Faculty Bibliography

INTRODUCTION/BACKGROUND:Online resources have become a major source of medical information for the general public. To date, there has not been an assessment of patient-oriented online resources for face and upper extremity transplantation candidates and patients. The goal of this study is to perform a comprehensive assessment of these resources. METHODS:Our analysis relied on 2 dimensions: comprehensiveness and readability. Comprehensiveness was evaluated using 14 predetermined variables. Readability was evaluated using 8 different readability scales through the Readability Studio Professional Edition Software (Oleander Software, Ltd, Vandalia, Ohio). Data were also collected from solid organ transplantation (SOT), specifically kidney and liver, programs for comparison. RESULTS:Face and upper extremity transplantation programs were significantly more likely to list exclusion criteria (73.9% vs 41.2%; P = 0.02), the need for life-long immunosuppression (87.0% vs 58.8%; P = 0.02), and benefits of transplantation (91.3% vs 61.8%; P = 0.01) compared with SOT programs. The average readability level of online resources by all face and upper extremity transplantation programs exceeded the sixth grade reading level recommended by the National Institutes of Health and the American Medical Association. The average reading grade level of online resources by these programs was also significantly higher than those of SOT with both exceeding the recommended reading level (13.95 ± 1.55 vs 12.60 ± 1.65; P = 0.003). CONCLUSIONS:Future efforts in face and upper extremity transplantation should be directed toward developing standardized, comprehensive, and intelligible resources with high-quality content and simple language.

INTRODUCTION/BACKGROUND:Orthognathic surgery plays an important role in restoring aesthetic facial contour, correcting dental malocclusion, and the surgical treatment of obstructive sleep apnea. However, the rate of complications following bimaxillary as compared with single-jaw orthognathic surgery remains unclear. The authors therefore sought to evaluate complication rates following bimaxillary as compared with single-jaw orthognathic surgery MATERIALS AND METHODS:: The American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database was used to identify comparison groups. Preoperative characteristics and postoperative outcomes were compared between groups. The listed procedures have different operating times and characteristics with longer time expected in the bimaxillary osteotomies group. Regression analyses were performed to control for potential confounders. RESULTS:The 3 groups of interest included patients who underwent mandibular osteotomies (n = 126), LeFort I osteotomy (n = 194), and bimaxillary osteotomies (n = 190). These procedures have different operating times, with a longer time expected with bimaxillary osteotomies. Patients undergoing bimaxillary osteotomies had significantly higher rates of early wound complications, overall complications, longer mean operative time, and mean hospital length of stay. Performing bimaxillary osteotomies in the outpatient setting was an independent risk factor for wound complications (OR = 12.58; 95% CI: 1.66-95.20; P = 0.01), while an ASA class of 3 or more was an independent risk factor for overall complications (OR = 3.61; 95% CI: 1.02-12.75; P = 0.04) and longer hospital length of stay (β = 4.96; 95% CI: 2.64 - 7.29; P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS:Surgery in the outpatient setting as well as patient American Society of Anesthesiology physical status class 3 or higher were independent factors for postoperative adverse events in patients undergoing bimaxillary surgery. Our findings highlight the importance of addressing modifiable risk factors preoperatively and the need for closer postoperative monitoring in this patient population for optimal outcomes.

PURPOSE/OBJECTIVE:To highlight the challenges and lessons learned in tooth-bearing maxillomandibular facial allotransplantation. PATIENTS AND METHODS/METHODS:Two patients with ballistic composite facial injury underwent tooth-bearing maxillomandibular facial transplantation (FT) after informed consent and institutional review board approval. Patient 1 had undergone total face, double jaw, teeth, and tongue transplantation in March 2012. Patient 2 had undergone partial face, double jaw, and teeth transplantation in January 2018. Le Fort III and bilateral sagittal split skeletal osteotomies were performed in both transplants. Computerized surgical planning was used in both cases, and the allografts were transferred in intermaxillary fixation (IMF) with prefabricated dental splints before rigid skeletal fixation. RESULTS:Normal class I occlusion was achieved at the conclusion of each surgery. Patient 1 had developed a 2 × 2-mm palatal fistula in the early postoperative period and had also gradually developed class III malocclusion. Orthodontic treatment was started at 5 months after transplantation but failed. A Le Fort III advancement was performed 1 month later with successful restoration of class I occlusion. The palatal fistula was successfully repaired at 9 postoperative months. Patient 2 developed a postoperative palate and floor of mouth dehiscence, requiring palatal repair and hyoid and genioglossus advancement on postoperative day (POD) 11. Orthodontic treatment was initiated for Class II malocclusion. On POD 108, left mandibular nonunion was diagnosed. Left coronoidectomy, open reduction, and internal fixation were performed. IMF was maintained for 2 weeks. Orthodontic treatment was then resumed, with normalization of the occlusion by 10 months after FT. CONCLUSIONS:Maxillomandibular transplantation is a viable reconstructive solution for composite midface defects not amenable to autologous reconstruction. Improvement of functional outcomes and prevention of major complications rely on close attention to occlusal relationships, temporomandibular joint dynamics, dental health, and the intraoral donor-recipient soft tissue interface.

Facial transplant (FT) is a viable option for patients with severe craniomaxillofacial deformities. Transplant imaging requires coordination between radiologists and surgeons and an understanding of the merits and limitations of imaging modalities. Digital subtraction angiography and CT angiography are critical to mapping vascular anatomy, while volume-rendered CT allows evaluation of osseous defects and landmarks used for surgical cutting guides. This article highlights the components of successful FT imaging at two institutions and in two index cases. A deliberate stepwise approach to performance and interpretation of preoperative FT imaging, which consists of the modalities and protocols described here, is essential to seamless integration of the multidisciplinary FT team. ^©RSNA, 2019 See discussion on this article by Lincoln .

Since 2005, facial transplantation has emerged as a viable reconstructive option for the most severe defects not amenable to conventional reconstructive techniques, with promising aesthetic and functional outcomes to date. Key facial subunits and midface structures such as the eyelids, lips, and nose are now able to be successfully replaced rather than reconstructed, enabling adequate functional outcomes in even the most extensive defects. However, even in cases of severe facial disfigurement, the decision to proceed with transplantation versus autologous reconstruction remains a source of debate, with no current consensus regarding precise indications and inclusion/exclusion criteria. This report details the case of a candidate referred for face transplantation who ultimately underwent autologous facial reconstruction. Through this representative case, our objective is to clarify the criteria that make a patient a suitable face transplant candidate, as well as to demonstrate the outcomes achievable with a conventional autologous reconstruction, using a methodically planned, multistaged approach.

Purpose Facial transplantation involves partial or total replacement of neuromuscular and skeletal structures of the face, head, and neck using donor tissues and is among the most extensive facial reconstructive procedures. This case report compares changes in speech production and articulator movement in a 44-year-old man from pretransplant to a 13-month posttransplant period. Method Speech production and articulator movement data were examined at 5 time points, once pretransplant and 4 times posttransplant (4, 7, 10, and 13 months), and compared to 4 healthy controls. A motion capture system was used to track jaw and vertical/horizontal lip movement during nonspeech and speech tasks. Speech intelligibility, jaw displacement, lip aperture, and movement variability were measured. Results Speech intelligibility varied across the study period and was restored to control status by 7 months posttransplant. Jaw displacement and lip aperture in the vertical plane significantly increased over time for nonspeech and speech tasks. Changes in horizontal lip movements over time were minimal. Jaw and lip movement variability fluctuated over time and was greater than the controls by 13 months posttransplant. Discussion Findings quantify changes in articulator movement and contributions to improved speech production following facial transplant. Changes reflect the adaptability of the speech motor system and are discussed in relation to pretransplant speech motor control patterns.

BACKGROUND:Autologous bone grafts remain a standard of care for the reconstruction of large bony defects, but limitations persist. The authors explored the bone regenerative capacity of customized, three-dimensionally printed bioactive ceramic scaffolds with dipyridamole, an adenosine A2A receptor indirect agonist known to enhance bone formation. METHODS:Critical-size bony defects (10-mm height, 10-mm length, full-thickness) were created at the mandibular rami of rabbits (n = 15). Defects were replaced by a custom-to-defect, three-dimensionally printed bioactive ceramic scaffold composed of β-tricalcium phosphate. Scaffolds were uncoated (control), collagen-coated, or immersed in 100 μM dipyridamole. At 8 weeks, animals were euthanized and the rami retrieved. Bone growth was assessed exclusively within scaffold pores, and evaluated by micro-computed tomography/advanced reconstruction software. Micro-computed tomographic quantification was calculated. Nondecalcified histology was performed. A general linear mixed model was performed to compare group means and 95 percent confidence intervals. RESULTS:Qualitative analysis did not show an inflammatory response. The control and collagen groups (12.3 ± 8.3 percent and 6.9 ± 8.3 percent bone occupancy of free space, respectively) had less bone growth, whereas the most bone growth was in the dipyridamole group (26.9 ± 10.7 percent); the difference was statistically significant (dipyridamole versus control, p < 0.03; dipyridamole versus collagen, p < 0.01 ). There was significantly more residual scaffold material for the collagen group relative to the dipyridamole group (p < 0.015), whereas the control group presented intermediate values (nonsignificant relative to both collagen and dipyridamole). Highly cellular and vascularized intramembranous-like bone healing was observed in all groups. CONCLUSION:Dipyridamole significantly increased the three-dimensionally printed bioactive ceramic scaffold's ability to regenerate bone in a thin bone defect environment.

Traumatic optic neuropathy (TON) is rare. The heterogeneity of injury patterns and patient condition on presentation makes diagnosis difficult. Fracture patterns associated with TON have never been evaluated. Retrospective review of 42 patients diagnosed with TON at the R. Adams Cowley Shock Trauma Center from May 1998 to August 2010 was performed. Thirty-three patients met criteria for study inclusion of fracture patterns. Additional variables measured included patient demographics and mechanism. Cluster analysis was used to form homogenous groups of patients based on different fracture patterns. Fracture frequency was analyzed by group and study population. Visual depiction of fracture patterns was created for each group. Cluster analysis of fracture patterns yielded five common "groups" or fracture patterns among the study population. Group 1 ( n  = 3, 9%) revealed contralateral lateral orbital wall (100%), zygoma (67%), and nasal bone (67%) fractures. Group 2 ( n  = 7, 21%) demonstrated fractures of the frontal bone (86%), nasal bones (71%), and ipsilateral orbital roof (57%). Group 3 ( n  = 14, 43%) involved fractures of the ipsilateral zygoma (100%), lateral orbital wall (29%), as well as frontal and nasal bones (21% each). Group 4 ( n  = 5, 15%) consisted of mid- and upper-face fractures; 100% fractured the ipsilateral orbital floor, medial and lateral walls, maxilla, and zygoma; 80% fractured the orbital roof and bilateral zygoma. Group 5 ( n  = 4, 12%) was characterized by fractures of the ipsilateral orbital floor, medial and lateral orbital walls (75% each), and orbital roof (50%). A notably high 15 of 33 patients (45%) sustained penetrating trauma. Our study demonstrates five fracture pattern groups associated with TON. Zygomatic, frontal, nasal, and orbital fractures were the most common. Fractures with a combination of frontal, nasal, and orbital fractures are particularly concerning and warrant close attention to the eye.