Faculty Bibliography

BACKGROUND: Nodular melanoma (NM) may be biologically aggressive compared with the more common superficial spreading melanoma (SSM), with recent data suggesting underlying genetic differences between these 2 subtypes. To better define the clinical behavior of NMs, the authors compared their clinical and histopathologic features to those of SSMs at their institution, a tertiary referral center, over 3 decades. METHODS: A total of 1,684 patients diagnosed with 1,734 melanomas were prospectively enrolled. Of these, 1,143 patients (69% SSM, 11% NM, 20% other) were diagnosed between 1972 and 1982; 541 patients (54% SSM, 23% NM, 23% other) were diagnosed between 2002 and the present. Differences between the features of NM and SSM within each time period as well as changes over time were analyzed. RESULTS: The authors found that SSMs are now diagnosed as thinner lesions (P < .0001) with a low incidence of histologic ulceration (P < .0001), whereas there was no significant change in the median tumor thickness or ulceration status of NMs over time (P = .10, P = .30, respectively). The median age at diagnosis of NM, however, did significantly increase over time (51 years to 63 years, P < .01). The median duration of NMs was reported to be only 5 months compared with 9 months in SSM patients. CONCLUSIONS: The authors' data suggest that improvements have been made in the early detection of SSM but not NM. Modifications of current screening practices, including increased surveillance of high-risk patients with an emphasis on the 'E' for 'evolution' criterion of the ABCDE acronym used for early detection of melanoma, are thus warranted

BACKGROUND: Different Insulin-like Growth Factor Binding Proteins (IGFBPs) have been investigated as potential biomarkers in several types of tumors. In this study, we examined both IGFBP-3 and -4 levels in tissues and sera of melanoma patients representing different stages of melanoma progression. METHODS: The study cohort consisted of 132 melanoma patients (primary, n = 72; metastatic, n = 60; 64 Male, 68 Female; Median Age = 56) prospectively enrolled in the New York University School of Medicine Interdisciplinary Melanoma Cooperative Group (NYU IMCG) between August 2002 and December 2006. We assessed tumor-expression and circulating sera levels of IGFBP-3 and -4 using immunohistochemistry and ELISA assays. Correlations with clinicopathologic parameters were examined using Wilcoxon rank-sum tests and Spearman-rank correlation coefficients. RESULTS: Median IGFBP-4 tumor expression was significantly greater in primary versus metastatic patients (70% versus 10%, p = 0.01) A trend for greater median IGFBP-3 sera concentration was observed in metastatic versus primary patients (4.9 microg/ml vs. 3.4 microg/ml, respectively, p = 0.09). However, sera levels fell within a normal range for IGFBP-3. Neither IGFBP-3 nor -4 correlated with survival in this subset of patients. CONCLUSION: Decreased IGFBP-4 tumor expression might be a step in the progression from primary to metastatic melanoma. Our data lend support to a recently-described novel tumor suppressor role of secreting IGFBPs in melanoma. However, data do not support the clinical utility of measuring levels of IGFBP-3 and -4 in sera of melanoma patients

BACKGROUND: Attempts to define the clinical behavior of pleomorphic lobular carcinoma (PLC) have been limited to small series, and clinical management strategies have yet to be established. We describe our experience with PLC as compared to classic ILC and invasive ductal carcinoma (IDC). METHODS: From 9/1996 to 5/2003, clinical and histopathologic data for 5,635 patients undergoing primary surgical treatment and sentinel lymph node biopsy for breast cancer were collected. Four hundred eighty one (8.5%) patients were diagnosed with ILC; 3,978 (70.6%) with IDC. Of those with ILC, 356 (74%) patients had material available for pathologic re-review and comprise our study population: 52 were classified as PLC; 298 were classified as classic ILC; and 6 cases were reclassified as IDC. We compared clinical, pathologic, and treatment factors for patients with PLC, ILC, and IDC using the Wilcoxon rank sum and Fisher's exact tests. RESULTS: PLC were larger than ILC and IDC (20 vs. 15 vs. 13, P < 0.001), had more positive nodes (median 1 vs. 0 vs. 0, P < 0.05) and more frequently required mastectomy (63.5% vs. 38.7% vs. 28.8%, P < 0.001). In addition, more patients with PLC had developed metastatic disease compared to patients with ILC (11.5% vs. 3.7%, P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: These findings suggest that PLC is a distinct clinical entity that presents at a more advanced stage and may require more aggressive surgical and adjuvant treatment. J. Surg. Oncol. (c) 2008 Wiley-Liss, Inc

CONTEXT: Both atypical lobular hyperplasia (ALH) and lobular carcinoma in situ (LCIS) have traditionally been considered to be risk factors for the development of invasive carcinoma and are followed by close observation. Recent studies have suggested that these lesions may represent true precursors with progression to invasive carcinoma. Due to the debate over the significance of these lesions and the small number of cases reported in the literature, the treatment for lobular neoplasia diagnosed by percutaneous core biopsy (PCB) remains controversial. OBJECTIVE: To review our experience with pure LCIS or ALH diagnosed by PCB and correlate the radiologic findings and surgical excision diagnoses to develop management guidelines for lobular neoplasia diagnosed by PCB. DESIGN: We searched the pathology database for patients who underwent PCB with a diagnosis of either pure LCIS or ALH and had subsequent surgical excision. We compared the core diagnoses with the surgical excision diagnoses and the radiologic findings. RESULTS: Thirty-eight PCBs with a diagnosis of ALH (18 cases) or LCIS (20 cases) were identified. Carcinoma was present at excision in 1 (6%) of the ALH cases and in 2 (10%) of the LCIS cases. In summary, 8% (3/38) of PCBs diagnosed as lobular neoplasia (ALH or LCIS) were upgraded to carcinoma (invasive carcinoma or ductal carcinoma in situ) at excision. CONCLUSIONS: Surgical excision is indicated for all PCBs diagnosed as ALH or LCIS, as a significant percentage will show carcinoma at excision

Ductal carcinoma in situ with microinvasion (DCISM) is a distinct clinicopathologic entity. Its true metastatic potential has been unclear, due in part to historical differences in the definition of microinvasion. The role of routine axillary staging for DCISM is controversial, given the reportedly low incidence of axillary metastases. We describe our institutional experience with DCISM, and define the role of axillary staging. A retrospective analysis was made of patients with DCISM. Forty-four patients underwent axillary staging (24 axillary lymph node dissection [ALND], 22 sentinel node biopsy [SNB]). Macrometastatic disease was present in three patients (7%), and two patients had isolated tumor cells (itc) in the sentinel node. Patients with axillary metastases tended to be younger. Comedonecrosis, nuclear grade, multifocal microinvasion or presentation as a clinical mass was not associated with a higher rate of axillary metastases. In this series, 7% of patients had macrometastatic disease, and two patients (5%) had itc only. Axillary staging is indicated, and SNB is appropriate for the identification of axillary metastatic disease

Background: Although remission rates for metastatic melanoma are generally very poor, some patients can survive for prolonged periods following metastasis. Here we use gene expression profiling of metastatic melanoma samples to search for a molecular basis for this observation. Methods: We analyzed gene expression profiles of 44 metastatic melanoma specimens collected from 38 patients who were followed clinically for a median of 20 months after surgery. RNA was processed using standard methods and hybridized to Affymetrix Human Genome HU133 Plus 2.0 arrays. Data were analyzed using GeneSpring and PathwayAssist software, normalizing using a PLIER algorithm and utilizing ANOVA statistical tests. Results: Unsupervised clustering yielded 4 distinct groups of subjects, 2 of which had large differences in overall survival. We then used supervised clustering to compare patients whose post-surgery survival was less then 1.5 years (11 subjects, 9.5 month median survival) to those who survived greater than 1.5 years (23 subjects, 26 month median survival, 17 alive at last follow-up). Only genes with changes in expression of > 2 with a p value of < 0.05 were accepted, resulting in a group of approximately 200 genes. Genes associated with immune response (TNFa, IRF1, Granzyme B, CD8a, CXCL11, IL27AR, GBP1, CXCL10, CCBP2, GBP2, CCR9 and IFIT4) or with cell proliferation (FGFR1, MET, MDM2, CDC25A, RFC2, SOS1, HOXA3, MCM4, MCM7, ORC5L, KIF23 and VAV3) were highly represented. Prolonged survival was associated with elevated expression of immune response genes and decreased expression of genes associated with cell proliferation. Conclusions: Gene expression profiling of metastatic melanoma samples identified a set of genes associated with patient survival, and suggests that immune surveillance is a mechanism for prolonged survival in these patients