Faculty Bibliography

Objective: Cerebral venous sinus thrombosis (CVST) is a rare but potentially dangerous complication following craniotomies involving the posterior fossa, the skull base, and craniotomies involving the superior sagittal sinus. Surgical manipulation of the sinuses has been shown to cause sinus thromboses of varying degrees. This phenomenon is often clinically silent, with only a small number of patients becoming symptomatic. Recent advances in neuroimaging provide higher resolution evaluation of cerebral sinuses pre and postoperatively, often revealing clinically silent filling defects. Although sinus thrombosis can be a major cause of morbidity and mortality, its incidence and factors that contribute to its formation in the postoperative population remain unclear. In addition, current guidelines advise to anticoagulate with Heparin upon diagnosis, which can be contraindicated for immediate post craniotomy patients. The goal of this study is to evaluate retrospective data of patient outcomes and factors that might contribute to sinus thrombus formation. Methods: A retrospective chart review was conducted at NYU Langone Medical Center. Ninety-seven patients were included who underwent either a retrosigmoid/translabrynthine/suboccipital resection of a posterior fossa tumor or a supratentorial craniotomy for resection of parasagittal/falcine tumor between July 1, 2014 and July 1, 2015. Pre operative Magnetic Resonance Venography (MRV) was obtained per the attending surgeon's discretion. Based on intraoperative findings, clinical symptoms, and surgeon's preference, a postoperative MRV was obtained. Decision to treat a thrombosis was made based on the results of the MRV and clinical symptoms. Treatments included observation, intravenous fluids (IVF) alone, anti-platelet therapy with Aspirin alone, or a combination of the two. Results: A total of 7 of 97 patients (7.22%) had postoperative sinus thrombosis. Of those patients, 5 had occlusion of the venous sinuses. In the occlusion group, 4 had preoperative imaging documenting patency of the sinuses. An additional 2 patients had postoperative MRVs revealing partial thrombosis of the sinus, 1 that was new and 1 that did not have a preoperative MRV for comparison. Compared with the cohort of patients without postoperative thromboses, there was no significant difference in age, BMI, length of surgery, or surgical approach. Of the 5 patients with postoperative thrombotic occlusion, 4 underwent intervention (1 with IVF alone, 2 with IVF and aspirin, and 1 with aspirin alone). Two patients with thromboses also developed CSF leaks requiring lumbar drainage and operative repair. One patient had a persistent CSF leak requiring a shunt. Of the 2 patients with partial thrombosis, 1 was placed on IVF and aspirin. At 3 months follow up, 1 out of 5 patients in the occlusion group had recanalization of the previously thrombosed sinus. Conclusions: MRV is a non-invasive method to evaluate the caliber and patency of dural venous sinuses in post craniotomy patients. Symptomatic thrombosis is rare and can be managed either conservatively or with IVF and/or anti platelet therapy, both which are safer than anticoagulation with heparin in post craniotomy patients. A larger prospective trial is necessary to further characterize the incidence of postoperative venous sinus thrombosis, identify risk factors, and to devise recommendations for therapy

OBJECTIVE A randomized trial that compares clinical outcomes following microsurgery (MS) or stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) for patients with small- and medium-sized vestibular schwannomas (VSs) is impractical, but would have important implications for clinical decision making. A matched cohort analysis was conducted to evaluate clinical outcomes in patients treated with MS or SRS. METHODS The records of 399 VS patients who were cared for by 2 neurosurgeons and 1 neurotologist between 2001 and 2014 were evaluated. From this data set, 3 retrospective matched cohorts were created to compare hearing preservation (21 matched pairs), facial nerve preservation (83 matched pairs), intervention-free survival, and complication rates (85 matched pairs) between cases managed with SRS and patients managed with MS. Cases were matched for age at surgery (+/- 10 years) and lesion size (+/- 0.1 cm). To compare hearing outcomes, cases were additionally matched for preoperative Class A hearing according to the American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery guidelines. To compare facial nerve (i.e., cranial nerve [CN] VII) outcomes, cases were additionally matched for preoperative House-Brackmann (HB) score. Investigators who were not involved with patient care reviewed the clinical and imaging records. The reported outcomes were as assessed at the time of the last follow-up, unless otherwise stated. RESULTS The preservation of preoperative Class A hearing status was achieved in 14.3% of MS cases compared with 42.9% of SRS cases (OR 4.5; p < 0.05) after an average follow-up interval of 43.7 months and 30.3 months, respectively. Serviceable hearing was preserved in 42.8% of MS cases compared with 85.7% of SRS cases (OR 8.0; p < 0.01). The rates of postoperative CN VII dysfunction were low for both groups, although significantly higher in the MS group (HB III-IV 11% vs 0% for SRS; OR 21.3; p < 0.01) at a median follow-up interval of 35.7 and 19.0 months for MS and SRS, respectively. There was no difference in the need for subsequent intervention (2 MS patients and 2 SRS patients). CONCLUSIONS At this high-volume center, VS resection or radiosurgery for tumors