Faculty Bibliography

PURPOSE/OBJECTIVE:To compare patellar instability with magnetic resonance imaging analysis using continuous real-time radial gradient-echo (GRE) imaging in the assessment of symptomatic patients and asymptomatic subjects. METHODS:Symptomatic patients with suspected patellofemoral maltracking and asymptomatic volunteers were scanned in real time by a radial 2-dimensional GRE sequence at 3 T in axial orientation at the patella level through a range of flexion-extension. The degree of lateral maltracking, as well as the associated tibial tubercle-trochlear groove distance and trochlea depth, was measured. Patellar lateralization was categorized as normal (≤2 mm), mild (>2 to ≤5 mm), moderate (>5 to ≤10 mm), or severe (>10 mm). The patellofemoral cartilage was also assessed according to the modified Outerbridge grading system. RESULTS:The study included 20 symptomatic patients (13 women and 7 men; mean age, 36 ± 12.8 years) and 10 asymptomatic subjects (3 women and 7 men; mean age, 33.1 years). The mean time to perform the dynamic component ranged from 3 to 7 minutes. Lateralization in the symptomatic group was normal in 10 patients, mild in 1, moderate in 8, and severe in 1. There was no lateral tracking greater than 3 mm in the volunteer group. Lateral maltracking was significantly higher in symptomatic patients than in asymptomatic subjects (4.4 ± 3.7 mm vs 1.5 ± 0.71 mm, P = .007). Lateral tracking significantly correlated with tibial tubercle-trochlear groove distance (r = 0.48, P = .006). There was excellent agreement on lateral tracking between the 2 reviewers (intraclass correlation coefficient, 0.979; 95% confidence interval, 0.956-0.990). CONCLUSIONS:The inclusion of a dynamic radial 2-dimensional GRE sequence is a rapid and easily performed addition to the standard magnetic resonance imaging protocol and allows dynamic quantitative assessment of patellar instability and lateral maltracking in symptomatic patients. With a paucity of reported data using this technique confirming that these results reach clinical significance, future work is required to determine how much lateral tracking is clinically significant. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE/METHODS:Level III, case control.

It was an honor to be selected to participate in the 2017 Arthroscopy Association of North America Advanced Arthroscopy Traveling Fellowship. This year's group included Michael J. Alaia, M.D., Assistant Professor and Associate Sports Medicine Fellowship Director at NYU Hospital for Joint Diseases; Nathan K. Endres, M.D., Associate Professor at the University of Vermont; LCDR Patrick W. Joyner, M.D., Assistant Professor at Naval Medical Center Portsmouth, and Head Physician East Coast Navy Seals; and LTC Christopher J. Tucker, M.D., Assistant Professor at the Uniformed Services University and Chief of Sports Service at Fort Belvoir Community Hospital. This year, we were honored to have a true pioneer in sports medicine and arthroscopic surgery, Dr. Jack M. Bert, Past President of Arthroscopy Association of North America and Adjunct Clinical Professor at the University of Minnesota, serve as our Godfather.

Over recent years, appreciation for the critical role of the meniscus in joint biomechanics has led to an emphasis on meniscal preservation. Meniscal allograft transplant (MAT) is a promising biological solution for the symptomatic young patient with a meniscus-deficient knee that has not developed advanced osteoarthritis. As surgical techniques are refined and outcomes continue to improve, it is vital to consider the utility of such procedures and offer a straightforward approach to MAT. This article and accompanying video provide a step-by-step tutorial on how to perform a MAT using the bridge and slot technique, its key pearls and pitfalls as well as the relevant advantages and disadvantages of MAT.

The posteromedial corner of the knee encompasses five medial structures posterior to the medial collateral ligament. With modern MRI systems, these structures are readily identified and can be appreciated in the context of multiligamentous knee injuries. It is recognized that anteromedial rotatory instability results from an injury that involves both the medial collateral ligament and the posterior oblique ligament. Like posterolateral corner injuries, untreated or concurrent posteromedial corner injuries resulting in rotatory instability place additional strain on anterior and posterior cruciate ligament reconstructions, which can ultimately contribute to graft failure and poor clinical outcomes. Various options exist for posteromedial corner reconstruction, with early results indicating that anatomic reconstruction can restore valgus stability and improve patient function. A thorough understanding of the anatomy, physical examination findings, and imaging characteristics will aid the physician in the management of these injuries.

PURPOSE: Injury to the anterolateral ligament (ALL) of the knee has recently received attention as a potential risk factor for failure of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. However, evaluation of the anterolateral ligament is currently difficult, and radiologic data are sparse with regard to the normal appearance of this ligament. The purpose of the present study was to determine whether the ALL could be identified and visualized using ultrasonography. METHODS: Ten non-paired, fresh-frozen cadaveric knees underwent ultrasound by an experienced musculoskeletal radiologist using a Siemens S2000 Acuson Ultrasound machine with a 14-MHz linear transducer. After first identifying anatomical landmarks by palpation, a thin band of tissue originating in the vicinity of the fibular collateral ligament (FCL) origin was identified and followed up distally. The tibia was held at 30 degrees of flexion and internally rotated to verify tightening of the structure. Under ultrasound guidance, 25-gauge hypodermic needles were placed at what were sonographically determined to be the origin and insertion points of the ligament. One-tenth of a CC of aniline blue dye was injected. The specimens were then dissected to confirm the presence and location of the ALL. If an ALL was found, distances between the epicentre of the injected dye and the actual origin and insertion points were calculated. Additionally, ligament length based on dissection images and ultrasound images was calculated. RESULTS: Eight of ten specimens had an anterolateral structure that originated from the lateral femoral epicondyle just posterior and superior to the origin of the FCL and inserted on the lateral plateau approximately halfway between Gerdy's tubercle and the fibular head. The average length based on ultrasound was 3.8 cm (+/-.7; range 3.1-4.7) and 4.1 cm (+/-1.1; range 2.6-6.1) based on dissection. Length based on dissection and ultrasound had minimal agreement (ICC = .308; 95 % confidence interval .257-.382, p = .265). The average width of the structure on dissection was .8 cm (+/-.24; range .5-1.2). The mean distance from ultrasound-determined origin and insertion points to anatomical origin and insertion based on dissection was 10.9 mm (+/-2.9, range 7.0-15.8) and 12.5 mm (+/-5.7 range 3.2-19.3), respectively. Inter-observer reliability was excellent for all measurements based on dissection and ultrasound. CONCLUSION: Ultrasound was unable to reliably identify the anterolateral structure from its femoral to tibial attachment sites. Distinguishing it from the posterior IT band and anterolateral capsule was challenging, and it is possible that the structure is a thickened band of fascia rather than a true ligament. As a clinical diagnostic tool, ultrasound likely offers little utility in the evaluation of the ALL for injury. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV.

Objectives: Continuous gradient-echo (GRE) acquisition or "dynamic magnetic resonance imaging", allows for high-speed examination of pathologies based on joint motion. We sought to assess the efficacy of a radial GRE sequence with in the characterization of patellofemoral maltracking. Methods: Patients with suspected patellofemoral maltracking and asymptomatic volunteers were scanned using GRE (Siemens LiveView WIP; Malvern, PA, USA) at 3T in the axial plane at the patella level through a range of flexion-extension (0-30degree). The mean time to perform the dynamic component ranged from 3-7 mins. Lateral maltracking (amount patella moved laterally through knee ranging) was measured. Patella lateralization was categorized as normal (<= 2mm), mild (2-5mm), moderate (5-10mm), or severe (>10mm). Tibial tuberosity: trochlear groove (TT: TG) distance, trochlea depth, Insall-Salvati ratio, and patellofemoral cartilage quality (according to the modified Outerbridge grading system) were also assessed. Results: Eighteen symptomatic (6 men; 12 women, age range 14-51 years) and 10 asymptomatic subjects (6 men; 4 women, age range 25-68 years) were included. Two symptomatic patients underwent bilateral examinations. Lateralization in the symptomatic group was normal (n=10), mild (n=2), moderate (n=5) and severe (n=3). There was no abnormal maltracking in the volunteer group. Lateral tracking significantly correlated with TT: TG distance (F=38.0; p<.0001), trochlea depth (F=5.8; p=.023), Insall-Salvati ratio (F=4.642; p=.04) and Outerbridge Patella score (F=6.6; p=.016). Lateral tracking did not correlate with Outerbridge Trochlear score. Conclusion: Lateral tracking measured on GRE was found to significantly correlate with current measures of patellar instability including, TT: TG, trochlea depth, and the Insall-Salvati ratio. GRE is a rapid and easily performed addition to the standard protocol for kinematic patellofemoral motion and can add dynamic information on patellofemoral tracking. This may be help determine if an isolated MPFL or an MPFL reconstruction and tibial tubercle osteotomy is needed to treat patella instability

Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injuries are among the most commonly studied orthopaedic injuries. Despite having an excellent prognosis, complications do occur. The timely recognition and management of complications is imperative to ensure the success of reconstruction. Avoiding such complications requires thorough preoperative planning, proficient technical skills to properly manage intraoperative complications, and an extensive knowledge of possible postoperative complications.

PURPOSE: Traditionally, biceps tenotomy has been recommended for obese, older, and less active patient populations, while tenodesis is preferred in younger, thinner, and more active individuals. In an effort to better understand the impact obesity has on the surgical management of long head of the biceps tendinopathy, the current study analyzed the effect body mass index had on surgical outcomes following open subpectoralis major biceps tenodesis. METHODS: Patients who underwent biceps tenodesis between June 2006 and December 2013 were identified from our institution's surgical database. They were then contacted to assess their functional outcomes using validated outcome measures. Comparisons were made between the outcomes seen in obese patients (BMI >/= 30) and non-obese patients (BMI < 30) with subgroup analyses looking at gender, age, and length of follow-up. RESULTS: One hundred and twenty-two patients completed a follow-up assessment with a mean follow-up of 29.3 months. The non-obese cohort was composed of 84 patients with a mean BMI of 25.8. The obese cohort was composed of 38 patients with a mean BMI of 33.4. No significant difference was noted to be present with respect to postoperative outcome measures. Regression analysis with BMI as an independent variable demonstrated poor correlation with outcome measures. CONCLUSIONS: The results of the current study support open subpectoralis biceps tenodesis as an acceptable option for the treatment of LHB pathology irrespective of the treated patient's body mass index. Both obese and non-obese patients demonstrated low postoperative DASH scores and high Oxford Shoulder scores.

BACKGROUND: Patellar tendon rupture is rare in the general population. Typically, failure occurs proximally or at the mid-substance. Distal avulsion from the tibial tubercle in adults is rare and not well described in the orthopedic literature. METHODS: We present the largest series of patients with distal patellar tendon injury with associated multi-ligamentous disruption of the knee. A series of six patients with distal patellar tendon avulsion were identified at a single institution. The cases were reviewed and are presented. RESULTS: Each case of distal patellar tendon rupture was associated with high-energy trauma to the knee. There was multi-ligamentous disruption in all cases, associated tibial plateau fracture in one case, and a compartment syndrome diagnosed in another. We propose that distal patellar tendon avulsion is a distinct pathology of the extensor mechanism in healthy adults. When present, it should prompt clinicians to assess patients for occult knee dislocation, monitor their neurovascular status, and obtain an MRI to evaluate for associated multi-ligamentous injury. CONCLUSION: We propose a modification to the Schenk classification to include extensor mechanism injury to help guide steps of operative intervention.

Purpose: Quantification of tendon retraction is paramount in the surgical decision-making algorithm for proximal hamstring avulsion injury. Not only is it used to determine if surgery is indicated, but it may lead the surgeon to change the pre-operative plan from a more aesthetically-appealing gluteal fold incision to a more extensile, longitudinally-based proximal thigh incision. However, the hamstring origin on the ischial tuberosity is broad. Variability in location on the ischial tuberosity used as the proximal landmark and occasional difficulty in locating the proximal tendon stump may lead to differences in perceived retraction, altering the surgical decision making process. We hypothesize there will be substantial variability in the ischial tuberosity location used as the proximal marker, not only between orthopaedists and radiologists, but also amongst radiologists themselves. Materials and Methods: Two surveys were created for the purpose of this study. One survey was sent to members of the Society of Skeletal Radiology (SSR), querying the preferred ischial tuberosity landmark, perceived difficulties in quantifying retraction, and the impact of radiology measurements on clinical decision making. A similar survey, with added questions on the impact of imaging findings in clinical management was approved and posted onto the American Orthopaedic Society for Sports Medicine (AOSSM) website. Results: Two hundred and fifteen SSR members responded to the survey. For cases of complete and partial hamstring avulsion, there was variability among musculoskeletal (MSK) radiologists in the proximal landmark used for quantification of retraction, with n = 100 (47%) using the conjoint tendon origin, n = 84 (39%) using the semimembranosus tendon origin, and n = 31(14%) using the posterior-inferior edge of the ischial tuberosity. Difficulty in determining location of the retracted tendon stump was reported by n = 93(44%) of MSK radiologists. Most MSK radiologists (n = 118, 55%) reported measurements in their dictation and were unsure as to whether or not they are used to guide clinical management. Results of the second survey posted by AOSSM will be subsequently reported when available. Conclusion: Differences in choosing an ischial tuberosity landmark and occasional difficulty in locating the proximal tendon stump may lead to substantial variability in measured tendon retraction among MSK radiologists in cases of proximal hamstring avulsion. Radiologists should consider a standardized approach to measuring tendon retraction or should clearly stipulate the location of the proximal landmark in their reports