Searched for: in-biosketch:true
person:shauka01
Reply [Letter]
Shaukat, Aasma; Robertson, Douglas; Rex, Douglas
PMID: 33529674
ISSN: 1528-0012
CID: 4944472
Improvement in adenoma detection using a novel artificial intelligence-aided polyp detection device
Shaukat, Aasma; Colucci, Daniel; Erisson, Lavi; Phillips, Sloane; Ng, Jonathan; Iglesias, Juan Eugenio; Saltzman, John R; Somers, Samuel; Brugge, William
PMCID:7857961
PMID: 33553591
ISSN: 2364-3722
CID: 4944482
The Time Is Now to Understand and Address Sex-Related Disparities in Gastroenterology and Hepatology [Editorial]
Shaukat, Aasma; Oxentenko, Amy S
ABSTRACT:Many gastrointestinal disorders, autoimmune diseases, and pregnancy-related conditions preferentially impact women. This issue of The American Journal of Gastroenterology focuses on women's health in the context of gastrointestinal and liver disease. This editorial highlights the current issue's contents and seeks to spark the conversations to bring awareness to the many issues faced by women as both patients and practitioners.
PMID: 33657032
ISSN: 1572-0241
CID: 4944492
ACG Clinical Guidelines: Colorectal Cancer Screening 2021
Shaukat, Aasma; Kahi, Charles J; Burke, Carol A; Rabeneck, Linda; Sauer, Bryan G; Rex, Douglas K
Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the third most common cancer in men and women in the United States. CRC screening efforts are directed toward removal of adenomas and sessile serrated lesions and detection of early-stage CRC. The purpose of this article is to update the 2009 American College of Gastroenterology CRC screening guidelines. The guideline is framed around several key questions. We conducted a comprehensive literature search to include studies through October 2020. The inclusion criteria were studies of any design with men and women age 40 years and older. Detailed recommendations for CRC screening in average-risk individuals and those with a family history of CRC are discussed. We also provide recommendations on the role of aspirin for chemoprevention, quality indicators for colonoscopy, approaches to organized CRC screening and improving adherence to CRC screening. CRC screening must be optimized to allow effective and sustained reduction of CRC incidence and mortality. This can be accomplished by achieving high rates of adherence, quality monitoring and improvement, following evidence-based guidelines, and removing barriers through the spectrum of care from noninvasive screening tests to screening and diagnostic colonoscopy. The development of cost-effective, highly accurate, noninvasive modalities associated with improved overall adherence to the screening process is also a desirable goal.
PMID: 33657038
ISSN: 1572-0241
CID: 4944502
Response [Comment]
Shaukat, Aasma; Robertson, Douglas J; Burke, Carol A; Cruise, Michael; Lieberman, David A; Anderson, Joseph C; Dominitz, Jason; Gupta, Samir; Rex, Douglas K
PMID: 33875148
ISSN: 1097-6779
CID: 4944512
Guaiac Fecal Occult Blood Test and Reduction in Colorectal Cancer Incidence [Letter]
Shaukat, Aasma; Church, Timothy R; Mandel, Jack S
PMID: 33965576
ISSN: 1542-7714
CID: 4944522
No tissue left behind: What can a segmental polyp recurrence rate tell us about quality of polypectomy? [Editorial]
Reinink, Andrew R; Shaukat, Aasma
PMID: 34147240
ISSN: 1097-6779
CID: 4944532
Microbiota or placebo after antimicrobial therapy for recurrent Clostridioides difficile at home: A clinical trial with novel home-based enrollment
Drekonja, Dimitri M; Shaukat, Aasma; Zhang, Jane H; Reinink, Andrew R; Nugent, Sean; Dominitz, Jason A; Davis-Karim, Anne; Gerding, Dale N; Kyriakides, Tassos C
INTRODUCTION/UNASSIGNED: METHODS/UNASSIGNED:infection or death. Cases are identified by searching the Veterans Affairs Corporate Data Warehouse, with central study coordinators then reaching out to potential participants. Individuals meeting inclusion criteria and interested in participation are scheduled for in-home consent, randomization, and capsule administration, followed by telephone follow-up for 6 months. To mitigate risks of COVID-19, enrollment via video visits has been implemented. RESULTS/UNASSIGNED:A total of 102 participants have been enrolled through January 2021. Centralized case identification and in-home enrollment has facilitated enrollment from 34 unique states, with 38% being from rural or highly rural areas. DISCUSSION/UNASSIGNED:Centralized case identification and in-home enrollment is a feasible and innovative method of conducting randomized controlled trials in the Veterans Affairs system, improving access to clinical research for populations who may have difficulty engaging with the traditional model of clinical trials where enrollment is based at large hospitals in major metropolitan areas.
PMID: 34154439
ISSN: 1740-7753
CID: 4944542
Benchmarking Adenoma Detection Rates for Colonoscopy: Results From a US-Based Registry
Shaukat, Aasma; Holub, Jennifer; Pike, Irving M; Pochapin, Mark; Greenwald, David; Schmitt, Colleen; Eisen, Glenn
INTRODUCTION/BACKGROUND:Adenoma detection rate (ADR) is highly variable across practices, and national or population-based estimates are not available. Our aim was to study the ADR, variability of rates over time, and factors associated with detection rates of ADR in a national sample of patients undergoing colonoscopy. METHODS:We used colonoscopies submitted to the GI Quality Improvement Consortium, Ltd. registry from 2014 to 2018 on adults aged 50-89 years. We used hierarchical logistic models to study factors associated with ADR. RESULTS:A total of 2,646,833 colonoscopies were performed by 1,169 endoscopists during the study period. The average ADR for screening colonoscopies per endoscopist was 36.80% (SD 10.21), 44.08 (SD 10.98) in men and 31.20 (SD 9.65) in women. Adjusted to the US population, the ADR was 39.08%. There was a significant increase in ADR from screening colonoscopies over the study period from 33.93% in 2014 to 38.12% in 2018. DISCUSSION/CONCLUSIONS:The average ADR from a large national US sample standardized to the US population is 39.05% and has increased over time.
PMID: 34158463
ISSN: 1572-0241
CID: 4933992
AGA Clinical Practice Update on Chemoprevention for Colorectal Neoplasia: Expert Review
Liang, Peter S; Shaukat, Aasma; Crockett, Seth D
DESCRIPTION/METHODS:The purpose of this expert review is to describe the role of medications for the chemoprevention of colorectal neoplasia. Neoplasia is defined as precancerous lesions (e.g., adenoma and sessile serrated lesion) or cancer. The scope of this review excludes dietary factors and high-risk individuals with hereditary syndromes or inflammatory bowel disease. METHODS:The best practice advice statements are based on a review of the literature to provide practical advice. A formal systematic review and rating of the quality of evidence or strength of recommendation were not performed. BEST PRACTICE ADVICE 1: In individuals at average risk for CRC who are (1) younger than 70 years with a life expectancy of at least 10 years, (2) have a 10-year cardiovascular disease risk of at least 10%, and (3) not at high risk for bleeding, clinicians should use low-dose aspirin to reduce CRC incidence and mortality. BEST PRACTICE ADVICE 2: In individuals with a history of CRC, clinicians should consider using aspirin to prevent recurrent colorectal neoplasia. BEST PRACTICE ADVICE 3: In individuals at average risk for CRC, clinicians should not use non-aspirin NSAIDs to prevent colorectal neoplasia because of a substantial risk of cardiovascular and gastrointestinal adverse events. BEST PRACTICE ADVICE 4: In individuals with type 2 diabetes, clinicians may consider using metformin to prevent colorectal neoplasia. BEST PRACTICE ADVICE 5: In individuals with CRC and type 2 diabetes, clinicians may consider using metformin to reduce mortality. BEST PRACTICE ADVICE 6: Clinicians should not use calcium or vitamin D (alone or together) to prevent colorectal neoplasia. BEST PRACTICE ADVICE 7: Clinicians should not use folic acid to prevent colorectal neoplasia. BEST PRACTICE ADVICE 8: In individuals at average risk for CRC, clinicians should not use statins to prevent colorectal neoplasia. BEST PRACTICE ADVICE 9: In individuals with a history of CRC, clinicians should not use statins to reduce mortality.
PMID: 33581359
ISSN: 1542-7714
CID: 4828642