Faculty Bibliography

BACKGROUND: Surgery in patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) is often associated with complications. The aim of our study was to evaluate whether concomitant IBD was associated with an increased risk of postcholecystectomy complications. METHODS: The study group consisted of 82 consecutive IBD patients who underwent cholecystectomy from January 2001 to October 2010. The control group included 296 cholecystectomy patients without IBD who were randomly selected from the cholecystectomy database. Variables were analyzed by univariate and multivariate analyses. RESULTS: There were no significant differences in age, gender, body mass index, presence of gallstones/common bile duct stones, indication for cholecystectomy, and postoperative mortality between the study and control groups. More patients in the study group had postoperative complications than in the control group (17.1% vs. 6.8%, P = 0.005). On multivariate analysis, the presence of concomitant IBD was independently associated with an increased risk for postoperative complications (odds ratio [OR] = 4.64; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.63-13.20, P = 0.004) after adjusting for age, the presence of cirrhosis, diabetes, body mass index, the use of corticosteroids, immunomodulators, total parental nutrition, or biologics, the presence of primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC), acute or chronic cholecystitis, cholelithiasis, or prior abdominal surgeries, and indication for surgery (elective vs. emergent). CONCLUSIONS: IBD patients undergoing cholecystectomy have a significantly increased risk of postoperative complications. Although further studies are warranted to clarify the reason for these differences, caution should be taken to determine the need and timing of cholecystectomy in IBD patients.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: There is limited data on the appropriate management of dysplasia in Crohn's colitis. An evidence-based surgical strategy is provided. METHODS: Patients with a pathologic diagnosis of dysplasia in Crohn's colitis from 1987 to 2009 were identified. Patients were classified by dysplasia grade (low grade or LGD, high grade or HGD). Clinical, endoscopic, operative, and pathologic data were retrieved. Factors associated with a final cancer diagnosis were analyzed. Survival data on patients undergoing limited versus radical resection for cancer and HGD was compared. RESULTS: From 1987 to 2009, 50 patients underwent a colectomy for Crohn's colitis-associated dysplasia. The predictive value of HGD for a final HGD or cancer diagnosis was 73%. The predictive value of LGD on biopsy for HGD in the colectomy was 36%. Sixteen patients (44%) who underwent a total proctocolectomy (TPC) or subtotal colectomy (STC) had multifocal dysplasia. Four of 10 (40%) cancer patients had evidence of dysplasia remote from cancer site on pathologic examination. During follow-up, there were 3 cancer-related deaths. One patient died of metachronous cancer after STC. CONCLUSIONS: The findings confirm the risk of cancer in patients with CD dysplasia. Because of the multifocal nature of dysplasia in Crohn's colitis, TPC is recommended in good-risk patients. In specific circumstances, such as poor-risk patients especially in the setting of LGD, close endoscopic surveillance or alternatively segmental or STC with close postoperative endoscopic surveillance, depending upon the individual circumstance, may be discussed.

BACKGROUND: Patients with locally advanced or recurrent rectal cancer often require multimodality treatment. Intraoperative radiation therapy (IORT) is a focal approach which aims to improve local control. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed 42 patients treated with IORT following definitive resection of a locally advanced or recurrent rectal cancer from 2000-2009. All patients were treated with the Intrabeam(R) Photon Radiosurgery System (PRS). A dose of 5 Gy was prescribed to a depth of 1 cm (surface dose range: 13.4-23.1, median: 14.4 Gy). Median survival times were calculated using Kaplan-Meier analysis. RESULTS: Of 42 patients, 32 had recurrent disease (76%) while 10 had locally advanced disease (24%). Eighteen patients (43%) had tumors fixed to the sidewall. Margins were positive in 19 patients (45%). Median follow-up after IORT was 22 months (range 0.2-101). Median survival time after IORT was 34 months. The 3-year overall survival rate was 49% (43% for recurrent and 65% for locally advanced patients). Local recurrence was evaluable in 34 patients, of whom 32% failed. The 1-year local recurrence rate was 16%. Distant metastasis was evaluable in 30 patients, of whom 60% failed. The 1-year distant metastasis rate was 32%. No intraoperative complications were attributed to IORT. Median duration of IORT was 35 minutes (range: 14-39). Median discharge time after surgery was 7 days (range: 2-59). Hydronephrosis after IORT occurred in 10 patients (24%), 7 of whom had documented concomitant disease recurrence. CONCLUSIONS: The Intrabeam(R) PRS appears to be a safe technique for delivering IORT in rectal cancer patients. IORT with PRS marginally increased operative time, and did not appear to prolong hospitalization. Our rates of long-term toxicity, local recurrence, and survival rates compare favorably with published reports of IORT delivery with other methods.

BACKGROUND: A subset of patients with a pre-operative diagnosis of ulcerative colitis can develop Crohn's disease (CD) of the pouch after restorative proctocolectomy. While appendectomy has been implicated to be associated with an increased risk for CD, its impact on the development of de novo CD of the pouch in patients' ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (IPAA) has not been studied. The aims of the study were to assess the prevalence of CD of the pouch in patients with pre-colectomy appendectomy and to investigate the impact of appendectomy on the development of de novo CD of the pouch. METHODS: All eligible patients with restorative proctocolectomy and IPAA for IBD who had available information on pre-colectomy appendectomy were studied. Demographic and clinical characteristics were evaluated. Cox regression analysis was performed. RESULTS: The study included 434 patients (44.9 % male) with a mean age of 45.2 +/- 4.4 years and follow-up of 4.6 +/- 2.3 years. Forty patients (9.2 %) had had appendectomy prior to colectomy. Appendectomy was not shown to be associated with CD of the pouch or its phenotypes in both univariable and multivariable analyses. In the Cox model, independent risk factors associated with CD of the pouch were active smoking (hazard ratio [HR] =1.58; 95 % confidence interval [CI], 1.03-2.43) and family history of CD (HR=1.82; 95 % CI, 0.99-3.32). CONCLUSIONS: While this study has shown no association between previous appendectomy and the development of CD of pouch, active smoking was an independent risk factor for development of CD of the pouch.

BACKGROUND: This study examines the association between preoperative albumin and ileoanal pouch (IPAA) outcomes and the utility of serum albumin in the decision to perform a staged IPAA with an initial subtotal colectomy. METHODS: From 2001-2009, patients were identified from an institutional pouch database and albumin values were extracted from the clinic data repository. Hypoalbuminemic (albumin <3.5 g/dL) patients were compared with patients with normal albumin. The primary outcome was pouch failure. Secondary outcomes were anastomotic leak, length of stay, function, and quality of life after pouch surgery. RESULTS: Out of 405 patients, 34 were hypoalbuminemic pre-IPAA. Pre-IPAA hypoalbuminemia was associated with pouch failure (P = 0.004). Pre-IPAA hypoalbuminemia was an independent predictor of anastomotic leak (P = 0.017). Pre-IPAA hypoalbuminemia was an independent predictor of prolonged length of stay (LOS) (P < 0.001). Hypoalbuminemic patients who underwent index total proctocolectomy (TPC) with IPAA vs. subtotal colectomy (STC) and delayed IPAA had increased perioperative transfusion (P = 0.03) and median LOS at IPAA (P = 0.002). CONCLUSIONS: Preoperative serum albumin is an easily available, inexpensive marker in risk stratifying patients undergoing ileoanal pouch surgery. Serum albumin may provide an objective indicator in supporting the decision to undertake a subtotal colectomy as a first step rather than total proctocolectomy with immediate pouch creation.

BACKGROUND: Anastomotic sinus is a relatively uncommon complication after an IPAA. Disease course is poorly defined, and management can be challenging. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the frequency, management, and outcome of anastomotic pouch sinus. DESIGN: This research is a retrospective cohort study from a prospectively collected database. SETTING: The investigation took place in a high-volume specialized colorectal surgery department. PATIENTS: Patients with an anastomotic sinus after pouch surgery from 1997 to 2009 were included. MAIN OUTCOMES MEASURES: The primary outcomes measured were sinus healing and pouch failure. RESULTS: Of 2286 patients who underwent an IPAA, 45 (2.0%) patients were identified with an anastomotic pouch sinus. There were 32 (71%) males, and the mean age was 40 (+/-13) years. The pouch sinus was initially managed by observation in 23 (51%) patients, drainage of the sinus in 9 (20%) patients, unroofing of the sinus tract in 8 (18%) patients, sinus closure in 3 (7%) patients, and a diverting ileostomy in 2 (4%) patients. In 28 patients (62%), subsequent treatment was necessary. Sinus healing was achieved in 27 (60%) patients, whereas 15 (33%) eventually developed pouch failure. Of the treatment modalities applied, a strategy with observation as initial treatment was the most successful with a healing rate of 65%. The healing rate was significantly lower in symptomatic patients in comparison with asymptomatic patients (30% vs 84%, p = 0.001). Pouch failure was also higher (45% vs 24%, p = 0.14). No other factors associated with healing rate or pouch failure were identified. LIMITATIONS: This study was limited by its nonrandomized retrospective design. CONCLUSION: Anastomotic pouch sinuses after pouch surgery are associated with a high rate of pouch failure. Symptomatic presentation is a significant predictor for low healing rates and is associated with a high risk of pouch failure. Observation and watchful monitoring is the initial treatment of choice when permitted by the patient's condition.

BACKGROUND: Annual surveillance colonoscopy to detect colon cancer is recommended for patients with primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC) and ulcerative colitis (UC). Limited data currently support these recommendations. OBJECTIVE: To study whether a relationship exists between the severity and duration of PSC and the risk of colon cancer and dysplasia (colon neoplasia). DESIGN: Retrospective, longitudinal study. SETTING: Tertiary-care referral center. PATIENTS: Information pertaining to duration of PSC, UC, requirement for orthotopic liver transplantation, and time to diagnosis of colon neoplasia was obtained for patients with PSC and UC. Patients were evaluated and followed-up from 1985 to 2011 at a single institution. MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS: Association between the severity and duration of PSC-UC and the time of occurrence of colon neoplasia. RESULTS: Of 167 patients with a combined diagnosis of PSC-UC, 55 had colonic neoplasia on colonoscopy. Colonic neoplasia occurred more frequently within 2 years of a combined diagnosis of PSC-UC (6.6/100 patient-years of follow-up) than after 8 years from PSC-UC (2.7/100 patient-years of follow-up). On proportional hazards analysis, older age at PSC diagnosis (hazard ratio 1.23 for every 5 years; 95% confidence interval, 1.03-1.34; P = .014) increased the risk of colon neoplasia. LIMITATIONS: Retrospective study. CONCLUSION: In this study, the severity of PSC was not significantly associated with the risk of colon neoplasia. Patients with PSC and UC have a high risk of colon neoplasia soon after the coexistence of the two diseases is discovered. Older age at PSC diagnosis increases this risk.

BACKGROUND AND AIM: Colonoscopic perforation is a rare complication. We sought to determine its risk factors in patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study group consisted of 19 IBD patients who had perforation secondary to diagnostic or therapeutic colonoscopy from January 2002 to October 2010. The control group consists of 76 IBD patients undergoing colonoscopy and no perforations that were matched based on indication in a 4:1 ratio to the study group. Demographic and clinical variables as well as perforation outcomes were analyzed by univariate and multivariate analyses. RESULTS: There were a total of 5295 colonoscopies done during the study period in IBD patients of which 19 patients had perforation. The prevalence of perforation in IBD patients was 0.3%. Of the 19 patients, 12 had Crohn's disease (CD) and 7 had ulcerative colitis (UC). Patients in the perforation group were more likely treated with steroids (68.4% vs. 21.1%, p<0.001) and had severe disease on endoscopy (31.6% vs. 10.1%, p=0.03) than that in the control groups. On multivariate analysis, severe disease on endoscopy (adjusted odds ratio [aOR]=3.82, 95% confidence interval [CI]=1.03-15.24) and steroid treatment (aOR=7.68; 95% CI=1.48, 39.81) were independently associated with the risk of perforation. The median length of stay in the perforation group was 10 days (range 2-23 days). There was no mortality in our study. CONCLUSIONS: There appears to be a higher risk of colonoscopy-associated perforation in IBD patients with active disease and on steroids.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: We investigated the association between the severity of primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC) and clinical outcomes of patients with ulcerative colitis (UC) on the basis of need for colectomy. METHODS: We analyzed data from 167 patients with PSC and UC who were followed from 1985 to 2011. Patients with PSC and UC were divided into groups that received orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT) (n = 86) or did not (non-OLT, n = 81). Clinical and demographic variables were obtained, and patients were followed until they received OLT or the date of their last clinical visit. RESULTS: The OLT group had significantly more subjects with less severe symptoms of UC (59, 68.6%) than the non-OLT group (12, 14.8%; P < .001). The subjects in the OLT group had a median of 0 UC flares compared with 3 in the non-OLT group (P < .001); fewer subjects in the OLT group required use of azathioprine or mercaptopurine (1, 1.2%), compared with the non-OLT group (14, 17.3%; P = .006). More subjects in the non-OLT group required colectomies (61, 75.3%) than in the OLT group (23, 26.7%; P < .001). On the basis of Cox regression analysis, OLT for PSC independently reduces the need for colectomy (hazard ratio [HR], 0.43; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.25-0.75; P = .003), as does a high Mayo risk score at diagnosis (HR, 0.52; 95% CI, 0.37-0.72; P < .001). Development of colon neoplasia increased the risk for colectomy (HR, 2.47; 95% CI, 1.63-3.75; P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: Severe progressive PSC that requires liver transplantation appears to reduce the disease activity of UC and the need for colectomy.

BACKGROUND: Pelvic sepsis after IPAA predisposes to pouch failure. There are limited data on long-term pouch function for patients with pelvic sepsis. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to investigate functional outcomes and quality of life for patients undergoing IPAA who develop pelvic sepsis and preserve their pouch long-term. DESIGN: This study is based on retrospective analysis of prospectively accrued data. SETTINGS: This study was conducted at a single-center institution. PATIENTS: All patients undergoing IPAA from 1983 to 2007 were included. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary outcomes measured were functional outcomes (urgency, incontinence, bowel movements) and quality-of-life (restrictions, energy, happiness) parameters. RESULTS: Two hundred (6.2%) of 3234 patients developed pelvic septic complications within 3 months of IPAA. In the comparison of complications at the time of IPAA for the 2 groups, patients with pelvic sepsis had higher rates of postoperative hemorrhage (13.5% vs 3.7%, p < 0.001), anastomotic leak (35% vs 3.7%, p < 0.001), wound infection (14% vs 7.4%, p < 0.001), and fistula formation (37% vs 7.1%, p < 0.001). The overall median follow-up was 7 years. Pelvic sepsis was associated with greater pouch failure (19.5% vs 4%, p < 0.001). For patients with follow-up (pelvic sepsis = 144, nonpelvic sepsis = 2677) with a retained pouch, for whom we compared functional outcomes and quality of life, incontinence was worse (never/rare: 69.5% vs 77.8%, p = 0.03). Urgency scores were lower in pelvic sepsis but not statistically significant. The overall Cleveland Global Quality of Life score (and components) in the sepsis group were significantly worse than in the nonsepsis group (0.74 vs 0.79, p < 0.001). Patients who developed sepsis were also less likely to recommend IPAA to others than patients who did not develop pelvic sepsis. LIMITATIONS: This study was limited by the retrospective analysis and the use of questionnaires. CONCLUSIONS: Pelvic sepsis after IPAA leads to worse functional outcomes and quality of life even when it does not lead to pouch failure. This finding argues for careful attention to preoperative and intraoperative planning and strategies aimed at reducing this complication after IPAA.