Faculty Bibliography

BACKGROUND: The Bypass Angioplasty Revascularization Investigation (BARI) included 4039 patients with multivessel coronary artery disease; 1829 consented to randomization, and 2010 did not but were followed up in a registry. Thus, we can evaluate the outcome of physician-guided versus random assignment of percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA) versus coronary artery bypass graft surgery (CABG). METHODS AND RESULTS: We compared the baseline features and outcomes for PTCA and CABG in the overall registry and its predesignated subgroups. We assessed the impact of treatment by choice versus random assignment by comparing the results in the registry with those of the randomized trial. Statistical adjustments for differences in baseline characteristics were made. Within the registry, nearly twice as many patients were selected for PTCA (1189) as CABG (625); mortality at 7 years was similar for PTCA (13.9%) and CABG (14.2%) (P=0.66) before and after adjustment for baseline differences between patients selected for PTCA versus CABG (adjusted RR, 1.02; P=0.86). In contrast to the randomized trial, the 7-year mortality rate of treated diabetics in the registry was equally high (26%) with PTCA or CABG. Seven-year mortality was higher for patients undergoing PTCA in the randomized trial than in the registry (19.1% versus 13.9%, P<0.01) but not for those undergoing CABG (15.6% versus 14.2%, P=0.57). The adjusted relative mortality risk for PTCA in the randomized versus registry population was 1.17 (P=0.16). CONCLUSIONS: BARI physicians were able to select PTCA rather than CABG for 65% of registry patients who underwent revascularization without compromising long-term survival either in the overall population or in treated diabetics

Revascularization options for intermediate sized vessels (2.5-2.9 mm) have historically been limited. IVAT is a pilot study to assess the efficacy and safety of debulking intermediate sized vessels using directional coronary atherectomy (DCA). Between March 1996 and June 1997, 50 patients were enrolled at seven hospitals in the United States. Of those patients, 70% presented with unstable angina and 52% had single vessel disease. Of the lesions treated, 96% were de novo. Adjunctive PTCA after DCA was performed in 90% of cases at the discretion of the investigator to maximize luminal diameter. The GTO DCA device was used in 90% of cases. Procedural success (residual stenosis <50% without major complications) was 94%. Stents were placed in 12% of patients. The only complications were three non-Q wave MIs. Mean reference vessel diameter increased from 2.49 mm pre-procedure to 2.57 mm after DCA and 2.61 post-procedure; mean MLD increased from 0.76 mm to 2.03 mm to 2.31 mm; and mean stenosis decreased from 70% to 21% post DCA and to 11% post procedure. At six months follow-up, 18.0% of target lesions required revascularization. Total revascularization, including non-target vessels, was 32%. These results suggest that DCA has a high procedural success rate and a low target lesion revascularization rate in intermediate sized vessels

BACKGROUND: In PTCA patients with multivessel coronary artery disease, incomplete revascularization (IR) is the result of both pre-PTCA strategy and initial lesion outcome. The unique contribution of these components on long-term patient outcome is uncertain. METHODS AND RESULTS: From the Bypass Angioplasty Revascularization Investigation (BARI), 2047 patients who underwent first-time PTCA were evaluated. Before enrollment, all significant lesions were assessed by the PTCA operator for clinical importance and intention to dilate. Complete revascularization (CR) was defined as successful dilatation of all clinically relevant lesions. Planned CR was indicated in 65% of all patients. More lesions were intended for PTCA in these patients compared with those with planned IR (2.8 versus 2.1). Successful dilatation of all intended lesions occurred in 45% of patients with planned CR versus 56% with planned IR (P<0. 001). In multivariable analysis, planned IR (versus planned CR), initial lesions attempted (not all versus all intended lesions attempted), and initial lesion outcome (not all versus all attempted lesions successful) were unrelated to 5-year risk of cardiac death or death/myocardial infarction but were all independently related to risk of CABG. CONCLUSIONS: Overall, a pre-PTCA strategy of IR in BARI-like patients appears comparable to a strategy of CR except for a higher need for CABG. Whether the use of new devices may attenuate the elevated risk of CABG in patients with multivessel disease and planned IR remains to be determined

BACKGROUND: Patients with treated diabetes in the randomized-trial segment of the Bypass Angioplasty Revascularization Investigation (BARI) who were randomized to initial revascularization with PTCA had significantly worse 5-year survival than patients assigned to CABG. This treatment difference was not seen among diabetic patients eligible for BARI who opted to select their mode of revascularization. We hypothesized that differences in patient characteristics, assessed and unmeasured, together with the treatment selection in the registry, at least partially account for this discrepancy. METHODS AND RESULTS: Among diabetics taking insulin or oral hypoglycemic drugs at entry, angiographic and clinical presentations were comparable between randomized and registry patients. However, more registry patients were white, and registry diabetics tended to be more educated and more physically active and to report better quality of life. Procedural characteristics and in-hospital complications were comparable. The 5-year all-cause mortality rate was 34.5% in randomized diabetic patients assigned to PTCA versus 19.4% in CABG patients (P=0.0024; relative risk [RR]=1.87); corresponding cardiac mortality rates were 23.4% and 8.2%, respectively (P=0.0002; RR=3.10). The CABG benefit was more apparent among patients requiring insulin. In the registry, all-cause mortality was 14.4% for PTCA versus 14.9% for CABG (P=0.86, RR=1.10), with corresponding cardiac mortality rates of 7.5% and 6. 0%, respectively (P=0.73; RR=1.07). These RRs in the registry increased to 1.29 and 1.41, respectively, after adjustment for all known differences between treatment groups. CONCLUSIONS: BARI registry results are not inconsistent with the finding in the randomized trial that initial CABG is associated with better long-term survival than PTCA in treated diabetic patients with multivessel coronary disease suitable for either surgical or catheter-based revascularization

Thrombolytic therapy is lifesaving in patients with acute myocardial infarction who present within 12 hours of symptom onset, have ECG signs of ST-segment elevation or new left bundle branch block, and have no contraindications to thrombolysis (such as internal bleeding, recent major surgery or trauma, intracranial disease, or severe uncontrolled hypertension). Certain patients presenting more than 12 hours after symptom onset also may be candidates for thrombolysis. However, only 54% of patients obtain normal angiographic blood flow with the most aggressive regimen validated to date: accelerated recombinant tissue type plasminogen activator plus aspirin and heparin. Newer and investigational drugs, such as reteplase, lanoteplase, and saruplase, are easier to administer but generally have not yet been shown to be safer or more effective than other thrombolytics

Direct percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty has recently shown better results than thrombolysis in reestablishing normal arterial flow following an acute myocardial infarction (MI). Because many patients do not have timely access to well-established cardiac catheterization facilities, however, optimizing the use of thrombolytic agents, as well as adjuvant therapies that inhibit the prothrombotic process, remains an essential strategy. Prescribe chewed aspirin for all patients with acute MI; also give heparin with recombinant tissue-type plasminogen activator and pharmacologically similar thrombolytics. Low molecular weight heparin is easier to use than the unfractionated drug may reduce the risk of reinfarction. Newer and investigational antiplatelet and antithrombin agents (such as abciximab and bivalirudin) have yielded evidence of improved arterial patency with fewer hemorrhagic complications