Faculty Bibliography

BACKGROUND: Atypical hemolytic uremic syndrome (aHUS) is a rare disease with a high recurrence rate after kidney transplantation. In most cases, aHUS are caused by genetic mutations of components of the complement alternative pathway. In this single-center series, we present our data of 12 consecutive patients with aHUS and the outcome after kidney transplantation. METHODS: In this 10-year retrospective study, we identified 12 patients with aHUS who were managed in our center since 2003. We reviewed clinical data, including genetic testing, posttransplant course and response to therapy including the prophylactic use of eculizumab. RESULTS: Overall, eight patients are women. Six of our patients have at least one genetic mutation causing aHUS, including 4 with complement factor H mutations. Nine patients had at least one previous kidney transplant that failed secondary to recurrent aHUS (75% of our patients). Three patients were treated with eculizumab and plasmapheresis for recurrent aHUS after kidney transplantation; two of them responded to the therapy. Four patients received prophylactic eculizumab; three of them received 6 months and one has been on life long therapy. No signs of recurrence have been observed in these 4 patients so far. CONCLUSION: Genetic mutations of the complement alternative pathway were confirmed in half of our patients, most of those mutations are in CHF. We demonstrate that treatment or prophylaxis with eculizumab was effective in reversing or preventing aHUS whether or not genetic complement mutations were identified.

BACKGROUND: Incompatible live donor kidney transplantation is associated with an increased rate of antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) and subsequent transplant glomerulopathy. For patients with severe, oliguric AMR, graft loss is inevitable without timely intervention. METHODS: We reviewed our experience rescuing kidney allografts with this severe AMR phenotype by using splenectomy alone (n=14), eculizumab alone (n=5), or splenectomy plus eculizumab (n=5), in addition to plasmapheresis. RESULTS: The study population was 267 consecutive patients with donor-specific antibody undergoing desensitization. In the first 3 weeks after transplantation (median=6 days), 24 patients developed sudden onset oliguria and rapidly rising serum creatinine with marked rebound of donor-specific antibody, and a biopsy that showed features of AMR. At a median follow-up of 533 days, 4 of 14 splenectomy-alone patients experienced graft loss (median=320 days), compared to four of five eculizumab-alone patients with graft failure (median=95 days). No patients treated with splenectomy plus eculizumab experienced graft loss. There was more chronic glomerulopathy in the splenectomy-alone and eculizumab-alone groups at 1 year, whereas splenectomy plus eculizumab patients had almost no transplant glomerulopathy. CONCLUSION: These data suggest that for patients manifesting early severe AMR, splenectomy plus eculizumab may provide an effective intervention for rescuing and preserving allograft function.

Current methods to remove donor-specific HLA antibody (DSA) from sensitized patients remain imperfect. We tested novel approaches to desensitization using an animal model of allogeneic sensitization with skin grafts from dark agouti (DA) to Lewis rats. At the peak IgG alloantibody response we transplanted DA kidneys into nephrectomized Lewis recipients (n = 6) and all died within 10 days from antibody-mediated rejection (AMR). Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplants (HSCT) from DA donors failed to engraft after lethal or sub-lethal irradiation. Sensitized rats given lethal irradiation plus syngeneic green fluorescent protein (GFP) + HSCT had repopulation of blood, spleen, thymus and lymph nodes by GFP+ cells. At 2 months after HSCT, serum DSA levels were reduced 60-70% and DSA (IgG) production in cultured splenocytes was also significantly decreased. However, there was only a modest improvement in graft survival from an average of 6.5 to 13.9 (n = 9) days. Adding seven daily doses of fludarabine to the preconditioning regimen resulted in long-term survival (>90 days) in 7 out of 10 rat kidney allografts. We conclude that syngeneic HSCT performed after preconditioning with irradiation and fludarabine can reduce DSA, prevent DSA rebound and AMR, enabling successful transplantation in animals with strong antibody reactivity to the donor MHC.

BACKGROUND: Bortezomib has been used to reduce HLA antibody in patients either before transplantation or as treatment for antibody-mediated rejection (AMR). Reports on its efficacy show mixed results. The mechanism of action of this agent is via proteasome inhibition. The primary route of synthesis of HLA class I molecules is dependent on peptide generation by the proteasome, whereas that of class II is not. We observed a differential effect of bortezomib on class I versus class II antibody and hypothesized that this was related to a reduced expression of class I HLA antigens. METHODS: The effect of bortezomib on HLA antibody levels was evaluated in 13 patients who were desensitized for incompatible renal transplantation. We calculated the percent difference in HLA antibody level before and after bortezomib treatment and the impact of bortezomib on HLA expression in lymphocytes of healthy control subjects. RESULTS: On average, the level of HLA class I donor-specific antibody (DSA) decreased by 32%, whereas that of class II DSA increased by 29%. In vitro bortezomib treatment of lymphocytes resulted in a mean decrease of 23% in MHC class I expression on B lymphocytes and no change (+1.08%) in MHC class II expression (P=0.0003). The amount of intracellular class I molecules was reduced by a mean of 29% with bortezomib. CONCLUSION: These data indicate that bortezomib reduces HLA class I antibody more effectively than class II antibody. This difference may be due to the reduced expression of class I molecules resulting from treatment with this proteasome inhibitor.

The impact of kidney donation on the ability to change or initiate health or life insurance following donation is unknown. To quantify this risk, we surveyed 1046 individuals who donated a kidney at our center between 1970 and 2011. Participants were asked whether they changed or initiated health or life insurance after donation, and if they had any difficulty doing so. Among 395 donors who changed or initiated health insurance after donation, 27 (7%) reported difficulty; among those who reported difficulty, 15 were denied altogether, 12 were charged a higher premium and 8 were told they had a preexisting condition because they were kidney donors. Among 186 donors who changed or initiated life insurance after donation, 46 (25%) reported difficulty; among those who reported difficulty, 23 were denied altogether, 27 were charged a higher premium and 17 were told they had a preexisting condition because they were kidney donors. In this single-center study, a high proportion of kidney donors reported difficulty changing or initiating insurance, particularly life insurance. These practices by insurers create unnecessary burden and stress for those choosing to donate and could negatively impact the likelihood of live kidney donation among those considering donation.