Faculty Bibliography

OBJECTIVE: To compare the fixation stability of intramedullary nails to that of locked plates for the treatment of distal metaphyseal tibia and fibula fractures. METHODS: A simulated, distal metaphyseal tibia fracture was created in 8 pairs of cadaveric tibia-fibula specimens. One of each pair was treated using an intramedullary nail (Trigen IM Nail System; SN Richards, Memphis, TN) and the other with a locked plate (Peri-Loc Periarticular Locked Plating System; SN Richards). Each specimen was vertically loaded to 250 N in central, anterior, posterior, medial, and lateral locations; loaded to 250 N in cantilever bending in anterior to posterior and posterior to anterior directions; and loaded to 250 N mm in torsion. Load-displacement curves were generated to determine the construct stiffness for each loading scenario, with comparisons made between the 2 treatment groups. Each specimen was then cyclically loaded with 750 N vertical loads applied for 10, 100, 1000, and 10,000 cycles. Measurements of fracture displacements were made and compared between treatment groups. A fibular osteotomy was then created in each specimen at the same level as the tibia fracture to simulate a same-level tibia-fibular fracture. Torsional stiffness assessment and cyclic vertical loading for 10, 100, 1000, and 10,000 cycles were repeated and fracture displacement measurements were again obtained. RESULTS: The locked plate construct was stiffer than the intramedullary nail construct for central, anterior, and posterior loading scenarios (P < 0.005, P < 0.03, and P < 0.02, respectively). The intramedullary nail construct was stiffer than the locked plate construct for both anterior to posterior and posterior to anterior cantilever bending (P < 0.03 and P < 0.02, respectively). No statistically significant difference in stiffness was noted between treatment groups for medial and lateral vertical loading or for torsional loading (P = 0.09, P = 0.32, and P = 0.84, respectively). There was no significant difference between treatment groups with respect to fracture displacement after cyclic vertical loading. After creation of the fibular osteotomy fracture, construct displacements after 1000 and 10,000 cycles significantly increased and torsional stiffness significantly decreased for both treatment groups. The locked plate constructs had significantly less displacement after cyclic loading of 1000 and 10,000 than the locked nail constructs (P < 0.001 and P < 0.0001, respectively). Locked plate constructs were stiffer in torsion after osteotomy than the intramedullary nail constructs (P < 0.05). CONCLUSION: This study demonstrated that, in the treatment of distal metaphyseal tibia fractures, locked plates provided more stable fixation than intramedullary nails in vertical loading but were less effective in cantilever bending. An intact fibula in the presence of a distal tibia fracture improved the fracture fixation stability for both treatment methods. In fracture patterns in which the fibula cannot be effectively stabilized, locked plates offer improved mechanical stability when compared with locked intramedullary nails

Gaucher disease is a rare, hereditary disease caused by lack of a lysosomal enzyme. This results in the accumulation of glucocerebroside in the cells of the reticuloendothelial system, including the bone marrow. The orthopaedic manifestations of this disease are important for the orthopaedic surgeon to recognize and understand. Patients with Gaucher disease are at risk for pathologic fracture, abnormal bony remodeling and delayed healing, increased intraoperative bleeding, and infection. Osteomyelitis and avascular necrosis, two common sequelae of the disease, can present in very similar fashions and warrant careful and accurate diagnosis to ensure proper treatment. The impact of Gaucher disease on the musculoskeletal system is reviewed with emphasis on the importance of understanding these effects for the treating orthopaedic surgeon.

Fracture-dislocation of the elbow is a signiicant injury with mixed outcomes. The purpose of the study was to evaluate patient perceived outcome following surgical stabilization of these complex injuries. Twenty-nine available patients (76%) from 37 identiied with 'terrible triad' injury patterns, in- cluding ulnohumeral dislocation, radial head fracture, and coronoid fracture, were available for a minimum 1-year follow-up (mean, 27 months). All patients were evaluated by their treating physician. Radiographic outcome was evaluated at latest follow-up. Functional outcome was based upon DASH, Mayo elbow performance, and Broberg-Mor- rey scores. Complications were recorded. Results included that the average lexion-extension arc of elbow motion was 109 degrees +/- 27 degrees , and the average pronation-supination arc was 128 degrees +/- 44 degrees . Grip strength averaged 72% of the contralateral extremity. The Mayo score was a mean of 81 (range, 45 to 100), the Broberg-Morrey mean was 77 (range, 33 to 100) The mean DASH was 28 (range, 0 to 72). When compared to the age-based normal values, the mean patient's DASH score was 1.4 SD worse than an average person of the same age None of the injury characteristics, patient demographics or treatment modalities was signiicantly associated with a poor outcome at the 95% conidence interval. Conclusions are that the results with terrible triad injuries are often unsatisfactory, but surgical management with the use of a systematic approach may be beneicial. Our approach led to the restoration of elbow joint stability in all patients

External fixation for the purpose of bony realignment has been in practice since the early 1900s and is widely used today. External fixators are primarily used for trauma but may also be used for deformity correction and arthrodesis, among other applications. The advantages of external fixation over open reduction and internal fixation and intramedullary nailing include simplicity of application, adjustability of the construct, and increased access for wound care and wound monitoring after fixation is achieved. Frame design requires a combination of pins, wires, clamps, rings, and rods to ultimately form a stable construct that can apply compressive, distractive, or neutral forces on bone

Tourniquet use is effective in producing a bloodless field. It is recommended that the least effective pressures be used to minimize tissue microstructure and biochemical damage from tourniquet application. When applied at the thigh, the minimum effective tourniquet pressure is 90 to 100 mm Hg above systolic BP, and in a normotensive, nonobese patient, pressure of 250 mm Hg is sufficient. Similarly, an arm tourniquet pressure of 200 mm Hg is recommended. The purpose of this survey was to assess the tourniquet pressures used by orthopaedic surgeons, both academic and community based, and their familiarity with associated literature. MATERIALS:: A Website-based survey was distributed to a random sample of academic and community-based surgeons. Respondents were asked the upper and lower-extremity tourniquet pressures they routinely use. They were asked if they were able to cite or were aware of literature to support their answer. They were also asked to specify their practice setting and years in practice. Results were statistically analyzed utilizing Fisher's exact test and Mann-Whitney test. RESULTS:: A total of 199 survey responses were collected. Out of these, 151 (76%) were complete for the lower extremity, and 141 (71%) were complete for upper extremity. The average years in practice were 12.6 years (range, 1-30). The median LE pressure was 300 mm (range, 150-400), and the median UE pressure was 250 mm (range, 150-300). Less than 20% of respondents routinely used pressures of 250 mm or less for the lower extremity. For upper extremity, only 11.3% used pressures at or below 200 mm. Surgeons in academic practice were more likely to use lower tourniquet pressures, and less likely to choose 'don't know' as the option for literature support, but the difference was not statistically significant. Although 60% of respondents thought that they were aware of literature supporting their answers, only 25% of these for the lower extremity and 11% for the upper used the correct pressures. CONCLUSION:: This survey demonstrates the existing gulf between tourniquet use and supporting literature. Tourniquet use is not benign and the correct pressure usage allows the least morbidity. We hope this survey will raise awareness of the correct tourniquet pressures and change practice patterns based on 'that's how we have always done it'

OBJECTIVE: To compare the fixation stability in the femoral head with sliding hip screw versus helical blade designs for unstable, intertrochanteric hip fractures. METHODS: A simulated, unstable intertrochanteric hip fracture was created in six pairs of cadaveric femurs. One of each pair was treated using an intramedullary nail with a sliding hip screw (ITST) for femoral head fixation and the other was treated with a nail with a helical blade (TFN). Each specimen was cyclically loaded with 750N vertical loads applied for 10, 100, 1000 and 10,000 cycles. Measurements for femoral head displacement, fracture fragment opening and sliding were made. Specimens were then loaded to failure. RESULTS: There was significantly more permanent inferior femoral head displacement in the ITST samples compared to the TFN samples after each cyclic loading (all p values<0.05). There was significantly more permanent fracture site opening and inferior displacement in the ITST group compared with the TFN group at 1000 and 10,000 cycles (p<0.05). Final loads to failure were not significantly different (p=0.51) between the two treatment groups. Nine specimens demonstrated fracture extension into the anteromedial cortex and subtrochanteric region and three specimens, which had an ITST implant, demonstrated a splitting fracture of the femoral head. CONCLUSION: This study demonstrated that fixation of the femoral head with a helical blade was biomechanically superior to fixation with a standard sliding hip screw in a cadaveric, unstable intertrochanteric hip fracture model

Injuries to the tarsometatarsal or Lisfranc joint, though rare, are often undiagnosed or inadequately treated, resulting in poor long-term outcomes. Clinical and radiographic data are needed to recognize and treat these injuries for optimal outcomes. In this article, we review the anatomy, biomechanics, injury mechanisms, clinical presentation, radiographic evaluation, injury classification, treatment, outcome, and complications of Lisfranc joint injuries

This study was performed to determine if picture archiving communication systems can provide a more accurate method of determining implant length for intramedullary tibial nailing. Postoperative radiographs of 40 patients who underwent intramedullary nailing of their tibial shaft fractures using picture archiving communication systems were retrieved. In phase one and two of this investigation, tibial nail lengths were measured using 'measuring distance' and 'measure calibration' tools displayed on the respective digital systems. Phase 3 of this study involved 5 tibial Sawbones (Pacific Research Laboratories, Vashon, Wash) radiographically captured on the picture archiving communication systems with a radiograph marker of known length. Using the 'measuring distance' and 'measure calibration' tools in phases one and two did not result in accurate measurements. Of 40 digital radiographic images measured and calibrated with the on-screen ruler and using the digital system tools, 100% of our measurements were inaccurate. An average of 19.4-mm and 10.6-mm difference was noted in uncorrected measurements on anteroposterior (AP) and lateral views, respectively. An average 25.8 mm and 15.7 mm was noted in calibrated (corrected) measurements on AP and lateral views respectively. Digitally measured and calibrated lengths were an average 22 mm and 25 mm greater from the actual known length of the tibial nail, respectively. Phase 3 of our study presented the most accurate results in length determination of tibial nail length