Faculty Bibliography

BACKGROUND: The feasibility and safety of single-incision laparoscopic total proctocolectomy (TPC) and ileal pouch anal anastomosis (IPAA) were first reported in 2010. To improve accuracy and efficiency while maintaining the cosmetic advantages of single-incision laparoscopic surgery, we have since modified the technique to include the use of a 5-mm instrument placed through the eventual drain site. The aim of this study is to compare reduced port laparoscopic (RPL) IPAA with conventional laparoscopic IPAA with respect to short-term outcomes to assess safety. METHODS: RPL cases were matched to conventional laparoscopy cases for patient age (+/-5 years), body mass index, gender, diagnosis, type and number of stages of surgical procedure, American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) classification, and year of surgery (+/-3 years). Groups were compared using chi(2) or Fisher exact tests for categorical and Wilcoxon rank-sum test for quantitative data. RESULTS: Twenty-four RPL patients were case-matched to an equal number of patients who underwent conventional laparoscopic IPAA. Short-term outcomes including postoperative complications, length of hospital stay, and time to first bowel movement were similar between groups. Despite similar diagnosis, previous surgery, and comorbidity, operative blood loss (p < 0.001) and operating time (p = 0.02) were lower for the RPL group. CONCLUSION: RPL IPAA can be safely performed with short-term outcomes comparable to conventional laparoscopy.

BACKGROUND: Patients undergoing abdominal surgery for Crohn's disease are predisposed to recurrence requiring reoperation. The effectiveness of laparoscopic versus open resection in patients with previous intestinal resection for Crohn's through midline laparotomy is controversial. METHODS: Patients with previous open resection for intestinal Crohn's disease undergoing elective laparoscopic surgery for recurrent bowel disease from 1997 to 2011 were case-matched with open counterparts based on age (+/-5 years), gender, body mass index (+/-2 kg/m(2)), American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) score, surgical procedure, and year of surgery (+/-3 years). Groups were compared using Chi-square or Fisher exact tests for categorical and the Wilcoxon rank-sum test for quantitative data. RESULTS: 26 patients undergoing laparoscopic ileocolectomy (n = 14), proctocolectomy (n = 5), small bowel resection (n = 4), abdominoperineal resection (n = 1), extended right colectomy (n = 1), and strictureplasty (n = 1) were well matched to 26 patients undergoing open surgery. The number of previous operations, disease phenotypes, steroid use, and comorbidities were comparable in the two groups. There were no deaths, and three patients (12%) required conversion because of adhesions. Laparoscopic and open groups had statistically similar operating times (169 versus 158 min, p = 0.94), estimated blood loss (222 versus 427 ml, p = 0.32), overall morbidity (39 versus 69%, p = 0.051), reoperation rates (8 versus 0%, p = 0.5), postoperative return of bowel function (3.5 +/- 1.4 versus 3.9 +/- 1.7 days, p = 0.3), mean length of hospital stay (6.4 +/- 6.2 versus 6.9 +/- 3.5 days, p = 0.12), and readmission rates (8 versus 12%, p = 0.64). Wound infection rate was decreased after laparoscopic surgery (0 versus 27%, p = 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Surgery for recurrent Crohn's disease in patients with previous primary resection through laparotomy can be frequently and safely completed laparoscopically. Wound infection rates are reduced, but the recovery advantages of a minimally invasive approach are not maintained when compared with open surgery. The decision to operate laparoscopically should therefore be carefully calibrated.

BACKGROUND: This study examines the association between preoperative albumin and ileoanal pouch (IPAA) outcomes and the utility of serum albumin in the decision to perform a staged IPAA with an initial subtotal colectomy. METHODS: From 2001-2009, patients were identified from an institutional pouch database and albumin values were extracted from the clinic data repository. Hypoalbuminemic (albumin <3.5 g/dL) patients were compared with patients with normal albumin. The primary outcome was pouch failure. Secondary outcomes were anastomotic leak, length of stay, function, and quality of life after pouch surgery. RESULTS: Out of 405 patients, 34 were hypoalbuminemic pre-IPAA. Pre-IPAA hypoalbuminemia was associated with pouch failure (P = 0.004). Pre-IPAA hypoalbuminemia was an independent predictor of anastomotic leak (P = 0.017). Pre-IPAA hypoalbuminemia was an independent predictor of prolonged length of stay (LOS) (P < 0.001). Hypoalbuminemic patients who underwent index total proctocolectomy (TPC) with IPAA vs. subtotal colectomy (STC) and delayed IPAA had increased perioperative transfusion (P = 0.03) and median LOS at IPAA (P = 0.002). CONCLUSIONS: Preoperative serum albumin is an easily available, inexpensive marker in risk stratifying patients undergoing ileoanal pouch surgery. Serum albumin may provide an objective indicator in supporting the decision to undertake a subtotal colectomy as a first step rather than total proctocolectomy with immediate pouch creation.

BACKGROUND: A subset of patients with a pre-operative diagnosis of ulcerative colitis can develop Crohn's disease (CD) of the pouch after restorative proctocolectomy. While appendectomy has been implicated to be associated with an increased risk for CD, its impact on the development of de novo CD of the pouch in patients' ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (IPAA) has not been studied. The aims of the study were to assess the prevalence of CD of the pouch in patients with pre-colectomy appendectomy and to investigate the impact of appendectomy on the development of de novo CD of the pouch. METHODS: All eligible patients with restorative proctocolectomy and IPAA for IBD who had available information on pre-colectomy appendectomy were studied. Demographic and clinical characteristics were evaluated. Cox regression analysis was performed. RESULTS: The study included 434 patients (44.9 % male) with a mean age of 45.2 +/- 4.4 years and follow-up of 4.6 +/- 2.3 years. Forty patients (9.2 %) had had appendectomy prior to colectomy. Appendectomy was not shown to be associated with CD of the pouch or its phenotypes in both univariable and multivariable analyses. In the Cox model, independent risk factors associated with CD of the pouch were active smoking (hazard ratio [HR] =1.58; 95 % confidence interval [CI], 1.03-2.43) and family history of CD (HR=1.82; 95 % CI, 0.99-3.32). CONCLUSIONS: While this study has shown no association between previous appendectomy and the development of CD of pouch, active smoking was an independent risk factor for development of CD of the pouch.

BACKGROUND: Anastomotic sinus is a relatively uncommon complication after an IPAA. Disease course is poorly defined, and management can be challenging. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the frequency, management, and outcome of anastomotic pouch sinus. DESIGN: This research is a retrospective cohort study from a prospectively collected database. SETTING: The investigation took place in a high-volume specialized colorectal surgery department. PATIENTS: Patients with an anastomotic sinus after pouch surgery from 1997 to 2009 were included. MAIN OUTCOMES MEASURES: The primary outcomes measured were sinus healing and pouch failure. RESULTS: Of 2286 patients who underwent an IPAA, 45 (2.0%) patients were identified with an anastomotic pouch sinus. There were 32 (71%) males, and the mean age was 40 (+/-13) years. The pouch sinus was initially managed by observation in 23 (51%) patients, drainage of the sinus in 9 (20%) patients, unroofing of the sinus tract in 8 (18%) patients, sinus closure in 3 (7%) patients, and a diverting ileostomy in 2 (4%) patients. In 28 patients (62%), subsequent treatment was necessary. Sinus healing was achieved in 27 (60%) patients, whereas 15 (33%) eventually developed pouch failure. Of the treatment modalities applied, a strategy with observation as initial treatment was the most successful with a healing rate of 65%. The healing rate was significantly lower in symptomatic patients in comparison with asymptomatic patients (30% vs 84%, p = 0.001). Pouch failure was also higher (45% vs 24%, p = 0.14). No other factors associated with healing rate or pouch failure were identified. LIMITATIONS: This study was limited by its nonrandomized retrospective design. CONCLUSION: Anastomotic pouch sinuses after pouch surgery are associated with a high rate of pouch failure. Symptomatic presentation is a significant predictor for low healing rates and is associated with a high risk of pouch failure. Observation and watchful monitoring is the initial treatment of choice when permitted by the patient's condition.

BACKGROUND: Pelvic sepsis after IPAA predisposes to pouch failure. There are limited data on long-term pouch function for patients with pelvic sepsis. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to investigate functional outcomes and quality of life for patients undergoing IPAA who develop pelvic sepsis and preserve their pouch long-term. DESIGN: This study is based on retrospective analysis of prospectively accrued data. SETTINGS: This study was conducted at a single-center institution. PATIENTS: All patients undergoing IPAA from 1983 to 2007 were included. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary outcomes measured were functional outcomes (urgency, incontinence, bowel movements) and quality-of-life (restrictions, energy, happiness) parameters. RESULTS: Two hundred (6.2%) of 3234 patients developed pelvic septic complications within 3 months of IPAA. In the comparison of complications at the time of IPAA for the 2 groups, patients with pelvic sepsis had higher rates of postoperative hemorrhage (13.5% vs 3.7%, p < 0.001), anastomotic leak (35% vs 3.7%, p < 0.001), wound infection (14% vs 7.4%, p < 0.001), and fistula formation (37% vs 7.1%, p < 0.001). The overall median follow-up was 7 years. Pelvic sepsis was associated with greater pouch failure (19.5% vs 4%, p < 0.001). For patients with follow-up (pelvic sepsis = 144, nonpelvic sepsis = 2677) with a retained pouch, for whom we compared functional outcomes and quality of life, incontinence was worse (never/rare: 69.5% vs 77.8%, p = 0.03). Urgency scores were lower in pelvic sepsis but not statistically significant. The overall Cleveland Global Quality of Life score (and components) in the sepsis group were significantly worse than in the nonsepsis group (0.74 vs 0.79, p < 0.001). Patients who developed sepsis were also less likely to recommend IPAA to others than patients who did not develop pelvic sepsis. LIMITATIONS: This study was limited by the retrospective analysis and the use of questionnaires. CONCLUSIONS: Pelvic sepsis after IPAA leads to worse functional outcomes and quality of life even when it does not lead to pouch failure. This finding argues for careful attention to preoperative and intraoperative planning and strategies aimed at reducing this complication after IPAA.

BACKGROUND: Annual surveillance colonoscopy to detect colon cancer is recommended for patients with primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC) and ulcerative colitis (UC). Limited data currently support these recommendations. OBJECTIVE: To study whether a relationship exists between the severity and duration of PSC and the risk of colon cancer and dysplasia (colon neoplasia). DESIGN: Retrospective, longitudinal study. SETTING: Tertiary-care referral center. PATIENTS: Information pertaining to duration of PSC, UC, requirement for orthotopic liver transplantation, and time to diagnosis of colon neoplasia was obtained for patients with PSC and UC. Patients were evaluated and followed-up from 1985 to 2011 at a single institution. MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS: Association between the severity and duration of PSC-UC and the time of occurrence of colon neoplasia. RESULTS: Of 167 patients with a combined diagnosis of PSC-UC, 55 had colonic neoplasia on colonoscopy. Colonic neoplasia occurred more frequently within 2 years of a combined diagnosis of PSC-UC (6.6/100 patient-years of follow-up) than after 8 years from PSC-UC (2.7/100 patient-years of follow-up). On proportional hazards analysis, older age at PSC diagnosis (hazard ratio 1.23 for every 5 years; 95% confidence interval, 1.03-1.34; P = .014) increased the risk of colon neoplasia. LIMITATIONS: Retrospective study. CONCLUSION: In this study, the severity of PSC was not significantly associated with the risk of colon neoplasia. Patients with PSC and UC have a high risk of colon neoplasia soon after the coexistence of the two diseases is discovered. Older age at PSC diagnosis increases this risk.

BACKGROUND AND AIM: Surveillance for colon cancer is recommended in patients with primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC) and ulcerative colitis (UC). It is unclear whether characteristics of colon neoplasia have changed over time. The aim of the study was to examine the temporal trends in colon neoplasia in patients with PSC and UC. METHODS: A total of 167 patients followed up at our institution between 1985 and 2011, 55 of these with neoplasia detected on colonoscopic biopsy were identified. Characteristics of patients with colon neoplasia in PSC-UC were studied for two different time periods: 1985-1998 (early cohort) compared to 1999-2011 (recent cohort). RESULTS: The median age at diagnosis of colon neoplasms was 53 years (median IQR, 43-63). The baseline characteristics were similar in both cohorts. The colonic neoplasms that developed in PSC-UC patients were spread throughout the colon on colonoscopy, while there was predominant right sided distribution on colectomy in both cohorts. (81.7% vs. 18.3%, p<0.001) Compared to the recent cohort, both the PSC (17 vs. 11 years, p=0.02) and UC duration (20 vs. 12 years, p=0.02) were longer in the early cohort. There were no differences in the grades and stages of cancer diagnosis. In addition, no differences in transplant-free survival or UC characteristics were revealed. CONCLUSIONS: With annual colonoscopic surveillance, dysplasia and cancer in patients with a combined diagnosis of PSC//UC is being diagnosed in patients with a shorter duration of these conditions. The nature and the location of neoplasia have, however, not changed.

BACKGROUND AND AIM: Colonoscopic perforation is a rare complication. We sought to determine its risk factors in patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study group consisted of 19 IBD patients who had perforation secondary to diagnostic or therapeutic colonoscopy from January 2002 to October 2010. The control group consists of 76 IBD patients undergoing colonoscopy and no perforations that were matched based on indication in a 4:1 ratio to the study group. Demographic and clinical variables as well as perforation outcomes were analyzed by univariate and multivariate analyses. RESULTS: There were a total of 5295 colonoscopies done during the study period in IBD patients of which 19 patients had perforation. The prevalence of perforation in IBD patients was 0.3%. Of the 19 patients, 12 had Crohn's disease (CD) and 7 had ulcerative colitis (UC). Patients in the perforation group were more likely treated with steroids (68.4% vs. 21.1%, p<0.001) and had severe disease on endoscopy (31.6% vs. 10.1%, p=0.03) than that in the control groups. On multivariate analysis, severe disease on endoscopy (adjusted odds ratio [aOR]=3.82, 95% confidence interval [CI]=1.03-15.24) and steroid treatment (aOR=7.68; 95% CI=1.48, 39.81) were independently associated with the risk of perforation. The median length of stay in the perforation group was 10 days (range 2-23 days). There was no mortality in our study. CONCLUSIONS: There appears to be a higher risk of colonoscopy-associated perforation in IBD patients with active disease and on steroids.

BACKGROUND: A proportion of UC patients with restorative proctocolectomy and IPAA develop pouch failure. Accurate risk assessment is critical for making proper evaluation and treatment. Information on factors that may reliably predict pouch failure for the patients requiring referral to a specialized care unit is minimal. AIM: We sought to develop and internally validate a nomogram for the prediction of late-onset pouch failure. METHODS: The study cohort included all eligible UC patients with restorative proctocolectomy and IPAA at the subspecialty Pouchitis Clinic from 2002 to 2009. Inclusion criteria were patients having: 1) inflammatory bowel disease; 2) ileal pouches; and 3) regular follow-up at the Pouchitis Clinic. Demographic and clinical variables were prospectively collected. Multivariable accelerated failure time regression model was developed to predict pouch failure defined as pouch excision or permanent diversion. Discrimination and calibration of the model were assessed following bootstrapping methods for correcting optimism, and the model was presented as a nomogram. RESULTS: A total of 921 patients were included for the model. The mean age for this cohort was 45.5 years old. The mean follow-up at the Pouchitis Clinic was 5.8 years. Kaplan-Meier analysis showed that the probabilities for pouch retention are 0.939, 0.916 and 0.907 at 3, 5 and 7 years, respectively. The predictor variables which were included in the nomogram were smoking, duration of the pouch, baseline pouch diagnosis, and pre- and post-op use of biologics. The concordance index was 0.824. The nomogram seemed well calibrated based on the calibration curve. CONCLUSIONS: The nomogram model appeared to predict late-onset pouch failure reasonably well with satisfactory concordance index and calibration curve. The nomogram is readily applicable for clinical practice in pouch patients.