Faculty Bibliography

The nucleotide analog NS5B polymerase inhibitor sofosbuvir was approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) in December 2013 for the treatment of chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection in combination with ribavirin or peginterferon and ribavirin. Sofosbuvir was developed to meet an urgent medical need for shorter, safer, simplified, more effective HCV treatment regimens and to reduce or eliminate the need for peginterferon. New treatment regimens were especially required for patient populations with limited treatment options, including patients who had failed prior HCV therapy, those with compensated and decompensated cirrhosis, and those who were either intolerant of or had contraindications to interferon. Sofosbuvir plus ribavirin for patients with genotype 2 or 3 HCV infection was the first approved all-oral treatment option. Sofosbuvir is also the backbone of the first regimen available for patients awaiting liver transplantation to prevent HCV recurrence, as well as the first oral interferon-free regimen for patients coinfected with HCV and HIV. This paper describes the development of sofosbuvir up to its original FDA approval.

Chronic hepatitis B (CHB) continues to be an important public health problem worldwide, including in the United States. An algorithm for managing CHB was developed by a panel of United States hepatologists in 2004 and subsequently updated in 2006 and 2008. Since 2008, additional data on long-term safety and efficacy of licensed therapies have become available and have better defined therapeutic options for CHB. The evidence indicates that potent antiviral therapy can lead to regression of extensive fibrosis or even cirrhosis, thus potentially altering the natural history of CHB. In addition, appropriate choice of antiviral agent can minimize the risk of resistance. This updated algorithm for managing CHB is based primarily on evidence from the scientific literature. Where data were lacking, the panel relied on clinical experience and consensus expert opinion. The primary aim of antiviral therapy for CHB is durable suppression of serum hepatitis B virus (HBV) DNA to low or undetectable levels. CHB patients who have HBV DNA >2,000 IU/mL, elevated alanine aminotransferase (ALT), and any degree of fibrosis should receive antiviral therapy regardless of their hepatitis B e antigen (HBeAg) status. CHB patients with HBV DNA >2,000 IU/mL and elevated ALT but no evidence of fibrosis may also be considered for antiviral therapy. Approved antiviral therapies for CHB are interferon alfa-2b, peginterferon alfa-2a, lamivudine, adefovir, entecavir, telbivudine, and tenofovir, although the preferred first-line treatment choices are peginterferon alfa-2a, entecavir, and tenofovir. In determining choice of therapy, considerations include efficacy, safety, rate of resistance, method of administration, duration, and cost.

IMPORTANCE: The antiviral activity of all-oral, ribavirin-free, direct-acting antiviral regimens requires evaluation in patients with chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection. OBJECTIVE: To determine the rates of sustained virologic response (SVR) in patients receiving the 3-drug combination of daclatasvir (a pan-genotypic NS5A inhibitor), asunaprevir (an NS3 protease inhibitor), and beclabuvir (a nonnucleoside NS5B inhibitor). DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This was an open-label, single-group, uncontrolled international study (UNITY-1) conducted at 66 sites in the United States, Canada, France, and Australia between December 2013 and August 2014. Patients without cirrhosis who were either treatment-naive (n = 312) or treatment-experienced (n = 103) and had chronic HCV genotype 1 infection were included. INTERVENTIONS: Patients received a twice-daily fixed-dose combination of daclatasvir, 30 mg; asunaprevir, 200 mg; and beclabuvir, 75 mg. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: The primary study outcome was SVR12 (HCV-RNA <25 IU/mL at posttreatment week 12) in patients naive to treatment. A key secondary outcome was SVR12 in the treatment-experienced cohort. RESULTS: Baseline characteristics were comparable between the treatment-naive and treatment-experienced cohorts. Patients were 58% male, 26% had IL28B (rs12979860) CC genotype, 73% were infected with genotype 1a, and 27% were infected with genotype 1b. Overall, SVR12 was observed in 379 of 415 patients (91.3%; 95% CI, 88.6%-94.0%): 287 of 312 treatment-naive patients (92.0%; 95% CI, 89.0%-95.0%) and 92 of 103 treatment-experienced patients (89.3%; 95% CI, 83.4%-95.3%). Virologic failure occurred in 34 patients (8%) overall. One patient died at posttreatment week 3; this was not considered related to study medication. There were 7 serious adverse events, all considered unrelated to study treatment, and 3 adverse events (<1%) leading to treatment discontinuation, including 2 grade 4 alanine aminotransferase elevations. The most common adverse events (in >/=10% of patients) were headache, fatigue, diarrhea, and nausea. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: In this open-label, nonrandomized, uncontrolled study, a high rate of SVR12 was achieved in treatment-naive and treatment-experienced noncirrhotic patients with chronic HCV genotype 1 infection who received 12 weeks of treatment with the oral fixed-dose regimen of daclatasvir, asunaprevir, and beclabuvir. TRIAL REGISTRATION: clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT01979939.

Introduction: The all-oral combination of daclatasvir (DCV; pangenotypic NS5A inhibitor), asunaprevir (ASV; NS3 protease inhibitor), and beclabuvir (BCV; BMS-791325; non-nucleoside NS5B inhibitor)- DCV-TRIO regimen-was evaluated without ribavirin in HCV genotype (GT) 1-infected treatment-naive and -experienced patients without cirrhosis in a Phase 3, open-label, international clinical trial. Methods: Patients received a fixed-dose combination (FDC) of DCV 30 mg, ASV 200 mg, and BCV 75 mg twice daily for 12 weeks. SVR12 rates in the treatment-naive and -experienced cohorts were evaluated separately as key efficacy outcomes. Results: SVR12 was achieved by 92 % of treatment-naive patients (Table). Among treatment-experienced patients, 89 % achieved SVR12. Virologic failure occurred in 34 (8 %) patients overall. Baseline characteristics were comparable between the treatment-naive (N = 312) and treatment-experienced (N = 103) cohorts. Overall, patients were 58 %male and 26 %IL28B (rs1297860) CC genotype; 73 % were infected with GT 1a and 27 % with GT 1b. One death reported posttreatment was considered not related to study treatment. There were 7 serious adverse events, all considered unrelated to study treatment, and 3 (<1 %) adverse events leading to treatment discontinuation. The most common adverse events (in>10 % of patients) were headache, fatigue, diarrhea, and nausea. Conclusions: In this Phase 3 study of 415 patients, 12 weeks of alloral treatment with DCV/ASV/BCV FDC achieved high SVR12 rates in patients with chronic HCV GT 1 infection and was well tolerated. These findings demonstrate the potent antiviral activity, safety, and tolerability of the DCV-TRIO regimen in treatment-naive and treatment- experienced patients without cirrhosis

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Treatment for CH-C contains interferon with substantial associated side effects and health-related quality of life (HRQL) impairment. Currently, there is no published data assessing the impact of interferon-free regimens on HRQL. The aim is to report the HRQL of patients who participated in clinical trials of sofosbuvir (SOF) for CH-C. METHODS: CH-C patients were treated with sofosbuvir (SOF), pegylated interferon (PegIFN), ribavirin (RBV), or placebo in different combinations and duration (POSITRON, FISSION, FUSION, and NEUTRINO phase III trials). HRQL was assessed using SF-36 at baseline, during treatment, at the end of treatment, and at follow-up, and compared between treatment arms. RESULTS: HRQL scores decreased over the course of treatment for all treatment arms in all studies; however, patients returned to their baseline score by the end of follow-up. Compared to placebo, SOF and RBV was not associated with HRQL impairment (POSITRON). Compared to SOF and RBV, HRQL was significantly more impaired in the PegIFN and RBV arm (FISSION). For those treated with SOF and RBV, there was no difference in HRQL between 12 weeks or 16 weeks of treatment (FUSION). Multivariate analysis demonstrated that depression, fatigue, and insomnia were important predictors of patients' HRQL prior, during or after treatment. Additionally, anemia and receiving interferon were predictors of HRQL impairment during treatment. Achieving sustained virologic response after 12 weeks of follow-up (SVR-12) with SOF and RBV was associated with improvement in HRQL scores from baseline. CONCLUSIONS: Treatment-related HRQL impairment during SOF and RBV regimen is mild, and does not increase with longer treatment duration. Achieving SVR-12 with SOF and RBV is associated with an improvement in HRQL.