Faculty Bibliography

OBJECTIVES: To examine hospital use for patients with evidence of cognitive decline indicative of early cognitive impairment. DESIGN: Medicare Part A hospital utilization data were linked to data from the MacArthur Research Network on Successful Aging Community Study to examine the association between baseline cognition and decline in cognitive function over a 3-year period and any hospitalization over that same period. SETTING: New Haven, Connecticut, and East Boston, Massachusetts. PARTICIPANTS: Subjects (N=598) were from two sites of the MacArthur Research Network on Successful Aging Community Study, a 7-year cohort study of community-dwelling older persons with high physical and cognitive functioning. MEASUREMENTS: Multivariate logistic regression was used to determine the association between any hospitalization over 3 years (1988-91) as the outcome variable and baseline cognitive function and decline in cognition over 3 years as primary predictor variables. Decline was based upon repeated (1988 and 1991) measures of delayed verbal recall and the Short Portable Mental Status Questionnaire (SPMSQ). RESULTS: Of 598 subjects, 48 died between 1988 and 1991. No baseline (1988) delayed recall scores or change in recall scores (1988-91) were associated with hospitalization. Although 48.2% declined on verbal memory scores, decline was not associated with risk of hospitalization. Of 494 subjects with complete 3-year data, 31.2% declined at least one point on the SPMSQ, and 4.7% declined more than two points. Among individuals aged 75 and older at baseline, the adjusted odds ratio for hospitalization for those who declined more than 2 points compared with those who declined less was 7.8 (95% confidence interval=2.0-30.8). CONCLUSION: Although specific memory tests were not associated with hospitalization, high-functioning older persons who experienced decline in overall cognitive function were more likely to be hospitalized. Variation in baseline cognitive function in this high-functioning cohort did not affect hospitalization, but additional research is needed to evaluate associations with other healthcare costs.

OBJECTIVES: To assess physician recognition of dementia and cognitive impairment, compare recognition with documentation, and identify physician and patient factors associated with recognition. DESIGN: Survey of physicians and review of medical records. SETTING: Health maintenance organization in southern California. PARTICIPANTS: Seven hundred twenty-nine physicians who provided care for women participating in a cohort study of memory (Women's Memory Study). MEASUREMENTS: Percentage of patients with dementia or cognitive impairment (using the Telephone Interview of Cognitive Status supplemented by the Telephone Dementia Questionnaire) recognized by physicians. Relationship between physician recognition and patient characteristics and physician demographics, practice characteristics, training, knowledge, and attitudes about dementia. RESULTS: Physicians (n=365) correctly identified 81% of patients with dementia and 44% of patients with cognitive impairment without definite dementia. Medical records documented cognitive impairment in 83% of patients with dementia and 26% of patients with cognitive impairment without definite dementia. In a multivariable model, physicians with geriatric credentials (defined as geriatric fellowship experience and/or the certificate of added qualifications) recognized cognitive impairment more often than did those without (risk ratio (RR)=1.56, 95% confidence interval (CI)=1.04-1.66). Physicians were more likely to recognize cognitive impairment in patients with a history of depression treatment (RR=1.3, 95% CI=1.03-1.45) or stroke (RR=1.37, 95% CI=1.04-1.45) and less likely to recognize impairment in patients with cognitive impairment without definite dementia than in those with dementia (RR=0.46, 95% CI=0.23-0.72) and in patients with a prior hospitalization for myocardial infarction (RR=0.37, 95% CI=0.09-0.88) or cancer (RR=0.49, 95% CI=0.18-0.90). CONCLUSION: Medical record documentation reflects physician recognition of dementia, yet physicians are aware of, but have not documented, many patients with milder cognitive impairment. Physicians are unaware of cognitive impairment in more than 40% of their cognitively impaired patients. Additional geriatrics training may promote recognition, but systems solutions are needed to improve recognition critical to provision of emerging therapies for early dementia.

OBJECTIVES: To assess the quality of chronic pain care provided to vulnerable older persons. DESIGN: Observational study evaluating 11 process-of-care quality indicators using medical records and interviews with patients or proxies covering care received from July 1998 through July 1999. SETTING: Two senior managed care plans. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 372 older patients at increased risk of functional decline or death identified by interview of a random sample of community dwellers aged 65 and older enrolled in these managed-care plans. MEASUREMENTS: Percentage of quality indicators satisfied for patients with chronic pain. RESULTS: Fewer than 40% of vulnerable patients reported having been screened for pain over a 2-year period. One hundred twenty-three patients (33%) had medical record documentation of a new episode of chronic pain during a 13-month period, including 18 presentations for headache, 66 for back pain, and 68 for joint pain. Two or more history elements relevant to the presenting pain complaint were documented for 39% of patients, and at least one relevant physical examination element was documented for 68% of patients. Treatment was offered to 86% of patients, but follow-up occurred in only 66%. Eleven of 18 patients prescribed opioids reported being offered a bowel regimen, and 10% of patients prescribed noncyclooxygenase-selective nonsteroidal antiinflammatory medications received appropriate attention to potential gastrointestinal toxicity. CONCLUSION: Chronic pain management in older vulnerable patients is inadequate. Improvement is needed in screening, clinical evaluation, follow-up, and attention to potential toxicities of therapy.

OBJECTIVE: The authors examined whether older adults respond comparably to two standard depression instruments rating symptoms by frequency/duration or degree of severity/"bother." METHODS: Data for this cross sectional analysis of a prospective cohort came from 699 community-dwelling individuals within the communities of Durham, North Carolina, and New Haven, Connecticut. Differences in response between the Center for Epidemiological Studies-Depression (CES-D) survey, emphasizing symptom frequency, were compared with the Hopkins Symptom Checklist (HSCL) subscale, emphasizing bother or discomfort related to those symptoms. Socioeconomic, demographic, and clinical characteristics for subjects with the greatest difference between standardized scale scores were analyzed with multivariable logistic regression. RESULTS: Older persons differed in their responses between the two instruments, despite similar content. Individuals in the highest quartile of difference between the two scales (indicating more bother than symptom frequency) had significantly more education, higher income, and were less often African American, with no differences in health conditions. Moreover, these specific socioeconomic and ethnic characteristics remained significant in multivariable analyses. CONCLUSIONS: Older persons not only differed significantly in their responses between depression instruments based on one dimension or the other, although with similar content, but response was significantly associated with specific subject characteristics. The heterogeneity of older patient populations suggests that recognition of depressive symptoms should include both constructs of symptom-associated discomfort and symptom frequency to achieve more accurate assessment.

OBJECTIVES: To examine whether simple cognitive tests, when applied to cognitively intact older persons, are useful predictors of cognitive impairment 7 years later. DESIGN: Cohort study. SETTING: Durham, North Carolina; East Boston, Massachusetts; and New Haven, Connecticut, areas that are part of the National Institute on Aging Established Populations for Epidemiological Studies of the Elderly. PARTICIPANTS: Participants, aged 70 to 79, from three community-based studies, who were in the top third of this age group, based on physical and cognitive functional status. MEASUREMENTS: New onset of cognitive impairment as defined by a score of less than 7 on the Short Portable Mental Status Questionnaire (SPMSQ) in 1995. RESULTS: At 7 years, 21.8% (149 of 684 subjects) scored lower than 7 on the SPMSQ. Using multivariate logistic regression, three baseline (1988) cognitive tests predicted impairment in 1995. These included two simple tests of delayed recall-the ability to remember up to six items from a short story and up to 18 words from recall of Boston Naming Test items. For each story item missed, the adjusted odds ratio (AOR) for cognitive impairment was 1.44 (95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.16-1.78, P <.001). For each missed item from the word list, the AOR was 1.20 (95% CI = 1.09-1.31, P <.001). The Delayed Recognition Span, which assesses nonverbal memory, also predicted cognitive impairment, albeit less strongly (odds ratio = 1.06 per each missed answer, 95% CI = 1.003-1.13, P =.04). CONCLUSIONS: This study identifies measures of delayed recall and recognition as significant early predictors of subsequent cognitive decline in high-functioning older persons. Future efforts to identify those at greatest risk of cognitive impairment may benefit by including these measures.

Evaluating dementia in patients with early symptoms of cognitive decline is clinically challenging. Growing evidence indicates that appropriate incorporation of PET into the clinical work-up can improve diagnostic and prognostic accuracy with respect to Alzheimer's disease (AD), the most common cause of dementia in the geriatric population. The precise diagnostic role of PET and its economic impact in this context, however, have not been systematically examined previously. METHODS: We compared the relative value of 2 strategies for assessing whether early AD is responsible for cognitive symptoms in geriatric patients: (a) a conventional approach, based largely on establishing clinical criteria for the presence of dementia and excluding non-AD etiologies that could contribute to the patient's symptoms, and (b) a proposed approach using PET to examine regional cerebral metabolism and look for characteristic patterns of abnormal metabolism. The total costs (measured in dollars) and benefits (measured in number of accurate diagnoses) of diagnostic testing and clinical outcomes accruing to each strategy were calculated using formalized tools of decision analysis. The primary outcome measure by which the strategies were compared was the ratio of costs to benefits obtained following each approach. RESULTS: Following the proposed approach led to improved accuracy in identifying early AD, without adding to the overall costs of diagnosis and treatment ($3,433 vs. $3,564 per patient approached by the proposed or conventional algorithm, respectively). The strategy making use of PET was associated with a reduced rate of false-negative and false-positive findings compared with the conventional approach (3.1% vs. 8.2% and 12.0% vs. 23.0%, respectively, at a prevalence of 51.6% in the studied symptomatic population) and a cost savings of $1,138 per correct diagnosis rendered ($4,047 vs. $5,185). The lower cost per unit benefit for the proposed strategy was maintained over a wide range of tested values for variables of sensitivity, specificity, costs of PET and long-term care, and varying approaches to the use of structural neuroimaging. CONCLUSION: Appropriate use of PET for evaluating early dementia in geriatric patients can add valuable information to the clinical work-up, without adding to the overall costs of evaluation and management, resulting in a greater number of patients being accurately diagnosed for the same level of financial expenditure. Thus, the opportunity exists for diminishing the morbidity of dementia economically, with earlier institution of more appropriate management in evaluated patients.