Faculty Bibliography

BACKGROUND:Platelet-rich plasma (PRP) shows promise as an androgenetic alopecia (AGA) treatment. OBJECTIVE:Conduct a randomized placebo-controlled split-scalp study to investigate PRP's effects on hair regrowth and thickness. METHODS:35 study participants with AGA had two 7.6-centimeter x 7.6-centimeter squares tattooed on their scalps. Areas were randomly assigned to intradermal injection with PRP or saline. Subjects underwent three monthly treatment sessions with evaluation three months after final treatment. RESULTS:(p < 0.05). There was no significant difference in hair density change between the two groups (p > 0.05). No serious adverse events were reported. LIMITATIONS/CONCLUSIONS:Possible PRP diffusion due to split-scalp study design as well as microinjections causing micro-injury to both sides. CONCLUSION/CONCLUSIONS:PRP may have benefit in increasing hair density.

Alopecia areata (AA) is a common autoimmune skin disease resulting in the loss of hair on the scalp and elsewhere on the body that affects over 146 million people worldwide at some point in their lives. Founded in 1981, the National AA Foundation (NAAF) is a nonprofit organization that supports research to find a cure or acceptable treatment for AA, supports those with the disease, and educates the public about AA. NAAF conducts research summits every two years to review progress and create new directions in its funded and promoted research. This report from the seventh AA Research Summit, Forging the Future, held December 4-5, 2018 in New York City provides highlights of the research presented and future research priorities identified during targeted discussion sessions.

BACKGROUND:Topical minoxidil is the only US FDA-approved drug for the treatment of female pattern hair loss (FPHL). While the safety profile of topical minoxidil is excellent, the efficacy of minoxidil in hair growth is extremely low. A recent survey of 8000 people observed that only 4% of hair loss patients using an over-the-counter minoxidil were very satisfied with their results. In contrast, in clinical studies with an intervening physician, approximately 30%-40% of patients demonstrate an appreciable benefit. Compliance with topical drug regimens is often a major obstacle, limiting their effectiveness. Topical minoxidil leaves a greasy residue on the hair, which is especially problematic for women who do not wash their hair daily. AIMS/OBJECTIVE:We set out to develop an "After Minoxidil" companion spray to minoxidil that removes residual minoxidil from the hair, where it is not needed, yet leaves minoxidil on the scalp where it is required. We hypothesized that improving the cosmetic properties of minoxidil would improve patient compliance with the drug and subsequently improve clinical outcomes. METHODS:A cohort of 20 FPHL patients was recruited to use the novel "After Minoxidil" spray and report changes in hair quality on a Likert scale. RESULTS:In our cohort of FPHL patients, the novel "After Minoxidil" spray restored ease of styling and reduced greasiness to preminoxidil level in 65% and 85% of subjects, respectively. The average reduction in perceived greasiness was 78%. Importantly, 70% of subjects interviewed stated they would likely continue to use the minoxidil and "After Minoxidil" treatment regimen for 6 months, vs 0% willing to use minoxidil alone. CONCLUSION/CONCLUSIONS:The novel "After Minoxidil" spray improved ease of hair styling and reduced greasiness following application of topical minoxidil; thus, the novel "After Minoxidil" spray may help improve drug compliance and efficacy.

BACKGROUND:A systematic review failed to identify any systemic therapy used in alopecia areata (AA) where use is supported by robust evidence from high quality randomized controlled trials (RCTs). OBJECTIVE:To produce an international consensus statement on the use and utility of various treatments for AA. METHODS:Fifty hair experts from 5 continents were invited to participate in a 3 round Delphi process. Agreement >66% was considered consensus. RESULTS:In the first round, consensus was achieved in 22 of 423 (5%) questions. Following a face-to-face meeting in round 3, overall, consensus was achieved for only 130 (33%) treatment specific questions. There was greater consensus for intralesional treatment of AA 19 (68%) followed by topical treatment 25 (43%). Consensus was achieved in 45 (36%) questions pertaining to systemic therapies in AA. The categories with the least consensus were phototherapy and non-prescription therapies. LIMITATIONS/CONCLUSIONS:The study included a comprehensive list of systemic treatments for AA, but not all treatments used. CONCLUSION/CONCLUSIONS:Despite divergent opinions amongst experts, consensus was achieved on a number of pertinent questions. The concluding statement also highlights areas where expert consensus is lacking and where an international patient registry could enable further research.

A preliminary observation of high frequency of male pattern hair loss among admitted COVID-19 patients and suggest that androgen expression might be a clue to COVID-19 severity.

Racial disparities in COVID-19 infection rates and disease severity are due to a multifactorial etiology that can include socioeconomic as well as other factors. Nevertheless, genetic factors in different ethnic groups often contribute to disease severity and treatment response. In particular, the frequency of genetic variations in the androgen receptor differs by ethnicity and gender. For example, the increased prevalence of prostate cancer and androgenetic alopecia among African Americans correlates with the frequency of these variants. In this communication, we propose that androgens may be implicated in COVID-19 disease severity. As such, special attention may need to be given to African Americans infected by the SARS-CoV-2 virus. Finally, if a link to genetic variations in the androgen receptor and COVID-19 disease severity can be established, it would suggest new treatment options.