Faculty Bibliography

OBJECTIVE: To examine the prognostic capabilities of intravoxel incoherent motion (IVIM) metrics and their ability to predict response to neoadjuvant treatment (NAT). Additionally, to observe changes in IVIM metrics between pre- and post-treatment MRI. METHODS: This IRB-approved, HIPAA-compliant retrospective study observed 31 breast cancer patients (32 lesions). Patients underwent standard bilateral breast MRI along with diffusion-weighted imaging before and after NAT. Six patients underwent an additional IVIM-MRI scan 12-14 weeks after initial scan and 2 cycles of treatment. In addition to apparent diffusion coefficients (ADC) from monoexponential decay, IVIM mean values (tissue diffusivity Dt, perfusion fraction fp, and pseudodiffusivity Dp) and histogram metrics were derived using a biexponential model. An additional filter identified voxels of highly vascular tumor tissue (VTT), excluding necrotic or normal tissue. Clinical data include histology of biopsy and clinical response to treatment through RECIST assessment. Comparisons of treatment response were made using Wilcoxon rank-sum tests. RESULTS: Average, kurtosis, and skewness of pseudodiffusion Dp significantly differentiated RECIST responders from nonresponders. ADC and Dt values generally increased ( approximately 70%) and VTT% values generally decreased ( approximately 20%) post-treatment. CONCLUSION: Dp metrics showed prognostic capabilities; slow and heterogeneous pseudodiffusion offer poor prognosis. Baseline ADC/Dt parameters were not significant predictors of response. This work suggests that IVIM mean values and heterogeneity metrics may have prognostic value in the setting of breast cancer NAT.

PURPOSE: The purpose was to evaluate the relationship between body mass index (BMI), mammographic breast density, magnetic resonance (MR) background parenchymal enhancement (BPE), and MR fibroglandular tissue (FGT) in women with breast cancer. METHODS: Our institutional database was queried for patients with preoperative mammography and breast MR imaging. RESULTS: There were 573 women eligible for analysis. Elevated BMI was associated with advanced stage of disease (P=.01), lower mammographic density (P<.0001), lower FGT (P<.0001), higher BPE (P=.005), and nonpalpable lesions (P=.04). CONCLUSIONS: Higher BMI was associated with decreased breast density and FGT. Higher BMI was also associated with advanced stage disease and nonpalpable tumors on clinical exam.

Women newly diagnosed with stage 1 breast cancer have an early-stage disease that can be effectively treated. Evidence provides little justification for performing imaging to exclude metastasis in asymptomatic women with stage I breast cancer. No differences have been found in survival or quality of life in women regardless of whether they underwent initial workup for metastatic disease. These women generally prefer intensive follow-up to detect an early recurrence. However, survival rates do not differ between women who obtain intensive screening and surveillance, with imaging and laboratory studies, and women who undergo testing only as a result of development of symptoms or findings on clinical examinations. In addition, quality of life is similar for women who undergo intensive surveillance compared with those who do not. American Society of Clinical Oncology and National Comprehensive Cancer Network guidelines state that annual mammography is the only imaging examination that should be performed to detect a localized breast recurrence in asymptomatic patients. Additional imaging may be needed if the patient has locoregional symptoms. The ACR Appropriateness Criteria are evidence-based guidelines for specific clinical conditions that are reviewed every 3 years by a multidisciplinary expert panel. The guideline development and review by the panel include extensive analysis of current medical literature from peer-reviewed journals and application of a well-established consensus methodology (modified Delphi) to rate the appropriateness of imaging and treatment procedures. When evidence is lacking or not definitive, expert opinion may be used to recommend imaging or treatment.

Purpose To demonstrate the feasibility of the use of a rapid, noninvasive, in vivo imaging method to measure fatty acid fractions of breast adipose tissue during diagnostic breast magnetic resonance (MR) examinations and to investigate associations between fatty acid fractions in breast adipose tissue and breast cancer status by using this method. Materials and Methods The institutional review board approved this retrospective HIPAA-compliant study and informed consent was waived. Between July 2013 and September 2014, multiple-echo three-dimensional gradient-echo data were acquired for 89 women. Spectra were generated and used to estimate fractions of monounsaturated fatty acid (MUFA), polyunsaturated fatty acid (PUFA), and saturated fatty acid (SFA) in the breast adipose tissue. Analysis of covariance and exact Mann-Whitney tests were used to compare groups and the Spearman rank correlation coefficient was used to characterize the association of each imaging measure with each attribute. Results For postmenopausal women, MUFA was lower (0.38 +/- 0.06 vs 0.46 +/- 0.10; P < .05) and SFA was higher (0.31 +/- 0.07 vs 0.19 +/- 0.11; P < .05) for women with invasive ductal carcinoma than for those with benign tissue. No correlation was found between body mass index (BMI) and fatty acid fractions in breast adipose tissue. In women with benign tissue, postmenopausal women had a higher PUFA (0.35 +/- 0.06 vs 0.27 +/- 0.05; P < .01) and lower SFA (0.19 +/- 0.11 vs 0.30 +/- 0.12; P < .05) than premenopausal women. Conclusion There is a possible link between the presence of invasive ductal carcinoma and fatty acid fractions in breast adipose tissue for postmenopausal women in whom BMI values are not correlated with the fatty acid fractions. (c) RSNA, 2016 Online supplemental material is available for this article.

OBJECTIVE: MRI-guided needle localization allows access to MRI-detected mammographically occult breast lesions that are not amenable to MRI-guided biopsy. The purpose of this study was to examine the safety and outcomes of MRI-guided needle localization. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Ninety-nine consecutive breast lesions that underwent preoperative MRI-guided needle localization were identified. Clinical indications for breast MRI, reasons for performing MRI-guided needle localization, and surgical pathology results were recorded. Lesion characteristics, procedure time, and complications were assessed. RESULTS: Of 99 lesions, 60 (60.6%) were in a location inaccessible for MRI biopsy, necessitating MRI-guided needle localization. Histologic evaluation revealed 38 (38.4%) carcinomas, 31 (31.3%) high-risk lesions, and 30 (30.3%) benign lesions. Carcinoma was more likely to be found in women with known cancer (31/61 [50.8%]; p = 0.003) than in women undergoing imaging for high-risk screening (2/18 [11.1%]) or problem solving (6/20 [30%]). Masses (p = 0.013) and foci (p < 0.001) were more likely to be malignant than were lesions with nonmass enhancement. Foci were significantly more often malignant compared with all other lesion types (9/10 [90%]; p < 0.001). The mean (+/- SD) procedure time was 32.9 +/- 9.39 minutes. All lesions were occult on specimen radiographs. There were no procedure-related complications. CONCLUSION: The positive predictive value of MRI-guided needle localization (38.4%) is comparable to that of mammography- and tomosynthesis-guided localizations and is highest in women with a known diagnosis of cancer. It is highly accurate in targeting small enhancing lesions, thereby improving surgical management. MRI-guided needle localization is a safe, accurate, and time-efficient procedure.

PURPOSE: To examine heterogeneous breast cancer through intravoxel incoherent motion (IVIM) histogram analysis. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This HIPAA-compliant, IRB-approved retrospective study included 62 patients (age 48.44 +/- 11.14 years, 50 malignant lesions and 12 benign) who underwent contrast-enhanced 3 T breast MRI and diffusion-weighted imaging. Apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) and IVIM biomarkers of tissue diffusivity (Dt), perfusion fraction (fp), and pseudo-diffusivity (Dp) were calculated using voxel-based analysis for the whole lesion volume. Histogram analysis was performed to quantify tumour heterogeneity. Comparisons were made using Mann-Whitney tests between benign/malignant status, histological subtype, and molecular prognostic factor status while Spearman's rank correlation was used to characterize the association between imaging biomarkers and prognostic factor expression. RESULTS: The average values of the ADC and IVIM biomarkers, Dt and fp, showed significant differences between benign and malignant lesions. Additional significant differences were found in the histogram parameters among tumour subtypes and molecular prognostic factor status. IVIM histogram metrics, particularly fp and Dp, showed significant correlation with hormonal factor expression. CONCLUSION: Advanced diffusion imaging biomarkers show relationships with molecular prognostic factors and breast cancer malignancy. This analysis reveals novel diagnostic metrics that may explain some of the observed variability in treatment response among breast cancer patients. KEY POINTS: * Novel IVIM biomarkers characterize heterogeneous breast cancer. * Histogram analysis enables quantification of tumour heterogeneity. * IVIM biomarkers show relationships with breast cancer malignancy and molecular prognostic factors.

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to determine frequency of discordant lesions and discordant false-negative cancers at stereotactic vacuum-assisted biopsy (SVAB). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Institutional database was searched for discordant SVAB results between January 1, 2005 and December 31, 2012, in this retrospective institutional review board-approved Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act-compliant study. Patient age, indication for initial mammogram, breast density, lesion size, Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System categorization, operator experience, biopsy needle gauge, biopsy histology, and final surgical histology of discordant lesions were collected and entered into a Microsoft Excel spreadsheet. Discordant rate and false-negative rates were calculated. Fisher exact test was used to assess prevalence of discordance using 11-Gauge needles versus 9-Gauge needles. Patient age, lesion Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System, operator days of experience, mammographic density, and lesion size were evaluated for association with false-negative discordant lesions using an exact Mann-Whitney U test. RESULTS: A total of 1861 SVABs were performed, 224 (12%) with an 11-Gauge VAB device and 1637 (88%) with a 9G Suros or Eviva device. Majority (1409 of 1861; 76%) of SVABs targeted calcifications. Twenty-three of 1861 (1.2%) discordant lesions were identified in 23 women. Seven of 23 (30%) discordant lesions were found to be cancers after final surgical pathology. Needle gauge was not associated with discordance. Operator experience was not associated with false-negative discordance. CONCLUSIONS: A relatively low discordance rate (1.2%) was observed. However, a high percentage (30%; range in literature 11.7%-53.8%) of our discordant lesions were false negatives. This study emphasizes the need for careful radiological-pathologic review after SVAB and for repeat biopsy or surgical excision in the setting of discordance.