Faculty Bibliography

OBJECTIVE: To describe a novel technique of robotic inguinal lymphadenectomy with near infrared fluorescence imaging (NIRF) using indocyanine green (ICG) to facilitate lymph node identification during robotic groin dissection for penile cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The patient is placed in lithotomy position with access to the groin. Three robotic ports and 1 assist port are placed in a V configuration below the tip of femoral triangle. Intradermal ICG is injected at the base of the penis (0.5 mL of 2 mg/kg concentration in normal saline), and the lymphatic channels and nodes are visualized using NIRF in the robotic console approximately 15 minutes after injection. The surgical template established in the open approach is then replicated using NIRF to ensure complete resection of the affected nodes. RESULTS: A total of 10 groin dissections in 5 patients have been completed using this technique, with an average lymph node yield of 7 per groin (range 5-13 lymph nodes). Mean operative time per groin was 207 minutes (range 164-258 minutes) and estimated blood loss was 38 mL (range 25-50 mL). Mean length of hospital stay was 1.8 days (range 0-4 days). Identification of the lymphatic drainage pattern from the superficial to deep groin nodes to pelvic nodes underneath the inguinal ligament was identified in all patients. With a mean follow-up of 10 months (range 3-16 months), there have been no postoperative infections, lymphatic leaks, wound breakdown, or necrosis. Pathologically involved lymph nodes were identified using NIRF. CONCLUSION: Our novel technique of robotic inguinal lymphadenectomy with fluorescence lymphangiography allows for identification and excision of both superficial and deep groin nodes with a significant reduction in morbidity compared with the open approach. Prospective studies are required to ensure long-term efficacy and results of this procedure.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the success of urethroplasty for urethral strictures arising after erosion of an artificial urinary sphincter (AUS) and rates of subsequent AUS replacement. PATIENTS AND METHODS: From 2009-2016, we identified patients from the Trauma and Urologic Reconstruction Network of Surgeons and several other centers. We included patients with urethral strictures arising from AUS erosion undergoing urethroplasty with/without subsequent AUS replacement. We retrospectively reviewed patient demographics, history, stricture characteristics, and outcomes. Variables in patients with and without complications after AUS replacement were compared using Chi-Square test, independent samples t-test, and Mann-Whitney-U test when appropriate. RESULTS: Thirty-one men were identified with the inclusion criteria. Radical prostatectomy was the etiology of incontinence in 87%, and 33% had radiation therapy. Anastomotic (28) and buccal graft substitution (3) urethroplasty were performed. Follow-up cystoscopy was done in 28 patients (median 4.5 months, interquartile range[IQR]: 3-8) showing no urethral stricture recurrences. Median overall follow-up was 22.0 months (IQR: 15-38). In 27 men (87%), AUS was replaced at median of 6.0 months (IQR: 4-7) after urethroplasty. In 25 patients with >3 months of follow-up after AUS replacement, urethral complications requiring AUS revision / removal occurred in 9 patients (36%) and included sub-cuff atrophy (3), and erosion (6). Mean length of stricture was higher in patients who developed a complication after urethroplasty and AUS replacement (2.2 vs. 1.5 cm, p=0.04). CONCLUSIONS: In patients with urethral stricture after AUS erosion, urethroplasty is successful. However, AUS replacement after urethroplasty has a high erosion rate even in the short-term.

In recent years, the issues of the transgender population have become more visible in the media worldwide. Transgender patients at various stages of their transformation will present to urologic clinics requiring general or specialized urologic care. Knowledge of specifics of reconstructed anatomy and potential unique complications of the reconstruction will become important in providing urologic care to these patients. In this article, we have concentrated on describing diagnosis and treatment of the more common urologic complications after female-to-male reconstructions: urethrocutaneous fistulae, neourethral strictures, and symptomatic persistent vaginal cavities.

Introduction & Objective: The management of concurrent ipsilateral ureteral strictures is challenging as the ureter cannot be transected in two places. The mainstays of reconstruction in this clinical scenario include renal autotransplant or ileal ureter, both of which are associated with morbid short and long-term complications. The concept of an onlay graft or flap to increase the size of the lumen is a well-established technique for urethral reconstruction. We demonstrate the feasibility of this concept to the ureter by placing an onlay of bladder and appendix to manage concurrent ureteral strictures. Materials and Methods: A 66-year-old man with bilateral proximal ureteral stones who developed a 3 cm right distal ureteral stricture, and a 6 cm right proximal ureteral after undergoing ureteroscopy and laser lithotripsy at an outside institution. These strictures were refractory to endoscopic management. The patient had an elevated creatinine. Robotic reconstruction was performed. Simultaneous intraoperative ureteroscopy was performed to delineate the stricture. As the ureteroscope was passed retrograde, the 3 cm distal and 6 cm proximal ureteral strictures were incised using the robot along the anterior aspect of the ureter. The patient's appendix was mobilized, detubularized, and placed as an onlay flap onto the proximal stricture. The distal ureteral stricture was repaired by marsupializing a flap of bladder onto the ureter for a non-transecting reimplant. Results: The patient had an uneventful postoperative course and went home on postoperative day 4. Nephrostogramperformed at 6 weeks post op demonstrated prompt drainage of contrast after stent removal. Patient did not have flank pain after stent removal, and ultrasound at 4 months post op demonstrated no hydronephrosis. Conclusions: For the appropriate patient, ureteral reconstruction using onlay of appendix and bladder is a feasible option for multiple ureteral strictures. Long-term outcomes need to be elucidated

Urologists in the United States may see a greater number of transgender or gender-variant patients in their practices due to changing legislation, insurance coverage, and greater social acceptance of transgender individuals. While gender-confirming surgeries should only be attempted by experienced reconstructive surgeons, patients may seek care from general urologists for orchiectomy and management of voiding dysfunction or other concerns that may be complicated by prior reconstructions