Faculty Bibliography

BACKGROUND:Modern chemotherapeutics have led to improved systemic disease control for patients with locally advanced pancreatic cancer (LAPC). Surgical strategies such as distal pancreatectomy with celiac axis resection (DP-CAR) are increasingly entertained. Herein we review procedure-specific outcomes and assess biologic rationale for DP-CAR. METHODS:A prospectively maintained single-institution database of all pancreatectomies was queried for patients undergoing DP-CAR. We excluded all patients for whom complete data were not available and those who were not treated with contemporary multi-agent therapy. Data were supplemented with dedicated chart review and outreach for long-term oncologic outcomes. RESULTS:Fifty-four patients underwent DP-CAR between 2008 and 2018. The median age was 62.7 years. Ninety-eight percent received induction chemotherapy. Arterial reconstruction was performed in 17% and concomitant visceral resection in 30%. The R0 resection rate was 87%. Postoperative complications were common (43%) with chyle leak being the most frequent (17%). Length of stay was 8 days, readmission occurred in one-third, and 90-day mortality was 2%. Disease recurrence occurred in 74% during a median follow up of 17.4 months. Median recurrence-free (RFS) and overall survival (OS) were 9 and 25 months, respectively. CONCLUSIONS:Following modern induction paradigms, DP-CAR can be performed with low mortality, manageable morbidity, and excellent rates of margin-negative resection in high-volume settings. The profile of complications of DP-CAR is distinct from pancreaticoduodenectomy and simple distal pancreatectomy. OS and RFS are similar to those undergoing resection of borderline resectable and resectable disease. Improved systemic disease control will likely lead to increasing utilization of aggressive surgical approaches to LAPC.

Most patients diagnosed with pancreatic cancer are classified as nonoperative candidates based on the contemporary guidelines of resectability. The advent of more potent control of systemic disease using neoadjuvant chemotherapy has enabled more aggressive operative interventions. In our multidisciplinary practice, patients with Stage III, locally advanced pancreatic cancer and superior mesenteric artery (SMA) encasement are now carefully triaged with high quality, preoperative imaging to determine if they can be considered candidates for operative resection with periadventitial dissection of the SMA. Patients displaying a "halo sign," where the encased SMA remains fully patent and free from arterial invasion, are now candidates for SMA periadventitial dissection. This procedure involves the surgical stripping of the infiltrated neurolymphatic tissue off the SMA leaving behind a bare "skeletonized artery." Alternatively, the "string sign" involving the SMA confers a more likely case of arterial invasion, where a complete oncologic resection cannot be achieved successfully. This method of patient selection in case of SMA involvement abandons the traditional metrics of circumferential degrees of the arterial encasement to guide surgical decisions. Our institutional approach has allowed us to meaningfully expand our operative methods of resection with the potential for improved longitudinal outcomes to pancreatic cancer patients who were deprived historically from the more effective and possibly curative treatment.

OBJECTIVE:The aim of this study was to critically analyze the surgical experience of managing autoimmune pancreatitis (AIP) in an era of modern diagnostics and compare these patients with those who were managed conservatively. METHODS:Two prospectively maintained databases were used to retrospectively identify patients with AIP who were either managed conservatively or underwent pancreatectomy. RESULTS:Eighty-eight patients were included in the study, of which 56 (63.6%) underwent resection and 32 (36.4%) were managed conservatively. Patients who underwent resection were more likely to present with jaundice (64.3% vs 18.1%, P < 0.001) and weight loss (53.6% vs 15.6%, P = 0.005). The cohort who underwent resection had a significantly higher median carbohydrate antigen 19-9 (40.0 vs 18.6 U/mL, P = 0.034) and was less likely to have elevated immunoglobulin G4 (26.1% vs 50.0%, P < 0.001). The most frequent initial diagnosis in the cohort who underwent resection was ductal adenocarcinoma (82.1%). Nine patients (28.1%) in the conservatively managed cohort experienced AIP relapse compared with 6 patients (10.7%) in the cohort who underwent resection. CONCLUSIONS:The most frequent reason for surgical resection of AIP is concern for malignancy. Carbohydrate antigen 19-9 elevations were more common than immunoglobulin G4 in our cohort, suggesting that this laboratory profile is suboptimal for this population.

BACKGROUND:Lymph node (LN) metastasis is associated with decreased survival following resection for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). In N0 disease, increasing total evaluated LN (ELN) correlates with improved outcomes suggesting patients may be understaged when LNs are undersampled. We aim to assess the optimal number of examined lymph nodes (ELN) following pancreatectomy. METHODS:Data from 1837 patients undergoing surgery were prospectively collected. The binomial probability law was utilized to analyze the minimum number of examined LNs (minELN) and accurately characterize each histopathologic stage. LN ratio (LNR) was compared to American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) guidelines. RESULTS:As ELN total increased, the likelihood of finding node positive disease increased. An evaluation based upon the binomial probability law suggested an optimal minELN of 12 for accurate AJCC N staging. As the number of ELNs increased, the discriminatory capacity of alternative strategies to characterize LN disease exceeded that offered by AJCC N stage. CONCLUSION/CONCLUSIONS:This is the first study dedicated to optimizing histopathologic staging in PDAC using models of minELN informed by the binomial probability law. This study highlights two separate cutoffs for ELNs depending upon prognostic goal and validates that 12 LNs are adequate to determine AJCC N stage for the majority of patients.

BACKGROUND:Pancreatoduodenectomies at high risk for clinically relevant pancreatic fistula are uncommon, yet intimidating, situations. In such scenarios, the impact of individual surgeon experience on outcomes is poorly understood. METHODS:The fistula risk score was applied to identify high-risk patients (fistula risk score 7-10) from 7,706 pancreatoduodenectomies performed at 18 international institutions (2003-2020). For each case, surgeon pancreatoduodenectomy career volume and years of practice were linked to intraoperative fistula mitigation strategy adoption and outcomes. Consequently, best operative approaches for clinically relevant pancreatic fistula prevention and best performer profiles were identified through multivariable analysis models. RESULTS:Eight hundred and thirty high-risk pancreatoduodenectomies, performed by 64 surgeons, displayed an overall clinically relevant pancreatic fistula rate of 33.7%. Clinically relevant pancreatic fistula rates decreased with escalating surgeon career pancreatoduodenectomy (-49.7%) and career length (-41.2%; both P < .001), as did transfusion and reoperation rates, postoperative morbidity index, and duration of stay. Great experience (≥400 pancreatoduodenectomies performed or ≥21-year-long career) was a significant predictor of clinically relevant pancreatic fistula prevention (odds ratio 0.52, 95% confidence interval 0.35-0.76) and was more often associated with pancreatojejunostomy reconstruction and prophylactic octreotide omission, which were both independently associated with clinically relevant pancreatic fistula reduction. A risk-adjusted performance analysis also correlated with experience. Moreover, minimizing blood loss (≤400 mL) significantly contributed to clinically relevant pancreatic fistula prevention (odds ratio 0.40, 95% confidence interval 0.22-0.74). CONCLUSION/CONCLUSIONS:Surgeon experience is a key contributor to achieve better outcomes after high-risk pancreatoduodenectomy. Surgeons can improve their performance in these challenging situations by employing pancreatojejunostomy reconstruction, omitting prophylactic octreotide, and minimizing blood loss.

BACKGROUND:Historically, a positive margin after pancreatectomy for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) was associated with decreased survival. In an era when neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) is being used frequently, the prognostic significance of margin status is unclear. STUDY DESIGN/METHODS:Patients with localized PDAC who received NAC and underwent pancreatectomy from 2011-2018 were identified from a single-institution database. Patients with fewer than 2 months of NAC, R2 resection, or less than 90-day follow-up were excluded. A positive margin included tumors within 1 mm of the surgical margin. RESULTS:468 patients met inclusion criteria. The median age was 65 and 53% were female. Preoperative clinical staging demonstrated most had locally advanced (n=222, 47%) or borderline resectable (n=172, 37%) disease. The median follow-up was 18.5 (10.6-30.0) months. The median duration of NAC was 119 (IQR:87-168) days. FOLFIRINOX was first-line therapy for 67%, and 73% received neoadjuvant radiotherapy. Most underwent pancreaticoduodenectomy (69%). 40% were node positive and 80% had an R0 resection. 56% received at least one cycle of adjuvant therapy. Median overall survival (OS) and recurrence-free survival (RFS) were 22.0 (CI: 19.4-25.1) and 11.0 (CI: 10.0-12.1) months. On multivariate analysis, margin status was not a significant predictor of OS or RFS. Factors associated with OS included: clinical stage, duration of NAC, nodal status, histopathologic treatment response score, and receipt of adjuvant chemotherapy. CONCLUSIONS:Microscopic margin positivity is not associated with recurrence and survival in localized PDAC patients resected after treatment with NAC. Aggressive surgical extirpation in high volume centers should be considered in selected patients after extensive NAC.

PURPOSE/OBJECTIVE:Immunotherapy is currently ineffective for nearly all pancreatic ductal adenocarcinomas(PDAC), largely due to its tumor microenvironment(TME) that lacks antigen experienced T effector cells(Teffs). Vaccine-based immunotherapies are known to activate antigen-specific Teffs in the peripheral blood. To evaluate the effect of vaccine therapy on the PDAC TME, we designed a neoadjuvant and adjuvant clinical trial of an irradiated, granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor(GM-CSF)-secreting, allogeneic PDAC vaccine(GVAX). EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN/METHODS:Eighty-seven eligible patients with resectable PDAC were randomly assigned(1:1:1) to receive GVAX alone or in combination with two forms of low-dose cyclophosphamide(Cy). Resected tumors following neoadjuvant immunotherapy were assessed for the formation of tertiary lymphoid aggregates(TLA) in response to treatment. The clinical endpoints are disease-free survival(DFS) and overall survival(OS). RESULTS:The neoadjuvant treatment with GVAX either alone or with two forms of low dose Cy is safe and feasible without adversely increasing the surgical complication rate. Patients in Arm A who received neoadjuvant and adjuvant GVAX alone had a trend toward longer median OS(35.0 months) than that(24.8 months) in the historical controls who received adjuvant GVAX alone. However, Arm C, who received low dose oral Cy in addition to GVAX, had a significantly shorter DFS than Arm A. When comparing patients with OS>24 months to those with OS<15 months, longer OS was found to be associated with higher density of intratumoral TLA. CONCLUSIONS:It is safe and feasible to use a neoadjuvant immunotherapy approach for PDACs to evaluate early biologic responses. In-depth analysis of TLAs is warranted in future neoadjuvant immunotherapy clinical trials.

BACKGROUND:The aim of this study was to determine the incidence of high-grade dysplasia (HGD) or invasive carcinoma in patients with small branch duct intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms (BD-IPMNs). METHODS:923 patients who underwent surgical resection for an IPMN were identified. Sendai-negative patients were identified as those without history of pancreatitis or jaundice, main pancreatic duct size (MPD) <5 mm, cyst size <3 cm, no mural nodules, negative cyst fluid cytology for adenocarcinoma, or serum carbohydrate antigen 19-9 (CA 19-9) <37 U/L. RESULTS:BD-IPMN was identified in 388 (46.4%) patients and 89 (22.9%) were categorized as Sendai-negative. Overall, 68 (17.5%) of BD-IPMN had HGD and 62 (16.0%) had an associated invasive-carcinoma. Among the 89 Sendai-negative patients, 12 (13.5%) had IPMNs with HGD and only one patient (1.1%) had invasive-carcinoma. Of note, older age (OR 1.13, 95% CI 1.03-1.23; P = 0.008) and minimal dilation of MPD (OR 11.3, 95% CI 2.40-53.65; P = 0.002) were associated with high-risk disease in Sendai-negative patients after multivariable risk adjustment. CONCLUSION/CONCLUSIONS:The risk of harboring a high-risk disease remains low in small BD-IPMNs. However, Sendai-negative patients who are older than 65 years old and those with minimal dilation of MPD (3-5 mm) are at greater risk of high-risk lesions and should be given consideration to be included as a "worrisome feature" in a future guidelines update.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES/OBJECTIVE:Despite the long-standing consensus on the importance of tumor size, tumor number and carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) levels as predictors of long-term outcomes among patients with colorectal liver metastases (CRLM), optimal prognostic cut-offs for these variables have not been established. METHODS:Patients who underwent curative-intent resection of CRLM and had available data on at least one of the three variables of interest above were selected from a multi-institutional dataset of patients with known KRAS mutational status. The resulting cohort was randomly split into training and testing datasets and recursive partitioning analysis was employed to determine optimal cut-offs. The concordance probability estimates (CPEs) for these optimal cut offs were calculated and compared to CPEs for the most widely used cut-offs in the surgical literature. RESULTS:A total of 1643 patients who met eligibility criteria were identified. Following recursive partitioning analysis in the training dataset, the following cut-offs were identified: 2.95 cm for tumor size, 1.5 for tumor number and 6.15 ng/ml for CEA levels. In the entire dataset, the calculated CPEs for the new tumor size (0.52), tumor number (0.56) and CEA (0.53) cut offs exceeded CPEs for other commonly employed cut-offs. CONCLUSION/CONCLUSIONS:The current study was able to identify optimal cut-offs for the three most commonly employed prognostic factors in CRLM. While the per variable gains in discriminatory power are modest, these novel cut-offs may help produce appreciable increases in prognostic performance when combined in the context of future risk scores.

PURPOSE/OBJECTIVE:To evaluate somatic mutations, circulating tumor cells (CTCs) and circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) in patients with Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) with pathologic complete response (pCR) to neoadjuvant therapy (NAT) and find their associations with outcome. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN/METHODS:. RESULTS:= 0.081). Five patients available for CTCs data were all positive for CTCs and seven of 16 patients with pCR were detected with ctDNA at surgery. We proposed a new concept of regression assessment combining genomic analysis of resected specimens and liquid biopsy data for PDAC, namely, molecular complete response (mCR). Three of six patients with mCR recurred as compared with six in 15 non-mCR patients. Seven of 15 non-mCR patients died during follow-up, while there was only one in six patients with mCR. CONCLUSIONS:This study first reports that somatic mutations, CTCs, and ctDNA existed even in patients with PDAC with pCR to NAT, which could possibly predict early recurrence and reduced survival. The current regression evaluation system of PDAC needs to be reassessed at a molecular level.