Try a new search

Format these results:

Searched for:

in-biosketch:true

person:cerfor01

Total Results:

389


Tumours of the thymus: a cohort study of prognostic factors from the European Society of Thoracic Surgeons database

Ruffini, Enrico; Detterbeck, Frank; Van Raemdonck, Dirk; Rocco, Gaetano; Thomas, Pascal; Weder, Walter; Brunelli, Alessandro; Evangelista, Andrea; Venuta, Federico; [Cerfolio, Robert]
OBJECTIVES/OBJECTIVE:A retrospective database was developed by the European Society of Thoracic Surgeons, collecting patients submitted to surgery for thymic tumours to analyse clinico-pathological prognostic predictors. METHODS:A total of 2151 incident cases from 35 institutions were collected from 1990 to 2010. Clinical-pathological characteristics were analysed, including age, gender, associated myasthenia gravis stage (Masaoka), World Health Organization histology, type of thymic tumour [thymoma, thymic carcinoma (TC), neuroendocrine thymic tumour (NETT)], type of resection (complete/incomplete), tumour size, adjuvant therapy and recurrence. Primary outcome was overall survival (OS); secondary outcomes were the proportion of incomplete resections, disease-free survival and the cumulative incidence of recurrence (CIR). RESULTS:A total of 2030 patients were analysed for OS (1798 thymomas, 191 TCs and 41 NETTs). Ten-year OS was 0.73 (95% confidence interval 0.69-0.75). Complete resection (R0) was achieved in 88% of the patients. Ten-year CIR was 0.12 (0.10-0.15). Predictors of shorter OS were increased age (P < 0-001), stage [III vs I HR 2.66, 1.80-3.92; IV vs I hazard ratio (HR) 4.41, 2.67-7.26], TC (HR 2.39, 1.68-3.40) and NETT (HR 2.59, 1.35-4.99) vs thymomas and incomplete resection (HR 1.74, 1.18-2.57). Risk of recurrence increased with tumour size (P = 0.003), stage (III vs I HR 5.67, 2.80-11.45; IV vs I HR 13.08, 5.70-30.03) and NETT (HR 7.18, 3.48-14.82). Analysis using a propensity score indicates that the administration of adjuvant therapy was beneficial in increasing OS (HR 0.69, 0.49-0.97) in R0 resections. CONCLUSIONS:Masaoka stages III-IV, incomplete resection and non-thymoma histology showed a significant impact in increasing recurrence and in worsening survival. The administration of adjuvant therapy after complete resection is associated with improved survival.
PMID: 24482389
ISSN: 1873-734x
CID: 4070022

Performing robotic lobectomy and segmentectomy: cost, profitability, and outcomes

Nasir, Basil S; Bryant, Ayesha S; Minnich, Douglas J; Wei, Ben; Cerfolio, Robert J
BACKGROUND: The primary objective of this study was to evaluate our experience using a completely portal (no access incision) robotic pulmonary lobectomy or segmentectomy. METHODS: This was a retrospective review of a consecutive series of patients. RESULTS: From February 2010 until October 2013, 862 robotic operations were performed by 1 surgeon. Of these, 394 were for a planned anatomic pulmonary resection, comprising robotic lobectomy in 282, robotic segmentectomy in 71, and conversions to open in 41 (10 for bleeding, 1 patient required transfusion; and no conversions for bleeding in the last 100 patients). Indications were malignancy in 88%. A median of 17 lymph nodes were removed. Median hospital stay was 2 days. Approximate financial data yielded: median hospital charges, $32,000 per patient (total, $12.6 million); collections, 23.7%; direct costs, $13,800 per patient; and $4,750 profit per patient (total, $1.6 million). Major morbidity occurred in 9.6%. The 30-day operative mortality was 0.25%, and 90-day mortality was 0.5%. Patients reported a median pain score of 2/10 at their 3-week postoperative clinic visit. CONCLUSIONS: Robotic lobectomy for cancer offers outstanding results, with excellent lymph node removal and minimal morbidity, mortality, and pain. Despite its costs, it is profitable for the hospital system. Disadvantages include capital costs, the learning curve for the team, and the lack of lung palpation. Robotic surgery is an important tool in the armamentarium for the thoracic surgeon, but its precise role is still evolving.
PMID: 24793685
ISSN: 1552-6259
CID: 2538492

The incidence and management of postoperative chylothorax after pulmonary resection and thoracic mediastinal lymph node dissection

Bryant, Ayesha S; Minnich, Douglas J; Wei, Benjamin; Cerfolio, Robert James
BACKGROUND: Our objective was to determine the incidence and optimal management of chylothorax after pulmonary resection with complete thoracic mediastinal lymph node dissection (MLND). METHODS: This is a retrospective review of patients who underwent pulmonary resection with MLND. RESULTS: Between January 2000 and December 2012, 2,838 patients underwent pulmonary resection with MLND by one surgeon (RJC). Forty-one (1.4%) of these patients experienced a chylothorax. Univariate analysis showed that lobectomy (p<0.001), a robotic approach (p=0.03), right-sided operations (p<0.001), and pathologic N2 disease (p=0.007) were significantly associated with the development of chylothorax. Multivariate analysis showed that lobectomy (p=0.011), a robotic approach (p=0.032), and pathologic N2 disease (p=0.027) remained predictors. All patients were initially treated with cessation of oral intake and 200 mug subcutaneous somatostatin every 8 hours. If after 48 hours the chest tube output was less than 450 mL/day and the effluent was clear, patients was given a medium-chain triglyceride (MCT) diet and were observed for 48 hours in the hospital. If the chest tube output remained below 450 mL/day, the chest tube was removed, they were discharged home with directions to continue the MCT diet and to return in 2 weeks. Patients were instructed to consume a high-fat meal 24 hours before their clinic appointment. If the patient's chest roentgenogram was clear at that time, they were considered "treated." This approach was successful in 37 (90%) patients. The 4 patients in whom the initial treatment was unsuccessful underwent reoperation with pleurodesis and duct ligation. CONCLUSIONS: Chylothorax after pulmonary resection and MLND occurred in 1.4% of patients. Its incidence was higher in those with pathologic N2 disease and those who underwent robotic resection. Nonoperative therapy is almost always effective.
PMID: 24811982
ISSN: 1552-6259
CID: 2538482

The prevalence of nodal upstaging during robotic lung resection in early stage non-small cell lung cancer

Wilson, Jennifer L; Louie, Brian E; Cerfolio, Robert J; Park, Bernard J; Vallieres, Eric; Aye, Ralph W; Abdel-Razek, Ahmed; Bryant, Ayesha; Farivar, Alexander S
BACKGROUND: Pathologic nodal upstaging can be considered a surrogate for completeness of nodal evaluation and quality of surgery. We sought to determine the rate of nodal upstaging and disease-free and overall survival with a robotic approach in clinical stage I NSCLC. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed patients with clinical stage I NSCLC after robotic lobectomy or segmentectomy at three centers from 2009 to 2012. Data were collected primarily based on Society of Thoracic Surgeons database elements. RESULTS: Robotic anatomic lung resection was performed in 302 patients. The majority were right sided (192; 63.6%) and of the upper lobe (192; 63.6%). Most were clinical stage IA (237; 78.5%). Pathologic nodal upstaging occurred in 33 patients (10.9% [pN1 20, 6.6%; pN2 13, 4.3%]). Hilar (pN1) upstaging occurred in 3.5%, 8.6%, and 10.8%, respectively, for cT1a, cT1b, and cT2a tumors. Comparatively, historic hilar upstage rates of video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) versus thoracotomy for cT1a, cT1b, and cT2a were 5.2%, 7.1%, and 5.7%, versus 7.4%, 8.8%, and 11.5%, respectively. Median follow-up was 12.3 months (range, 0 to 49). Forty patients (13.2%) had disease recurrence (local 11, 3.6%; regional 7, 2.3%; distant 22, 7.3%). The 2-year overall survival was 87.6%, and the disease-free survival was 70.2%. CONCLUSIONS: The rate of nodal upstaging for robotic resection appears to be superior to VATS and similar to thoracotomy data when analyzed by clinical T stage. Both disease-free and overall survival were comparable to recent VATS and thoracotomy data. A larger series of matched open, VATS and robotic approaches is necessary.
PMID: 24726603
ISSN: 1552-6259
CID: 2538522

The safety and efficacy of mediastinoscopy when performed by general thoracic surgeons

Wei, Benjamin; Bryant, Ayesha S; Minnich, Douglas J; Cerfolio, Robert J
BACKGROUND: Previous publications suggest that mediastinoscopy only obtains a biopsy of lymph node tissue in about 50% of patients; however, those data included results from nonthoracic surgeons. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study was performed using a database of a consecutive series of patients who underwent mediastinoscopy or video mediastinoscopy by general thoracic surgeons only. RESULTS: Between January 1997 and September 2013, 1,970 patients underwent mediastinoscopy (video mediastinoscopy in the last 243). The indications were staging for known or suspected lung cancer in 68.5%. Morbidity occurred in 25 patients (1.3%). Significant bleeding occurred in 5 patients (0.25%): 2 patients required sternotomy, and bleeding in the other 3 was controlled with packing alone. No patients required transfusion. There were no 30-day operative deaths. Median operative time was 18 minutes, and 96.1% of operations were performed as outpatient procedures. Lymph node tissue was obtained from all patients, and biopsy specimens from at least two mediastinal stations were obtained for 98% who had non-small cell lung cancer. The false-negative rate for N2 lymph nodes that were accessible by mediastinoscopy was 8.2% when lymph nodes dissected at the time of pulmonary resection were used as the reference standard. CONCLUSIONS: In the hands of general thoracic surgeons mediastinoscopy provides lymph node tissue from multiple stations essentially 100% of the time; has minimal morbidity and essentially no deaths; and is a short outpatient procedure. Specialty-specific data (and not national databases) should be used when the efficacy of mediastinoscopy is compared with endobronchial ultrasound.
PMID: 24751152
ISSN: 1552-6259
CID: 2538512

Total port approach for robotic lobectomy

Cerfolio, Robert J
Robotic surgery is safe and efficient, with similar survival rates to the open and video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) approaches. The surgeon can provide an R0 resection in patients with cancer. Technical modifications lead to decreased operative times and may improve the ability to teach. The capital cost, service contract costs, and equipment costs have to be carefully considered and studied, and patient selection is critical. There are few achievable benefits of using a robotic system compared with VATS when performing a sympathotomy for patients with hyperhidrosis or a pulmonary wedge resection for tissue diagnosis for patients with interstitial lung disease.
PMID: 24780418
ISSN: 1558-5069
CID: 2538502

Satisfaction and compensatory hyperhidrosis rates 5 years and longer after video-assisted thoracoscopic sympathotomy for hyperhidrosis

Bryant, Ayesha S; Cerfolio, Robert James
OBJECTIVE: The objective of the present study was to determine the long-term fate and factors of compensatory hyperhidrosis (CH) in patients who have undergone video-assisted thoracoscopic sympathotomy for focal hyperhidrosis. METHODS: The same quality-of-life survey was administered 6 months postoperatively and then annually to all patients who underwent video-assisted thoracoscopic sympathotomy for hyperhidrosis. A second rib (R2)/R3 sympathotomy was most commonly performed until September 2007 and then R4/R5 sympathotomy was used. RESULTS: From January 1999 until December 2012, 193 patients underwent video-assisted thoracoscopic sympathotomy for hyperhidrosis, of whom, 173 had provided >/=1 year of postoperative survey information. No operative mortalities occurred. Of the 173 patients, 133 (77%) reported "clinically bothersome" CH. This rate had decreased to an average of 35% at 5 and 12 years postoperatively. Univariate analysis showed the CH incidence was significantly greater for the patients who had undergone R2/R3 versus R4/R5 sympathotomy (P < .001), had had multiple sites of sweating at presentation (P < .001), had used oral medication to control hyperhidrosis preoperatively (P = .022), or were female (P = .002). On multivariate analysis, only R2/R3 versus R4/R5 sympathotomy (P < .021) and multiple sites of sweating at presentation (P < .037) remained statistically significant. Twelve patients (6.2%) regretted having the operation for CH. CONCLUSIONS: Patients who undergo sympathotomy for hyperhidrosis will commonly report "clinically bothersome" compensatory hyperhidrosis. CH will more likely if R2/R3 sympathetic interruption has been performed instead of R4/R5 and in patients who present with multiple areas of sweating. The severity of clinically bothersome CH decreased during the first 3 years postoperatively.
PMID: 24507405
ISSN: 1097-685x
CID: 2538552

Accuracy of fluorodeoxyglucose-positron emission tomography within the clinical practice of the American College of Surgeons Oncology Group Z4031 trial to diagnose clinical stage I non-small cell lung cancer

Grogan, Eric L; Deppen, Stephen A; Ballman, Karla V; Andrade, Gabriela M; Verdial, Francys C; Aldrich, Melinda C; Chen, Chiu L; Decker, Paul A; Harpole, David H; Cerfolio, Robert J; Keenan, Robert J; Jones, David R; D'Amico, Thomas A; Shrager, Joseph B; Meyers, Bryan F; Putnam, Joe B Jr
BACKGROUND: Fluorodeoxyglucose-positron emission tomography (FDG-PET) is recommended for diagnosis and staging of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Meta-analyses of FDG-PET diagnostic accuracy demonstrated sensitivity of 96% and specificity of 78% but were performed in select centers, introducing potential bias. This study evaluates the accuracy of FDG-PET to diagnose NSCLC and examines differences across enrolling sites in the national American College of Surgeons Oncology Group (ACOSOG) Z4031 trial. METHODS: Between 2004 and 2006, 959 eligible patients with clinical stage I (cT1-2 N0 M0) known or suspected NSCLC were enrolled in the Z4031 trial, and with a baseline FDG-PET available for 682. Final diagnosis was determined by pathologic examination. FDG-PET avidity was categorized into avid or not avid by radiologist description or reported maximum standard uptake value. FDG-PET diagnostic accuracy was calculated for the entire cohort. Accuracy differences based on preoperative size and by enrolling site were examined. RESULTS: Preoperative FDG-PET results were available for 682 participants enrolled at 51 sites in 39 cities. Lung cancer prevalence was 83%. FDG-PET sensitivity was 82% (95% confidence interval, 79 to 85) and specificity was 31% (95% confidence interval, 23% to 40%). Positive and negative predictive values were 85% and 26%, respectively. Accuracy improved with lesion size. Of 80 false-positive scans, 69% were granulomas. False-negative scans occurred in 101 patients, with adenocarcinoma being the most frequent (64%), and 11 were 10 mm or less. The sensitivity varied from 68% to 91% (p=0.03), and the specificity ranged from 15% to 44% (p=0.72) across cities with more than 25 participants. CONCLUSIONS: In a national surgical population with clinical stage I NSCLC, FDG-PET to diagnose lung cancer performed poorly compared with published studies.
PMCID:4008142
PMID: 24576597
ISSN: 1552-6259
CID: 2538532

Comparing robotic lung resection with thoracotomy and video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery cases entered into the Society of Thoracic Surgeons database

Farivar, Alexander S; Cerfolio, Robert J; Vallieres, Eric; Knight, Ariel W; Bryant, Ayesha; Lingala, Vijaya; Aye, Ralph W; Louie, Brian E
OBJECTIVE: The use of robotic lung surgery has increased dramatically despite being a new, costly technology with undefined benefits over standard of care. There is a paucity of published comparative articles justifying its use or cost. Furthermore, outcomes regarding robotic lung resection are either from single institutions with in-house historical comparisons or based on limited numbers. We compared consecutive robotic anatomic lung resections performed at two institutions with matched data from The Society of Thoracic Surgeons (STS) National Database for all open and video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) resections. We sought to define any benefits to a robotic approach versus national outcomes after thoracotomy and VATS. METHODS: Data from all consecutive robotic anatomic lung resections were collected from two institutions (n = 181) from January 2010 until January 2012 and matched against the same variables for anatomic resections via thoracotomy (n = 5913) and VATS (n = 4612) from the STS National Database. Patients with clinical N2, N3, and M1 disease were excluded. RESULTS: There was a significant decrease in 30-day mortality and postoperative blood transfusion after robotic lung resection relative to VATS and thoracotomy. The patients stayed in the hospital 2 days less after robotic surgery than VATS and 4 days less than after thoracotomy. Robotic surgery led to fewer air leaks, intraoperative blood transfusions, need for perioperative bronchoscopy or reintubation, pneumonias, and atrial arrhythmias compared with thoracotomy. CONCLUSIONS: This is the first comparative analysis using national STS data. It suggests potential benefits of robotic surgery relative to VATS and thoracotomy, particularly in reducing length of stay, 30-day mortality, and postoperative blood transfusion.
PMID: 24553055
ISSN: 1559-0879
CID: 2538542

Comprehensive molecular profiling of lung adenocarcinoma

Collisson, Eric A.; Campbell, Joshua D.; Brooks, Angela N.; Berger, Alice H.; Lee, William; Chmielecki, Juliann; Beer, David G.; Cope, Leslie; Creighton, Chad J.; Danilova, Ludmila; Ding, Li; Getz, Gad; Hammerman, Peter S.; Hayes, D. Neil; Hernandez, Bryan; Herman, James G.; Heymach, John V.; Jurisica, Igor; Kucherlapati, Raju; Kwiatkowski, David; Ladanyi, Marc; Robertson, Gordon; Schultz, Nikolaus; Shen, Ronglai; Sinha, Rileen; Sougnez, Carrie; Tsao, Ming-Sound; Travis, William D.; Weinstein, John N.; Wigle, Dennis A.; Wilkerson, Matthew D.; Chu, Andy; Cherniack, Andrew D.; Hadjipanayis, Angela; Rosenberg, Mara; Weisenberger, Daniel J.; Laird, Peter W.; Radenbaugh, Amie; Ma, Singer; Stuart, Joshua M.; Byers, Lauren Averett; Baylin, Stephen B.; Govindan, Ramaswamy; Meyerson, Matthew; Rosenberg, Mara; Gabriel, Stacey B.; Cibulskis, Kristian; Sougnez, Carrie; Kim, Jaegil; Stewart, Chip; Lichtenstein, Lee; Lander, Eric S.; Lawrence, Michael S.; Getz; Kandoth, Cyriac; Fulton, Robert; Fulton, Lucinda L.; McLellan, Michael D.; Wilson, Richard K.; Ye, Kai; Fronick, Catrina C.; Maher, Christopher A.; Miller, Christopher A.; Wendl, Michael C.; Cabanski, Christopher; Ding, Li; Mardis, Elaine; Govindan, Ramaswamy; Creighton, Chad J.; Wheeler, David; Balasundaram, Miruna; Butterfield, Yaron S. N.; Carlsen, Rebecca; Chu, Andy; Chuah, Eric; Dhalla, Noreen; Guin, Ranabir; Hirst, Carrie; Lee, Darlene; Li, Haiyan I.; Mayo, Michael; Moore, Richard A.; Mungall, Andrew J.; Schein, Jacqueline E.; Sipahimalani, Payal; Tam, Angela; Varhol, Richard; Robertson, A. Gordon; Wye, Natasja; Thiessen, Nina; Holt, Robert A.; Jones, Steven J. M.; Marra, Marco A.; Campbell, Joshua D.; Brooks, Angela N.; Chmielecki, Juliann; Imielinski, Marcin; Onofrio, Robert C.; Hodis, Eran; Zack, Travis; Sougnez, Carrie; Helman, Elena; Pedamallu, Chandra Sekhar; Mesirov, Jill; Cherniack, Andrew D.; Saksena, Gordon; Schumacher, Steven E.; Carter, Scott L.; Hernandez, Bryan; Garraway, Levi; Beroukhim, Rameen; Gabriel, Stacey B.; Getz, Gad; Meyerson, Matthew; Hadjipanayis, Angela; Lee, Semin; Mahadeshwar, Harshad S.; Pantazi, Angeliki; Protopopov, Alexei; Ren, Xiaojia; Seth, Sahil; Song, Xingzhi; Tang, Jiabin; Yang, Lixing; Zhang, Jianhua; Chen, Peng-Chieh; Parfenov, Michael; Xu, Andrew Wei; Santoso, Netty; Chin, Lynda; Park, Peter J.; Kucherlapati, Raju; Hoadley, Katherine A.; Auman, J. Todd; Meng, Shaowu; Shi, Yan; Buda, Elizabeth; Waring, Scot; Veluvolu, Umadevi; Tan, Donghui; Mieczkowski, Piotr A.; Jones, Corbin D.; Simons, Janae V.; Soloway, Matthew G.; Bodenheimer, Tom; Jefferys, Stuart R.; Roach, Jeffrey; Hoyle, Alan P.; Wu, Junyuan; Balu, Saianand; Singh, Darshan; Prins, Jan F.; Marron, J. S.; Parker, Joel S.; Hayes, D. Neil; Perou, Charles M.; Liu, Jinze; Cope, Leslie; Danilova, Ludmila; Weisenberger, Daniel J.; Maglinte, Dennis T.; Lai, Philip H.; Bootwalla, Moiz S.; Van Den Berg, David J.; Triche, Timothy, Jr.; Baylin, Stephen B.; Laird, Peter W.; Rosenberg, Mara; Chin, Lynda; Zhang, Jianhua; Cho, Juok; DiCara, Daniel; Heiman, David; Lin, Pei; Mallard, William; Voet, Douglas; Zhang, Hailei; Zou, Lihua; Noble, Michael S.; Lawrence, Michael S.; Saksena, Gordon; Gehlenborg, Nils; Thorvaldsdottir, Helga; Mesirov, Jill; Nazaire, Marc-Danie; Robinson, Jim; Getz, Gad; Lee, William; Aksoy, B. Arman; Ciriello, Giovanni; Taylor, Barry S.; Dresdner, Gideon; Gao, Jianjiong; Gross, Benjamin; Seshan, Venkatraman E.; Ladanyi, Marc; Reva, Boris; Sinha, Rileen; Sumer, S. Onur; Weinhold, Nils; Schultz, Nikolaus; Shen, Ronglai; Sander, Chris; Sam Ng; Ma, Singer; Zhu, Jingchun; Radenbaugh, Amie; Stuart, Joshua M.; Benz, Christopher C.; Yau, Christina; Haussler, David; Spellman, Paul T.; Wilkerson, Matthew D.; Parker, Joel S.; Hoadley, Katherine A.; Kimes, Patrick K.; Hayes, D. Neil; Perou, Charles M.; Broom, Bradley M.; Wang, Jing; Lu, Yiling; Patrick Kwok Shing Ng; Diao, Lixia; Byers, Lauren Averett; Liu, Wenbin; Heymach, John V.; Amos, Christopher I.; Weinstein, John N.; Akbani, Rehan; Mills, Gordon B.; Curley, Erin; Paulauskis, Joseph; Lau, Kevin; Morris, Scott; Shelton, Troy; Mallery, David; Gardner, Johanna; Penny, Robert; Saller, Charles; Tarvin, Katherine; Richards, William G.; Cerfolio, Robert; Bryant, Ayesha; Raymond, Daniel P.; Pennell, Nathan A.; Farver, Carol; Czerwinski, Christine; Huelsenbeck-Dill, Lori; Iacocca, Mary; Petrelli, Nicholas; Rabeno, Brenda; Brown, Jennifer; Bauer, Thomas; Dolzhanskiy, Oleg; Potapova, Olga; Rotin, Daniil; Voronina, Olga; Nemirovich-Danchenko, Elena; Fedosenko, Konstantin V.; Gal, Anthony; Behera, Madhusmita; Ramalingam, Suresh S.; Sica, Gabriel; Flieder, Douglas; Boyd, Jeff; Weaver, JoEllen; Kohl, Bernard; Dang Huy Quoc Thinh; Sandusky, George; Juhl, Hartmut; Duhig, Edwina; Illei, Peter; Gabrielson, Edward; Shin, James; Lee, Beverly; Rogers, Kristen; Trusty, Dante; Brock, Malcolm V.; Williamson, Christina; Burks, Eric; Rieger-Christ, Kimberly; Holway, Antonia; Sullivan, Travis; Wigle, Dennis A.; Asiedu, Michael K.; Kosari, Farhad; Travis, William D.; Rekhtman, Natasha; Zakowski, Maureen; Rusch, Valerie W.; Zippile, Paul; Suh, James; Pass, Harvey; Goparaju, Chandra; Owusu-Sarpong, Yvonne; Bartlett, John M. S.; Kodeeswaran, Sugy; Parfitt, Jeremy; Sekhon, Harmanjatinder; Albert, Monique; Eckman, John; Myers, Jerome B.; Cheney, Richard; Morrison, Carl; Gaudioso, Carmelo; Borgia, Jeffrey A.; Bonomi, Philip; Pool, Mark; Liptay, Michael J.; Moiseenko, Fedor; Zaytseva, Irina; Dienemann, Hendrik; Meister, Michael; Schnabel, Philipp A.; Muley, Thomas R.; Peifer, Martin; Gomez-Fernandez, Carmen; Herbert, Lynn; Egea, Sophie; Huang, Mei; Thorne, Leigh B.; Boice, Lori; Salazar, Ashley Hill; Funkhouser, William K.; Rathmell, W. Kimryn; Dhir, Rajiv; Yousem, Samuel A.; Dacic, Sanja; Schneider, Frank; Siegfried, Jill M.; Hajek, Richard; Watson, Mark A.; McDonald, Sandra; Meyers, Bryan; Clarke, Belinda; Yang, Ian A.; Fong, Kwun M.; Hunter, Lindy; Windsor, Morgan; Bowman, Rayleen V.; Peters, Solange; Letovanec, Igor; Khan, Khurram Z.; Jensen, Mark A.; Snyder, Eric E.; Srinivasan, Deepak; Kahn, Ari B.; Baboud, Julien; Pot, David A.; Shaw, Kenna R. Mills; Sheth, Margi; Davidsen, Tanja; Demchok, John A.; Yang, Liming; Wang, Zhining; Tarnuzzer, Roy; Zenklusen, Jean Claude; Ozenberger, Bradley A.; Sofia, Heidi J.; Travis, William D.; Cheney, Richard; Clarke, Belinda; Dacic, Sanja; Duhig, Edwina; Funkhouser, William K.; Illei, Peter; Farver, Carol; Rekhtman, Natasha; Sica, Gabriel; Suh, James; Tsao, Ming-Sound
ISI:000339566300025
ISSN: 0028-0836
CID: 5270632