Faculty Bibliography

Introduction: Clostridium difficile infection (CDI) occurs frequently in patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) and is associated with increased disease activity. Due to concern for complications, immunosuppressive medication (ISM) is often withheld after CDI, although few data exist to inform this decision. This study aims to assess the influence of ISM on outcomes following CDI in IBD patients. Methods: This multicenter, retrospective cohort study was performed at 4 academic medical centers in New York City. Patient demographic and clinical data was abstracted from databases at each site for adult patients with an established diagnosis of IBD also diagnosed with CDI. Escalation of therapy was defined as initiation or dose escalation of corticosteroids or new biologic use following antibiotic therapy for CDI. Outcomes were assessed at 30 and 90 days after last positive C. difficile test. Continuous variables were compared using two-sided T-tests and proportions were compared using Chi-squared tests. Exact methods were used for expected cell size. Results: 207 patients met inclusion criteria (49 outpatient, 158 inpatient). Demographic information is listed in Table 1. Escalation of IBD regimen (Table 2) was more frequent in outpatients at 90 days (43% vs. 22%, P<0.01), with 49% (39/61) of ISM escalation occurring within 14 days of CDI.) Patients not escalated had higher rates of sepsis than escalated patients (11% vs. 2%, P=0.04). Severe outcomes (death, sepsis, or colectomy) at 90 days were markedly increased in the non-escalation group (15% vs 2%, P<0.01). There was no difference in CDI recurrence or rehospitalization between groups. Conclusion: In this multicenter study assessing outcomes of ISM use in patients with IBD and CDI, initiation of steroid or biologic therapy following CDI treatment was not associated with adverse clinical outcomes. While no difference was observed between CDI recurrence or rehospitalization among groups, sepsis and severe outcomes were significantly more common in patients not undergoing escalation. These data suggest that escalation of IBD therapy following CDI is not associated with worse clinical outcomes and a subset of patients may benefit from timely treatment of underlying inflammatory disease. Prospective studies are needed to validate these data and to inform clinical guidelines regarding the timing of ISM use following CDI

The use of thiopurines in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) has been examined in numerous prospective, controlled trials, with a majority demonstrating a clinical benefit. We conducted this review to describe the historical and current evidence in the use of thiopurines in IBD. A systematic search was performed on MEDLINE between 1965 and 2016 to identify studies on thiopurines in IBD. The most robust evidence for thiopurines in IBD includes induction of remission in combination with anti-tumor necrosis factor (anti-TNF) agents, and maintenance of remission and post-operative maintenance in Crohn's disease. Less evidence exists for thiopurine monotherapy in induction of remission, maintenance of ulcerative colitis, chemoprevention of colorectal cancer, and in preventing immunogenicity to anti-TNF. Evidence was often limited by trial design. Overall, thiopurines have demonstrated efficacy in a broad range of presentations of IBD. With more efficacious novel therapeutic agents, the positioning of thiopurines in the management of IBD will change and future studies will analyze the benefit of thiopurines alone and in conjunction with these new medications.

In patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), chronic inflammation is a major risk factor for the development of gastrointestinal malignancies. The pathogenesis of colitis-associated cancer is distinct from sporadic colorectal carcinoma and the critical molecular mechanisms underlying this process have yet to be elucidated. Patients with IBD have also been shown to be at increased risk of developing extra-intestinal malignancies. Medical therapies that diminish the mucosal inflammatory response represent the foundation of treatment in IBD, and recent evidence supports their introduction earlier in the disease course. However, therapies that alter the immune system, often used for long durations, may also promote carcinogenesis. As the population of patients with IBD grows older, with longer duration of chronic inflammation and longer exposure to immunosuppression, there is an increasing risk of cancer development. Many of these patients will require cancer treatment, including chemotherapy, radiation, hormonal therapy, and surgery. Many patients will require further treatment for their IBD. This review seeks to explore the characteristics and risks of cancer in patients with IBD, and to evaluate the limited data on patients with IBD and cancer, including management of IBD after a diagnosis of cancer, the effects of cancer treatment on IBD, and the effect of IBD and medications for IBD on cancer outcomes.

OBJECTIVES/OBJECTIVE:Patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) have a higher prevalence of Clostridium difficile infection (CDI) and worse outcomes. Research has highlighted the inconsistent care that is provided to patients with IBD, and at our institution, the CDI testing rate was 41%. The present quality improvement intervention sought to increase CDI testing for inpatients with IBD with a flare. METHODS:Eighty-nine patients admitted to our gastrointestinal unit over a 9-month period with IBD flare were eligible for the study. If a patient did not have a test for CDI ordered, the floor nurse collected stool and alerted the provider to order the test. The primary outcome was percent of eligible patients receiving a test. Secondary outcomes included rate of CDI, length of hospital stay, and readmission rate within 6 months. RESULTS:There was a significant increase in testing for CDI to 75% (p = .0151). Patients who received a test were more likely to have CDI (p = .0316), shorter hospital stays (p = .0095), and fewer readmissions (p = .0366). CONCLUSION/CONCLUSIONS:This study used the nursing admission workflow to increase the rate of CDI testing. Future studies should further characterize inconsistencies in IBD care and implement quality improvements.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Our understanding of malignancy associated with immunosuppression in patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) comes from studies of individuals with no history of cancer. We investigated whether patients with IBD and a history of cancer who were subsequently immunosuppressed have an increased risk of developing incident cancer. METHODS: We performed a retrospective analysis of data from 333 patients with IBD treated at 7 academic medical centers who developed cancer and subsequently received treatment with anti-tumor necrosis factor (TNF), anti-TNF with an anti-metabolite (thiopurines, methotrexate), anti-metabolites, or no subsequent exposure to immunosuppressive agents (controls). We collected data on their primary outcomes of incident cancers (new or recurrent). Hazard ratios (HRs) were calculated using Cox proportional hazards and Kaplan-Meier survival curves; study groups were compared using the Log-Rank test. RESULTS: During the follow-up period, 90 patients (27%) developed an incident cancer. Patient characteristics between groups differed, but matching was not possible due to the relatively small sample sizes. There was no difference in time to (p=0.14) or type of (p= 0.61) incident cancer among the 4 groups. After adjusting for recurrence risk for type of prior cancer, there was no difference in risk of incident cancer (HR for anti-TNF=0.32; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.09-1.09; HR for anti-TNF with an anti-metabolite=0.64; 95% CI, 0.26-1.59; HR for an anti-metabolite=1.08; 95% CI, 0.54-2.15) or time to subsequent cancer between study arms (p=.22). CONCLUSION: Based on a retrospective study, in patients with IBD and a history of cancer, exposure to an anti-TNF agent or an anti-metabolite following cancer was not associated with an increased risk of incident cancer, compared to patients who did not receive immunosuppression. Larger, matched, prospective studies are needed to confirm these findings.

Immunomodulators and biologic agents are effective in treating inflammatory bowel diseases (IBDs), and recent evidence supports their introduction earlier in the disease course. An important concern to both patients and physicians considering immunosuppression (IS) for the treatment of IBD is the potential associated cancer risk. Several important clinical questions deserve attention with respect to IBD therapy and cancer. First, does medical therapy for IBD predispose to developing cancer? Second, in an IBD patient with a history of cancer, does IBD therapy impact cancer recurrence? Third, once cancer develops in an IBD patient, is the cancer outcome different? Finally, in an IBD patient with current cancer, does the cancer therapy affect IBD outcomes? In a recent multicentric study, patients were identified based on a diagnosis of IBD and cancer with subsequent exposure to anti-tumor necrosis factor α (anti-TNFα arm), thiopurines or methotrexate (antimetabolite arm) or without subsequent IS exposure (control arm). Two hundred and fifty-five patients met the inclusion criteria. Prior cancers included 121 solid, 62 gastrointestinal, 55 dermatologic and 17 hematologic malignancies. During the follow-up period, 75 (29.4%) patients developed incident cancer: 36 (14.1%) a new cancer, 33 (12.9%) a recurrent cancer and 6 (2.4%) a new and recurrent cancer. Incident cancer rate per 100 person-years for patients exposed to anti-TNFα, anti-metabolites and controls was 2.6 with 795 person-years of follow-up, 14.8 with 122 person-years of follow-up and 8.52 with 422 person-years of follow-up, respectively. In this series of IBD patients with a history of cancer, exposure to IS following a cancer diagnosis was not associated with an increased risk of incident cancer compared to patients who did not receive these agents. Prospective data are needed to confirm these findings.