Faculty Bibliography

BACKGROUND CONTEXT: Adult spinal deformity (ASD) patients maintain upright posture by compensating through their spine, pelvis and lower extremities. Little data exist quantifying the contribution of lower extremity compensation through the hips, knees, and ankles to maintain upright posture. PURPOSE: Evaluate the effect of the lower limb compensation by numerically unfolding patients. STUDY DESIGN/SETTING: Multicenter, prospective cohort. PATIENT SAMPLE: A total of 288 patients surgically treated for complex ASD with preoperative full body images. OUTCOME MEASURES: Horizontal distance between vertebra centroid and ankle.
METHOD(S): Surgical ASD patients were enrolled into a prospective study based on three criteria deformity severity (PI-LL>25degree, TPA>30degree, SVA>15cm, TCobb>70degree or TLCobb>50degree), procedure complexity (>12 levels fused, 3CO or ACR) and/or age (>65 and >7 levels fused). Preop full-body images were evaluated and age and PI-adjusted normative values were used to model spine alignment based upon three configurations: COMP (all lower extremity compensatory mechanisms maintained), PARTIAL (removal of ankle dorsiflexion and knee flexion, maintained hip extension), UNCOMP (ankle, knee, and hip compensation eliminated by reset PT to the age and PI norms). The three configurations were compared, and COMP alignment was stratified by TPA percentiles to investigate the offsets from each vertebra to the ankle joint acting as a surrogate of the gravity line in free-standing position.
RESULT(S): A total of 288 patients met inclusion criteria (60+/-15yo, 70.5% female, 27.4+/-5.9 BMI). COMP spine deformity magnitude included PI-LL 15+/-24, TPA 24+/-14, and SVA 65+/-69mm. As the model transitioned from COMP to UNCOMP alignment, the initial posterior translation of the pelvis decreased significantly to an anterior translation vs the ankle (P.Shift 30 to -7.6 mm). This was associated with a decrease in pelvic retroversion (PT 24.1 to 16.1), hip extension (SFA 203 to 200), knee flexion (KA 5.5 to -0.4), and ankle dorsiflexion (AA 5.3 to 3.7). As a result, the anterior malalignment of the trunk significantly increased SVA (65 to 120mm) and G-SVA (C7-Ankle from 36 to 127 mm), leading to a three-fold increase in bending moments sustained by the ankle joint. The stratification of the COMP position by TPA percentiles revealed that as the deformity increases, the vertebrae above T8 translate anteriorly, those below T10 move posteriorly, with the T8-T10 segment remaining ~3cm posterior to the ankle joint independently of the deformity severity.
CONCLUSION(S): Removal of lower limbs' compensation revealed an unsustainable truncal malalignment with a three-fold increase of bending moments at the ankle joints. Combined, lower limb compensations permit "reducing" the SVA by two-fold and the C7-ankle SVA by three-fold. From a mechanical point of view, this compensation permits maintaining the trunk center of mass (T9) at a fixed offset of ~3 cm from the ankle joint. FDA DEVICE/DRUG STATUS: This abstract does not discuss or include any applicable devices or drugs.
Copyright

BACKGROUND CONTEXT: Previous literature has demonstrated the advantages of lateral single position surgery (L-SPS) in the perioperative period; however, 2-year postoperative outcomes of this novel technique have not yet been compared to circumferential anterior-posterior fusion (FLIP) at 2-years postoperatively. PURPOSE: Evaluate the feasibility and safety of L-SPS technique against the conventional FLIP. STUDY DESIGN/SETTING: Multi-center retrospective cohort study. PATIENT SAMPLE: Patients undergoing primary AP (ALIF or LLIF) fusions with bilateral percutaneous pedicle screw fixation between L2-S1 with minimum 2-year followup at three institutions. OUTCOME MEASURES: Outcome measures included levels fused, operative time, estimated blood loss and perioperative complications. Radiographic analysis included lumbar lordosis (LL), pelvic incidence (PI), pelvic tilt (PT), PI-LL mismatch and segmental lumbar lordosis.
METHOD(S): Patients were grouped as L-SPS if anterior and posterior portions of the procedure were performed in the lateral decubitus position, and FLIP if patients were repositioned from supine or lateral to prone position for the posterior portion of the procedure. Groups were compared in terms of demographics, intraoperative, perioperative and radiological outcomes, complications and reoperations up to 2 years follow-up. Measures were compared using independent samples or paired t-tests and chi-squared analyses with significance set at p<0.05.
RESULT(S): A total of 442 pts met inclusion, including 352 L-SPS and 90 FLIP pts. Significant differences were noted in age (62.4 vs. 56.9; p= < 0.001) and smoking status (7% vs. 16%; p=0.023) between the L-SPS and FLIP groups. No differences between L-SPS and FLIP were noted in gender (57.4% female vs 57.8% female, p=1.000), BMI (30.0kg/m2 vs 29.3kg/m2; p=0.318). No differences were noted in number of levels fused between L-SPS and FLIP (1.45vs 1.50; p=0.533), proportion including ALIF (38% vs 39%; p=0.809), or the proportion of surgeries including L5-S1 (38%vs 31%; p=0.222). Perioperative outcomes: L-SPS demonstrated significantly lower Op time (97.7min vs 297.0 min; p < 0.001), fluoro dose (36.5mGy vs 78.8mGy; p < 0.001), EBL (88.8mL vs 270.0mL; p < 0.001), and LOS (1.91 days vs. 3.61 days; p < 0.001) compared to FLIP. L-SPS also demonstrated significantly fewer post-op complications than FLIP (21.9% vs 34.4%; p=0.013), specifically regarding rates of ileus (0.0% vs 5.6%; p < 0.001). There was no difference in remaining surgical site, neurological, or medical complications between groups. Reoperation: N=no differences in reoperation were noted at 30-day (1.7%L-SPS vs 4.4%FLIP, p=0.125), 90-day (5.1%L-SPS vs 5.6%FLIP, p=0.795) or 2-year follow-up (9.7%L-SPS vs 12.2%FLIP; p=0.441). The most common reason for return to OR was Adjacent Segment Disease, (L-SPS 3.1% vs. FLIP 7.8%; p=0.067). Pseudarthrosis rates were similar between groups (0.0%L-SPS vs. 1.1%FLIP; p=0.204). Radiological Outcomes: no significant differences were noted in rates of radiological fusion (94.3% L-SPS vs 97.8%FLIP; p=0.266) or subsidence (6.9%L-SPS vs 12.2%FLIP; p=0.260). There were no differences noted between L-SPS and FLIP in change in LL from Baseline to 1-year (3.5 vs 2.8; p=0.466) and post-op to 1yr (-0.18 vs -0.51; p=0.777), or in PI-LL from Baseline to 1-year (-3.5 vs -3.2; p=0.835) and from post-op to 1-year (0.71 vs 0.71; 0.998).
CONCLUSION(S): L-SPS improves safety, improves operative efficiency and reduces complications in the perioperative period while maintaining similar efficacy of AP fusion at 2-year followup in treating degenerative lumbar spinal conditions. FDA DEVICE/DRUG STATUS: This abstract does not discuss or include any applicable devices or drugs.
Copyright

BACKGROUND:Studies have utilized psychological questionnaires to identify the psychological distress among certain surgical populations. RESEARCH QUESTION/OBJECTIVE:Is there an additional psychological burden among patients undergoing surgical treatment for their symptomatic degenerative cervical disease? MATERIALS AND METHODS/METHODS:Patients>18 years of age with symptomatic, degenerative cervical spine disease were included and prospectively enrolled. Correlations and multivariable logistic regression analysis assessed the relationship between these mental health components (PCS, FABQ) and the severity of disability described by the NDI, EQ-5D, and mJOA score. Patient distress scores were compared to previously published benchmarks for other diagnoses. RESULTS:). Increasing neck disability and decreasing EQ-5D were correlated with greater PCS and FABQ(all p<0.001). Patients with severe psychological distress at baseline were more likely to report severe neck disability, while physician-reported mJOA had weaker associations. Compared to historical controls of lumbar patients, patients in our study had greater levels of psychological distress, as measured by FABQ (40.0 vs 17.6;p<0.001) and PCS (27.4 vs 19.3;p<0.001). DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION/CONCLUSIONS:Degenerative cervical spine patients seeking surgery were found to have a significant level of psychological distress, with a large portion reporting severe fear avoidance beliefs and catastrophizing pain at baseline. Strong correlation was seen between patient-reported functional metrics, but less so with physician-reported signs and symptoms. Additionally, this population demonstrated higher psychological burden in certain respects than previously identified benchmarks of patients with other disorders. Preoperative treatment to help mitigate this distress, impact postoperative outcomes, and should be further investigated. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE/METHODS:Level III.

Background/UNASSIGNED:Patients with symptomatic cervical deformity (CD) requiring surgical correction often present with hyperkyphosis (HK), although patients with hyperlordotic curves may require surgery as well. Few studies have investigated differences in CD corrective surgery with regard to HK and hyperlordosis (HL). Objective/UNASSIGNED:The objective of the study is to evaluate patterns in treatment for CD patients with baseline (BL) HK and HL and understand how extreme curvature of the spine may influence surgical outcomes. Materials and Methods/UNASSIGNED:Operative CD patients with BL and 1-year (1Y) radiographic data were included in the study. Patients were stratified based on BL C2-C7 lordosis (CL) angle: those >1 standard deviation (SD) from the mean (-6.96 ± 21.47°) were hyperlordotic (>14.51°) or hyperkyphotic (<-28.43°) depending on directionality. Patients within 1SD were considered control group. Results/UNASSIGNED:< 0.001), however, postoperative differences in MGS and C0-C2 were not significant. HK drivers of deformity were primarily C (90%), whereas HL had primary CT (38.1%), UT (23.8%), and C (14.3%) drivers. Conclusions/UNASSIGNED:Hyperlodotic patients trended higher revision rates with greater radiographic malalignment at 1-year postoperative, perhaps due to undercorrection compared to kyphotic etiologies.

BACKGROUND:As corrective surgery for cervical deformity (CD) increases, so does the rate of complications and reoperations. To minimize suboptimal postoperative outcomes, it is important to develop a tool that allows for proper preoperative risk stratification. OBJECTIVE:To develop a prognostic utility for identification of risk factors that lead to the development of major complications and unplanned reoperations. METHODS:CD patients age 18 years or older were stratified into 2 groups based on the postoperative occurrence of a revision and/or major complication. Multivariable logistic regressions identified characteristics that were associated with revision or major complication. Decision tree analysis established cutoffs for predictive variables. Models predicting both outcomes were quantified using area under the curve (AUC) and receiver operating curve characteristics. RESULTS:A total of 109 patients with CD were included in this study. By 1 year postoperatively, 26 patients experienced a major complication and 17 patients underwent a revision. Predictive modeling incorporating preoperative and surgical factors identified development of a revision to include upper instrumented vertebrae > C5, lowermost instrumented vertebrae > T7, number of unfused lordotic cervical vertebrae > 1, baseline T1 slope > 25.3°, and number of vertebral levels in maximal kyphosis > 12 (AUC: 0.82). For developing a major complication, a model included a current smoking history, osteoporosis, upper instrumented vertebrae inclination angle < 0° or > 40°, anterior diskectomies > 3, and a posterior Smith Peterson osteotomy (AUC: 0.81). CONCLUSION/CONCLUSIONS:Revisions were predicted using a predominance of radiographic parameters while the occurrence of major complications relied on baseline bone health, radiographic, and surgical characteristics.

OBJECTIVE:Revision surgery is often necessary for adult spinal deformity (ASD) patients. Satisfaction with management is an important component of health-related quality of life. The authors hypothesized that patients who underwent multiple revision surgeries following ASD correction would exhibit lower self-reported satisfaction scores. METHODS:This was a retrospective cohort study of 668 patients who underwent ASD surgery and were eligible for a minimum 2-year follow-up. Visits were stratified by occurrence prior to the index surgery (period 0), after the index surgery only (period 1), after the first revision only (period 2), and after the second revision only (period 3). Patients were further stratified by prior spine surgery before their index surgery. Scoliosis Research Society-22 (SRS-22r) health-related quality-of-life satisfaction subscore and total satisfaction scores were evaluated at all periods using multiple linear regression and adjustment for age, sex, and Charlson Comorbidity Index. RESULTS:In total, 46.6% of the study patients had undergone prior spine surgery before their index surgery. The overall revision rate was 21.3%. Among patients with no spine surgery prior to the index surgery, SRS-22r satisfaction scores increased from period 0 to 1 (from 2.8 to 4.3, p < 0.0001), decreased after one revision from period 1 to 2 (4.3 to 3.9, p = 0.0004), and decreased further after a second revision from period 2 to 3 (3.9 to 3.3, p = 0.0437). Among patients with spine surgery prior to the index procedure, SRS-22r satisfaction increased from period 0 to 1 (2.8 to 4.2, p < 0.0001) and decreased from period 1 to 2 (4.2 to 3.8, p = 0.0011). No differences in follow-up time from last surgery were observed (all p > 0.3). Among patients with multiple revisions, 40% experienced rod fracture, 40% proximal junctional kyphosis, and 33% pseudarthrosis. CONCLUSIONS:Among patients undergoing ASD surgery, revision surgery is associated with decreased satisfaction, and multiple revisions are associated with additive detriment to satisfaction among patients initially undergoing primary surgery. These findings have direct implications for preoperative patient counseling and establishment of postoperative expectations.

STUDY DESIGN/METHODS:Retrospective cohort. OBJECTIVE:To describe the 2-year outcomes for patients undergoing surgical correction of cervical deformity. BACKGROUND:Adult cervical deformity (CD) has been shown to compromise health-related quality of life. While advances in spinal realignment have shown promising short-term clinical results in this parameter, the long-term outcomes of CD corrective surgery remain unclear. METHODS:Operative CD patients >18 years with 2-year (2Y) HRQL/radiographic data were included. Improvement in radiographic, neurologic and HRQL outcomes were reported. Patients with a prior cervical fusion and patients with the greatest and smallest change based on NDI, NRS neck, mJOA were compared using multivariable analysis controlling for age, and frailty, and invasiveness. RESULTS:158 patients were included in this study. By 2Y, 96.3% of patients improved in Ames cSVA modifier, 34.2% in TS-CL, 42.0% in Horizontal gaze modifier, and 40.9% in SVA modifier. Additionally, 65.5% of patients improved in Passias CL modifier, 53.3% in TS-CL modifier, 100% in C2-T3 modifier, 88.9% in C2S modifier, and 81.0% in MGS modifier severity by 2Y. The cohort significantly improved from BL to 2Y in NDI, NRS Neck, and mJOA, all P<0.05. 59.3% of patients met MCID for NDI, 62.3% for NRS Neck, and 37.3% for mJOA. 97 patients presented with at least one neurologic deficit at BL and 63.9% no longer reported that deficit at follow-up. There were 45 (34.6%) cases of DJK (∆DJKA>10° between LIV and LIV-2), of which 17 were distal junctional failure (DJF-DJK requiring reoperation). Patients with the greatest beneficial change were less likely to have had a complication in the 2-year follow-up period. CONCLUSION/CONCLUSIONS:Correction of cervical deformity results in notable clinical and radiographic improvement with most patients achieving favorable outcomes after two years. However, complications including distal junctional kyphosis or failure remain prevalent.

BACKGROUND:Frailty is influential in determining operative outcomes, including complications, in patients with cervical deformity (CD). OBJECTIVE:To assess whether frailty status limits the highest achievable outcomes of patients with CD. METHODS:Adult patients with CD with 2-year (2Y) data included. Frailty stratification: not frail (NF) <0.2, frail (F) 0.2 to 0.4, and severely frail (SF) >0.4. Analysis of covariance established estimated marginal means based on age, invasiveness, and baseline deformity, for improvement, deterioration, or maintenance in Neck Disability Index (NDI), Modified Japanese Orthopaedic Association (mJOA), and Numerical Rating Scale Neck Pain. RESULTS:One hundred twenty-six patients with CD included 29 NF, 83 F, and 14 SF. The NF group had the highest rates of deterioration and lowest rates of improvement in cervical Sagittal Vertical Axis and horizontal gaze modifiers. Two-year improvements in NDI by frailty: NF: -11.2, F: -16.9, and SF: -14.6 (P = .524). The top quartile of NF patients also had the lowest 1-year (1Y) NDI (7.0) compared with F (11.0) and SF (40.5). Between 1Y and 2Y, 7.9% of patients deteriorated in NDI, 71.1% maintained, and 21.1% improved. Between 1Y and 2Y, SF had the highest rate of improvement (42%), while NF had the highest rate of deterioration (18.5%). CONCLUSION/CONCLUSIONS:Although frail patients improved more often by 1Y, SF patients achieve most of their clinical improvement between 1 and 2Y. Frailty is associated with factors such as osteoporosis, poor alignment, neurological status, sarcopenia, and other medical comorbidities. Similarly, clinical outcomes can be affected by many factors (fusion status, number of pain generators within treated levels, integrity of soft tissues and bone, and deformity correction). Although accounting for such factors will ultimately determine whether frailty alone is an independent risk factor, these preliminary findings may suggest that frailty status affects the clinical outcomes and improvement after CD surgery.