients died, and 56 (21%) allografts failed by the end of follow-up. Reperfusion biopsies were more prognostic than procurement biopsies (hazard ratio for graft failure, 2.02; 95% confidence interval, 1.09 to 3.74 versus hazard ratio for graft failure, 1.30; 95% confidence interval, 0.61 to 2.76), with procurement biopsies not significantly associated with graft failure. CONCLUSIONS:We found that procurement biopsies are poorly reproducible, do not correlate well with paraffin-embedded reperfusion biopsies, and are not significantly associated with transplant outcomes.

Collapsing focal segmental glomerulosclerosis (cFSGS) in the native kidney is associated with heavy proteinuria and accelerated renal failure. However, cFSGS in the renal allograft is less well characterized. Here we report clinico-pathologic features and APOL1 donor risk genotypes in 38 patients with de novo post-kidney transplant cFSGS. Recipients were 34% female and 26% African American. Concurrent viral infections and acute vaso-occlusion (including thrombotic microangiopathy, cortical necrosis, atheroembolization, and cardiac arrest with contralateral graft thrombosis) were present in 13% and 29% of recipients, respectively. Notably, 61% of patients had concurrent acute rejection and 47% received grafts from African American donors, of which 53% carried APOL1 high-risk genotypes. These frequencies of acute rejection and grafts from African American donors were significantly higher than in our general transplant population (35% and 16%, respectively). Patients had a median serum creatinine of 5.4 mg/dl, urine protein/creatinine 3.5 g/g, and 18% had nephrotic syndrome. Graft failure occurred in 63% of patients at an average of eighteen months post-index biopsy. By univariate analysis, donor APOL1 high-risk genotypes, post-transplant time, nephrotic syndrome, and chronic histologic changes were associated with inferior graft survival while acute vaso-occlusion was associated with superior graft survival. Donor APOL1 high-risk genotypes independently predicted poor outcome. Compared to native kidney cFSGS, post-transplant cFSGS had more acute vaso-occlusion but less proteinuria. Thus, de novo cFSGS is associated with variable proteinuria and poor prognosis with potential predisposing factors of African American donor, acute rejection, viral infection and acute vaso-occlusion. Additionally, donor APOL1 high-risk genotypes are associated with higher incidence and worse graft survival.

BACKGROUND:Discard rate of Public Health Service Increased Risk (PHS-IR) organs is high despite the absence of worse kidney transplant outcomes. METHODS:We conducted a retrospective, single-center study of PHS-IR kidney offers made to kidney transplant-only potential recipients from 6/2004 to 5/2015. Overall mortality and transplant outcomes between potential recipients were stratified by response to PHS-IR kidney offers. Cox regression and Kaplan-Meier analyses of mortality and allograft failure were performed. RESULTS:A total of 2423 potential recipients were offered a PHS-IR kidney, with 1502 transplanted, with or without a PHS-IR kidney. Predictors of accepting a PHS-IR kidney included higher Estimated Post Transplant Survival (EPTS) score, prior kidney transplant, and lower educational achievement on multivariable analysis (P = 0.025, P = 0.004, P = 0.023). A positive response to a PHS-IR kidney was associated with lower risk of mortality (3.63% vs 11.6%; aHR 0.467, P = 0.0008). PHS-IR kidney recipients had decreased risk of allograft loss compared to non-PHS-IR recipients (P = 0.007), though mortality outcomes were not significantly different based on PHS-IR status (P = 0.38). No transmission of HIV, HBV, or HCV occurred from PHS-IR kidney donors in this cohort. CONCLUSIONS:Efforts must be made to increase awareness of the beneficial outcomes of PHS-IR organs to maximize appropriate donor allocation.

BACKGROUND:Since the borderline changes suspicious for acute T cell-mediated rejection (BL) category was broadened, there has been a debate regarding the right threshold for tubulitis and interstitial inflammation scores. METHODS:We studied a first cohort of 111 patients with BL found on an indication biopsy between 2006 and 2016 and compared those with scores of t1i0 (BLt1i0) to those with higher scores (BL≥t1i1). A second cohort of 56 patients with BL was used for external validation. We used a composite endpoint of death-censored graft failure or doubling of the serum creatinine level postbiopsy. RESULTS:In the first cohort, 68% (75/111) of the BL cases fell in the BLt1i0 group. At 5 years, the occurrence of the composite endpoint was 5% and 14% for BLt1i0 and BL≥t1i1, respectively. In contrast, the endpoint occurred in 5% of nonrejectors and 21% of patients with T cell-mediated rejection. In the validation cohort, 8% versus 36% of BLt1i0 and BL≥t1i1 reached the endpoint, respectively. Multivariable Cox modeling revealed that BLt1i0 patients had a prognosis similar to that of nonrejectors (adjusted hazard ratio, 0.6; 95% confidence interval, 0.1-2.2; P = 0.40) but better than that of patients with BL≥t1i1 (hazard ratio, 3.8; 95% confidence interval, 1.3-11.5; P = 0.02). Sensitivity analyses restricted to death-censored graft loss or using time posttransplant as the time of reference provided similar results. CONCLUSIONS:In summary, patients with BLt1i0 have a different prognosis to that of BL≥t1i1 patients, which brings into question the current diagnostic thresholds.

Factors that patients value when choosing a transplant center have not been well studied. In order to guide the improvement of patient-facing materials, we conducted an anonymous electronic survey of patients that assessed the relative importance of patient experience, practical considerations, transplant center reputation, center experience, and waitlist when selecting a transplant center. A total of 409 respondents completed the survey, of whom 68% were kidney transplant recipients and 32% had chronic kidney disease or were on dialysis. Participants had mean age 56 ± 12 years and were predominantly female (61%), white (79%), and had an associate's degree or higher (68%). Participants most often prioritized waitlist when evaluating transplant centers (transplanted 26%, chronic kidney disease 40%), and waitlist was almost twice as likely as outcomes to be ranked most important (30% vs 17%). Education level and transplant status were significantly associated with factors used for center prioritization. Waitlisted respondents most commonly (48%) relied on physicians for information when selecting a center, while a minority cited transplant-specific organizations. In order to improve shared decision-making, materials outlining center-specific waitlist features should be prioritized. Novel patient-oriented metrics for measuring transplant center quality that align with patient priorities must be explored.

BACKGROUND:Studies have demonstrated the Timed Up and Go Test's (TUGT) ability to forecast postoperative outcomes for several surgical specialties. Evaluations of the TUGT for waitlist and posttransplant outcomes have yet to be examined in kidney transplantation. OBJECTIVE:To assess the prognostic utility of the TUGT and its associations with waitlist and posttransplant outcomes for kidney transplant candidates. DESIGN AND METHODS:Single-center, prospective study of 518 patients who performed TUGT during their transplant evaluation between 9/1/2013-11/30/2014. TUGT times were evaluated as a continuous variable or 3-level discrete categorical variable with TUGT times categorized as long (>9 seconds), average (8-9 seconds), or short (5-8 seconds). RESULTS:Transplanted individuals had shorter TUGT times than those who remained on the waitlist (8.99 vs 9.79 seconds, P < 0.001). Bivariable and multivariable logistic regression showed that after adjusting for age, there was no association between TUGT times and probability of waitlist removal (OR 0.997 [0.814-1.221]), prolonged length of stay posttransplant (OR 1.113 [0.958-1.306] for deceased donor, OR 0.983 [0.757-1.277] for living donor), and 30-day readmissions (OR 0.984 [0.845-1.146] for deceased donor, OR 1.254 [0.976-1.613] for living donor). CONCLUSIONS:The TUGT was not associated with waitlist removal or prolonged hospitalization for kidney transplant candidates. Alternative assessments of global health, such as functional status or frailty, should be considered for evaluation of potential kidney transplant candidates.

The proportion of deceased donor kidneys procured for transplant but subsequently discarded has been growing steadily in the United States, but factors contributing to the rising discard rate remain unclear. To assess the reasons for and probability of organ discard we assembled a cohort of 212,305 deceased donor kidneys recovered for transplant from 2000-2015 in the SRTR registry that included 36,700 kidneys that were discarded. 'Biopsy Findings' (38.2%) was the most commonly reported reason for discard. The median Kidney Donor Risk Index of discarded kidneys was significantly higher than transplanted organs (1.78 vs 1.12), but a large overlap in the quality of discarded and transplanted kidneys was observed. Kidneys of donors who were older, female, Black, obese, diabetic, hypertensive or HCV-positive experienced a significantly increased odds of discard. Kidneys from donors with multiple unfavorable characteristics were more likely to be discarded, whereas unilaterally discarded kidneys had the most desirable donor characteristics and the recipients of their partner kidneys experienced a one-year death-censored graft survival rate over 90%. There was considerable geographic variation in the odds of discard across the United States, which further supports the notion that factors beyond organ quality contributed to kidney discard. Thus, while the discard of a small fraction of organs procured from donors may be inevitable, the discard of potentially transplantable kidneys needs to be avoided. This will require a better understanding of the factors contributing to organ discard in order to remove the disincentives to utilize less-than-ideal organs for transplantation.

The volume of solid organ transplant in the United States is increasing, providing improved quality of life and survival for patients with organ failure. The growth of transplant requires a systematized management of transplant outcomes assessment, especially with the movement toward value-based care. However, there are several challenges to analyzing outcomes in the current registry-based, transplant reporting system: (1) longitudinal data points are difficult to capture in outcomes models; (2) data elements are restricted to those that already exist in the registry data; and (3) there is a delay in the release of outcomes report. In this article, we propose an informatics approach to solve these problems by using a "common data model" to integrate disparate data sources, data elements, and temporal data points. Adopting such a framework can enable multicenter outcomes analyses among transplant centers, nationally and internationally.

Ischemia-reperfusion injury increases allograft immunogenicity and enhances myeloid dendritic cell maturation and trafficking to recipient's secondary lymphoid tissue. Here, we used postreperfusion biopsies from patients who received kidney allografts from deceased donors between 2006 and 2009 to assess the impact of ischemia-reperfusion damage and myeloid dendritic cell density on subsequent allograft rejection episodes. Histologic changes of severe ischemia-reperfusion damage in postreperfusion biopsies were found to be associated with subsequent rejection episodes and suboptimal allograft survival. Using BDCA-1 as a marker of myeloid dendritic cells, postreperfusion biopsies from deceased donors had lower dendritic cell density compared to postreperfusion biopsies from living donors or normal controls. This suggests a rapid emigration of donor dendritic cells out of the allograft. In our cohort, low dendritic cell density was associated with a subsequent increase in rejection episodes. However, it appears that the donor's cause of death also influenced dendritic cell density. Therefore, we assessed the additive impact of severe ischemia-reperfusion changes and low dendritic cell density on subsequent rejection. The aforementioned combination was a powerful and independent predictor of allograft rejection. Thus, our data highlight the prognostic value of histopathologic changes associated with ischemia-reperfusion in postreperfusion biopsies and suggest a rapid posttransplant emigration of myeloid dendritic cells out of the allograft to enhance alloimmunity. These findings may provide a rationale for minimizing ischemia-reperfusion injury and therapeutic targeting of donor-derived dendritic cells to promote rejection-free allograft survival.