Searched for: in-biosketch:true
person:golfij01
Marginal Misses in Gamma-knife Radiosurgery for Meningiomas: Are Treatment Volume and Dose Adequate? [Meeting Abstract]
Sethi, R. A.; Rush, S. C.; Liu, S.; Huang, P.; Parker, E.; Donahue, B.; Narayana, A.; Golfinos, J.
ISI:000310542900701
ISSN: 0360-3016
CID: 204782
Impact of Histological Subtype on the Outcome of Breast Cancer Brain Metastases Patients Treated With Gamma-knife Radiosurgery [Meeting Abstract]
Hardee, M. E.; Hsu, H.; Parker, E. C.; Narayana, A.; Golfinos, J. G.; Formenti, S. C.
ISI:000310542900570
ISSN: 0360-3016
CID: 204842
Use of Vemurafenib, a BRAF Inhibitor Along With Radiation Therapy in Melanoma Brain Metastasis [Meeting Abstract]
Narayana, A.; Mathew, M.; Golfinos, J. G.; Parker, E. C.; Ott, P.; Pavlick, A. C.
ISI:000310542900765
ISSN: 0360-3016
CID: 204892
Ipitimumab in Melanoma With Limited Brain Metastasis Treated With Stereotactic Radiosurgery [Meeting Abstract]
Mathew, M.; Ott, P.; Pavlick, A. C.; Rush, S. C.; Donahue, B.; Golfinos, J. G.; Parker, E. C.; Huang, P.; Narayana, A.
ISI:000310542900759
ISSN: 0360-3016
CID: 204902
A Multicenter, Single-Blind, Prospective Randomized Trial to Evaluate the Safety of a Polyethylene Glycol Hydrogel (Duraseal Dural Sealant System) as a Dural Sealant in Cranial Surgery
Osbun, JW; Ellenbogen, RG; Chesnut, RM; Chin, LS; Connolly, PJ; Cosgrove, GR; Delashaw, JB Jr; Golfinos, JG; Greenlee, JD; Haines, SJ; Jallo, J; Muizelaar, JP; Nanda, A; Shaffrey, M; Shah, MV; Tew, JM Jr; van, Loveren HR; Weinand, ME; White, JA; Wilberger, JE
OBJECTIVE: Incisional cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) leakage after cranial surgery is a significant cause of morbidity due to poor wound healing and infection, meningitis, and pseudomeningocele formation. Many common dural closure techniques, such as sutures, autologous grafts, gelatin or collagen sponges, and fibrin glues, are used to achieve watertight closure, although none are US Food and Drug Administration approved for this use. DuraSeal Dural Sealant System is a polyethylene glycol (PEG) hydrogel approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration for obtaining watertight dural closure when applied after standard dural suturing. This multicenter, prospective randomized study further evaluated the safety of a PEG hydrogel compared with common dural sealing techniques. METHODS: A total of 237 patients undergoing elective cranial surgery at 17 institutions were randomized to dural closure augmented with the PEG hydrogel or a control "standard of care" dural sealing technique after Valsalva maneuver demonstrated an intraoperative nonwatertight dural closure. Data were collected on complications resulting in unplanned postoperative interventions or reoperations, surgical site infections, CSF leaks, and other neurological complications within 30 days. Surgeons also provided data on the ease of use of the dural sealing techniques, as well as preparation and application times. RESULTS: The incidences of neurosurgical complications, surgical site infections, and CSF leaks were similar between treatment and control groups, with no statistically significant difference between the measures. In the PEG hydrogel group (n = 120), the incidence of neurosurgical complications was 5.8% (n = 7), the incidence of surgical site infections was 1.7% (n = 2), and the incidence of CSF leak was 0.8% (n = 1). In the control group (n = 117), the incidence of neurosurgical complications was 7.7% (n = 9), the incidence of surgical site infection was 2.6% (n = 3), and the incidence of CSF leak was 1.7% (n = 2). Sealant preparation time was less than 5 minutes in 96.6% of the PEG hydrogel group compared with 66.4% of controls (P < 0.001). The dural augmentation was applied in less than 1 minute in 85.7% of the PEG hydrogel group compared with 66.4% of the control group (P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The PEG hydrogel dural sealant used in this study has a similar safety profile to commonly used dural sealing techniques when used as dural closure augmentation in cranial surgery. The PEG hydrogel dural sealant demonstrated faster preparation and application times than other commonly used dural sealing techniques.
PMID: 22381303
ISSN: 1878-8750
CID: 165523
Retrosigmoid approach to cerebellopontine angle tumor resection: Surgical modifications
Heman-Ackah, Selena E; Cosetti, Maura K; Gupta, Sachin; Golfinos, John G; Roland, J Thomas Jr
PMID: 22815095
ISSN: 0023-852x
CID: 180392
IPILIMUMAB IN MELANOMA WITH LIMITED BRAIN METASTASIS TREATED WITH STEREOTACTIC RADIOSURGERY [Meeting Abstract]
Mathew, Maya; Ott, Patrick; Rush, Stephen; Donahue, Bernadine; Pavlick, Anna; Golfinos, John; Parker, Erik; Huang, Paul; Narayana, Ashwatha
ISI:000310971300240
ISSN: 1522-8517
CID: 204952
INTRINSIC ENHANCEMENT FROM THE NECROTIC COMPONENT OF RING-ENHANCING LESIONS: A KEY IMAGING FEATURE TO DISTINGUISH NECROTIC TUMORS FROM ABSCESSES [Meeting Abstract]
Fatterpekar, Girish; Raz, Eytan; Knopp, Edmond; Gruber, Michael; Parker, Erik; Golfinos, John; Zagzag, David
ISI:000310971300495
ISSN: 1522-8517
CID: 205012
VEMURAFENIB AND RADIATION THERAPY IN MELANOMA BRAIN METASTASIS [Meeting Abstract]
Narayana, Ashwatha; Mathew, Maya; Kannan, Rajni; Madden, Kathleen; Golfinos, John; Parker, Erik; Ott, Patrick; Pavlick, Anna
ISI:000310971300199
ISSN: 1522-8517
CID: 205042
Intraoperative Transcranial Motor-Evoked Potential Monitoring of the Facial Nerve during Cerebellopontine Angle Tumor Resection
Cosetti, Maura K; Xu, Ming; Rivera, Andrew; Jethanamest, Daniel; Kuhn, Maggie A; Beric, Aleksandar; Golfinos, John G; Roland, J Thomas
Objective To determine whether transcranial motor-evoked potential (TCMEP) monitoring of the facial nerve (FN) during cerebellopontine angle (CPA) tumor resection can predict both immediate and long-term postoperative FN function. Design Retrospective review. Setting Tertiary referral center. Main Outcome Measures DeltaTCMEP (final-initial) and immediate and long-term facial nerve function using House Brackmann (HB) rating scale. Results Intraoperative TCMEP data and immediate and follow-up FN outcome are reported for 52 patients undergoing CPA tumor resection. Patients with unsatisfactory facial outcome (HB >2) at follow-up had an average deltaTCMEP of 57 V, whereas those with HB I or II had a mean deltaTCMEP of 0.04 V (t = -2.6, p < 0.05.) Intraoperative deltaTCMEP did not differ significantly between groups with satisfactory (HB I, II) and unsatisfactory (HB > 2) facial function in the immediate postoperative period. Conclusion Intraoperative TCMEP of the facial nerve can be a valuable adjunct to conventional facial nerve electromyography during resection of tumors at the CPA. Intraoperative deltaTCMEP >57 V may be worrisome for long-term recovery of satisfactory facial nerve function.
PMCID:3578638
PMID: 24083121
ISSN: 2193-634x
CID: 563692