Faculty Bibliography

OBJECTIVE:To identify similarities and differences in protocols on determination of brain death/death by neurologic criteria (BD/DNC) around the world. METHODS:We collected and reviewed official national BD/DNC protocols from contacts around the world between January 2018 and April 2019. RESULTS:We communicated with contacts in 136 countries and found that 83 (61% of countries with contacts identified, 42% of the world) had BD/DNC protocols, 78 of which were unique. Protocols addressed the following prerequisites and provided differing instructions: drug clearance (64, 82%), temperature (61, 78%), laboratory values (56, 72%), observation period (37, 47%), and blood pressure (34, 44%). Protocols did not consistently identify the same components for the clinical examination of brain death; 70 (90%) included coma, 70 (90%) included the pupillary reflex, 68 (87%) included the corneal reflex, 67 (86%) included the oculovestibular reflex, 64 (82%) included the gag reflex, 62 (79%) included the cough reflex, 58 (74%) included the oculocephalic reflex, 37 (47%) included noxious stimulation to the face, and 22 (28%) included noxious stimulation to the limbs. Apnea testing was mentioned in 71 (91%) protocols; there was variability in the technique and target across protocols. Ancillary testing was included as a requirement for all determinations of BD/DNC in 22 (28%) protocols. CONCLUSIONS:There is considerable variability in BD/DNC determination protocols around the world. Medical standards for death should be the same everywhere. We recommend that a worldwide consensus be reached on the minimum standards for BD/DNC.

Background/UNASSIGNED:We explored factors associated with admission and discharge code status after nontraumatic intracranial hemorrhage. Methods/UNASSIGNED:We extracted data from patients admitted to our institution between January 1, 2013, and March 1, 2016 with nontraumatic intracerebral hemorrhage or subarachnoid hemorrhage who had a discharge modified Rankin Scale (mRS) of 4 to 6. We reviewed data based on admission and discharge code status. Results/UNASSIGNED:.06). There was no significant difference between discharge code status and sex, age, marital status, premorbid mRS, discharge GCS, or bleed severity. Conclusions/UNASSIGNED:Limitation of code status after nontraumatic intracranial hemorrhage appears to be associated with older age, white race, worse APACHE II score, and active cancer. The role of palliative care after intracranial hemorrhage and the racial disparity in limitation and de-escalation of treatment deserves further exploration.

Patients, clinicians, and hospitals have undergone monumental changes during the COVID-19 pandemic. This time of troubles has forced us to consider the fundamental obligations that neurologists have to our own individual patients as well as the greater community. By returning to our fundamental understanding of these duties we can ensure that we are providing the most ethically appropriate contingency and crisis care possible. We recommend specific adaptations to both the inpatient and outpatient settings, as well as changes to medical and trainee education. Furthermore, we explore the daunting but potentially necessary implementation of scare resource allocation protocols. As the pandemic evolves, we will need to adapt continuously to these rapidly changing circumstances and consider both national and regional standards and variation.

Direct access through the sinuses and nasopharyngeal mucosa in the endoscopic endonasal approach (EEA) raises concern for a contaminated operative environment and subsequent infection. The reported rate of meningitis in endoscopic endonasal skull base surgery in the literature ranges from 0.7 to 3.0% [1, 2]. The only factor identified as being independently associated with meningitis in a statistically significant manner is cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) leak [1-5]. However, many centers performing high volume of EEAs use postoperative antibiotic coverage independent of the presence intraoperative or postoperative CSF leak. Furthermore, while meningitis remains a severe concern, most centers use postoperative gram-positive coverage to prevent toxic shock syndrome caused by Staphylococcus aureus infection in the setting of prolonged nasal packing. There are currently a multitude of approaches regarding perioperative antibiotic coverage in EEAs [1-4]. Given the lack of consensus in the literature and our experience regarding the benefit of discontinuation of prolonged prophylactic antibiotics throughout the breadth of neurosurgical procedures, we sought to analyze the need for postoperative antibiotics in EEAs further. As such, we performed a prospective analysis compared with a retrospective cohort to delineate whether discontinuation of postoperative antibiotics leads to a change in the rate of postoperative infections. The retrospective cohort consisted of patients who underwent an EEA from January 1, 2013 to May 31, 2019. These patients all received postoperative antibiotics while nasal packing was in place (median 7 days). Starting on April 1, 2019 until August 1, 2019, we discontinued postoperative antibiotic use. Patients from this group made up the prospective cohort. The retrospective cohort had 315 patients (66% pituitary macroadenomas vs. 7% microadenomas, 4% meningiomas, 4% craniopharyngiomas, 4% chordomas, and 15% others) while the prospective group had 23 patients (57% pituitary macroadenomas, 30% craniopharyngiomas, 8% meningiomas/chordomas, and 5% others). The primary endpoint was rate of postoperative infections and specifically, meningitis and multidrug resistant organism (MDRO) infections. There was no statistically significant difference in the use of nasal packing (p = 0.085), intraoperative CSF leak (p = 0.133), and postoperative CSF leak (p = 0.507) between the two groups. There was also no significant difference in the number of patients with positive preoperative MSSA and MRSA nasal swabs (p = 0.622). There was a significant decrease in the number of patients discharged with antibiotics (55.1% in the retrospective and 4.5% in the prospective group, p = 0.000). The number of patients with positive blood cultures (p = 0.701) and positive urine cultures (p = 0.691) did not differ significantly between the two groups. Finally, there was no statistically significant difference in postoperative CSF infections (p = 0.34) or MDRO infections (0.786) between the two groups. We describe promising preliminary results that demonstrate that discontinuation of postoperative antibiotics in EEAs do not lead to a statistically significant increase in the rate of postoperative CSF or MDRO infections. The previous algorithm for postoperative antibiotic coverage in our center, like many centers, called for gram-positive coverage, which may have contributed to the overall preponderance of gram-negative meningitis cases in this cohort