Faculty Bibliography

BACKGROUND:The current study aims to characterize the natural history of sporadic vestibular schwannoma volumetric tumor growth, including long-term growth patterns following initial detection of growth. METHODS:Volumetric tumor measurements from 3,505 serial MRI studies were analyzed from unselected consecutive patients undergoing wait-and-scan management at three tertiary referral centers between 1998 and 2018. Volumetric tumor growth was defined as a change in volume ≥20%. RESULTS:Among 952 patients undergoing observation, 622 experienced tumor growth with initial growth-free survival rates (95% CI) at 1, 3, and 5 years following diagnosis of 66% (63-69), 30% (27-34), and 20% (17-24). Among 405 patients who continued to be observed despite demonstrating initial growth, 210 experienced subsequent tumor growth with subsequent growth-free survival rates at 1, 3, and 5 years following initial growth of 77% (72-81), 37% (31-43), and 24% (18-31). Larger tumor volume at initial growth (HR 1.13, p=0.02) and increasing tumor growth rate (HR 1.31; p<0.001) were significantly associated with an increased likelihood of subsequent growth, whereas a longer duration of time between diagnosis and detection of initial growth was protective (HR 0.69; p<0.001). CONCLUSIONS:While most vestibular schwannomas exhibit an overall propensity for volumetric growth following diagnosis, prior tumor growth does not perfectly predict future growth. Tumors can subsequently grow faster, slower, or demonstrate quiescence and stability. Larger tumor size and increasing tumor growth rate portend a higher likelihood of continued growth. These findings can inform timing of intervention: whether upfront at initial diagnosis, after detection of initial growth, or only after continued growth is observed.

BACKGROUND:The optimal management of asymptomatic, petroclival meningiomas remains incompletely defined. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of upfront stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) for patients with asymptomatic, petroclival region meningiomas. METHODS:This retrospective, international, multicenter study involved patients treated with SRS for an asymptomatic, petroclival region meningioma. Study endpoints included local tumor control rate, procedural complications, and the emergence of new neurological deficits. RESULTS:There were 72 patients (22 males, mean age 59.53 years (SD ± 11.9)) with an asymptomatic meningioma located in the petroclival region who were treated with upfront SRS. Mean margin dose and maximum dose were 13.26 (SD ± 2.72) Gy and 26.14 (SD ± 6.75) Gy respectively. Median radiological and clinical follow-up periods post-SRS were 52.5 (IQR 61.75) and 47.5 months (IQR 69.75) respectively. At last follow-up, tumor control was achieved in all patients. SRS-related complications occurred in 6 (8.33%) patients, with 3 of them (4.17%) exhibiting new neurological deficits. CONCLUSIONS:Upfront SRS for asymptomatic, petroclival region meningiomas affords excellent local tumor control and does so with a relatively low risk of SRS-related complications. SRS can be considered at diagnosis of an asymptomatic petroclival region meningioma. If active surveillance is initially chosen, SRS should be recommended when growth is noted during radiological follow-up.

BACKGROUND:Disruptions of the inferior longitudinal fasciculus (ILF) in the nondominant temporal lobe can lead to the rare but significant higher visual-processing disturbance of prosopagnosia. Here, the authors describe a 57-year-old right hand-dominant female with a large breast cancer brain metastasis in the right temporal lobe who underwent resection and subsequent Gamma Knife radiosurgery. She presented with difficulty with facial recognition, but following surgical intervention, the prosopagnosia became more profound. OBSERVATIONS/METHODS:Even in nondominant cortex, significant deficits can arise when operating near higher visual-processing centers, including the ILF. LESSONS/CONCLUSIONS:This case highlights the utility of imaging-based tractography obtained from preoperative imaging for resective surgical planning even when operating in areas that do not involve what is traditionally considered elegant areas of the brain. To optimize neurological outcomes in metastatic tumor resection, awareness and diffusion tensor imaging of neighboring, displaced white matter tracts may prevent permanent deficits in higher visual processing.

OBJECTIVE:Stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) provides a safe and effective therapeutic modality for patients with pituitary adenomas. The mechanism of delayed endocrine deficits based on targeted radiation to the hypothalamic-pituitary axis remains unclear. Radiation to normal neuroendocrine structures likely plays a role in delayed hypopituitarism after SRS. In this multicenter study by the International Radiosurgery Research Foundation (IRRF), the authors aimed to evaluate radiation tolerance of structures surrounding pituitary adenomas and identify predictors of delayed hypopituitarism after SRS for these tumors. METHODS:This is a retrospective review of patients with pituitary adenomas who underwent single-fraction SRS from 1997 to 2019 at 16 institutions within the IRRF. Dosimetric point measurements of 14 predefined neuroanatomical structures along the hypothalamus, pituitary stalk, and normal pituitary gland were made. Statistical analyses were performed to determine the impact of doses to critical structures on clinical, radiographic, and endocrine outcomes. RESULTS:The study cohort comprised 521 pituitary adenomas treated with SRS. Tumor control was achieved in 93.9% of patients over a median follow-up period of 60.1 months, and 22.5% of patients developed new loss of pituitary function with a median treatment volume of 3.2 cm3. Median maximal radiosurgical doses to the hypothalamus, pituitary stalk, and normal pituitary gland were 1.4, 7.2, and 11.3 Gy, respectively. Nonfunctioning adenoma status, younger age, higher margin dose, and higher doses to the pituitary stalk and normal pituitary gland were independent predictors of new or worsening hypopituitarism. Neither the dose to the hypothalamus nor the ratio between doses to the pituitary stalk and gland were significant predictors. The threshold of the median dose to the pituitary stalk for new endocrinopathy was 10.7 Gy in a single fraction (OR 1.77, 95% CI 1.17-2.68, p = 0.006). CONCLUSIONS:SRS for the treatment of pituitary adenomas affords a high tumor control rate with an acceptable risk of new or worsening endocrinopathy. This evaluation of point dosimetry to adjacent neuroanatomical structures revealed that doses to the pituitary stalk, with a threshold of 10.7 Gy, and doses to the normal gland significantly increased the risk of post-SRS hypopituitarism. In patients with preserved pre-SRS neuroendocrine function, limiting the dose to the pituitary stalk and gland while still delivering an optimal dose to the tumor appears prudent.

OBJECTIVE:As novel therapies improve survival for men with prostate cancer, intracranial metastatic disease has become more common. The purpose of this multicenter study was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) in the management of intracranial prostate cancer metastases. METHODS:Demographic data, primary tumor characteristics, SRS treatment parameters, and clinical and imaging follow-up data of patients from nine institutions treated with SRS from July 2005 to June 2020 for cerebral metastases from prostate carcinoma were collected and analyzed. RESULTS:Forty-six patients were treated in 51 SRS procedures for 120 prostate cancer intracranial metastases. At SRS, the mean patient age was 68.04 ± 9.05 years, the mean time interval from prostate cancer diagnosis to SRS was 4.82 ± 4.89 years, and extracranial dissemination was noted in 34 (73.9%) patients. The median patient Karnofsky Performance Scale (KPS) score at SRS was 80, and neurological symptoms attributed to intracranial involvement were present prior to 39 (76%) SRS procedures. Single-fraction SRS was used in 49 procedures. Stereotactic radiotherapy using 6 Gy in five sessions was utilized in 2 procedures. The median margin dose was 18 (range 6-28) Gy, and the median tumor volume was 2.45 (range 0.04-45) ml. At a median radiological follow-up of 6 (range 0-156) months, local progression was seen with 14 lesions. The median survival following SRS was 15.18 months, and the 1-year overall intracranial progression-free survival was 44%. The KPS score at SRS was noted to be associated with improved overall (p = 0.02) and progression-free survival (p = 0.03). Age ≥ 65 years at SRS was associated with decreased overall survival (p = 0.04). There were no serious grade 3-5 toxicities noted. CONCLUSIONS:SRS appears to be a safe, well-tolerated, and effective management option for patients with prostate cancer intracranial metastases.

OBJECTIVE:In the era in which more patients with greater numbers of brain metastases (BMs) are being treated with stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) alone, it is critical to understand how patient, tumor, and treatment factors affect functional status and overall survival (OS). The authors examined the survival outcomes and dosimetry to critical structures in patients treated with Gamma Knife radiosurgery (GKRS) for ≥ 25 metastases in a single session or cumulatively over the course of their disease. METHODS:A retrospective analysis was conducted at a single institution. The institution's prospective Gamma Knife (GK) SRS registry was queried to identify patients treated with GKRS for ≥ 25 cumulative BMs between June 2013 and April 2020. Ninety-five patients were identified, and their data were used for analysis. Treatment plans for dosimetric analysis were available for 89 patients. Patient, tumor, and treatment characteristics were identified, and outcomes and OS were evaluated. RESULTS:The authors identified 1132 patients with BMs in their institutional registry. Ninety-five patients were treated for ≥ 25 cumulative metastases, resulting in a total of 3596 tumors treated during 373 separate treatment sessions. The median number of SRS sessions per patient was 3 (range 1-12 SRS sessions), with nearly all patients (n = 93, 98%) having > 1 session. On univariate analysis, factors affecting OS in a statistically significant manner included histology, tumor volume, tumor number, diagnosis-specific graded prognostic assessment (DS-GPA), brain metastasis velocity (BMV), and need for subsequent whole-brain radiation therapy (WBRT). The median of the mean WB dose was 4.07 Gy (range 1.39-10.15 Gy). In the top quartile for both the highest cumulative number and highest cumulative volume of treated metastases, the median of the mean WB dose was 6.14 Gy (range 4.02-10.15 Gy). Seventy-nine patients (83%) had all treated tumors controlled at last follow-up, reflecting the high and durable control rate. Corticosteroids for tumor- or treatment-related effects were prescribed in just over one-quarter of the patients. Of the patients with radiographically proven adverse radiation effects (AREs; 15%), 4 were symptomatic. Four patients required subsequent craniotomy for hemorrhage, progression, or AREs. CONCLUSIONS:In selected patients with a large number of cumulative BMs, multiple courses of SRS are feasible and safe. Together with new systemic therapies, the study results demonstrate that the achieved survival rates compare favorably to those of larger contemporary cohorts, while avoiding WBRT in the majority of patients. Therefore, along with the findings of other series, this study supports SRS as a standard practice in selected patients with larger numbers of BMs.

OBJECTIVE:Patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) metastatic to the brain are living longer. The risk of new brain metastases when these patients stop systemic therapy is unknown. The authors hypothesized that the risk of new brain metastases remains constant for as long as patients are off systemic therapy. METHODS:A prospectively collected registry of patients undergoing radiosurgery for brain metastases was analyzed. Of 606 patients with NSCLC, 63 met the inclusion criteria of discontinuing systemic therapy for at least 90 days and undergoing active surveillance. The risk factors for the development of new tumors were determined using Cox proportional hazards and recurrent events models. RESULTS:The median duration to new brain metastases off systemic therapy was 16.0 months. The probability of developing an additional new tumor at 6, 12, and 18 months was 26%, 40%, and 53%, respectively. There were no additional new tumors 22 months after stopping therapy. Patients who discontinued therapy due to intolerance or progression of the disease and those with mutations in RAS or receptor tyrosine kinase (RTK) pathways (e.g., KRAS, EGFR) were more likely to develop new tumors (hazard ratio [HR] 2.25, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.33-3.81, p = 2.5 × 10-3; HR 2.51, 95% CI 1.45-4.34, p = 9.8 × 10-4, respectively). CONCLUSIONS:The rate of new brain metastases from NSCLC in patients off systemic therapy decreases over time and is uncommon 2 years after cessation of cancer therapy. Patients who stop therapy due to toxicity or who have RAS or RTK pathway mutations have a higher rate of new metastases and should be followed more closely.

OBJECTIVE:In this study, the authors aimed to clarify the relationship between hearing loss and tumor volumetric growth rates in patients with untreated vestibular schwannoma (VS). METHODS:Records of 128 treatment-naive patients diagnosed with unilateral VS between 2012 and 2018 with serial audiometric assessment and MRI were reviewed. Tumor growth rates were determined from initial and final tumor volumes, with a median follow-up of 24.3 months (IQR 8.5-48.8 months). Hearing changes were based on pure tone averages, speech discrimination scores, and American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery hearing class. Primary outcomes were the loss of class A hearing and loss of serviceable hearing, estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method and with associations estimated from Cox proportional hazards models and reported as hazard ratios. RESULTS:Larger initial tumor size was associated with an increased risk of losing class A (HR 1.5 for a 1-cm3 increase; p = 0.047) and serviceable (HR 1.3; p < 0.001) hearing. Additionally, increasing volumetric tumor growth rate was associated with elevated risk of loss of class A hearing (HR 1.2 for increase of 100% per year; p = 0.031) and serviceable hearing (HR 1.2; p = 0.014). Hazard ratios increased linearly with increasing growth rates, without any evident threshold growth rate that resulted in a large, sudden increased risk of hearing loss. CONCLUSIONS:Larger initial tumor size and faster tumor growth rates were associated with an elevated risk of loss of class A and serviceable hearing.

OBJECTIVE:Meningiomas that arise primarily within the cavernous sinus are often believed to be more indolent in their growth pattern. Despite this perceived growth pattern, disabling symptoms can arise even with small tumors. While research has been done on cavernous sinus meningiomas (CSMs) and their treatment, very little is known about their natural growth rates. With a better understanding of the growth rate of CSM, patient treatment and guidance can be can optimized and individualized. The goal of this study was to determine volumetric growth rates of untreated CSMs. METHODS:Thirty-seven patients with 166 MR images obtained between May 2004 and September 2019 were reviewed, with a range of 2-13 MR images per patient (average of 4.5 MR images per patient). These scans were obtained over an average follow-up period of 45.9 months (median 33.8, range 2.8-136.9 months). All imaging prior to any intervention was included in this analysis. Volumetric measurements were performed and assessed over time. RESULTS:The estimated volumetric growth rate was 23.3% per year (95% CI 10.2%-38.0%, p < 0.001), which is equivalent to an estimated volume doubling time (VDT) of 3.3 years (95% CI 2.1-7.1 years). There was no significant relationship between growth rate and patient age (p = 0.09) or between growth rate and patient sex (p = 0.78). The median absolute growth rate was 41% with a range of -1% to 1793%. With a definition of "growth" as an increase of greater than 20% during the observed period, 65% of tumors demonstrated growth within their observation interval. Growth rates for each tumor were calculated and tumors were segmented based on growth rate. Of 37 patients, 22% (8) demonstrated no growth (< 5% annual growth, equivalent to a VDT > 13.9 years), 32% (12) were designated as slow growth (annual growth rate 5%-20%, VDT 3.5-13.9 years), 38% (14) were found to have medium growth (annual growth rate 20%-100%, VDT 0.7-3.5 years), and 8% were considered fast growing (annual growth rate > 100%, VDT < 0.7 years). CONCLUSIONS:This study evaluated CSM volumetric growth rates. A deeper understanding of the natural history of untreated CSMs allows for better counseling and management of patients.

PURPOSE/OBJECTIVE(S): Multiple single institution retrospective studies have suggested that managing melanoma brain metastases (MBM) with stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) and immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) is associated with improved overall survival (OS) when administered concurrently (within 4 weeks) rather than sequentially (ICI and SRS administered more than 4 weeks apart). However, there is a paucity of data quantifying the risk of developing radiation necrosis (RN) in this setting. MATERIALS/METHODS: The International Radiosurgery Research Foundation approved the analysis. The Kaplan Meier method and log-rank test were used to compare OS and local control (LC) at 1- and 2-years post SRS. Factors associated with the development of RN and OS were further analyzed using logistic and Cox proportional hazards regression models. The null hypothesis was rejected for P < 0.05.
RESULT(S): There were 254 patients with 1,322 MBM treated across 10 international institutions. The median follow-up was 12.9 months, median age was 63 years (interquartile range [IQR]: 51-73 years), BRAF mutation was present in 46.6% of patients, active extracranial disease was present in 70% of patients, and the median Karnofsky Performance Status (KPS) was 90. SRS/ICI was administered concurrently in 46.5% of patients. All patients were treated on the stereotactic radiosurgery platform. The median margin dose was 20 Gy (IQR: 18-21 Gy), median number of fractions was 1 (range: 1-4), mean total brain metastasis volume was 3.4 cc and the mean V12 Gy was 8.7 cc. Radiation necrosis occurred in 14.2% of patients (5.9% Grade 1; 5.1% Grade 2; 2.8% Grade 3; 0.4% Grade 4). Overall survival at 1-year was 77.4% vs. 72.1%, and at 2-years was 63.1% vs. 46.1% (P=0.048) for concurrent and sequential therapy, respectively. Local control at 1-year was 91.5% vs. 84.6%, and at 2-years was 84.9% vs. 75.6% (P=0.12) for concurrent and sequential therapy, respectively. On multivariate logistic regression total treated brain metastasis volume (odds radio [OR]: 1.11; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.03-1.20; P=0.008) was associated with a higher risk of development of RN; however, sequential therapy (OR: 0.97; 95% CI: 0.46-2.06; P=0.94), and V12 (OR: 0.98; 95% CI: 0.95-1.01; P=0.22) were not statistically significant. On multivariate cox regression, sequential therapy (hazard ratio [HR]: 1.58; 95% CI: 1.05-2.42; P=0.03) and KPS (HR: 0.96; 95% CI: 0.94-0.98; P < 0.001) were prognostic factors for OS, while the presence of extracranial disease (HR: 1.03; 95% CI: 0.66-1.59; P=0.90) and age (HR: 1.01; 95% CI: 1.00-1.02; P=0.25) were not prognostic.
CONCLUSION(S): In appropriately selected patients with MBM, concurrent administration of SRS/ICI may be associated with improved OS without an increased risk of RN when compared to sequential therapy. The risk of RN appears to increase with irradiated brain volume; therefore, hypofractionated SRS may be considered in patients with high volume disease. Prospective data are needed to further evaluate these findings. AUTHOR DISCLOSURE: E.J. Lehrer: None. J. Gurewitz: None. T.D. Malouff: ASTRO Bylaws Committee. K. Bernstein: None. D. Kondziolka: None. P. Bonney: None. S.I. Patel: Independent Contractor; Alberta Health Services. Research Grant; Alberta Cancer Foundation. Travel Expenses; University Hospital Foundation. Chair; Alberta Health Services. Co-Director; Alberta Health Services. Manage and screen wish applications; Make-A-Wish Foundation (Northern Alberta Chapter). J.D. Palmer: Research Grant; Varian Medical Systems, The Kroger Company. Consultant; Huron Consulting. Speaker's Bureau; Varian Medical Systems, Depuy Synthes. Advisory Board; Novocure. Member of panel; NCCN.K. Fakhoury: None. C.G. Rusthoven: Employee; SURVIVEiT (nonprofit cancer patient advocacy). Research Grant; Takeda. Advise regarding patient-facing medical content; SURVIVEiT.D. Mathieu: None. C. Deibert: None. P. Picozzi: None. B. Jones: None. C. Lee: None. S. Sharma: None. A. Niranjan: None. J.P. Sheehan: Neuropoint Alliance. M. Ahluwalia: None. D.M. Trifiletti: None.
Copyright