Faculty Bibliography

BACKGROUND: Superior mesenteric artery syndrome is caused by compression of the third portion of the duodenum by the superior mesenteric artery. Many disease states predispose one to this condition. METHODS: We present a case report of a young female patient who presented with gastro-duodenal obstruction from superior mesenteric artery syndrome and subsequently underwent surgical treatment with minimally invasive techniques. Pathophysiology of SMA syndrome is reviewed. RESULTS: The cause of superior mesenteric artery syndrome is variable but always results in duodenal obstruction. Surgery is one treatment option that is effective and can be performed laparoscopically. CONCLUSION: Laparoscopic duodenojejunostomy is an acceptable method of treating superior mesenteric artery syndrome

BACKGROUND: The role of upper endoscopy (EGD) in obese patients prior to bariatric surgery is controversial. The aim of this study was to evaluate the diagnostic yield and cost of routine EGD before bariatric surgery. METHODS: The medical records of consecutive obese patients who underwent EGD prior to bariatric surgery between May 2000 and September 2002 were reviewed. Two experienced endoscopists reviewed all EGD reports, and findings were divided into 4 groups based on predetermined criteria: group 0 (normal study), group 1 (abnormal findings that neither changed the surgical approach nor postponed surgery), group 2 (abnormal findings that changed the surgical approach or postponed surgery), and group 3 (results that were an absolute contraindication to surgery). Clinically important findings included lesions in groups 2 and 3. The cost of EGD (430.72 US dollars) was estimated using the endoscopist fee under Medicare reimbursement. RESULTS: During the 28-month study period, 195 patients were evaluated by EGD prior to bariatric surgery. One or more lesions were identified in 89.7% of patients, with 61.5% having a clinically important finding. The prevalence of endoscopic findings using the classification system above was as follows: group 0 (10.3%), group 1 (28.2%), group 2 (61.5%), and group 3 (0.0%). Overall, the most common lesions identified were hiatal hernia (40.0%), gastritis (28.7%), esophagitis (9.2%), gastric ulcer (3.6%), Barrett's esophagus (3.1%), and esophageal ulcer (3.1%). The cost of performing routine endoscopy on all patients prior to bariatric surgery was 699.92 US dollars per clinically important lesion detected. CONCLUSIONS: Routine upper endoscopy before bariatric surgery has a high diagnostic yield and has a low cost per clinically important lesion detected

Laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding is an effective and safe surgical treatment for morbid obesity. Initial experience with the Lap-Band system (Inamed Health, Santa Barbara, California) in the United States and Australia has demonstrated that surgical technique can affect outcomes in terms of weight loss, quality of life, and complication rates. Placement of the gastric band by means of the perigastric technique is associated with high rates of gastric prolapse, food intolerance, and weight loss failure that frequently lead to band explantation. In the pars flaccida technique, band placement higher on the stomach results in the formation of a smaller pouch and lower rates of gastric prolapse, which may contribute to greater weight loss and improved quality of life. This article describes the technical aspects of the pars flaccida approach in the laparoscopic placement of adjustable gastric bands

Laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding is the most commonly performed operation for morbid obesity in Europe and Australia and has been shown to result in significant long-term weight loss. The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-monitored clinical trial results with the LAP-BAND system (INAMED Health, Santa Barbara, CA) did not reproduce the results of studies performed elsewhere in the world. This article reviews data from the first and second FDA clinical trials as well as data from continuing US clinical experience. Four American surgeons at 4 centers have performed more than 500 LAP-BAND procedures not included in the first 2 FDA clinical trials. Of these patients, 115 have been followed for at least 9 months, and 43 have been followed for at least 12 months. A retrospective analysis of prospective data gathered from these patients is presented. The percent excess weight loss was 35.6% at 9 months and 41.6% at 12 months. The average body mass index decreased from 47.5 to 38.8 in 9 months and from 47.5 to 37.3 in 12 months. There were no deaths related to the insertion of the device. Of 15 complications requiring operative management (13%) in 12 patients, there were 8 port displacements or tubing breaks (7%), 2 elective explantations (2%), 2 cases of gastric prolapse (2%), 1 gastric pouch dilatation (<1%), 1 port abscess (<1%), and 1 hemorrhage (<1%). Clinical experience with the LAP-BAND system in the United States shows the device to be a safe and effective treatment for morbid obesity, with results comparable to the international data. The combination of proper surgical technique and close patient follow-up with frequent band adjustments, performed in a comprehensive bariatric program setting, may make the LAP-BAND system a powerful surgical tool in the treatment of morbid obesity

Although the laparoscopic technique is an accepted method for elective splenectomy, it is controversial in the setting of trauma. A few reports have described laparoscopic splenorrhaphy for trauma, but none have performed laparoscopic splenectomy for splenic rupture. When the spleen is injured, vascular control and poor visibility due to bleeding present obstacles to laparoscopy. The development of the hand-assist device has helped surgeons make the transition from laparotomy to laparoscopy because of the advantages it provides, such as tactile sensation and immediate vascular control. We utilized these benefits of the hand-assist device to convert a laparoscopic operation to a hand-assisted laparoscopic operation and were thus able to avoid a laparotomy. We report a case in which the hand-assist device was used as an alternative to conversion during a laparoscopic splenectomy for ruptured spleen

BACKGROUND: Biliopancreatic diversion with duodenal switch (BPD-DS) is an operation which provides one of the greatest maintained weight losses of any bariatric procedure. We looked at the safety and efficacy of laparoscopic BPD-DS for morbid obesity. METHODS: A 150-200 ml sleeve gastrectomy was created and anastomosed to the distal 250 cm of divided ileum. The median length of the common channel was 100 cm. All patients were prospectively followed up to 12 months. RESULTS: 40 consecutive patients underwent laparoscopic BPD-DS as a primary procedure for morbid obesity. Median patient body mass index (BMI) was 60 kg/m2 (range 42-85 kg/m2). Mean age was 43 +/- 1 years (+/- SEM), with 12 males and 28 females. One patient was converted to open laparotomy (2.5%). Median operative time was 210 +/- 9 minutes (range 110-360 minutes) with a significant correlation between BMI and operative time (p = 0.04). Median length of stay was 4 days (range 3-210 days). There was one 30-day mortality (2.5%). Major morbidities occurred in 6 patients (15%), including 1 anastomotic leak (2.5%), 1 venous thrombosis (2.5%), 4 staple-line hemorrhages (10%) and 1 subphrenic abscess (2.5%). Median follow-up at 6 months (range 1-12 months) resulted in 46% +/- 2% excess weight loss (EWL) and at 9 months 58% +/- 3% EWL. CONCLUSION: Laparoscopic BPD-DS is a complex, yet feasible, procedure resulting in effective weight loss with an acceptable morbidity. A BMI >65 was associated with increased morbidity and mortality. A long-term study is needed to confirm efficacy and proper patient selection

Angiogenesis has been correlated with increased invasion and metastases in a variety of human neoplasms. Inadequate inhibition of the growth of tumor microvessels by anticancer agents may result in treatment failure, rated clinically as progressive or stable disease. We have investigated the antiangiogenic properties of three camptothecin analogues, 9-amino-20(S)-camptothecin, topotecan, and camptosar (CPT-11), currently under investigation in clinical settings. Angiogenesis was induced by basic fibroblast growth factor in the cornea of inbred Swiss-Webster mice, with the aim of exploring the suppression of neovascularization by the analogues injected into the mice daily over a period of 6 days. The dose range chosen is known to inhibit, in the mouse model, the growth of various human tumor xenografts or murine tumors. The statistical analysis evaluated the association between the area of neoangiogenesis and the dose of the drugs tested and correlated the effects with observed drug toxicity. It was established that, as the drug doses increased, the area of neovascularization decreased, appearing to approximate a negative exponential curve. 9-Amino-20(S)-camptothecin at 6.89 and 8.26 micromol/kg (2.5 and 3.0 mg/kg) and topotecan at 8.31 micromol/kg (3.5 mg/kg), both drugs being delivered over a 6-day period, had statistically significant reduction (47.2-72.5%) of neoangiogenesis and acceptable toxicity. At higher doses of the two analogues, toxic body-weight losses and deaths were observed. CPT-11 showed statistically significant reduction of neoangiogenesis at a dose of 359 micromol/kg (210 mg/kg) delivered over a 6-day course. Unlike camptothecin analogues, the nontoxic dose of vincristine did not induce a statistically significant inhibition of angiogenesis, and there was no dose-dependent escalation of antiangiogenic effects. The results indicate that camptothecins are most likely cytotoxic against two tumor compartments: in addition to tumor cells of epithelial origin, the drugs act against endothelial cells and prevent the growth of the tumor microvessels. We have hypothesized that treatment failure in some patients is due to incomplete or inadequate inhibition of the microvessel growth by camptothecins. Presumably, an intensive inhibition of the remaining tumor microvasculature in such patients could be achieved by combining a camptothecin with another antiangiogenic anticancer agent or with a highly selective angiogenic inhibitor exerting minimal dose-limiting toxicity. Such treatment by a camptothecin plus a less toxic inhibitor of angiogenesis can improve antitumor efficacy. To validate this concept, preclinical studies followed by clinical trials are planned