Faculty Bibliography

BACKGROUND:Patients with celiac disease and inflammatory bowel disease, two immune-mediated luminal conditions, have higher rates of certain infections than healthy counterparts. The prevalence of many gastrointestinal infections in these patients, however, is unknown. AIMS/OBJECTIVE:Using a novel clinical stool pathogen PCR test, we investigated the hypothesis that patients with celiac disease/inflammatory bowel disease had different distributions of diarrheal pathogens than other patients. METHODS:We performed a retrospective cohort study of outpatients who underwent stool pathogen testing with the FilmArray Gastrointestinal PCR Panel (BioFire Diagnostics, Salt Lake City, UT) at our institution from January 1 to December 31, 2015. Rates of pathogens were measured in patients with or without celiac disease/inflammatory bowel disease. RESULTS:Of 955 patients, 337 had positive test for any pathogen, with 465 bacterial, parasitic, or viral pathogens identified. One hundred and twenty-seven patients (13.3%) had celiac disease or inflammatory bowel disease, of which 29/127 (22.8%) had a positive test, compared to 308/828 other patients (37.2%) (p = 0.002). Patients with celiac disease/inflammatory bowel disease had significantly fewer viruses (1.6 vs. 8.1% of patients; p = 0.008) and parasites (0 vs. 3.3%; p = 0.039), with nonsignificant trend toward fewer bacteria (21.3 vs. 29.2%; p = 0.063). Escherichia coli species were most common in both populations. CONCLUSIONS:Stool PCR identified numerous pathogens in patients with or without celiac disease/inflammatory bowel disease. Patients with celiac disease/inflammatory bowel disease were significantly less likely to have any pathogen identified, and had significantly fewer viruses and parasites. In this population, knowledge of common pathogens can guide diagnostic evaluation and offer opportunities for treatment.

Background/UNASSIGNED:(VRE) is associated with poor outcomes. This study evaluated the impact of VRE colonization on subsequent acquisition of enteric pathogens. Methods/UNASSIGNED:. Our primary outcome was the presence of any enteric pathogen. Cox proportional hazards modeling was used to adjust for factors associated with enteric infection. Results/UNASSIGNED:with VRE (57% vs 28%, p < 0.01). Conclusions/UNASSIGNED:enteric infection. VRE domination of the gut microbiome may protect against acquisition of common enteric pathogens.

Introduction: Clostridium difficile infection (CDI) occurs frequently in patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) and is associated with increased disease activity. Due to concern for complications, immunosuppressive medication (ISM) is often withheld after CDI, although few data exist to inform this decision. This study aims to assess the influence of ISM on outcomes following CDI in IBD patients. Methods: This multicenter, retrospective cohort study was performed at 4 academic medical centers in New York City. Patient demographic and clinical data was abstracted from databases at each site for adult patients with an established diagnosis of IBD also diagnosed with CDI. Escalation of therapy was defined as initiation or dose escalation of corticosteroids or new biologic use following antibiotic therapy for CDI. Outcomes were assessed at 30 and 90 days after last positive C. difficile test. Continuous variables were compared using two-sided T-tests and proportions were compared using Chi-squared tests. Exact methods were used for expected cell size. Results: 207 patients met inclusion criteria (49 outpatient, 158 inpatient). Demographic information is listed in Table 1. Escalation of IBD regimen (Table 2) was more frequent in outpatients at 90 days (43% vs. 22%, P<0.01), with 49% (39/61) of ISM escalation occurring within 14 days of CDI.) Patients not escalated had higher rates of sepsis than escalated patients (11% vs. 2%, P=0.04). Severe outcomes (death, sepsis, or colectomy) at 90 days were markedly increased in the non-escalation group (15% vs 2%, P<0.01). There was no difference in CDI recurrence or rehospitalization between groups. Conclusion: In this multicenter study assessing outcomes of ISM use in patients with IBD and CDI, initiation of steroid or biologic therapy following CDI treatment was not associated with adverse clinical outcomes. While no difference was observed between CDI recurrence or rehospitalization among groups, sepsis and severe outcomes were significantly more common in patients not undergoing escalation. These data suggest that escalation of IBD therapy following CDI is not associated with worse clinical outcomes and a subset of patients may benefit from timely treatment of underlying inflammatory disease. Prospective studies are needed to validate these data and to inform clinical guidelines regarding the timing of ISM use following CDI

BACKGROUND:Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), comprising Crohn disease and ulcerative colitis, is a risk factor for colorectal cancer (CRC). Chemotherapy toxicity may exacerbate IBD symptoms and vice versa, but data are limited. We evaluated chemotherapy tolerance and oncologic outcomes in patients with CRC with and without IBD. PATIENTS AND METHODS/METHODS:Medical records of patients with CRC with and without IBD treated between 2008 and 2013 were reviewed. Where possible, patients were matched by age, sex, stage, and diagnosis year. Chemotherapy tolerance and survival outcomes were compared between patients with IBD and without IBD. RESULTS:A total of 158 subjects with CRC were included: 80 patients had IBD and 78 matched control patients did not have IBD. Between cases and controls, there were no significant differences in demographic data, stage of CRC, and cancer treatments, with equivalent numbers of patients receiving surgery, radiation, and chemotherapy. Patients with IBD experienced more CRC treatment alterations than those without IBD (74% vs. 44%, P = .03), largely due to a higher frequency of treatment delays among patients with IBD. Differences in stage-specific 5-year overall survival (OS) and recurrence-free survival (RFS) in patients with and without IBD were not significant, except for stage IV patients with IBD who had significantly shorter OS than those without IBD. Patients with histologically active IBD did not require more chemotherapy alterations than patients with inactive IBD. CONCLUSION/CONCLUSIONS:In this series, patients with CRC with IBD experienced more treatment alterations (mostly delays) than those without IBD. Patients with stage IV CRC with IBD had shorter survival than patients without IBD.

BACKGROUND:The similar presentations in relapse of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) and enteric infection pose substantial barriers to diagnosis and treatment. The objective of this study was to investigate the incidence, etiology, predictors, and treatment of enteric infection in patients with IBD. METHODS:We reviewed the records of 214 patients with IBD who underwent 295 gastrointestinal pathogen panel and Clostridium difficile infection (CDI) polymerase chain reaction (PCR) stool tests during an exacerbation of symptoms. We collected baseline characteristics, PCR outcomes, and medication exposures. We tested for associations via the Chi-square test and the t-test. Logistic regression analysis was used to identify predictors of enteric infection. RESULTS:Of 295 PCR tests ordered during an exacerbation of symptoms, 38 (12.9%) were positive for CDI and 41 (13.8%) were positive for 14 other pathogens, with E. coli species as the most common. A previous history of CDI or colonic involvement of IBD predicted CDI, whereas a previous colectomy predicted negative testing for CDI. The majority with CDI (24, 63.2%) received oral vancomycin and 15 (37.5%) with other enteric pathogens were treated for their infection. Patients with CDI had a longer median length of hospital stay (8.5 versus 4 days, P = 0.041). Patients who tested negative for enteric infections were more likely to have IBD medications added or up-titrated (P = 0.027). CONCLUSIONS:Enteric infection was detected in 79 (26.8%) symptomatic patients with IBD , with CDI the most frequent followed by E. coli. Negative stool PCR testing was associated with changes in IBD management. Broad enteric PCR testing should be considered during relapse of IBD.