Faculty Bibliography

Background: Invasion is a dominant escape mechanism following angiogenic blockade in glioblastomas (GBM). Lithium has shown anti-invasive activity in glioma cells by inhibiting Glycogen Synthetase Kinase -3. This phase II study evaluated the safety and efficacy of using lithium and bevacizumab (BEV) in newly diagnosed GBM. Methods: From 2010 through 2012, 20 GBM patients with residual disease after surgery were treated with involved-field radiation therapy to 5940 cGy and concomitant temozolomide (TMZ) (75 mg/m2 daily for 42 days) along with BEV (10 mg/kg every 2 weeks), starting 29 days after surgery. This was followed by six 28-day cycles of TMZ (150 mg/m2 on days 1-7, BEV (10 mg/kg) on days 8 and 22, and lithium 300 mg BID. Lithium was increased every 7 days up to 600 mg BID with a serum lithium goal level of 0.8 to 1.2 mEq/L. Results: The median follow-up was 9.9 months (range 1.9-24.5). Fourteen patients (70.0%) received at least one dose of lithium and three patients completed the entire course of therapy. The median number of BEV infusion was 9 (range 2-19). Five patients discontinued trial due to skin sensitivity (n = 2), pulmonary embolism (n = 1), infection (n = 1), and hematological toxicity (n=1). Two patients experienced dose limiting lithium toxicity which included drowsiness (n = 1) and tremor (n = 1). No patients experienced grade 3/4 intra-cranial hemorrhage. The median progression free survival (PFS) was 9.3 months. The 12-month PFS and OS were 31.9% and 59.3% respectively. For the 14 patients who received lithium, the 12-month PFS and OS were 42.9% and 69.2% respectively. Conclusions: The strategy of targeting angiogenesis and invasion simultaneously in newly diagnosed GBM is effective and feasible

Background Whole brain radiation therapy (WBRT) reduces local recurrence in patients after surgical resection of brain metastases without improving overall survival. Involved field radiation therapy (IFRT) has been used at our center to avoid delayed neurotoxicity associated with WBRT in well-selected patients with surgically resected single brain metastases. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the long-term outcomes of these patients. Methods Thirty-three consecutive patients with single brain metastases from a known primary tumor were treated with gross total resection followed by IFRT between 2006 and 2011. The postoperative surgical bed was treated to 40.05 Gy in 15 fractions of 2.67 Gy with conformal radiation therapy. Patients received serial MRIs and neurological exams in follow-up. Surgery, WBRT, or stereotactic radiosurgery was performed as salvage treatment when necessary. Results The median follow-up was 16 months (range: 2-65 months). Local control, distant brain recurrence-free survival, and overall survival at 12 and 24 months were 90.3% and 85.8%, 60.7% and 51.4%, and 65.6% and 61.5%, respectively. Overall, 5 (15%) patients developed recurrence at the resection cavity, and 13 (39%) patients experienced recurrence at a new intracranial site. Two patients received WBRT, 8 stereotactic radiosurgery, 2 surgery, and 2 both chemotherapy and IFRT as salvage. Four patients died from CNS disease progression. Conclusion For patients with newly diagnosed single brain metastases treated with surgical resection, postoperative IFRT to the resection cavity achieves reasonable rates of local control and is an excellent alternative to WBRT.

OBJECTIVE: Incisional cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) leakage after cranial surgery is a significant cause of morbidity due to poor wound healing and infection, meningitis, and pseudomeningocele formation. Many common dural closure techniques, such as sutures, autologous grafts, gelatin or collagen sponges, and fibrin glues, are used to achieve watertight closure, although none are US Food and Drug Administration approved for this use. DuraSeal Dural Sealant System is a polyethylene glycol (PEG) hydrogel approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration for obtaining watertight dural closure when applied after standard dural suturing. This multicenter, prospective randomized study further evaluated the safety of a PEG hydrogel compared with common dural sealing techniques. METHODS: A total of 237 patients undergoing elective cranial surgery at 17 institutions were randomized to dural closure augmented with the PEG hydrogel or a control "standard of care" dural sealing technique after Valsalva maneuver demonstrated an intraoperative nonwatertight dural closure. Data were collected on complications resulting in unplanned postoperative interventions or reoperations, surgical site infections, CSF leaks, and other neurological complications within 30 days. Surgeons also provided data on the ease of use of the dural sealing techniques, as well as preparation and application times. RESULTS: The incidences of neurosurgical complications, surgical site infections, and CSF leaks were similar between treatment and control groups, with no statistically significant difference between the measures. In the PEG hydrogel group (n = 120), the incidence of neurosurgical complications was 5.8% (n = 7), the incidence of surgical site infections was 1.7% (n = 2), and the incidence of CSF leak was 0.8% (n = 1). In the control group (n = 117), the incidence of neurosurgical complications was 7.7% (n = 9), the incidence of surgical site infection was 2.6% (n = 3), and the incidence of CSF leak was 1.7% (n = 2). Sealant preparation time was less than 5 minutes in 96.6% of the PEG hydrogel group compared with 66.4% of controls (P < 0.001). The dural augmentation was applied in less than 1 minute in 85.7% of the PEG hydrogel group compared with 66.4% of the control group (P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The PEG hydrogel dural sealant used in this study has a similar safety profile to commonly used dural sealing techniques when used as dural closure augmentation in cranial surgery. The PEG hydrogel dural sealant demonstrated faster preparation and application times than other commonly used dural sealing techniques.